A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2018
Autor(a) principal: Monteiro Neto, Figueiredo lattes
Orientador(a): Arantes, Marco Antonio lattes
Banca de defesa: Arantes, Marco Antonio lattes, Vianna, Tulio Lima lattes, Neres, Geraldo Magella lattes
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
Toledo
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais
Departamento: Centro de Ciências Humanas e Sociais
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/3513
Resumo: Brazilian criminal policy has been oriented by criminal policies increasingly concerned with vigilance, control and neutralization of individuals considered to be dangerous, especially after the country’s redemocratization, in the late 80's of the twentieth century, having as paradigmatic framework and edition of the Law of Hideous Crimes - Law 8.072/90. This process has led us to what has become known as the super-incarceration society, in which Brazil occupies the position of the third country that most arrests people in the world, with now more than 700,000 prisoners in the prison system, with 40% of them being provisional prisoners awaiting a trial. It is about this process that custody hearing is intended to interfere, by placing face to face the prisoner and the judge, in order for the magistrate to analyze the prisoner's custody situation within a maximum of 24 hours from the arrest. Interestingly, however, the Resolution 213/15, from the National Council of Justice, which made custody hearing mandatory for all Courts in the country after May 1st , 2016, prevents it from being discussed at this hearing the fact by which a person was arrested, being characterized, therefore, as another instrument of subjection of the individual, depriving them of one of the rights that stand out most in the process of citizenship, which is the right of speech and decision-making influence in public life. It is not for another reason that the custody hearing was not only unable to reduce the number of incarceration in the city of Umuarama, where the research was conducted, but saw it grow in the first year after its implementation.
id UNIOESTE-1_cab905d08492e2087e23ded284047339
oai_identifier_str oai:tede.unioeste.br:tede/3513
network_acronym_str UNIOESTE-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
repository_id_str
spelling Arantes, Marco Antoniohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0856092788190593Arantes, Marco Antoniohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0856092788190593Vianna, Tulio Limahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6090986439508650Neres, Geraldo Magellahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1738102562803273http://lattes.cnpq.br/1492313574982202Monteiro Neto, Figueiredo2018-03-28T18:17:19Z2018-02-26MONTEIRO NETO, Figueiredo. A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo. 2018. 116 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Sociais) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2018.http://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/3513Brazilian criminal policy has been oriented by criminal policies increasingly concerned with vigilance, control and neutralization of individuals considered to be dangerous, especially after the country’s redemocratization, in the late 80's of the twentieth century, having as paradigmatic framework and edition of the Law of Hideous Crimes - Law 8.072/90. This process has led us to what has become known as the super-incarceration society, in which Brazil occupies the position of the third country that most arrests people in the world, with now more than 700,000 prisoners in the prison system, with 40% of them being provisional prisoners awaiting a trial. It is about this process that custody hearing is intended to interfere, by placing face to face the prisoner and the judge, in order for the magistrate to analyze the prisoner's custody situation within a maximum of 24 hours from the arrest. Interestingly, however, the Resolution 213/15, from the National Council of Justice, which made custody hearing mandatory for all Courts in the country after May 1st , 2016, prevents it from being discussed at this hearing the fact by which a person was arrested, being characterized, therefore, as another instrument of subjection of the individual, depriving them of one of the rights that stand out most in the process of citizenship, which is the right of speech and decision-making influence in public life. It is not for another reason that the custody hearing was not only unable to reduce the number of incarceration in the city of Umuarama, where the research was conducted, but saw it grow in the first year after its implementation.A política criminal brasileira tem se orientado por políticas criminais cada vez mais preocupadas com a vigilância, controle e neutralização dos indivíduos reputados perigosos, principalmente após a redemocratização do país, no final da década 80 do século XX, tendo como marco paradigmático a edição da Lei dos Crimes Hediondos – lei 8.072/90. Este processo nos conduziu ao que se convencionou chamar de sociedade do superencarceramento, em que o Brasil ocupa o posto de terceiro país que mais prende pessoas no mundo, contando atualmente com mais de 700 mil presos no sistema carcerário, sendo que 40% são presos provisórios aguardando um julgamento. É sobre este processo que a audiência de custódia pretende interferir, ao colocar cara a cara o preso e o juiz, a fim de que o magistrado analise a situação prisional do custodiado no prazo máximo de 24 horas contados da prisão. Curiosamente, porém, a Resolução 213/15, do Conselho Nacional de Justiça, que tornou obrigatória a audiência de custódia para todos os Tribunais do país após 1º de maio de 2016, impede que seja discutido nesta audiência o fato pelo qual a pessoa está presa, caracterizando-se, em razão disso, como mais um instrumento de assujeitamento do indivíduo, privando-o de um dos direitos que mais destacam o processo de cidadania, que é o direito de fala e influência na tomada de decisão na vida pública. Não por outra razão, a audiência de custódia não só foi incapaz de diminuir o número de encarceramento na Comarca de Umuarama, local onde a pesquisa foi realizada, mas o viu crescer no primeiro ano após a sua implementação.Submitted by Marilene Donadel (marilene.donadel@unioeste.br) on 2018-03-28T18:17:19Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Figueiredo_M_Neto_2018.pdf: 1248839 bytes, checksum: e565e3a17cd44068323b7062d6748dbb (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-03-28T18:17:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Figueiredo_M_Neto_2018.pdf: 1248839 bytes, checksum: e565e3a17cd44068323b7062d6748dbb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-02-26application/pdfpor-2624803687637593200500Universidade Estadual do Oeste do ParanáToledoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências SociaisUNIOESTEBrasilCentro de Ciências Humanas e SociaisSuperencarceramentoAudiência de custódiaPolítica públicaPublic policySuper-incarcerationCustody hearingOUTROS::CIENCIAS SOCIAISA audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivoCustody hearing and its inability to contain punitive powerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-73670270857646239526006006006640233372697234262-7650993349275569678info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTEinstname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)instacron:UNIOESTEORIGINALFigueiredo_M_Neto_2018.pdfFigueiredo_M_Neto_2018.pdfapplication/pdf1248839http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/3513/2/Figueiredo_M_Neto_2018.pdfe565e3a17cd44068323b7062d6748dbbMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/3513/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51tede/35132021-10-22 17:46:08.155oai:tede.unioeste.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede.unioeste.br/PUBhttp://tede.unioeste.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.repositorio@unioeste.bropendoar:2021-10-22T20:46:08Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Custody hearing and its inability to contain punitive power
title A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo
spellingShingle A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo
Monteiro Neto, Figueiredo
Superencarceramento
Audiência de custódia
Política pública
Public policy
Super-incarceration
Custody hearing
OUTROS::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS
title_short A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo
title_full A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo
title_fullStr A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo
title_full_unstemmed A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo
title_sort A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo
author Monteiro Neto, Figueiredo
author_facet Monteiro Neto, Figueiredo
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Arantes, Marco Antonio
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0856092788190593
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Arantes, Marco Antonio
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0856092788190593
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Vianna, Tulio Lima
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6090986439508650
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Neres, Geraldo Magella
dc.contributor.referee3Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1738102562803273
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1492313574982202
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Monteiro Neto, Figueiredo
contributor_str_mv Arantes, Marco Antonio
Arantes, Marco Antonio
Vianna, Tulio Lima
Neres, Geraldo Magella
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Superencarceramento
Audiência de custódia
Política pública
Public policy
topic Superencarceramento
Audiência de custódia
Política pública
Public policy
Super-incarceration
Custody hearing
OUTROS::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Super-incarceration
Custody hearing
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv OUTROS::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS
description Brazilian criminal policy has been oriented by criminal policies increasingly concerned with vigilance, control and neutralization of individuals considered to be dangerous, especially after the country’s redemocratization, in the late 80's of the twentieth century, having as paradigmatic framework and edition of the Law of Hideous Crimes - Law 8.072/90. This process has led us to what has become known as the super-incarceration society, in which Brazil occupies the position of the third country that most arrests people in the world, with now more than 700,000 prisoners in the prison system, with 40% of them being provisional prisoners awaiting a trial. It is about this process that custody hearing is intended to interfere, by placing face to face the prisoner and the judge, in order for the magistrate to analyze the prisoner's custody situation within a maximum of 24 hours from the arrest. Interestingly, however, the Resolution 213/15, from the National Council of Justice, which made custody hearing mandatory for all Courts in the country after May 1st , 2016, prevents it from being discussed at this hearing the fact by which a person was arrested, being characterized, therefore, as another instrument of subjection of the individual, depriving them of one of the rights that stand out most in the process of citizenship, which is the right of speech and decision-making influence in public life. It is not for another reason that the custody hearing was not only unable to reduce the number of incarceration in the city of Umuarama, where the research was conducted, but saw it grow in the first year after its implementation.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-03-28T18:17:19Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018-02-26
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv MONTEIRO NETO, Figueiredo. A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo. 2018. 116 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Sociais) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2018.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/3513
identifier_str_mv MONTEIRO NETO, Figueiredo. A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo. 2018. 116 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Sociais) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2018.
url http://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/3513
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv -7367027085764623952
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv 6640233372697234262
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv -7650993349275569678
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
Toledo
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UNIOESTE
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Centro de Ciências Humanas e Sociais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
Toledo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
instacron:UNIOESTE
instname_str Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
instacron_str UNIOESTE
institution UNIOESTE
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/3513/2/Figueiredo_M_Neto_2018.pdf
http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/3513/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv e565e3a17cd44068323b7062d6748dbb
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.repositorio@unioeste.br
_version_ 1811723568235413504