A dialética e as letras : imagens e paradigmas do pensar no Fedro de Platão

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2019
Autor(a) principal: Fabio da Silva Fortes
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://hdl.handle.net/1843/30891
Resumo: The debate about writing and dialectics raised in the dialogue Phaedrus, besides keeping alive a discussion of utmost importance for contemporary philosophy – the limits and possibilities of the relation between philosophy and language – is also the object of a reflection that does not show loss of vitality among Plato's scholars. After all, in the perspective of Platonic philosophy, would writing be adversary to thinking? Should we sustain, by reading the criticism that emerges in the first layer of signification of the myth of Theuth (Phdr. 274b-278b), that there is a strong contrast between two dimensions of language - the dimension of orality and writing - and, therefore, the unequivocal election of the former as the proper mode for dialectical expression? In order to contribute to this debate, by illuminating particularly the possible convergences and dissidences between the universe of letters and the dialectics in the context of Plato's work, especially within the Phaedrus, this doctoral dissertation aims at contributing, broadly speaking, to the debate on the limits and the possibilities of written language for the expression of philosophical thought. Strictly speaking, the objectives are: 1) to re-evaluate the problem of writing in Plato, based on the reflections contained especially in the Phaedrus, relating them to the plurality of subjects with which they have a relationship within the framework of the dialogue itself (rhetoric , dialectics, memory, psykhé, éros etc.); 2) in relation to the previous item, we aim at observing at what extent the reflections on the letters (γράμματα) and writing (γραφή) can be understood from the notions of image (εἴδωλον) and paradigm (παράδειγμα) and how they collaborate for the formulation of the notion of dialectic (διαλεκτική). Our hypothesis is that not only does writing appear in the Phaedrus as a consequence of the historical debate underway in Athens by the middle of the fifth century BC, on which Socrates would have presented a veiled disapproval, but also it does configure for Plato a theme of philosophical interest. We intend to show that, throughout the dialogue, while trying to answer the questions: can writing be beautiful? If so, in what conditions? There is also an answer that would go beyond a “ethics of writing” for the philosopher. Thus the own resources of the universe of writing – the letters – are also taken as elements through which the notion of dialectic associated with division (διαίρεσις) and reunion (συναγωγή) is formulated and can be understood philosophically, so that letters and writing becomes in the Platonic text not only images, but also paradigms for the determination of philosophical thinking.
id UFMG_d496750fb4177b4113ed8d9cd924060b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/30891
network_acronym_str UFMG
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository_id_str
spelling A dialética e as letras : imagens e paradigmas do pensar no Fedro de PlatãoThe dialectics and the letters: images and paradigms of thinking in Plato's PhaedrusFilosofiaDialéticaPlatãoFedroEscritaThe debate about writing and dialectics raised in the dialogue Phaedrus, besides keeping alive a discussion of utmost importance for contemporary philosophy – the limits and possibilities of the relation between philosophy and language – is also the object of a reflection that does not show loss of vitality among Plato's scholars. After all, in the perspective of Platonic philosophy, would writing be adversary to thinking? Should we sustain, by reading the criticism that emerges in the first layer of signification of the myth of Theuth (Phdr. 274b-278b), that there is a strong contrast between two dimensions of language - the dimension of orality and writing - and, therefore, the unequivocal election of the former as the proper mode for dialectical expression? In order to contribute to this debate, by illuminating particularly the possible convergences and dissidences between the universe of letters and the dialectics in the context of Plato's work, especially within the Phaedrus, this doctoral dissertation aims at contributing, broadly speaking, to the debate on the limits and the possibilities of written language for the expression of philosophical thought. Strictly speaking, the objectives are: 1) to re-evaluate the problem of writing in Plato, based on the reflections contained especially in the Phaedrus, relating them to the plurality of subjects with which they have a relationship within the framework of the dialogue itself (rhetoric , dialectics, memory, psykhé, éros etc.); 2) in relation to the previous item, we aim at observing at what extent the reflections on the letters (γράμματα) and writing (γραφή) can be understood from the notions of image (εἴδωλον) and paradigm (παράδειγμα) and how they collaborate for the formulation of the notion of dialectic (διαλεκτική). Our hypothesis is that not only does writing appear in the Phaedrus as a consequence of the historical debate underway in Athens by the middle of the fifth century BC, on which Socrates would have presented a veiled disapproval, but also it does configure for Plato a theme of philosophical interest. We intend to show that, throughout the dialogue, while trying to answer the questions: can writing be beautiful? If so, in what conditions? There is also an answer that would go beyond a “ethics of writing” for the philosopher. Thus the own resources of the universe of writing – the letters – are also taken as elements through which the notion of dialectic associated with division (διαίρεσις) and reunion (συναγωγή) is formulated and can be understood philosophically, so that letters and writing becomes in the Platonic text not only images, but also paradigms for the determination of philosophical thinking.Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais2019-11-08T14:50:14Z2025-09-09T00:07:16Z2019-11-08T14:50:14Z2019-08-19info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/30891porFabio da Silva Fortesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMG2025-09-09T00:07:16Zoai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/30891Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oairepositorio@ufmg.bropendoar:2025-09-09T00:07:16Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A dialética e as letras : imagens e paradigmas do pensar no Fedro de Platão
The dialectics and the letters: images and paradigms of thinking in Plato's Phaedrus
title A dialética e as letras : imagens e paradigmas do pensar no Fedro de Platão
spellingShingle A dialética e as letras : imagens e paradigmas do pensar no Fedro de Platão
Fabio da Silva Fortes
Filosofia
Dialética
Platão
Fedro
Escrita
title_short A dialética e as letras : imagens e paradigmas do pensar no Fedro de Platão
title_full A dialética e as letras : imagens e paradigmas do pensar no Fedro de Platão
title_fullStr A dialética e as letras : imagens e paradigmas do pensar no Fedro de Platão
title_full_unstemmed A dialética e as letras : imagens e paradigmas do pensar no Fedro de Platão
title_sort A dialética e as letras : imagens e paradigmas do pensar no Fedro de Platão
author Fabio da Silva Fortes
author_facet Fabio da Silva Fortes
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fabio da Silva Fortes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Filosofia
Dialética
Platão
Fedro
Escrita
topic Filosofia
Dialética
Platão
Fedro
Escrita
description The debate about writing and dialectics raised in the dialogue Phaedrus, besides keeping alive a discussion of utmost importance for contemporary philosophy – the limits and possibilities of the relation between philosophy and language – is also the object of a reflection that does not show loss of vitality among Plato's scholars. After all, in the perspective of Platonic philosophy, would writing be adversary to thinking? Should we sustain, by reading the criticism that emerges in the first layer of signification of the myth of Theuth (Phdr. 274b-278b), that there is a strong contrast between two dimensions of language - the dimension of orality and writing - and, therefore, the unequivocal election of the former as the proper mode for dialectical expression? In order to contribute to this debate, by illuminating particularly the possible convergences and dissidences between the universe of letters and the dialectics in the context of Plato's work, especially within the Phaedrus, this doctoral dissertation aims at contributing, broadly speaking, to the debate on the limits and the possibilities of written language for the expression of philosophical thought. Strictly speaking, the objectives are: 1) to re-evaluate the problem of writing in Plato, based on the reflections contained especially in the Phaedrus, relating them to the plurality of subjects with which they have a relationship within the framework of the dialogue itself (rhetoric , dialectics, memory, psykhé, éros etc.); 2) in relation to the previous item, we aim at observing at what extent the reflections on the letters (γράμματα) and writing (γραφή) can be understood from the notions of image (εἴδωλον) and paradigm (παράδειγμα) and how they collaborate for the formulation of the notion of dialectic (διαλεκτική). Our hypothesis is that not only does writing appear in the Phaedrus as a consequence of the historical debate underway in Athens by the middle of the fifth century BC, on which Socrates would have presented a veiled disapproval, but also it does configure for Plato a theme of philosophical interest. We intend to show that, throughout the dialogue, while trying to answer the questions: can writing be beautiful? If so, in what conditions? There is also an answer that would go beyond a “ethics of writing” for the philosopher. Thus the own resources of the universe of writing – the letters – are also taken as elements through which the notion of dialectic associated with division (διαίρεσις) and reunion (συναγωγή) is formulated and can be understood philosophically, so that letters and writing becomes in the Platonic text not only images, but also paradigms for the determination of philosophical thinking.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-08T14:50:14Z
2019-11-08T14:50:14Z
2019-08-19
2025-09-09T00:07:16Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1843/30891
url https://hdl.handle.net/1843/30891
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@ufmg.br
_version_ 1856414018521006080