A autonomia do servidor público no Brasil

• Ano de defesa: 2013
• Autor(a) principal: Silva Filho, Laércio de Oliveira e
• Orientador(a): Migueles, Carmen Pires
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Palavras-chave em Português: Autonomia; Servidores públicos; Direito administrativo; Administração pública
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Autonomy; Public servant; Administrative law; Public administration
• Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/10438/11205

The personal autonomy of the public servant while working for Public Administration is one of the requirements for successful implementation of knowledge management actions. This autonomy is also a desire of the workers, always defended by various class associations. However, it collides with political, legal, administrative and cultural constraints. The present research was built upon secondary and theoretical sources and the aim was to identify the nature of personal autonomy, its modalities, sources, limitations and possible development. This theoretical work was developed through transdisciplinary interpretation of sources, mostly derived from sociological, management, law and philosophy literature. Firstly, the concept of au tonomy is presented, followed by its first subdivision in two dimensions. The discipline that the doctrine of Administrative Law imposes to the autonomy of the Brazilian public server is also explored and problematized. Then the question is addressed in te rms of sociological view, from the ideal bureaucratic model of Max Weber and the findings of Michel Crozier. The relationship between autonomy and professional bureaucracies of Mintzberg is also reviewed. Finally, the human personality is presented as the source of autonomy as well as its justification in relation to doctrines that deny and attack it. Three dimensions of autonomy were identified: substantive, technical and objective. Based on that result, we proposed ways to stimulate it within the politica l, legal and administrative legitimate limiting factors that were identified.