Relativismo e ceticismo na dialética serial de Proudhon
Ano de defesa: | 2008 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Filosofia
|
Departamento: |
Filosofia
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/11789 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study is to examine how the method and the knowledge theory of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (1808-1865), multi-disciplinar thinker and theorist-founder of the political anarchism, replays to the important philosophical problem of the construction of objective knowledges when this construction is confronted with some particular difficulties, that are imposed by contaminations due to the presence of personal approaching filters. The objective is justified by the fact whereof, although the number of studies about the proudhonian thoughs in sociology, economy and politics, the studies upon the philosophy of Proudhon, until now, are very poor. Until now, this author is almost unknown in the philosophical researches. The objective is justified, moreover, because his philosophy offers a way to establish a better dialogue and interaction among the philosophical theories and the popular thinking, applied to the social and diary-life questions. The pointed problem brings forward the discussions that Proudhon establish with known philosophies, and clearly localize, to the philosophers and academical searchers, his place in this particular area of knowledge. Focused in Proudhon s theory, the pointed problem offers, as a natural complement, a landscape of the political-philosophical confrontations at the XIXth century, about the destiny and the ways of human thinking, at the cross-roads of the alternatives offered by philosophy, religion and science. The examined hypothesis is that the way found by Proudhon to respond the focused problem, is a coherent and fruitful combination of relativism and skepticism, in an universal method to evaluate and develop knowledges. The Proudhon s theory is named by him Serial Theory , and his method, Serial Dialetics . This explanation, consequently, will show how relativism and skepticism are combined by Proudhon at the construction of this method and this theory, to offer a replay to the focused philosophical problem |
id |
PUC_SP-1_16ebba91d0797f459e0628338d928970 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/11789 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Valverde, Antonio Jose Romerahttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4760792U7Borba, João Ribeiro de Almeida2016-04-27T17:27:25Z2008-11-032008-10-22Borba, João Ribeiro de Almeida. Relativismo e ceticismo na dialética serial de Proudhon. 2008. 438 f. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2008.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/11789The objective of this study is to examine how the method and the knowledge theory of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (1808-1865), multi-disciplinar thinker and theorist-founder of the political anarchism, replays to the important philosophical problem of the construction of objective knowledges when this construction is confronted with some particular difficulties, that are imposed by contaminations due to the presence of personal approaching filters. The objective is justified by the fact whereof, although the number of studies about the proudhonian thoughs in sociology, economy and politics, the studies upon the philosophy of Proudhon, until now, are very poor. Until now, this author is almost unknown in the philosophical researches. The objective is justified, moreover, because his philosophy offers a way to establish a better dialogue and interaction among the philosophical theories and the popular thinking, applied to the social and diary-life questions. The pointed problem brings forward the discussions that Proudhon establish with known philosophies, and clearly localize, to the philosophers and academical searchers, his place in this particular area of knowledge. Focused in Proudhon s theory, the pointed problem offers, as a natural complement, a landscape of the political-philosophical confrontations at the XIXth century, about the destiny and the ways of human thinking, at the cross-roads of the alternatives offered by philosophy, religion and science. The examined hypothesis is that the way found by Proudhon to respond the focused problem, is a coherent and fruitful combination of relativism and skepticism, in an universal method to evaluate and develop knowledges. The Proudhon s theory is named by him Serial Theory , and his method, Serial Dialetics . This explanation, consequently, will show how relativism and skepticism are combined by Proudhon at the construction of this method and this theory, to offer a replay to the focused philosophical problemO objetivo desta pesquisa é examinar o modo como o método e a teoria do conhecimento de Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (1808-1865), pensador multi-disciplinar e fundador teórico do anarquismo político, respondem ao importante problema filosófico da construção de conhecimentos objetivos em face das dificuldades que se impõem a esse conhecimento devido à contaminação do saber filosófico por filtros de abordagem personalizados. O objetivo se justifica pelo fato de que, embora se tenha um conhecimento razoável de sua sociologia , de sua economia e de seus princípios políticos, os estudos sobre a filosofia de Proudhon são ainda muito pobres, visto que o autor não tem despertado a atenção de pesquisadores dessa área. Justifica-se também porque sua filosofia oferece um caminho para o maior diálogo e interação entre as teorias filosóficas e o pensamento popular, voltado para questões que a vida diária e o convívio social lhe sugerem. O problema focalizado traz à tona o debate de Proudhon com filosofias conhecidas, e o situa no centro de discussões com as quais os estudiosos de Filosofia já estão bem familiarizados, oferecendo também, em sua esteira, um panorama dos confrontos político-filosóficos no século XIX em torno da questão do destino e dos rumos do pensamento humano, em face da religião, da filosofia e da ciência como alternativas. A hipótese examinada é a de que, diante do problema da construção de conhecimentos objetivos em face dos filtros de abordagem personalizados da filosofia, Proudhon oferece como resposta um método universal para a avaliação e o desenvolvimento dos conhecimentos, que segue por um lado o caminho do ceticismo, e por outro o do relativismo, combinando as duas tendências de maneira coerente e frutífera. Proudhon chama sua teoria do conhecimento de Teoria Serial , e seu método, de Dialética Serial . Esta pesquisa, portanto, deve revelar o modo como o relativismo e o ceticismo se combinam, na construção desse método e dessa teoria do conhecimento, de maneira a oferecer uma resposta, a resposta proudhoniana, ao mencionado problemaCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/24578/Joao%20Ribeiro%20de%20Almeida%20Borba.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em FilosofiaPUC-SPBRFilosofiaRelativismoTeoria serialProudhon, Pierre-Joseph -- 1809-1865 -- Critica e interpretacaoAnarquismoCeticismoDialeticaRelatividadeRelativismSkepticismDialeticsSerial theoryAnarchismCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIARelativismo e ceticismo na dialética serial de Proudhoninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTJoao Ribeiro de Almeida Borba.pdf.txtJoao Ribeiro de Almeida Borba.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain1319010https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11789/3/Joao%20Ribeiro%20de%20Almeida%20Borba.pdf.txt7b1de5d276d8d50440b7b21fef47f868MD53ORIGINALJoao Ribeiro de Almeida Borba.pdfapplication/pdf2396785https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11789/1/Joao%20Ribeiro%20de%20Almeida%20Borba.pdf1e086dea321bf99c332b62ac2eba5aa3MD51THUMBNAILJoao Ribeiro de Almeida Borba.pdf.jpgJoao Ribeiro de Almeida Borba.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2845https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11789/2/Joao%20Ribeiro%20de%20Almeida%20Borba.pdf.jpge0dbaae552cda4e33b5823c26942a622MD52handle/117892022-04-27 17:04:41.738oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/11789Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-04-27T20:04:41Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Relativismo e ceticismo na dialética serial de Proudhon |
title |
Relativismo e ceticismo na dialética serial de Proudhon |
spellingShingle |
Relativismo e ceticismo na dialética serial de Proudhon Borba, João Ribeiro de Almeida Relativismo Teoria serial Proudhon, Pierre-Joseph -- 1809-1865 -- Critica e interpretacao Anarquismo Ceticismo Dialetica Relatividade Relativism Skepticism Dialetics Serial theory Anarchism CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
Relativismo e ceticismo na dialética serial de Proudhon |
title_full |
Relativismo e ceticismo na dialética serial de Proudhon |
title_fullStr |
Relativismo e ceticismo na dialética serial de Proudhon |
title_full_unstemmed |
Relativismo e ceticismo na dialética serial de Proudhon |
title_sort |
Relativismo e ceticismo na dialética serial de Proudhon |
author |
Borba, João Ribeiro de Almeida |
author_facet |
Borba, João Ribeiro de Almeida |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Valverde, Antonio Jose Romera |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4760792U7 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Borba, João Ribeiro de Almeida |
contributor_str_mv |
Valverde, Antonio Jose Romera |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Relativismo Teoria serial Proudhon, Pierre-Joseph -- 1809-1865 -- Critica e interpretacao Anarquismo Ceticismo Dialetica Relatividade |
topic |
Relativismo Teoria serial Proudhon, Pierre-Joseph -- 1809-1865 -- Critica e interpretacao Anarquismo Ceticismo Dialetica Relatividade Relativism Skepticism Dialetics Serial theory Anarchism CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Relativism Skepticism Dialetics Serial theory Anarchism |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
The objective of this study is to examine how the method and the knowledge theory of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (1808-1865), multi-disciplinar thinker and theorist-founder of the political anarchism, replays to the important philosophical problem of the construction of objective knowledges when this construction is confronted with some particular difficulties, that are imposed by contaminations due to the presence of personal approaching filters. The objective is justified by the fact whereof, although the number of studies about the proudhonian thoughs in sociology, economy and politics, the studies upon the philosophy of Proudhon, until now, are very poor. Until now, this author is almost unknown in the philosophical researches. The objective is justified, moreover, because his philosophy offers a way to establish a better dialogue and interaction among the philosophical theories and the popular thinking, applied to the social and diary-life questions. The pointed problem brings forward the discussions that Proudhon establish with known philosophies, and clearly localize, to the philosophers and academical searchers, his place in this particular area of knowledge. Focused in Proudhon s theory, the pointed problem offers, as a natural complement, a landscape of the political-philosophical confrontations at the XIXth century, about the destiny and the ways of human thinking, at the cross-roads of the alternatives offered by philosophy, religion and science. The examined hypothesis is that the way found by Proudhon to respond the focused problem, is a coherent and fruitful combination of relativism and skepticism, in an universal method to evaluate and develop knowledges. The Proudhon s theory is named by him Serial Theory , and his method, Serial Dialetics . This explanation, consequently, will show how relativism and skepticism are combined by Proudhon at the construction of this method and this theory, to offer a replay to the focused philosophical problem |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2008-11-03 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2008-10-22 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-27T17:27:25Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Borba, João Ribeiro de Almeida. Relativismo e ceticismo na dialética serial de Proudhon. 2008. 438 f. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2008. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/11789 |
identifier_str_mv |
Borba, João Ribeiro de Almeida. Relativismo e ceticismo na dialética serial de Proudhon. 2008. 438 f. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2008. |
url |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/11789 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUC-SP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Filosofia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11789/3/Joao%20Ribeiro%20de%20Almeida%20Borba.pdf.txt https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11789/1/Joao%20Ribeiro%20de%20Almeida%20Borba.pdf https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11789/2/Joao%20Ribeiro%20de%20Almeida%20Borba.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
7b1de5d276d8d50440b7b21fef47f868 1e086dea321bf99c332b62ac2eba5aa3 e0dbaae552cda4e33b5823c26942a622 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br |
_version_ |
1809278180526129152 |