Prote????o ou desprote????o?: sentidos e significados do acolhimento institucional para as crian??as e adolescentes e suas fam??lias

• Ano de defesa: 2013
• Autor(a) principal: Meireles, Camila Gabriel
• Orientador(a): Santos, Benedito Rodrigues dos
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa Strictu Sensu em Psicologia
• Departamento: Escola de Sa??de e Medicina
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Fam??lia; Psicologia; Percep????o; Adolescentes; Assist??ncia a menores
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: PSICOLOGIA
• Resumo em Inglês: This study aims to understand, from a comparative perspective, the perception of children / adolescents and their families on institutional care. Based on a qualitative approach, we performed the case study of four teenagers, two of whom were still welcomed institutionally and two had returned to the care of their families. As for the procedures used, individual interviews were conducted with children and adolescents and with members of the family group, more specifically mothers, and complementary technique was employed in the preparation of drawings to support the interview one of the teenagers. The results indicated that the members of the families interviewed have different perceptions between themselves, both on the protective measure of institutional care much about the institution under which the protective measure was performed. Family members interviewed tended to justify the measure as a host factor and need to protect their children, who might have access to basic social rights such as food, shelter and education. However, the perception of those members of the institution where the research took place was extremely negative and meant as a factor of "risk" to their children, exemplified by the sale and use of drugs by teenagers in the shelter. Unlike the members of the families surveyed, interviews of children and adolescents have not offered support for the measure perception host as a protective factor. However, their perceptions coincided regarding unprotected offered by the host unit where the research was conducted. In this sense, the perceptions of children and teenagers on the institution-researched exacerbated the representation of host unit as equivalent to a prison unit without control over drug use, an environment unwelcoming and cold, with rules that more resemble a scheme prison. Data from this study highlight the challenge of units that receive institutional care adolescents under socio remain in its mission of "protection unit" and not become "unit socioeducation".
• Link de acesso: https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2287

This study aims to understand, from a comparative perspective, the perception of children / adolescents and their families on institutional care. Based on a qualitative approach, we performed the case study of four teenagers, two of whom were still welcomed institutionally and two had returned to the care of their families. As for the procedures used, individual interviews were conducted with children and adolescents and with members of the family group, more specifically mothers, and complementary technique was employed in the preparation of drawings to support the interview one of the teenagers. The results indicated that the members of the families interviewed have different perceptions between themselves, both on the protective measure of institutional care much about the institution under which the protective measure was performed. Family members interviewed tended to justify the measure as a host factor and need to protect their children, who might have access to basic social rights such as food, shelter and education. However, the perception of those members of the institution where the research took place was extremely negative and meant as a factor of "risk" to their children, exemplified by the sale and use of drugs by teenagers in the shelter. Unlike the members of the families surveyed, interviews of children and adolescents have not offered support for the measure perception host as a protective factor. However, their perceptions coincided regarding unprotected offered by the host unit where the research was conducted. In this sense, the perceptions of children and teenagers on the institution-researched exacerbated the representation of host unit as equivalent to a prison unit without control over drug use, an environment unwelcoming and cold, with rules that more resemble a scheme prison. Data from this study highlight the challenge of units that receive institutional care adolescents under socio remain in its mission of "protection unit" and not become "unit socioeducation".