Mapeamento cruzado dos títulos de diagnósticos de enfermagem formulados segundo a CIPE® versus diagnósticos da NANDA internacional para crianças com doenças renais

• Ano de defesa: 2019
• Autor(a) principal: Bezerra, Moiziara Xavier
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Brasil; UFRN; PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ENFERMAGEM
• Palavras-chave em Português: Processos de enfermagem; Terminologia; Diagnóstico de enfermagem; Criança; Nefropatias; CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEM
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/28424

This methodological study presents a quantitative angle that aims to do crossmapping of nursing diagnoses tittle in children whit kidney disease elaborated according to International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP®) from NANDA-I, as well as to categorize diagnoses tittle according to the standards of basics human needs theory and to perform cross-mapping product content validation. The study was divided into methodological steps: to build a data base of terms for children with kidney disease, formulation of diagnosis tittle for children with kidney disease and content validation. The diagnoses were formulated in to two lists and arranged in Microsoft Excell (Office 2013) program and classified according to basics human needs theory. The diagnoses were compared between classification systems mentioned and then classified into tittle listed or not listed. The not listed tittle was classified as: similar, wider, more restrict and non-agreement. Following this, the mapping product was analyzed by experts. It was counted the Content Index Validation equal plus 0,80. The experts who were involved in cross-mapping validation process are part of a research group of a public University in northeast of Brazil. The project was approved by Ethics Research Committee or University Hospital Onofre Lopes by nº 1.007.954 and licensed for ethics presentation by nº 42666815.0.0000.5292. It was identified 147 nursing diagnoses, 99 from ICNP and 48 from NANDA-I. After cross-mapping, 85,8% of INCP diagnoses was not listed in NANDA-I. The not listed diagnoses was classified in similar (2,3%), more restrict (34,1%), wider (8,2%) non-agreement (1,1%) and 54,3% of all diagnosis did not find a match in NANDA-I. All of ICNP and NANDA-I diagnosis tittle were classified in Basics Human Needs, respectively: psychobiology 68,5% and 31,5%; psychosocial 61,5% and 38,5%. It was not identified nursing diagnosis in psychospiritual needs. Cross-mapping was validated with 14 diagnosis listed both in NANDA-I and ICNP and 39 not listed, which presented CIV > 0,8. The study shown numerical differences in nursing diagnosis identification using two classification systems, however these systems contribution to nursing development promotes effective in health care since nursing diagnose identification along with standardized language contributes to nursing interventions and profession empowerment.