Integração de modelos hidrológicos baseados em processos físicos e técnicas de aprendizado de máquina
| Ano de defesa: | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Autor(a) principal: | |
| Orientador(a): | |
| Banca de defesa: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
| Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: | por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: | |
| Link de acesso: | https://hdl.handle.net/1843/84328 |
Resumo: | In recent years, the incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques in various areas of hydrology has grown dramatically. AI-based models, especially recurrent neural networks such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), have demonstrated superior performance compared to traditional conceptual models in various applied contexts. However, researchers face difficulties in physically interpreting the relationships predicted by these models, as well as limitations in their extrapolation capacity and prediction of untrained variables. Hybrid models emerge as a promising alternative, combining the analytical capacity of AI-based models with the physical constraints of conceptual models. This study investigated hybrid models based on three aspects: (i) the capacity of the data-driven component to abstract the conceptual component in search of better performance indices, (ii) the response of these models in spatial and temporal extrapolation scenarios, and (iii) their ability to simulate hydrological states not present in the input data. To this end, two types of hybrid models based on the GR4J conceptual model were developed and evaluated: one with dynamic parameterization, where an LSTM network estimates time-varying parameters, and another with internal flow substitution by an LSTM network. The results demonstrated that hybrid models may prioritize the data-driven component at the expense of physical representation to increase predictive capacity if they are not adequately constrained or have an incoherent conceptual structure. In spatial extrapolation scenarios, the LSTM network demonstrated superior performance, followed by the hybrid model with dynamic parameterization, while in temporal extrapolation under apparent low data availability, conceptual models outperformed pure LSTM networks and hybrid models. Regarding the simulation of untrained variables, although hybrid models possess this capability, a compromise in the physical coherence of internal states was observed, with both hybrid models showing significantly lower correlations than the GR4J conceptual model when compared with soil moisture estimates derived from remote sensing. These results indicate that the development of hybrid models requires special attention to implementing constraints that preserve the physical coherence of the represented processes, and that gains in predictive performance frequently occur at the expense of hydrological coherence. |
| id |
UFMG_794e4e9cd39b17e3d0b5b7d2d05d1ec3 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/84328 |
| network_acronym_str |
UFMG |
| network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
2025-08-12T12:29:06Z2025-09-09T01:15:09Z2025-08-12T12:29:06Z2025-04-16https://hdl.handle.net/1843/84328In recent years, the incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques in various areas of hydrology has grown dramatically. AI-based models, especially recurrent neural networks such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), have demonstrated superior performance compared to traditional conceptual models in various applied contexts. However, researchers face difficulties in physically interpreting the relationships predicted by these models, as well as limitations in their extrapolation capacity and prediction of untrained variables. Hybrid models emerge as a promising alternative, combining the analytical capacity of AI-based models with the physical constraints of conceptual models. This study investigated hybrid models based on three aspects: (i) the capacity of the data-driven component to abstract the conceptual component in search of better performance indices, (ii) the response of these models in spatial and temporal extrapolation scenarios, and (iii) their ability to simulate hydrological states not present in the input data. To this end, two types of hybrid models based on the GR4J conceptual model were developed and evaluated: one with dynamic parameterization, where an LSTM network estimates time-varying parameters, and another with internal flow substitution by an LSTM network. The results demonstrated that hybrid models may prioritize the data-driven component at the expense of physical representation to increase predictive capacity if they are not adequately constrained or have an incoherent conceptual structure. In spatial extrapolation scenarios, the LSTM network demonstrated superior performance, followed by the hybrid model with dynamic parameterization, while in temporal extrapolation under apparent low data availability, conceptual models outperformed pure LSTM networks and hybrid models. Regarding the simulation of untrained variables, although hybrid models possess this capability, a compromise in the physical coherence of internal states was observed, with both hybrid models showing significantly lower correlations than the GR4J conceptual model when compared with soil moisture estimates derived from remote sensing. These results indicate that the development of hybrid models requires special attention to implementing constraints that preserve the physical coherence of the represented processes, and that gains in predictive performance frequently occur at the expense of hydrological coherence.porUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraishttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/pt/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessModelagem hidrológicaAprendizado de máquinaModelagem híbridaEngenharia sanitáriaRecursos hídricos - DesenvolvimentoAprendizado do computadorHidrologia - ModelosInteligência artificialIntegração de modelos hidrológicos baseados em processos físicos e técnicas de aprendizado de máquinainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisVinicius Bryan de Souza Moreirareponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1018735164788797Francisco Eustáquio Oliveira e Silvahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3563298533127201André Ferreira RodriguesCleiton da Silva SilveiraNos últimos anos, a incorporação de técnicas de Inteligência Artificial (IA) em diversas áreas da hidrologia tem crescido vertiginosamente. Modelos baseados em IA, especialmente redes neurais recorrentes do tipo Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), têm demonstrado desempenho superior aos modelos conceituais tradicionais em diversos contextos aplicados. No entanto, pesquisadores enfrentam dificuldades em interpretar fisicamente as relações preditas por esses modelos, além de limitações na sua capacidade de extrapolação e na predição de variáveis não treinadas. Os modelos híbridos surgem como alternativa promissora, combinando a capacidade analítica dos modelos baseados em IA com as imposições físicas dos modelos conceituais. Este estudo investigou modelos híbridos com base em três aspectos: (i) a capacidade da parcela baseada em dados de abstrair a parcela conceitual em busca de melhores índices de ajuste, (ii) a resposta desses modelos em cenários de extrapolação espacial e temporal, e (iii) sua capacidade de simular estados hidrológicos não presentes nos dados de entrada. Para tanto, foram desenvolvidos e avaliados dois tipos de modelos híbridos baseados no modelo conceitual GR4J: um com parametrização dinâmica, onde uma rede LSTM estima parâmetros variáveis no tempo, e outro com substituição de fluxos internos por uma rede LSTM. Os resultados demonstraram que modelos híbridos podem priorizar a componente baseada em dados em detrimento da física visando elevar a capacidade preditiva caso não sejam adequadamente constritos ou possuam uma estrutura conceitual incoerente. Em cenários de extrapolação espacial, a rede LSTM demonstrou desempenho superior, seguida pelo modelo híbrido com parametrização dinâmica, enquanto na extrapolação temporal sob aparente baixa disponibilidade de dados, os modelos conceituais apresentaram desempenho superior às redes LSTM puras e aos modelos híbridos. Quanto à simulação de variáveis não treinadas, embora os modelos híbridos possuam essa capacidade, observou-se comprometimento da coerência física dos estados internos, com ambos os modelos híbridos apresentando correlações significativamente inferiores ao modelo conceitual GR4J quando comparados com estimativas de umidade do solo derivadas de sensoriamento remoto. Estes resultados indicam que o desenvolvimento de modelos híbridos requer atenção especial à implementação de restrições que preservem a coerência física dos processos representados, e que os ganhos em desempenho preditivo frequentemente ocorrem às custas da coerência hidrológica.BrasilENG - DEPARTAMENTO DE ENGENHARIA HIDRÁULICAPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Saneamento, Meio Ambiente e Recursos HídricosUFMGORIGINALDISSERTACAO_ALUNOMEST_VINICIUSMOREIRA_2023665692.pdfapplication/pdf37445340https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/307b1f9c-39ce-4faf-bee3-42d644b4cc7b/downloadcffb3bf66e1567b60ee9e1f0abc5b2f4MD51trueAnonymousREADLICENSElicense.txttext/plain2118https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/783c2f7c-d15c-419c-898e-11294cc53983/downloadcda590c95a0b51b4d15f60c9642ca272MD52falseAnonymousREADCC-LICENSElicense_rdfapplication/octet-stream1037https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/c2899aea-57b9-49ea-8ffd-268538c39aa7/downloadd434b2e45b27c6ef831461f4412a9d4eMD53falseAnonymousREAD1843/843282025-09-08 22:15:09.313http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/pt/Acesso Abertoopen.accessoai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/84328https://repositorio.ufmg.br/Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oairepositorio@ufmg.bropendoar:2025-09-09T01:15:09Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)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 |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Integração de modelos hidrológicos baseados em processos físicos e técnicas de aprendizado de máquina |
| title |
Integração de modelos hidrológicos baseados em processos físicos e técnicas de aprendizado de máquina |
| spellingShingle |
Integração de modelos hidrológicos baseados em processos físicos e técnicas de aprendizado de máquina Vinicius Bryan de Souza Moreira Engenharia sanitária Recursos hídricos - Desenvolvimento Aprendizado do computador Hidrologia - Modelos Inteligência artificial Modelagem hidrológica Aprendizado de máquina Modelagem híbrida |
| title_short |
Integração de modelos hidrológicos baseados em processos físicos e técnicas de aprendizado de máquina |
| title_full |
Integração de modelos hidrológicos baseados em processos físicos e técnicas de aprendizado de máquina |
| title_fullStr |
Integração de modelos hidrológicos baseados em processos físicos e técnicas de aprendizado de máquina |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Integração de modelos hidrológicos baseados em processos físicos e técnicas de aprendizado de máquina |
| title_sort |
Integração de modelos hidrológicos baseados em processos físicos e técnicas de aprendizado de máquina |
| author |
Vinicius Bryan de Souza Moreira |
| author_facet |
Vinicius Bryan de Souza Moreira |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vinicius Bryan de Souza Moreira |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia sanitária Recursos hídricos - Desenvolvimento Aprendizado do computador Hidrologia - Modelos Inteligência artificial |
| topic |
Engenharia sanitária Recursos hídricos - Desenvolvimento Aprendizado do computador Hidrologia - Modelos Inteligência artificial Modelagem hidrológica Aprendizado de máquina Modelagem híbrida |
| dc.subject.other.none.fl_str_mv |
Modelagem hidrológica Aprendizado de máquina Modelagem híbrida |
| description |
In recent years, the incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques in various areas of hydrology has grown dramatically. AI-based models, especially recurrent neural networks such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), have demonstrated superior performance compared to traditional conceptual models in various applied contexts. However, researchers face difficulties in physically interpreting the relationships predicted by these models, as well as limitations in their extrapolation capacity and prediction of untrained variables. Hybrid models emerge as a promising alternative, combining the analytical capacity of AI-based models with the physical constraints of conceptual models. This study investigated hybrid models based on three aspects: (i) the capacity of the data-driven component to abstract the conceptual component in search of better performance indices, (ii) the response of these models in spatial and temporal extrapolation scenarios, and (iii) their ability to simulate hydrological states not present in the input data. To this end, two types of hybrid models based on the GR4J conceptual model were developed and evaluated: one with dynamic parameterization, where an LSTM network estimates time-varying parameters, and another with internal flow substitution by an LSTM network. The results demonstrated that hybrid models may prioritize the data-driven component at the expense of physical representation to increase predictive capacity if they are not adequately constrained or have an incoherent conceptual structure. In spatial extrapolation scenarios, the LSTM network demonstrated superior performance, followed by the hybrid model with dynamic parameterization, while in temporal extrapolation under apparent low data availability, conceptual models outperformed pure LSTM networks and hybrid models. Regarding the simulation of untrained variables, although hybrid models possess this capability, a compromise in the physical coherence of internal states was observed, with both hybrid models showing significantly lower correlations than the GR4J conceptual model when compared with soil moisture estimates derived from remote sensing. These results indicate that the development of hybrid models requires special attention to implementing constraints that preserve the physical coherence of the represented processes, and that gains in predictive performance frequently occur at the expense of hydrological coherence. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2025-08-12T12:29:06Z 2025-09-09T01:15:09Z |
| dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2025-08-12T12:29:06Z |
| dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2025-04-16 |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| format |
masterThesis |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/1843/84328 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/1843/84328 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/pt/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/pt/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| instacron_str |
UFMG |
| institution |
UFMG |
| reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/307b1f9c-39ce-4faf-bee3-42d644b4cc7b/download https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/783c2f7c-d15c-419c-898e-11294cc53983/download https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/c2899aea-57b9-49ea-8ffd-268538c39aa7/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
cffb3bf66e1567b60ee9e1f0abc5b2f4 cda590c95a0b51b4d15f60c9642ca272 d434b2e45b27c6ef831461f4412a9d4e |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@ufmg.br |
| _version_ |
1862106069679996928 |