Judicialização da saúde: como decide o Poder Judiciário Federal?: análise das demandas de saúde na seção judiciária de Minas Gerais

• Ano de defesa: 2013
• Autor(a) principal: Junqueira, Silvana Regina Santos
• Orientador(a): Batitucci, Eduardo Cerqueira
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Fundação João Pinheiro
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Mestrado em Administração Pública
• Departamento: Escola de Governo Professor Paulo Neves de Carvalho
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Administração da Saúde; Serviço de Saúde; Saúde Pública; Política de Saúde; Minas Gerais
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: SAUDE COLETIVA::SAUDE PUBLICA
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/handle/tede/589

The Brazilian Constitution of 1988 enshrined the right to health as a fundamental right and a duty of the State, to be guaranteed by social and economic policies. The public health policy is developed by the principles and guidelines that the Constitution establishes and the creation of the Sistema Único de Saúde, under protection of the principles of universality, comprehensiveness and equality, the right to health is now claimed in court by those who understand that the State is not accomplishing these principles. The growth of lawsuits demanding treatments and medications directly impacts the management of public health policy and provokes discussion on the role of the judiciary in the face of administrative choices, questioning the legitimacy of its interference in public policies, the phenomenon known as judicialization of health, derived from judicialization of politics. In the trial of Suspensão de Tutela Antecipada nº 175, the Supreme Court indicates parameters for the decision on legal public health demands and became a paradigm for judicial action in such cases. Therefore, the research focuses on health claims in federal court, seeking to identify, in their sentencing, the fundamentals that guide and compliance with the criteria outlined by the Supreme Court, to contribute with some reflection for the defense of the Union in these claims.