Soroprevalência de lentiviroses de pequenos ruminantes e caracterização dos rebanhos caprinos e ovinos no estado do Maranhão, Brasil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2012
Autor(a) principal: TEIXEIRA, Whaubtyfran Cabral lattes
Orientador(a): CASTRO, Roberto Soares de
Banca de defesa: AZEVEDO, Edisio Oliveira de, VESCHI, Josir Laine Aparecida, PINHEIRO JÚNIOR, José Wilton
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
dARK ID: ark:/57462/0013000006vhv
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Veterinária
Departamento: Departamento de Medicina Veterinária
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/5900
Resumo: The aim of the present study was to determine the seroprevalence of small ruminant lentiviruses (LVPR), to characterize the zoosanitary management and describe the characteristics of the three most important sheep and goat rearing areas from Maranhão State, Brasil. 30 goats, 31 sheep and 52 mixed farms were visited, located in 23 municipalities of the Central, East and North regions of Maranhão. A questionnaire was applied on each property covering investigative details of the owner, property, herds, and hygiene, sanitary, nutritional and reproductive management adopted. The total number of animals in the herds was 3.405 goats and 2.971 sheep. To determine the prevalence of LVPR, 1.703 were analyzed blood serum samples of goats and 1.495 sheep. The animals were older than six months, various races and both sex. For the diagnosis of infection LVPR was used in the test agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID). The statistical analysis was performed using Epi Info version 6.04. The overall prevalence of CAEV infection was 2.8% (47/1703), and the prevalence in the regions North, East and Centre were 1.3% (5/385), 2.5% (18/713) and 4.0% (24/605), respectively. Significant differences between the North and Central were observed (P<0.05). Of the total number of herds sampled, 25.6% (21/82) had at least one positive animal. The prevalence of 4.4% (10/225) for males and 2.5% (37/1478) for females were significantly different (P<0.05). It was found that the prevalence did not increase with age (P>0.05). There prevalences of 11.3% (16/142), 3.5% (23/654) and 0.9% (8/907) were recorded in purebred, crossbred and SRD animals, respectively (P <0.05). It was found an overall prevalence of MVV infection of 0.7% (11/1495) and prevalence of 0.5%, 0.7% and 1.0% in the Central, East and North regions, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). Aditionaly, it was found that 0.5% (1/207) of males and 0.8% (10/1288) of females were seropositive (P>0.05). In relation to age was not observed significant difference (P>0.05). There was a prevalence of 1.5% (1/66), 1.0% (8/776) and 0.3% (2/653) for sheep purebred, crossbred and SRD, respectively (P>0.05). For the formation of the herds animals were purchased from the states of Piaui, Pernambuco, Ceará, Bahia and Paraíba. The main farming system adopted in both the goats (93.9%) and in sheep (92.8%) herds is the semi-extensive, where the animals are loose in the pasture during the day and are collected in the late afternoon. Regarding the type of fold used slatted (52.4% and 41.0%) and dirt (36.6% and 44.6%) were those with the highest frequencies. The sanitary practices adopted more frequently were: cleaning the premises, disinfection of the fold, cut and disinfection of the umbilical cord of the newborn, trimming, burial of corpses and separating sick animals. The most frequently clinical changes that affect goats and sheep were, respectively: worms (97.6% and 95.2%), caseous lymphadenitis (84.1% and 79.5), myiasis (79.3% and 73.5), abortion (73.3% and 67.5), pododermatitis (70.7% and 68.7%), parasitic skin disease (57.3% and 47.0%), mastitis (50.0% and 42.2%), arthritis (39.0% and 30.1%), contagious ecthyma (37.8% and 43.5%), keratoconjunctivitis (35.4% and 39.8%), pneumonia (29, 3% and 22.9%), diarrhea (23.2% and 19.3%) and neurological disorders (8.5% and 7.2%). It was found a high percentage of herds (65.8% in goat and 69.9% in sheep) that have problems with mortality, reaching up to 10% in each herd. Vaccination was adopted in 58.5% and 61.4% of goat and sheep herds, respectively. The deworming was the most frequently used practice for the control of nematode infections by 92.7% and 95.2% of goats and sheep, respectively. It is concluded that infection with LVPR is present in sheep and goats of located in the East, Central and Northern of Maranhão. In this sense, is explicit the need to implement control measures to prevent the spread of virus between flocks and new introductions in the state, by requiring negative tests for LVPR. It was observed that the health management adopted in goats and sheep properties in the Central, East and North regions of Maranhão, is poor, with serious problems that may interfere with the performance of the herds, requiring adjustments in order to maximize productivity and reduce costs.
id URPE_d1e2cc55287f2a2d894e9c5b4566dc66
oai_identifier_str oai:tede2:tede2/5900
network_acronym_str URPE
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
repository_id_str
spelling CASTRO, Roberto Soares deSANTOS, Hamilton PereiraAZEVEDO, Edisio Oliveira deVESCHI, Josir Laine AparecidaPINHEIRO JÚNIOR, José Wiltonhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1063866346097632TEIXEIRA, Whaubtyfran Cabral2016-11-09T12:16:52Z2012-02-09TEIXEIRA, Whaubtyfran Cabral. Soroprevalência de lentiviroses de pequenos ruminantes e caracterização dos rebanhos caprinos e ovinos no estado do Maranhão, Brasil. 2012. 120 f. Tese (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Veterinária) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/5900ark:/57462/0013000006vhvThe aim of the present study was to determine the seroprevalence of small ruminant lentiviruses (LVPR), to characterize the zoosanitary management and describe the characteristics of the three most important sheep and goat rearing areas from Maranhão State, Brasil. 30 goats, 31 sheep and 52 mixed farms were visited, located in 23 municipalities of the Central, East and North regions of Maranhão. A questionnaire was applied on each property covering investigative details of the owner, property, herds, and hygiene, sanitary, nutritional and reproductive management adopted. The total number of animals in the herds was 3.405 goats and 2.971 sheep. To determine the prevalence of LVPR, 1.703 were analyzed blood serum samples of goats and 1.495 sheep. The animals were older than six months, various races and both sex. For the diagnosis of infection LVPR was used in the test agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID). The statistical analysis was performed using Epi Info version 6.04. The overall prevalence of CAEV infection was 2.8% (47/1703), and the prevalence in the regions North, East and Centre were 1.3% (5/385), 2.5% (18/713) and 4.0% (24/605), respectively. Significant differences between the North and Central were observed (P<0.05). Of the total number of herds sampled, 25.6% (21/82) had at least one positive animal. The prevalence of 4.4% (10/225) for males and 2.5% (37/1478) for females were significantly different (P<0.05). It was found that the prevalence did not increase with age (P>0.05). There prevalences of 11.3% (16/142), 3.5% (23/654) and 0.9% (8/907) were recorded in purebred, crossbred and SRD animals, respectively (P <0.05). It was found an overall prevalence of MVV infection of 0.7% (11/1495) and prevalence of 0.5%, 0.7% and 1.0% in the Central, East and North regions, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). Aditionaly, it was found that 0.5% (1/207) of males and 0.8% (10/1288) of females were seropositive (P>0.05). In relation to age was not observed significant difference (P>0.05). There was a prevalence of 1.5% (1/66), 1.0% (8/776) and 0.3% (2/653) for sheep purebred, crossbred and SRD, respectively (P>0.05). For the formation of the herds animals were purchased from the states of Piaui, Pernambuco, Ceará, Bahia and Paraíba. The main farming system adopted in both the goats (93.9%) and in sheep (92.8%) herds is the semi-extensive, where the animals are loose in the pasture during the day and are collected in the late afternoon. Regarding the type of fold used slatted (52.4% and 41.0%) and dirt (36.6% and 44.6%) were those with the highest frequencies. The sanitary practices adopted more frequently were: cleaning the premises, disinfection of the fold, cut and disinfection of the umbilical cord of the newborn, trimming, burial of corpses and separating sick animals. The most frequently clinical changes that affect goats and sheep were, respectively: worms (97.6% and 95.2%), caseous lymphadenitis (84.1% and 79.5), myiasis (79.3% and 73.5), abortion (73.3% and 67.5), pododermatitis (70.7% and 68.7%), parasitic skin disease (57.3% and 47.0%), mastitis (50.0% and 42.2%), arthritis (39.0% and 30.1%), contagious ecthyma (37.8% and 43.5%), keratoconjunctivitis (35.4% and 39.8%), pneumonia (29, 3% and 22.9%), diarrhea (23.2% and 19.3%) and neurological disorders (8.5% and 7.2%). It was found a high percentage of herds (65.8% in goat and 69.9% in sheep) that have problems with mortality, reaching up to 10% in each herd. Vaccination was adopted in 58.5% and 61.4% of goat and sheep herds, respectively. The deworming was the most frequently used practice for the control of nematode infections by 92.7% and 95.2% of goats and sheep, respectively. It is concluded that infection with LVPR is present in sheep and goats of located in the East, Central and Northern of Maranhão. In this sense, is explicit the need to implement control measures to prevent the spread of virus between flocks and new introductions in the state, by requiring negative tests for LVPR. It was observed that the health management adopted in goats and sheep properties in the Central, East and North regions of Maranhão, is poor, with serious problems that may interfere with the performance of the herds, requiring adjustments in order to maximize productivity and reduce costs.Objetivou-se, no presente estudo, determinar a soroprevalência das lentiviroses de pequenos ruminantes (LVPR), caracterizar o manejo zoosanitário e descrever as características da caprinovinocultura nas três principais mesorregiões produtoras de caprinos e ovinos do Estado do Maranhão, Brasil. Foram visitados 30 criatórios de caprinos, 31 de ovinos e 52 mistos, localizados em 23 municípios das mesorregiões Centro, Leste e Norte Maranhense. Aplicou-se um questionário investigativo em cada propriedade abordando dados sobre o proprietário, propriedade, reabanho e os sistemas de manejos higiênico-sanitário, nutricional e reprodutivo. O número total de animais nesses rebanhos era de 3.405 caprinos 2.971 ovinos. Para determinar a prevalência de LVPR, foram analisadas 1.703 amostras de soro sanguíneo de caprinos e 1.495 de ovinos. Foram utilizados animais com idade superior a seis meses, de ambos os sexos e raças variadas. Para o diagnóstico da infecção pelo LVPR, utilizou-se o teste da imunodifusão em gel de ágar (micro-IDGA). A análise estatística dos dados foi realizada empregando-se o programa Epi Info versão 6.04. A prevalência geral da infecção pelo CAEV foi de 2,8% (47/1703), sendo as prevalências nas mesorregiões Norte, Leste e Centro de 1,3% (5/385), 2,5% (18/713) e 4,0% (24/605), respectivamente. Houve diferença significativa entre as prevalências das mesorregiões Norte e Centro (P<0,05). Do total de propriedades amostradas, 25,6% (21/82) apresentaram pelo menos um animal positivo. Com relação à variável sexo foi encontrada prevalência de 4,4% (10/225) para machos e 2,5% (37/1478) para as fêmeas, onde se evidenciou diferença significativa (P<0,05). Verificou-se que a prevalência não aumentou com a idade (P>0,05). Observaram-se prevalências de 11,3% (16/142), 3,5% (23/654) e 0,9% (8/907) para animais de raças puras, mestiços e SRD, respectivamente, apresentando diferença estatística significativa (P<0,05). Constatou-se uma prevalência geral da infecção pelo MVV de 0,7% (11/1495) e prevalências de 0,5% (3/564), 0,7% (4/539) e 1,0% (4/392) nas mesorregiões Centro, Leste e Norte, respectivamente, não sendo verificada diferença estatística significativa (P>0,05). Em relação à variável sexo, observou-se que 0,5% (1/207) dos machos e 0,8% (10/1288) das fêmeas foram soropositivos (P>0,05). Em relação à idade também não foi evidenciada diferença significativa (P>0,05). Observou-se prevalência de 1,5% (1/66), 1,0% (8/776) e 0,3% (2/653) para ovinos de raças puras, mestiços e SRD, respectivamente (P>0,05). Para a formação dos rebanhos base foram utilizados animais oriundos dos Estados do Piauí, Pernambuco, Ceará, Bahia e Paraíba. O principal sistema de criação adotado é o semi-extensivo, onde os animais permanecem soltos no pasto durante o dia e são recolhidos ao final da tarde, tanto nas criações de caprinos (93,9%) quanto nas de ovinos (92,8%). Quanto ao tipo de aprisco utilizado o ripado (52,4% e 41,0%) e o chão batido (36,6% e 44,6%) foram os que apresentaram as maiores frequências. As práticas sanitárias adotadas com maior frequência foram limpeza das instalações, desinfecção do aprisco, corte e desinfecção do cordão umbilical do recém-nascido, casqueamento, enterro dos cadáveres e separação de animais doentes. Alterações clínicas mais citadas que acometem os animais dos rebanhos caprinos e ovinos, respectivamente, foram verminose (97,6% e 95,2%), linfadenite caseosa (84,1% e 79,5), miíase (79,3% e 73,5), aborto (73,3% e 67,5), pododermatite (70,7% e 68,7%), ectoparasitose (57,3% e 47,0%), mastite (50,0% e 42,2%), artrite (39,0% e 30,1%), ectima contagioso (37,8% e 43,5%), ceratoconjuntivite (35,4% e 39,8%), pneumonia (29,3% e 22,9%), diarréia (23,2% e 19,3%) e alterações nervosas (8,5% e 7,2%). Foi verificado um percentual elevado (65,8% dos rebanhos caprinos e 69,9% nos ovinos) de propriedades que têm problemas com mortalidade, chegando a atingir até 10% em cada rebanho. A vacinação foi adotada em 58,5% e 61,4% dos rebanhos caprinos e ovinos, respectivamente, enquanto que a desverminação foi à prática mais adotada para o controle de verminoses por 92,7% e 95,2% dos criadores de caprinos e ovinos, respectivamente. Conclui-se que a infecção por LVPR está presente em caprinos e ovinos das mesorregiões Centro, Leste e Norte Maranhense. Nesse sentido, fica explícita a necessidade de implementar medidas de controle a fim de evitar a propagação dos vírus entre os rebanhos e novas introduções no Estado, através da exigência de testes negativos para LVPR. Observou-se que o manejo sanitário, adotado nas propriedades de caprinos e ovinos nas mesorregiões estudadas, é deficiente, apresentando sérios problemas que podem está interferindo no desempenho dos rebanhos, necessitando de adequações visando à maximização da produtividade e redução de custos.Submitted by (edna.saturno@ufrpe.br) on 2016-11-09T12:16:52Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Whaubtyfran Cabral Teixeira.pdf: 1328857 bytes, checksum: 071dbd504f948b5d47ca8a7a13339069 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2016-11-09T12:16:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Whaubtyfran Cabral Teixeira.pdf: 1328857 bytes, checksum: 071dbd504f948b5d47ca8a7a13339069 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-02-09Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPqCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciência VeterináriaUFRPEBrasilDepartamento de Medicina VeterináriaCaprinoOvinoInfecçãoVírusImunodifusãoGoatSheepInfectionImmunodiffusionMaedi-VisnaCIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIASoroprevalência de lentiviroses de pequenos ruminantes e caracterização dos rebanhos caprinos e ovinos no estado do Maranhão, Brasilinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis-3061482854177903105600600600600600-3020210563763616780453670264235017319-25559114369857136592075167498588264571info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPEinstname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)instacron:UFRPELICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/5900/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALWhaubtyfran Cabral Teixeira.pdfWhaubtyfran Cabral Teixeira.pdfapplication/pdf1328857http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/5900/2/Whaubtyfran+Cabral+Teixeira.pdf071dbd504f948b5d47ca8a7a13339069MD52tede2/59002016-11-09 09:16:52.17oai:tede2: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede/PUBhttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/oai/requestbdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.bropendoar:2016-11-09T12:16:52Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Soroprevalência de lentiviroses de pequenos ruminantes e caracterização dos rebanhos caprinos e ovinos no estado do Maranhão, Brasil
title Soroprevalência de lentiviroses de pequenos ruminantes e caracterização dos rebanhos caprinos e ovinos no estado do Maranhão, Brasil
spellingShingle Soroprevalência de lentiviroses de pequenos ruminantes e caracterização dos rebanhos caprinos e ovinos no estado do Maranhão, Brasil
TEIXEIRA, Whaubtyfran Cabral
Caprino
Ovino
Infecção
Vírus
Imunodifusão
Goat
Sheep
Infection
Immunodiffusion
Maedi-Visna
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA
title_short Soroprevalência de lentiviroses de pequenos ruminantes e caracterização dos rebanhos caprinos e ovinos no estado do Maranhão, Brasil
title_full Soroprevalência de lentiviroses de pequenos ruminantes e caracterização dos rebanhos caprinos e ovinos no estado do Maranhão, Brasil
title_fullStr Soroprevalência de lentiviroses de pequenos ruminantes e caracterização dos rebanhos caprinos e ovinos no estado do Maranhão, Brasil
title_full_unstemmed Soroprevalência de lentiviroses de pequenos ruminantes e caracterização dos rebanhos caprinos e ovinos no estado do Maranhão, Brasil
title_sort Soroprevalência de lentiviroses de pequenos ruminantes e caracterização dos rebanhos caprinos e ovinos no estado do Maranhão, Brasil
author TEIXEIRA, Whaubtyfran Cabral
author_facet TEIXEIRA, Whaubtyfran Cabral
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv CASTRO, Roberto Soares de
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv SANTOS, Hamilton Pereira
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv AZEVEDO, Edisio Oliveira de
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv VESCHI, Josir Laine Aparecida
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv PINHEIRO JÚNIOR, José Wilton
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1063866346097632
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv TEIXEIRA, Whaubtyfran Cabral
contributor_str_mv CASTRO, Roberto Soares de
SANTOS, Hamilton Pereira
AZEVEDO, Edisio Oliveira de
VESCHI, Josir Laine Aparecida
PINHEIRO JÚNIOR, José Wilton
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Caprino
Ovino
Infecção
Vírus
Imunodifusão
topic Caprino
Ovino
Infecção
Vírus
Imunodifusão
Goat
Sheep
Infection
Immunodiffusion
Maedi-Visna
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Goat
Sheep
Infection
Immunodiffusion
Maedi-Visna
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA
description The aim of the present study was to determine the seroprevalence of small ruminant lentiviruses (LVPR), to characterize the zoosanitary management and describe the characteristics of the three most important sheep and goat rearing areas from Maranhão State, Brasil. 30 goats, 31 sheep and 52 mixed farms were visited, located in 23 municipalities of the Central, East and North regions of Maranhão. A questionnaire was applied on each property covering investigative details of the owner, property, herds, and hygiene, sanitary, nutritional and reproductive management adopted. The total number of animals in the herds was 3.405 goats and 2.971 sheep. To determine the prevalence of LVPR, 1.703 were analyzed blood serum samples of goats and 1.495 sheep. The animals were older than six months, various races and both sex. For the diagnosis of infection LVPR was used in the test agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID). The statistical analysis was performed using Epi Info version 6.04. The overall prevalence of CAEV infection was 2.8% (47/1703), and the prevalence in the regions North, East and Centre were 1.3% (5/385), 2.5% (18/713) and 4.0% (24/605), respectively. Significant differences between the North and Central were observed (P<0.05). Of the total number of herds sampled, 25.6% (21/82) had at least one positive animal. The prevalence of 4.4% (10/225) for males and 2.5% (37/1478) for females were significantly different (P<0.05). It was found that the prevalence did not increase with age (P>0.05). There prevalences of 11.3% (16/142), 3.5% (23/654) and 0.9% (8/907) were recorded in purebred, crossbred and SRD animals, respectively (P <0.05). It was found an overall prevalence of MVV infection of 0.7% (11/1495) and prevalence of 0.5%, 0.7% and 1.0% in the Central, East and North regions, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). Aditionaly, it was found that 0.5% (1/207) of males and 0.8% (10/1288) of females were seropositive (P>0.05). In relation to age was not observed significant difference (P>0.05). There was a prevalence of 1.5% (1/66), 1.0% (8/776) and 0.3% (2/653) for sheep purebred, crossbred and SRD, respectively (P>0.05). For the formation of the herds animals were purchased from the states of Piaui, Pernambuco, Ceará, Bahia and Paraíba. The main farming system adopted in both the goats (93.9%) and in sheep (92.8%) herds is the semi-extensive, where the animals are loose in the pasture during the day and are collected in the late afternoon. Regarding the type of fold used slatted (52.4% and 41.0%) and dirt (36.6% and 44.6%) were those with the highest frequencies. The sanitary practices adopted more frequently were: cleaning the premises, disinfection of the fold, cut and disinfection of the umbilical cord of the newborn, trimming, burial of corpses and separating sick animals. The most frequently clinical changes that affect goats and sheep were, respectively: worms (97.6% and 95.2%), caseous lymphadenitis (84.1% and 79.5), myiasis (79.3% and 73.5), abortion (73.3% and 67.5), pododermatitis (70.7% and 68.7%), parasitic skin disease (57.3% and 47.0%), mastitis (50.0% and 42.2%), arthritis (39.0% and 30.1%), contagious ecthyma (37.8% and 43.5%), keratoconjunctivitis (35.4% and 39.8%), pneumonia (29, 3% and 22.9%), diarrhea (23.2% and 19.3%) and neurological disorders (8.5% and 7.2%). It was found a high percentage of herds (65.8% in goat and 69.9% in sheep) that have problems with mortality, reaching up to 10% in each herd. Vaccination was adopted in 58.5% and 61.4% of goat and sheep herds, respectively. The deworming was the most frequently used practice for the control of nematode infections by 92.7% and 95.2% of goats and sheep, respectively. It is concluded that infection with LVPR is present in sheep and goats of located in the East, Central and Northern of Maranhão. In this sense, is explicit the need to implement control measures to prevent the spread of virus between flocks and new introductions in the state, by requiring negative tests for LVPR. It was observed that the health management adopted in goats and sheep properties in the Central, East and North regions of Maranhão, is poor, with serious problems that may interfere with the performance of the herds, requiring adjustments in order to maximize productivity and reduce costs.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2012-02-09
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-11-09T12:16:52Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv TEIXEIRA, Whaubtyfran Cabral. Soroprevalência de lentiviroses de pequenos ruminantes e caracterização dos rebanhos caprinos e ovinos no estado do Maranhão, Brasil. 2012. 120 f. Tese (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Veterinária) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/5900
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/57462/0013000006vhv
identifier_str_mv TEIXEIRA, Whaubtyfran Cabral. Soroprevalência de lentiviroses de pequenos ruminantes e caracterização dos rebanhos caprinos e ovinos no estado do Maranhão, Brasil. 2012. 120 f. Tese (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Veterinária) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.
ark:/57462/0013000006vhv
url http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/5900
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv -3061482854177903105
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
600
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv -3020210563763616780
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 453670264235017319
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv -2555911436985713659
2075167498588264571
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Veterinária
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFRPE
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Departamento de Medicina Veterinária
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
instacron:UFRPE
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
instacron_str UFRPE
institution UFRPE
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/5900/1/license.txt
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/5900/2/Whaubtyfran+Cabral+Teixeira.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
071dbd504f948b5d47ca8a7a13339069
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.br
_version_ 1865912871676805120