A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo
Ano de defesa: | 2018 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
Toledo |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais
|
Departamento: |
Centro de Ciências Humanas e Sociais
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | http://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/3513 |
Resumo: | Brazilian criminal policy has been oriented by criminal policies increasingly concerned with vigilance, control and neutralization of individuals considered to be dangerous, especially after the country’s redemocratization, in the late 80's of the twentieth century, having as paradigmatic framework and edition of the Law of Hideous Crimes - Law 8.072/90. This process has led us to what has become known as the super-incarceration society, in which Brazil occupies the position of the third country that most arrests people in the world, with now more than 700,000 prisoners in the prison system, with 40% of them being provisional prisoners awaiting a trial. It is about this process that custody hearing is intended to interfere, by placing face to face the prisoner and the judge, in order for the magistrate to analyze the prisoner's custody situation within a maximum of 24 hours from the arrest. Interestingly, however, the Resolution 213/15, from the National Council of Justice, which made custody hearing mandatory for all Courts in the country after May 1st , 2016, prevents it from being discussed at this hearing the fact by which a person was arrested, being characterized, therefore, as another instrument of subjection of the individual, depriving them of one of the rights that stand out most in the process of citizenship, which is the right of speech and decision-making influence in public life. It is not for another reason that the custody hearing was not only unable to reduce the number of incarceration in the city of Umuarama, where the research was conducted, but saw it grow in the first year after its implementation. |
id |
UNIOESTE-1_cab905d08492e2087e23ded284047339 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede.unioeste.br:tede/3513 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIOESTE-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Arantes, Marco Antoniohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0856092788190593Arantes, Marco Antoniohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0856092788190593Vianna, Tulio Limahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6090986439508650Neres, Geraldo Magellahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1738102562803273http://lattes.cnpq.br/1492313574982202Monteiro Neto, Figueiredo2018-03-28T18:17:19Z2018-02-26MONTEIRO NETO, Figueiredo. A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo. 2018. 116 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Sociais) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2018.http://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/3513Brazilian criminal policy has been oriented by criminal policies increasingly concerned with vigilance, control and neutralization of individuals considered to be dangerous, especially after the country’s redemocratization, in the late 80's of the twentieth century, having as paradigmatic framework and edition of the Law of Hideous Crimes - Law 8.072/90. This process has led us to what has become known as the super-incarceration society, in which Brazil occupies the position of the third country that most arrests people in the world, with now more than 700,000 prisoners in the prison system, with 40% of them being provisional prisoners awaiting a trial. It is about this process that custody hearing is intended to interfere, by placing face to face the prisoner and the judge, in order for the magistrate to analyze the prisoner's custody situation within a maximum of 24 hours from the arrest. Interestingly, however, the Resolution 213/15, from the National Council of Justice, which made custody hearing mandatory for all Courts in the country after May 1st , 2016, prevents it from being discussed at this hearing the fact by which a person was arrested, being characterized, therefore, as another instrument of subjection of the individual, depriving them of one of the rights that stand out most in the process of citizenship, which is the right of speech and decision-making influence in public life. It is not for another reason that the custody hearing was not only unable to reduce the number of incarceration in the city of Umuarama, where the research was conducted, but saw it grow in the first year after its implementation.A política criminal brasileira tem se orientado por políticas criminais cada vez mais preocupadas com a vigilância, controle e neutralização dos indivíduos reputados perigosos, principalmente após a redemocratização do país, no final da década 80 do século XX, tendo como marco paradigmático a edição da Lei dos Crimes Hediondos – lei 8.072/90. Este processo nos conduziu ao que se convencionou chamar de sociedade do superencarceramento, em que o Brasil ocupa o posto de terceiro país que mais prende pessoas no mundo, contando atualmente com mais de 700 mil presos no sistema carcerário, sendo que 40% são presos provisórios aguardando um julgamento. É sobre este processo que a audiência de custódia pretende interferir, ao colocar cara a cara o preso e o juiz, a fim de que o magistrado analise a situação prisional do custodiado no prazo máximo de 24 horas contados da prisão. Curiosamente, porém, a Resolução 213/15, do Conselho Nacional de Justiça, que tornou obrigatória a audiência de custódia para todos os Tribunais do país após 1º de maio de 2016, impede que seja discutido nesta audiência o fato pelo qual a pessoa está presa, caracterizando-se, em razão disso, como mais um instrumento de assujeitamento do indivíduo, privando-o de um dos direitos que mais destacam o processo de cidadania, que é o direito de fala e influência na tomada de decisão na vida pública. Não por outra razão, a audiência de custódia não só foi incapaz de diminuir o número de encarceramento na Comarca de Umuarama, local onde a pesquisa foi realizada, mas o viu crescer no primeiro ano após a sua implementação.Submitted by Marilene Donadel (marilene.donadel@unioeste.br) on 2018-03-28T18:17:19Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Figueiredo_M_Neto_2018.pdf: 1248839 bytes, checksum: e565e3a17cd44068323b7062d6748dbb (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-03-28T18:17:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Figueiredo_M_Neto_2018.pdf: 1248839 bytes, checksum: e565e3a17cd44068323b7062d6748dbb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-02-26application/pdfpor-2624803687637593200500Universidade Estadual do Oeste do ParanáToledoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências SociaisUNIOESTEBrasilCentro de Ciências Humanas e SociaisSuperencarceramentoAudiência de custódiaPolítica públicaPublic policySuper-incarcerationCustody hearingOUTROS::CIENCIAS SOCIAISA audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivoCustody hearing and its inability to contain punitive powerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-73670270857646239526006006006640233372697234262-7650993349275569678info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTEinstname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)instacron:UNIOESTEORIGINALFigueiredo_M_Neto_2018.pdfFigueiredo_M_Neto_2018.pdfapplication/pdf1248839http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/3513/2/Figueiredo_M_Neto_2018.pdfe565e3a17cd44068323b7062d6748dbbMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/3513/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51tede/35132021-10-22 17:46:08.155oai:tede.unioeste.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede.unioeste.br/PUBhttp://tede.unioeste.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.repositorio@unioeste.bropendoar:2021-10-22T20:46:08Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Custody hearing and its inability to contain punitive power |
title |
A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo |
spellingShingle |
A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo Monteiro Neto, Figueiredo Superencarceramento Audiência de custódia Política pública Public policy Super-incarceration Custody hearing OUTROS::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS |
title_short |
A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo |
title_full |
A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo |
title_fullStr |
A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo |
title_full_unstemmed |
A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo |
title_sort |
A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo |
author |
Monteiro Neto, Figueiredo |
author_facet |
Monteiro Neto, Figueiredo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Arantes, Marco Antonio |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0856092788190593 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Arantes, Marco Antonio |
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0856092788190593 |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Vianna, Tulio Lima |
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6090986439508650 |
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
Neres, Geraldo Magella |
dc.contributor.referee3Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1738102562803273 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1492313574982202 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Monteiro Neto, Figueiredo |
contributor_str_mv |
Arantes, Marco Antonio Arantes, Marco Antonio Vianna, Tulio Lima Neres, Geraldo Magella |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Superencarceramento Audiência de custódia Política pública Public policy |
topic |
Superencarceramento Audiência de custódia Política pública Public policy Super-incarceration Custody hearing OUTROS::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Super-incarceration Custody hearing |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
OUTROS::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS |
description |
Brazilian criminal policy has been oriented by criminal policies increasingly concerned with vigilance, control and neutralization of individuals considered to be dangerous, especially after the country’s redemocratization, in the late 80's of the twentieth century, having as paradigmatic framework and edition of the Law of Hideous Crimes - Law 8.072/90. This process has led us to what has become known as the super-incarceration society, in which Brazil occupies the position of the third country that most arrests people in the world, with now more than 700,000 prisoners in the prison system, with 40% of them being provisional prisoners awaiting a trial. It is about this process that custody hearing is intended to interfere, by placing face to face the prisoner and the judge, in order for the magistrate to analyze the prisoner's custody situation within a maximum of 24 hours from the arrest. Interestingly, however, the Resolution 213/15, from the National Council of Justice, which made custody hearing mandatory for all Courts in the country after May 1st , 2016, prevents it from being discussed at this hearing the fact by which a person was arrested, being characterized, therefore, as another instrument of subjection of the individual, depriving them of one of the rights that stand out most in the process of citizenship, which is the right of speech and decision-making influence in public life. It is not for another reason that the custody hearing was not only unable to reduce the number of incarceration in the city of Umuarama, where the research was conducted, but saw it grow in the first year after its implementation. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-28T18:17:19Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018-02-26 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
MONTEIRO NETO, Figueiredo. A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo. 2018. 116 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Sociais) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2018. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/3513 |
identifier_str_mv |
MONTEIRO NETO, Figueiredo. A audiência de custódia e sua incapacidade de contenção do poder punitivo. 2018. 116 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Sociais) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2018. |
url |
http://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/3513 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-7367027085764623952 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
6640233372697234262 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-7650993349275569678 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná Toledo |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UNIOESTE |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Ciências Humanas e Sociais |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná Toledo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) instacron:UNIOESTE |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) |
instacron_str |
UNIOESTE |
institution |
UNIOESTE |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/3513/2/Figueiredo_M_Neto_2018.pdf http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/3513/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
e565e3a17cd44068323b7062d6748dbb bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.repositorio@unioeste.br |
_version_ |
1811723568235413504 |