Desenvolvimento curricular do curso de pedagogia da UEG (2000-2010)

• Ano de defesa: 2013
• Autor(a) principal: Moraes, Andréa Kochhann Machado de
• Orientador(a): Brzezinski, Iria
• Banca de defesa: Toschi, Mirza Seabra , Siqueira, Romilson Martins
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Educação
• Departamento: Ciências Humanas
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Curso de Pedagogia; Políticas Curriculares Nacionais; Matriz Unificada da UEG
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: School of Education; National Curriculum Policies; Matrix Unified UEG
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucgoias.edu.br/handle/tede/1100

The curriculum of Pedagogy Graduation Course of three University Unit (UnU), at the Goiàs State University is the object of this research in the Research Line PUC Goiás State, Political and Educational Institutions. The main objective is to analyze the curriculum of the Education Course of UEG in Anápolis (UnUCSEH), São Luís de Montes Belos, based on national curriculum (Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais) and it is before and after the unification curriculum, from from 2000 to 2010. The theoreis used as fundamentation to this research are: a) conceptualization of curriculum studies and theories of curriculum based mainly on studies of Goodson (1995), Pacheco (1996) and Sacristan (2008), b) studies on the essential elements of the Political pedagogical course at the University, specifically referenced in Veiga (1995, 1998), Cavagnari (1998) and in legal documents as PDI (2010) and PPI (2011) c ) historicizing of pedagogy in Brazil Goias and UEG having as theoretical contributions Brzezinski (1987, 1996, 2011a, 2011c) and Silva (2006), d) of the National Curriculum Guideline of Pedagogy. And based on the analysis of documents from the National Council of Education (Conselho Nacional da Educação). The problem of research includes studies and analyzes of curriculum development of the Education Course at UEG before and after the unification of curriculum based on legal documents, so the problem is stated thus: " What are the strong and weak aspects resulting of the process and development of the unification of the curriculum in Pedagogy Course of UEG in Anápolis UnUs (UnUCSEH), São Luís de Montes Belos documents?". The choice of method was the dialectical historical materialism because it is the most suitable for qualitative research in education. The methodology is based on qualitative approach, with multiple case study whichwas developed through documentary analysis, observation during the visit of three Colleges UnUs, informal conversations called spontaneous reports and analysis of a questionnaire. The purpose of the sample of the three Unus was selected according to criteria established a priori. The subjects are 28 teachers who answered the questionnaires. In informal conversations or spontaneous reports two secretaries of the University, a coordinator and six teachers. The results we had states that the potential unification curriculum is effective in Pedagogy courses investigated so relaxed, since: a) the uniqueness in the curriculum is represented by a common base b) the flexibility is expressed in several parts that consider the regional aspect and the interest of the students c) proclaimed in PPC the general principle that teaching practice is the object of Pedagogy d) articulated to guiding principles: such as the research and training as a cognitive principle, the integration of theory and practice, ie , praxis and flexibility. Several weak aspects were diagnosed and summarized in: a) inconsistencies in PPC b) disinterest about the PPC c) lack of study groups, d) lack of procurement, e) lack continuing education, f) little research, extension and monitoring; g) short interdisciplinary practice; h) misunderstanding of PBO i) little regency of supervision during the trainee process j) rare regional surveys l) neglect of AEA , m) interdisciplinary misunderstanding n) lack of knowledge and legal documents o) timid conception of identity educator.