Análise semiótica das propostas de redação do ENEM (2009-2015)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2017
Autor(a) principal: Azevedo Junior, José Bernardo de lattes
Orientador(a): Oliveira, Ana Claudia Mei Alves de
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Comunicação e Semiótica
Departamento: Faculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e Artes
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20207
Resumo: This research aims to investigate how the Ministry of Education works with the mechanisms of syncretic enunciation of all the totality of meanings of the proposal of writing the Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (ENEM) in the choice of texts of different languages, identified in the test as motivational texts. It also seeks to understand how the discursive interactions are given and what they establish to construct the production of meanings for the candidate. Created in 1998, the ENEM is a national level test and the initial objective was to evaluate the student at the end of basic education. As of 2009, when it gained greater popularity, the test to be used as a mode of selection in higher education institutions. The problematic is how the MEC articulates a perspective on a given theme, concretizing in texts of several languages for the candidate to understand them and, thus, to construct the argumentative e dissertation writing according to the competences required by the Exam. In order to respond to this questioning we work with the hypotheses that the MEC operates in the interaction regimes by combining procedures of the programming and manipulation regimes, structured by the choices of the enunciative strategies, to lead the candidate to adhere to the same point of view of the autarchy. These productions start from a themes introduced by the MEC with questions in the life of the candidate, which leads to test the hypothesis that the way to put the motivational texts in articulation, made available in several languages, forms the strategy of global enunciation with the sense of own point of view. The research also investigated whether there is a prominence in the plastic arrangement of the expression plane, which directs the candidate's thoughts with arguments that should be presented in his writing. The corpus of the research is composed of seven tests from the years 2009 to 2015. The analysis is based on the theoretical and methodological framework of the Discursive Semiotics of Algirdas Julien Greimas are explored the Sociosemiotics of Eric Landowski and the syncretism studies developed by Ana Claudia de Oliveira . For the understanding of the enunciation processes, the studies of José Luiz Fiorin, Norma Discini and Diana Barros are prioritized, as well as official government documents related to Education
id PUC_SP-1_cf2834e2116eb72643936afcdc40cd90
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/20207
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-1
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da PUC_SP
repository_id_str
spelling Oliveira, Ana Claudia Mei Alves dehttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4463895P0Azevedo Junior, José Bernardo de2017-07-11T12:44:05Z2017-06-29Azevedo Junior, José Bernardo de. Análise semiótica das propostas de redação do ENEM (2009-2015). 2017. 172 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Comunicação e Semiótica) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Comunicação e Semiótica, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2017.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20207This research aims to investigate how the Ministry of Education works with the mechanisms of syncretic enunciation of all the totality of meanings of the proposal of writing the Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (ENEM) in the choice of texts of different languages, identified in the test as motivational texts. It also seeks to understand how the discursive interactions are given and what they establish to construct the production of meanings for the candidate. Created in 1998, the ENEM is a national level test and the initial objective was to evaluate the student at the end of basic education. As of 2009, when it gained greater popularity, the test to be used as a mode of selection in higher education institutions. The problematic is how the MEC articulates a perspective on a given theme, concretizing in texts of several languages for the candidate to understand them and, thus, to construct the argumentative e dissertation writing according to the competences required by the Exam. In order to respond to this questioning we work with the hypotheses that the MEC operates in the interaction regimes by combining procedures of the programming and manipulation regimes, structured by the choices of the enunciative strategies, to lead the candidate to adhere to the same point of view of the autarchy. These productions start from a themes introduced by the MEC with questions in the life of the candidate, which leads to test the hypothesis that the way to put the motivational texts in articulation, made available in several languages, forms the strategy of global enunciation with the sense of own point of view. The research also investigated whether there is a prominence in the plastic arrangement of the expression plane, which directs the candidate's thoughts with arguments that should be presented in his writing. The corpus of the research is composed of seven tests from the years 2009 to 2015. The analysis is based on the theoretical and methodological framework of the Discursive Semiotics of Algirdas Julien Greimas are explored the Sociosemiotics of Eric Landowski and the syncretism studies developed by Ana Claudia de Oliveira . For the understanding of the enunciation processes, the studies of José Luiz Fiorin, Norma Discini and Diana Barros are prioritized, as well as official government documents related to EducationÀ luz dos estudos da semiótica francesa, esta pe squisa objetiva examinar como o Ministério da Educação trabalha com os mecanismos de enunciação sincrética da totalidade de sentidos da proposta de redação do Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio – ENEM – em escolhas de textos de diferentes linguagens, identificados na prova como textos motivadores. Também se busca compreender como se dão as interações discursivas e o que essas estabelecem para construir a produção de sentidos para o candidato. Criado em 1998, o ENEM é uma prova realizada em nível nacional e o objetivo inicial era o de avaliar o estudante ao final da educação básica. A partir de 2009, quando ganhou maior popularidade, o exame passou a ser utilizado como modo de seleção nas instituições de ensino superior. A problemática norteadora desse trabalho está de que maneira o MEC articula uma perspectiva sobre um tema dado, concretizando em textos de várias linguagens para o candidato depreendê-las e, assim, construir a redação dissertativaargumentativa de acordo com as competências requeridas pelo Exame. Para responder a esse questionamento trabalhamos com as hipóteses de que o MEC opera nos regimes de interação conjugando procedimentos dos regimes de programação e manipulação, estruturados pelas escolhas das estratégias enunciativas, para levar o candidato a aderir ao mesmo modo de pensar da autarquia. Para tanto, o Destinador considera os candidatos como sujeitos dotados de linguagem e aptos a reelaborar suas traduções de mundo em produções de linguagens verbal escrita. Essas produções partem de um temário apresentado pelo MEC com questões existentes no viver do candidato, o que leva a testar a hipótese que o modo de colocar os textos motivadores em articulação, disponibilizados em várias linguagens, forma a estratégia de enunciação global com o sentido do próprio ponto de vista do Destinador. A pesquisa também investigou se há destaque no arranjo plástico da expressão da proposta, o que direciona os pensamentos do candidato com argumentos que deverão ser apresentados em sua escritura. O corpus da pesquisa é composto por sete propostas de redação do exame dos anos de 2009 a 2015. Do arcabouço teórico-metodológico da Semiótica de Algirdas Julien Greimas exploramse a Sociossemiótica de Eric Landowski e os estudos do sincretismo desenvolvidos por Ana Claudia de Oliveira. Na esteira da compreensão dos processos enunciativos são priorizados os estudos de José Luiz Fiorin, Norma Discini e Diana Barros, além dos documentos oficiais do governo relacionados à EducaçãoConselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPqPontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo - PUCSPapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/42688/Jos%c3%a9%20Bernardo%20de%20Azevedo%20Junior.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Comunicação e SemióticaPUC-SPBrasilFaculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e ArtesENEM - Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (Brasil)Sincretismo de linguagensSemiótica discursivaSyncretism of languagesDiscursive semioticsCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAOAnálise semiótica das propostas de redação do ENEM (2009-2015)info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTJosé Bernardo de Azevedo Junior.pdf.txtJosé Bernardo de Azevedo Junior.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain310899https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20207/4/Jos%c3%a9%20Bernardo%20de%20Azevedo%20Junior.pdf.txt7e97e5547f7f912c065c7339438e2f8bMD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20207/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALJosé Bernardo de Azevedo Junior.pdfJosé Bernardo de Azevedo Junior.pdfapplication/pdf30962734https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20207/2/Jos%c3%a9%20Bernardo%20de%20Azevedo%20Junior.pdfb0cc8fb5f9eb3a99dfbeee91074c7d5eMD52THUMBNAILJosé Bernardo de Azevedo Junior.pdf.jpgJosé Bernardo de Azevedo Junior.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3221https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20207/3/Jos%c3%a9%20Bernardo%20de%20Azevedo%20Junior.pdf.jpgc9156f01550456d7088d6084e5e9b1f2MD53handle/202072022-04-28 08:17:44.429oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/20207Tk9UQTogQ09MT1FVRSBBUVVJIEEgU1VBIFBSw5NQUklBIExJQ0VOw4dBCkVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EgZGUgZXhlbXBsbyDDqSBmb3JuZWNpZGEgYXBlbmFzIHBhcmEgZmlucyBpbmZvcm1hdGl2b3MuCgpMSUNFTsOHQSBERSBESVNUUklCVUnDh8ODTyBOw4NPLUVYQ0xVU0lWQQoKQ29tIGEgYXByZXNlbnRhw6fDo28gZGVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EsIHZvY8OqIChvIGF1dG9yIChlcykgb3UgbyB0aXR1bGFyIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBkZSBhdXRvcikgY29uY2VkZSDDoCBVbml2ZXJzaWRhZGUgClhYWCAoU2lnbGEgZGEgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlKSBvIGRpcmVpdG8gbsOjby1leGNsdXNpdm8gZGUgcmVwcm9kdXppciwgIHRyYWR1emlyIChjb25mb3JtZSBkZWZpbmlkbyBhYmFpeG8pLCBlL291IApkaXN0cmlidWlyIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyAoaW5jbHVpbmRvIG8gcmVzdW1vKSBwb3IgdG9kbyBvIG11bmRvIG5vIGZvcm1hdG8gaW1wcmVzc28gZSBlbGV0csO0bmljbyBlIAplbSBxdWFscXVlciBtZWlvLCBpbmNsdWluZG8gb3MgZm9ybWF0b3Mgw6F1ZGlvIG91IHbDrWRlby4KClZvY8OqIGNvbmNvcmRhIHF1ZSBhIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSBwb2RlLCBzZW0gYWx0ZXJhciBvIGNvbnRlw7pkbywgdHJhbnNwb3IgYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIApwYXJhIHF1YWxxdWVyIG1laW8gb3UgZm9ybWF0byBwYXJhIGZpbnMgZGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gY29uY29yZGEgcXVlIGEgU2lnbGEgZGUgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlIHBvZGUgbWFudGVyIG1haXMgZGUgdW1hIGPDs3BpYSBhIHN1YSB0ZXNlIG91IApkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIHBhcmEgZmlucyBkZSBzZWd1cmFuw6dhLCBiYWNrLXVwIGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIGRlY2xhcmEgcXVlIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyDDqSBvcmlnaW5hbCBlIHF1ZSB2b2PDqiB0ZW0gbyBwb2RlciBkZSBjb25jZWRlciBvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBjb250aWRvcyAKbmVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EuIFZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgbyBkZXDDs3NpdG8gZGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBuw6NvLCBxdWUgc2VqYSBkZSBzZXUgCmNvbmhlY2ltZW50bywgaW5mcmluZ2UgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGUgbmluZ3XDqW0uCgpDYXNvIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBjb250ZW5oYSBtYXRlcmlhbCBxdWUgdm9jw6ogbsOjbyBwb3NzdWkgYSB0aXR1bGFyaWRhZGUgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzLCB2b2PDqiAKZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgb2J0ZXZlIGEgcGVybWlzc8OjbyBpcnJlc3RyaXRhIGRvIGRldGVudG9yIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcyBwYXJhIGNvbmNlZGVyIMOgIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSAKb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXByZXNlbnRhZG9zIG5lc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLCBlIHF1ZSBlc3NlIG1hdGVyaWFsIGRlIHByb3ByaWVkYWRlIGRlIHRlcmNlaXJvcyBlc3TDoSBjbGFyYW1lbnRlIAppZGVudGlmaWNhZG8gZSByZWNvbmhlY2lkbyBubyB0ZXh0byBvdSBubyBjb250ZcO6ZG8gZGEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIG9yYSBkZXBvc2l0YWRhLgoKQ0FTTyBBIFRFU0UgT1UgRElTU0VSVEHDh8ODTyBPUkEgREVQT1NJVEFEQSBURU5IQSBTSURPIFJFU1VMVEFETyBERSBVTSBQQVRST0PDjU5JTyBPVSAKQVBPSU8gREUgVU1BIEFHw4pOQ0lBIERFIEZPTUVOVE8gT1UgT1VUUk8gT1JHQU5JU01PIFFVRSBOw4NPIFNFSkEgQSBTSUdMQSBERSAKVU5JVkVSU0lEQURFLCBWT0PDiiBERUNMQVJBIFFVRSBSRVNQRUlUT1UgVE9ET1MgRSBRVUFJU1FVRVIgRElSRUlUT1MgREUgUkVWSVPDg08gQ09NTyAKVEFNQsOJTSBBUyBERU1BSVMgT0JSSUdBw4fDlUVTIEVYSUdJREFTIFBPUiBDT05UUkFUTyBPVSBBQ09SRE8uCgpBIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSBzZSBjb21wcm9tZXRlIGEgaWRlbnRpZmljYXIgY2xhcmFtZW50ZSBvIHNldSBub21lIChzKSBvdSBvKHMpIG5vbWUocykgZG8ocykgCmRldGVudG9yKGVzKSBkb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvLCBlIG7Do28gZmFyw6EgcXVhbHF1ZXIgYWx0ZXJhw6fDo28sIGFsw6ltIGRhcXVlbGFzIApjb25jZWRpZGFzIHBvciBlc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLgo=Repositório Institucionalhttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-04-28T11:17:44Repositório Institucional da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Análise semiótica das propostas de redação do ENEM (2009-2015)
title Análise semiótica das propostas de redação do ENEM (2009-2015)
spellingShingle Análise semiótica das propostas de redação do ENEM (2009-2015)
Azevedo Junior, José Bernardo de
ENEM - Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (Brasil)
Sincretismo de linguagens
Semiótica discursiva
Syncretism of languages
Discursive semiotics
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAO
title_short Análise semiótica das propostas de redação do ENEM (2009-2015)
title_full Análise semiótica das propostas de redação do ENEM (2009-2015)
title_fullStr Análise semiótica das propostas de redação do ENEM (2009-2015)
title_full_unstemmed Análise semiótica das propostas de redação do ENEM (2009-2015)
title_sort Análise semiótica das propostas de redação do ENEM (2009-2015)
author Azevedo Junior, José Bernardo de
author_facet Azevedo Junior, José Bernardo de
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Ana Claudia Mei Alves de
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4463895P0
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Azevedo Junior, José Bernardo de
contributor_str_mv Oliveira, Ana Claudia Mei Alves de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ENEM - Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (Brasil)
Sincretismo de linguagens
Semiótica discursiva
topic ENEM - Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (Brasil)
Sincretismo de linguagens
Semiótica discursiva
Syncretism of languages
Discursive semiotics
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Syncretism of languages
Discursive semiotics
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAO
description This research aims to investigate how the Ministry of Education works with the mechanisms of syncretic enunciation of all the totality of meanings of the proposal of writing the Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (ENEM) in the choice of texts of different languages, identified in the test as motivational texts. It also seeks to understand how the discursive interactions are given and what they establish to construct the production of meanings for the candidate. Created in 1998, the ENEM is a national level test and the initial objective was to evaluate the student at the end of basic education. As of 2009, when it gained greater popularity, the test to be used as a mode of selection in higher education institutions. The problematic is how the MEC articulates a perspective on a given theme, concretizing in texts of several languages for the candidate to understand them and, thus, to construct the argumentative e dissertation writing according to the competences required by the Exam. In order to respond to this questioning we work with the hypotheses that the MEC operates in the interaction regimes by combining procedures of the programming and manipulation regimes, structured by the choices of the enunciative strategies, to lead the candidate to adhere to the same point of view of the autarchy. These productions start from a themes introduced by the MEC with questions in the life of the candidate, which leads to test the hypothesis that the way to put the motivational texts in articulation, made available in several languages, forms the strategy of global enunciation with the sense of own point of view. The research also investigated whether there is a prominence in the plastic arrangement of the expression plane, which directs the candidate's thoughts with arguments that should be presented in his writing. The corpus of the research is composed of seven tests from the years 2009 to 2015. The analysis is based on the theoretical and methodological framework of the Discursive Semiotics of Algirdas Julien Greimas are explored the Sociosemiotics of Eric Landowski and the syncretism studies developed by Ana Claudia de Oliveira . For the understanding of the enunciation processes, the studies of José Luiz Fiorin, Norma Discini and Diana Barros are prioritized, as well as official government documents related to Education
publishDate 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-07-11T12:44:05Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017-06-29
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Azevedo Junior, José Bernardo de. Análise semiótica das propostas de redação do ENEM (2009-2015). 2017. 172 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Comunicação e Semiótica) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Comunicação e Semiótica, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2017.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20207
identifier_str_mv Azevedo Junior, José Bernardo de. Análise semiótica das propostas de redação do ENEM (2009-2015). 2017. 172 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Comunicação e Semiótica) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Comunicação e Semiótica, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2017.
url https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20207
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Comunicação e Semiótica
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv PUC-SP
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e Artes
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da PUC_SP
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da PUC_SP
collection Repositório Institucional da PUC_SP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20207/4/Jos%c3%a9%20Bernardo%20de%20Azevedo%20Junior.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20207/1/license.txt
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20207/2/Jos%c3%a9%20Bernardo%20de%20Azevedo%20Junior.pdf
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20207/3/Jos%c3%a9%20Bernardo%20de%20Azevedo%20Junior.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 7e97e5547f7f912c065c7339438e2f8b
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
b0cc8fb5f9eb3a99dfbeee91074c7d5e
c9156f01550456d7088d6084e5e9b1f2
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br
_version_ 1864285511974125568