Do "barro de loiça" à "loiça de barro": caracterização etnopedológica de um artesanato camponês no Agreste Paraibano.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2004
Autor(a) principal: Alves, Ângelo Guiseppe Chaves
Orientador(a): Marques, José Geraldo Wanderley lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais - PPGERN
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/1757
Resumo: Ethnopedological studies have been devoted mainly to agriculture, paying little attention to other aspects (e.g. pottery) of land use. The main objective of this work was to describe and analyse local knowledge and practices among peasant potters, as related to some soils that they use as ceramic resource, in a rural village (Chã da Pia) in Northeast Brazil. Peasant soil knowledge was described and analysed through an adaptation of classic ethnoscientific techniques, attempting to articulate emic and etic data, following Marques s Comprehensive Ethnoecology. Five soil profiles were formally described by researchers (etic approach) near pits where local people obtain pottery clay. Later, peasant artisans where asked to indicate the soil categories or materials they recognized in those same soil profiles (emic approach). Samples collected during both emic and etic approaches were used to describe and analyse the soils existing near these clay sources. Peasant potters recognized variations between the topsoil and subsurface soil. They were capable of distinguishing, identifying and naming, their way, some soil materials arranged in layers ( capas ) along the soil profile: terra (earth), piçarro (gravel), cabeça do barro (clay head), barro de loiça (ceramic clay), and pedra mole (soft rock). The multi-layered arrangement of these materials along the soil profiles was similar to the arrangement of the horizons as described in formal pedology. Nonetheless, local potters did not seem to know about pedogenetic relationships among these layers. Discriminant-canonical analysis, based on chemical, physical and morphological soil features, has shown clear distinctions between the agricultural topsoil and subsurface layers from where ceramic resources may be collected. It also made possible to demonstrate physical, chemical and morphological similarity among some soil materials (as distinguished by local potters) and the pedogenetic horizons where these materials are normally found. Barro de loiça is the main ceramic resource obtained from local soils. It was found mainly as part of the the 2Bt horizon in Eutric Planosols and Haplic Solonetz. The making of ethnopedological studies in different social and pedological environments could be an aid to the advancement of formal soil knowledge, also giving an opportunity to understanding and valuing local soil knowledge and management.
id SCAR_82132ad5b8ef8cb8254445f3471f23f8
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/1757
network_acronym_str SCAR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
repository_id_str
spelling Alves, Ângelo Guiseppe ChavesMarques, José Geraldo Wanderleyhttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/controladorbuscacv00cab904-4b43-4402-96bb-ec06e057e3172016-06-02T19:29:46Z2005-01-202016-06-02T19:29:46Z2004-07-30ALVES, ângelo Guiseppe Chaves. Do "barro de loiça" à "loiça de barro": caracterização etnopedológica de um artesanato camponês no Agreste Paraibano.. 2004. 197 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Biológicas) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2004.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/1757Ethnopedological studies have been devoted mainly to agriculture, paying little attention to other aspects (e.g. pottery) of land use. The main objective of this work was to describe and analyse local knowledge and practices among peasant potters, as related to some soils that they use as ceramic resource, in a rural village (Chã da Pia) in Northeast Brazil. Peasant soil knowledge was described and analysed through an adaptation of classic ethnoscientific techniques, attempting to articulate emic and etic data, following Marques s Comprehensive Ethnoecology. Five soil profiles were formally described by researchers (etic approach) near pits where local people obtain pottery clay. Later, peasant artisans where asked to indicate the soil categories or materials they recognized in those same soil profiles (emic approach). Samples collected during both emic and etic approaches were used to describe and analyse the soils existing near these clay sources. Peasant potters recognized variations between the topsoil and subsurface soil. They were capable of distinguishing, identifying and naming, their way, some soil materials arranged in layers ( capas ) along the soil profile: terra (earth), piçarro (gravel), cabeça do barro (clay head), barro de loiça (ceramic clay), and pedra mole (soft rock). The multi-layered arrangement of these materials along the soil profiles was similar to the arrangement of the horizons as described in formal pedology. Nonetheless, local potters did not seem to know about pedogenetic relationships among these layers. Discriminant-canonical analysis, based on chemical, physical and morphological soil features, has shown clear distinctions between the agricultural topsoil and subsurface layers from where ceramic resources may be collected. It also made possible to demonstrate physical, chemical and morphological similarity among some soil materials (as distinguished by local potters) and the pedogenetic horizons where these materials are normally found. Barro de loiça is the main ceramic resource obtained from local soils. It was found mainly as part of the the 2Bt horizon in Eutric Planosols and Haplic Solonetz. The making of ethnopedological studies in different social and pedological environments could be an aid to the advancement of formal soil knowledge, also giving an opportunity to understanding and valuing local soil knowledge and management.Os estudos etnopedológicos têm enfocado, prioritariamente, o uso agrícola dos solos, dando pouca atenção a outros campos de comportamento, tais como a cerâmica artesanal. Este trabalho teve como objetivo descrever e avaliar os conhecimentos e práticas de um grupo de artesãos camponeses ( loiceiros ), produtores de cerâmica utilitária ( loiça de barro ), sobre alguns solos que eles utilizam como recurso cerâmico em uma comunidade rural no Agreste Paraibano, Nordeste do Brasil. O saber pedológico camponês foi descrito e analisado através de técnicas adaptadas da etnociência clássica, buscando articular as abordagens emicista e eticista, com base na Etnoecologia Abrangente de Marques. Cinco perfis de solo foram descritos por agrônomos-pesquisadores (abordagem eticista) junto a barreiros de onde a população local extrai o barro-de-loiça . Posteriormente, solicitou-se a alguns camponeses que indicassem e nomeassem, nesses mesmos locais, os materiais de solo que fossem capazes de reconhecer (abordagem emicista). Amostras coletadas em ambas as abordagens foram usadas para caracterização morfológica, física e química desses solos. Os artesãos camponeses pesquisados reconheceram diferenças entre a camada arável e a sub-superfície do solo, sendo também capazes de distinguir, identificar e nomear, ao seu modo, alguns materiais de solo distribuídos em capas (camadas) superpostas ao longo do perfil, tais como: terra , piçarro , cabeça do barro , barro de loiça e pedra mole . O arranjo dessas camadas mostrou-se semelhante à distribuição dos horizontes nas descrições pedológicas formais, mas os loiceiros não demonstraram conhecimento de relações pedogenéticas entre partes do perfil. A análise discriminante canônica, baseada em propriedades físicas, químicas e morfológicas dos solos, mostrou diferenças entre as capas associadas à camada arável e aquelas mais profundas, que servem eventualmente como fonte de material cerâmico. Do mesmo modo, demonstrou-se similaridade entre alguns materiais de solo reconhecidos em capas e os horizontes pedogenéticos onde, normalmente, se situam esses mesmos materiais. Barro de loiça é o principal material de solo usado como recurso cerâmico pelos loiceiros e corresponde, localmente, a uma parte do horizonte Bt de solos classificados como Planossolo Nátrico Órtico e Planossolo Háplico Eutrófico. A realização de estudos etnopedológicos em diferentes contextos sociais e pedológicos pode contribuir para o avanço do conhecimento pedológico formal e para uma melhor compreensão e valorização dos sistemas locais de conhecimento e uso de solos.Financiadora de Estudos e Projetosapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de São CarlosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais - PPGERNUFSCarBREcologia humanaEtnoecologiaEtnopedologiaCampesinatoCerâmicaPlanossolosEthnoecologyEthnopedologyPeasantryPotteryPlanosolsSolonetzCIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIADo "barro de loiça" à "loiça de barro": caracterização etnopedológica de um artesanato camponês no Agreste Paraibano.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis-1-1d895d39c-5b36-4f0e-92e1-c4547945b661info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINALTeseAGCA.pdfapplication/pdf11486033https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/1757/1/TeseAGCA.pdf8ce32fee1bb551303df4db4831fcae21MD51THUMBNAILTeseAGCA.pdf.jpgTeseAGCA.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg7620https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/1757/2/TeseAGCA.pdf.jpg61672e66b5d0c283b52de145efb501daMD52ufscar/17572023-09-18 18:31:18.185oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/1757Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestopendoar:43222023-09-18T18:31:18Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Do "barro de loiça" à "loiça de barro": caracterização etnopedológica de um artesanato camponês no Agreste Paraibano.
title Do "barro de loiça" à "loiça de barro": caracterização etnopedológica de um artesanato camponês no Agreste Paraibano.
spellingShingle Do "barro de loiça" à "loiça de barro": caracterização etnopedológica de um artesanato camponês no Agreste Paraibano.
Alves, Ângelo Guiseppe Chaves
Ecologia humana
Etnoecologia
Etnopedologia
Campesinato
Cerâmica
Planossolos
Ethnoecology
Ethnopedology
Peasantry
Pottery
Planosols
Solonetz
CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA
title_short Do "barro de loiça" à "loiça de barro": caracterização etnopedológica de um artesanato camponês no Agreste Paraibano.
title_full Do "barro de loiça" à "loiça de barro": caracterização etnopedológica de um artesanato camponês no Agreste Paraibano.
title_fullStr Do "barro de loiça" à "loiça de barro": caracterização etnopedológica de um artesanato camponês no Agreste Paraibano.
title_full_unstemmed Do "barro de loiça" à "loiça de barro": caracterização etnopedológica de um artesanato camponês no Agreste Paraibano.
title_sort Do "barro de loiça" à "loiça de barro": caracterização etnopedológica de um artesanato camponês no Agreste Paraibano.
author Alves, Ângelo Guiseppe Chaves
author_facet Alves, Ângelo Guiseppe Chaves
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves, Ângelo Guiseppe Chaves
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Marques, José Geraldo Wanderley
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/controladorbuscacv
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv 00cab904-4b43-4402-96bb-ec06e057e317
contributor_str_mv Marques, José Geraldo Wanderley
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ecologia humana
Etnoecologia
Etnopedologia
Campesinato
Cerâmica
Planossolos
topic Ecologia humana
Etnoecologia
Etnopedologia
Campesinato
Cerâmica
Planossolos
Ethnoecology
Ethnopedology
Peasantry
Pottery
Planosols
Solonetz
CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Ethnoecology
Ethnopedology
Peasantry
Pottery
Planosols
Solonetz
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA
description Ethnopedological studies have been devoted mainly to agriculture, paying little attention to other aspects (e.g. pottery) of land use. The main objective of this work was to describe and analyse local knowledge and practices among peasant potters, as related to some soils that they use as ceramic resource, in a rural village (Chã da Pia) in Northeast Brazil. Peasant soil knowledge was described and analysed through an adaptation of classic ethnoscientific techniques, attempting to articulate emic and etic data, following Marques s Comprehensive Ethnoecology. Five soil profiles were formally described by researchers (etic approach) near pits where local people obtain pottery clay. Later, peasant artisans where asked to indicate the soil categories or materials they recognized in those same soil profiles (emic approach). Samples collected during both emic and etic approaches were used to describe and analyse the soils existing near these clay sources. Peasant potters recognized variations between the topsoil and subsurface soil. They were capable of distinguishing, identifying and naming, their way, some soil materials arranged in layers ( capas ) along the soil profile: terra (earth), piçarro (gravel), cabeça do barro (clay head), barro de loiça (ceramic clay), and pedra mole (soft rock). The multi-layered arrangement of these materials along the soil profiles was similar to the arrangement of the horizons as described in formal pedology. Nonetheless, local potters did not seem to know about pedogenetic relationships among these layers. Discriminant-canonical analysis, based on chemical, physical and morphological soil features, has shown clear distinctions between the agricultural topsoil and subsurface layers from where ceramic resources may be collected. It also made possible to demonstrate physical, chemical and morphological similarity among some soil materials (as distinguished by local potters) and the pedogenetic horizons where these materials are normally found. Barro de loiça is the main ceramic resource obtained from local soils. It was found mainly as part of the the 2Bt horizon in Eutric Planosols and Haplic Solonetz. The making of ethnopedological studies in different social and pedological environments could be an aid to the advancement of formal soil knowledge, also giving an opportunity to understanding and valuing local soil knowledge and management.
publishDate 2004
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2004-07-30
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2005-01-20
2016-06-02T19:29:46Z
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-06-02T19:29:46Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv ALVES, ângelo Guiseppe Chaves. Do "barro de loiça" à "loiça de barro": caracterização etnopedológica de um artesanato camponês no Agreste Paraibano.. 2004. 197 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Biológicas) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2004.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/1757
identifier_str_mv ALVES, ângelo Guiseppe Chaves. Do "barro de loiça" à "loiça de barro": caracterização etnopedológica de um artesanato camponês no Agreste Paraibano.. 2004. 197 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Biológicas) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2004.
url https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/1757
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv -1
-1
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv d895d39c-5b36-4f0e-92e1-c4547945b661
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais - PPGERN
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSCar
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:UFSCAR
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str UFSCAR
institution UFSCAR
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
collection Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/1757/1/TeseAGCA.pdf
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/1757/2/TeseAGCA.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 8ce32fee1bb551303df4db4831fcae21
61672e66b5d0c283b52de145efb501da
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1813715842850881536