Reprodutibilidade da cinem??tica da esc??pula, ??mero e tronco em adultos saud??veis, comparando as avalia????es entre os avaliadores experiente e inexperiente
Ano de defesa: | 2016 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Nove de Julho
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de P??s-Gradua????o em Ci??ncias da Reabilita????o
|
Departamento: |
Sa??de
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | http://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/handle/tede/1900 |
Resumo: | The reproducibility of scapular kinematics has already been tested intra- and inter-sessions and intra- and inter-days, however, these evaluations were only performed by experienced evaluators and the majority of studies included only one evaluator. Thus, the comparison between evaluators with different levels of experience has not yet been explored, leaving doubts as to the accuracy of the evaluation results when performed by different evaluators. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the reproducibility inter and intra-rater, experienced and inexperienced, during flexion and abduction movements of the arm for the scapula, humerus, and trunk segments. Kinematic data were captured during flexion and abduction movements of the arm using a system of 8 cameras and a sampling frequency of 120 Hz. In total, twenty healthy volunteers were evaluated (10 men and 10 women), with an average age of 25.1 (1.1) years, who underwent 6 sessions of movement analysis. Each evaluator carried out three sessions, two sessions on the first day, with a three-hour interval between them, and the third session on the second day, twenty-four hours after the first day. For each session, 5 repetitions of each movement, unilateral abduction and flexion of the arm, were performed. Statistical analysis was performed by an independent evaluator and the Shapiro-Wilk test was used for data distribution. The reproducibility of the range of motion and angular values at angles of 30??, 60??, 90??, and 120?? was verified through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard measurement error (SEM). The values obtained for the angles 30??, 60??, 90??, and 120?? intra-day ranged from 0.67-0.98 and (0.58?? to 5.64??) for the inexperienced evaluator and from 0.67?? to 0.98?? and (0.64?? to 6.17??) for the experienced evaluator in the flexion movement. During the abduction movement the values obtained at angles of 30??, 60??, 90??, and 120?? intra-day ranged from 0.75?? to 0.96?? and (0.51?? to 4.93??) for the inexperienced evaluator and from 0.62?? to 0.97?? and (0.66?? to 6.58??) for the experienced evaluator. The model presented good to excellent intra-day reproducibility for both evaluators in the flexion and abduction movements of the arm. Inter-day values in flexion varied from 0.41?? to 0.88?? and (0.64?? to 6.17??) for the inexperienced evaluator and 0.72?? to 0.95?? and (0.67?? to 4.31??) for the experienced evaluator. In the inter-day abduction movement, values ranged from 0.33?? to 0.91?? and (0.74?? to 6.60??) for the inexperienced evaluator and 0.72?? to 0.98?? and (0.73?? to 5.01??) for the experienced evaluator. The reproducibility of the inexperienced evaluator presented from weak to excellent in the arm flexion movement and poor to excellent in abduction of the arm. The reproducibility for the experienced evaluator was good to excellent for flexion and abduction of the arm between the scapula, humerus, and trunk segments in healthy adults. The results showed that there is no difference between evaluators in the intra-day evaluations; however, on an inter-day basis the experienced evaluator obtained better reproducibility results, demonstrating that a difference in levels of experience between evaluators is of fundamental importance to obtain reproducible results on different days. However, we emphasize the importance of performing further studies, with different movements and patients, performed by two or more evaluators. |
id |
NOVE_4e4588117d206e7fc61231c55e6b2292 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:tede/1900 |
network_acronym_str |
NOVE |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Lucareli, Paulo Roberto GarciaPolitti, FabianoLucareli, Paulo Roberto GarciaLanza, Fernanda de CordobaCamargo, Paula Rezendehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6214142384176087Gon??alves, Diogo Henrique Magalh??es2018-07-23T18:20:19Z2016-12-07Gon??alves, Diogo Henrique Magalh??es. Reprodutibilidade da cinem??tica da esc??pula, ??mero e tronco em adultos saud??veis, comparando as avalia????es entre os avaliadores experiente e inexperiente. 2016. 89 f. Disserta????o( Programa de P??s-Gradua????o em Ci??ncias da Reabilita????o) - Universidade Nove de Julho, S??o Paulo.http://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/handle/tede/1900The reproducibility of scapular kinematics has already been tested intra- and inter-sessions and intra- and inter-days, however, these evaluations were only performed by experienced evaluators and the majority of studies included only one evaluator. Thus, the comparison between evaluators with different levels of experience has not yet been explored, leaving doubts as to the accuracy of the evaluation results when performed by different evaluators. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the reproducibility inter and intra-rater, experienced and inexperienced, during flexion and abduction movements of the arm for the scapula, humerus, and trunk segments. Kinematic data were captured during flexion and abduction movements of the arm using a system of 8 cameras and a sampling frequency of 120 Hz. In total, twenty healthy volunteers were evaluated (10 men and 10 women), with an average age of 25.1 (1.1) years, who underwent 6 sessions of movement analysis. Each evaluator carried out three sessions, two sessions on the first day, with a three-hour interval between them, and the third session on the second day, twenty-four hours after the first day. For each session, 5 repetitions of each movement, unilateral abduction and flexion of the arm, were performed. Statistical analysis was performed by an independent evaluator and the Shapiro-Wilk test was used for data distribution. The reproducibility of the range of motion and angular values at angles of 30??, 60??, 90??, and 120?? was verified through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard measurement error (SEM). The values obtained for the angles 30??, 60??, 90??, and 120?? intra-day ranged from 0.67-0.98 and (0.58?? to 5.64??) for the inexperienced evaluator and from 0.67?? to 0.98?? and (0.64?? to 6.17??) for the experienced evaluator in the flexion movement. During the abduction movement the values obtained at angles of 30??, 60??, 90??, and 120?? intra-day ranged from 0.75?? to 0.96?? and (0.51?? to 4.93??) for the inexperienced evaluator and from 0.62?? to 0.97?? and (0.66?? to 6.58??) for the experienced evaluator. The model presented good to excellent intra-day reproducibility for both evaluators in the flexion and abduction movements of the arm. Inter-day values in flexion varied from 0.41?? to 0.88?? and (0.64?? to 6.17??) for the inexperienced evaluator and 0.72?? to 0.95?? and (0.67?? to 4.31??) for the experienced evaluator. In the inter-day abduction movement, values ranged from 0.33?? to 0.91?? and (0.74?? to 6.60??) for the inexperienced evaluator and 0.72?? to 0.98?? and (0.73?? to 5.01??) for the experienced evaluator. The reproducibility of the inexperienced evaluator presented from weak to excellent in the arm flexion movement and poor to excellent in abduction of the arm. The reproducibility for the experienced evaluator was good to excellent for flexion and abduction of the arm between the scapula, humerus, and trunk segments in healthy adults. The results showed that there is no difference between evaluators in the intra-day evaluations; however, on an inter-day basis the experienced evaluator obtained better reproducibility results, demonstrating that a difference in levels of experience between evaluators is of fundamental importance to obtain reproducible results on different days. However, we emphasize the importance of performing further studies, with different movements and patients, performed by two or more evaluators.A reprodutibilidade da cinem??tica escapular j?? foi testada intra e inter-sess??es e intra e inter-dias, por??m essas avalia????es foram realizadas apenas por avaliadores experientes e a maioria dos estudos com apenas um avaliador. A compara????o entre avaliadores com diferentes n??veis de experi??ncia ainda n??o foi explorada, deixando d??vidas quanto a precis??o dos resultados da avalia????o se realizadas por diferentes avaliadores. O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar a reprodutibilidade inter e intra-avaliadores, com diferentes n??veis de experi??ncia, nos movimentos de flex??o e abdu????o do bra??o para os segmentos da esc??pula, ??mero e tronco. As capturas dos dados de cinem??tica foram realizadas utilizando um sistema de 8 c??meras e frequ??ncia de amostragem de 120Hz durante os movimentos de flex??o e abdu????o do bra??o. Foram avaliados 20 volunt??rios saud??veis (10 homens e 10 mulheres) com idade m??dia de 25.1 (??1.1) anos, que foram submetidos ?? 6 sess??es de an??lise do movimento. Cada avaliador realizou tr??s sess??es, duas sess??es realizadas no primeiro dia com intervalo de tr??s horas entre elas e a terceira sess??o foi realizada no segundo dia, 48 horas ap??s o primeiro dia. Para cada sess??o foram realizadas 5 repeti????es de cada movimento, abdu????o e flex??o unilateral do bra??o. A an??lise estat??stica foi realizada por um avaliador independente, para distribui????o dos dados, foi utilizado o teste de Shapiro-Wilk, A reprodutibilidade da amplitude de movimento e dos valores angulares nos ??ngulos de 30??, 60??, 90?? e 120?? do bra??o foi verificada pelo coeficiente de correla????o intraclasse (ICC) assim como o erro de medida padr??o (SEM). Os valores obtidos nos ??ngulos de 30??, 60??, 90?? e 120?? intra-dia variaram de 0,67-0,98 e (0,58?? ?? 5,64??) para o avaliador inexperiente e variaram de 0,67-0,98 e (0,64?? ?? 6,17??) para o avaliador experiente, no movimento de flex??o. Durante o movimento de abdu????o os valores obtidos nos ??ngulos de 30??, 60??, 90?? e 120?? intra-dia variaram de 0,75-0,96 e (0,51?? ?? 4,93??) para o avaliador inexperiente e variaram de 0,62-0,97 e (0,66?? ?? 6,58??) para o avaliador experiente. O modelo apresentou de boa a excelente reprodutibilidade, intra-dia para ambos os avaliadores nos movimentos de flex??o e abdu????o do bra??o. Os valores obtidos inter-dias na flex??o variaram de 0,41 a 0,88 e (0,64?? a 6,17) para o avaliador inexperiente e de 0,72 a 0,95 e (0,67?? a 4,31??) para o avaliador experiente. No movimento de abdu????o inter-dias os valores variaram de 0,33 a 0,91 e (0,74?? a 6,60??) para o avaliador inexperiente e de 0,72 a 0,98 e (0,73?? a 5,01??) para o avaliador experiente. Apresentando a reprodutibilidade do avaliador inexperiente de fraca a excelente no movimento de flex??o do bra??o e pobre a excelente na abdu????o do bra??o. A reprodutibilidade para o avaliador experiente foi de boa a excelente para a flex??o e abdu????o do bra??o entre os segmentos da esc??pula, ??mero e tronco em adultos saud??veis. Mostrando que n??o h?? diferen??a entre avaliadores nas avalia????es intra-dia, por??m inter-dias o avaliador experiente obteve melhores resultados de reprodutibilidade, mostrando que a diferen??a de n??veis de experi??ncia entre os avaliadores ?? de fundamental import??ncia para se ter resultados reprodut??veis em diferentes dias. Entretanto devemos ressaltar a import??ncia de mais estudos serem realizados, com diferentes movimentos e pacientes, realizados por dois ou mais avaliadores.Submitted by Nadir Basilio (nadirsb@uninove.br) on 2018-07-23T18:20:19Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Diogo Henrique Magalh??es Gon??alves.pdf: 1521507 bytes, checksum: 0d42f8a3b94345ef905deb7a85a90628 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-23T18:20:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Diogo Henrique Magalh??es Gon??alves.pdf: 1521507 bytes, checksum: 0d42f8a3b94345ef905deb7a85a90628 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-12-07application/pdfporUniversidade Nove de JulhoPrograma de P??s-Gradua????o em Ci??ncias da Reabilita????oUNINOVEBrasilSa??dereprodutibilidadecinem??ticaesc??pulatronco??meroavaliadoresexperienteinexperientereproducibilitykinematicsscapulahumerustrunkevaluatorsexperiencedinexperiencedCIENCIAS DA SAUDEReprodutibilidade da cinem??tica da esc??pula, ??mero e tronco em adultos saud??veis, comparando as avalia????es entre os avaliadores experiente e inexperienteReliability of scapula, humerus and trunk kinematics in healthy adults, comparing the evaluations between experienced and inexperienced evaluatorsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis8765449414823306929600info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninoveinstname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEORIGINALDiogo Henrique Magalh??es Gon??alves.pdfDiogo Henrique Magalh??es Gon??alves.pdfapplication/pdf1521507http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1900/2/Diogo+Henrique+Magalh%C3%A3es+Gon%C3%A7alves.pdf0d42f8a3b94345ef905deb7a85a90628MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1900/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51tede/19002018-07-23 15:20:19.227oai:localhost: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/PRIhttp://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/oai/requestbibliotecatede@uninove.br||bibliotecatede@uninove.bropendoar:2018-07-23T18:20:19Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Reprodutibilidade da cinem??tica da esc??pula, ??mero e tronco em adultos saud??veis, comparando as avalia????es entre os avaliadores experiente e inexperiente |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Reliability of scapula, humerus and trunk kinematics in healthy adults, comparing the evaluations between experienced and inexperienced evaluators |
title |
Reprodutibilidade da cinem??tica da esc??pula, ??mero e tronco em adultos saud??veis, comparando as avalia????es entre os avaliadores experiente e inexperiente |
spellingShingle |
Reprodutibilidade da cinem??tica da esc??pula, ??mero e tronco em adultos saud??veis, comparando as avalia????es entre os avaliadores experiente e inexperiente Gon??alves, Diogo Henrique Magalh??es reprodutibilidade cinem??tica esc??pula tronco ??mero avaliadores experiente inexperiente reproducibility kinematics scapula humerus trunk evaluators experienced inexperienced CIENCIAS DA SAUDE |
title_short |
Reprodutibilidade da cinem??tica da esc??pula, ??mero e tronco em adultos saud??veis, comparando as avalia????es entre os avaliadores experiente e inexperiente |
title_full |
Reprodutibilidade da cinem??tica da esc??pula, ??mero e tronco em adultos saud??veis, comparando as avalia????es entre os avaliadores experiente e inexperiente |
title_fullStr |
Reprodutibilidade da cinem??tica da esc??pula, ??mero e tronco em adultos saud??veis, comparando as avalia????es entre os avaliadores experiente e inexperiente |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reprodutibilidade da cinem??tica da esc??pula, ??mero e tronco em adultos saud??veis, comparando as avalia????es entre os avaliadores experiente e inexperiente |
title_sort |
Reprodutibilidade da cinem??tica da esc??pula, ??mero e tronco em adultos saud??veis, comparando as avalia????es entre os avaliadores experiente e inexperiente |
author |
Gon??alves, Diogo Henrique Magalh??es |
author_facet |
Gon??alves, Diogo Henrique Magalh??es |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Lucareli, Paulo Roberto Garcia |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
Politti, Fabiano |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Lucareli, Paulo Roberto Garcia |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Lanza, Fernanda de Cordoba |
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
Camargo, Paula Rezende |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6214142384176087 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gon??alves, Diogo Henrique Magalh??es |
contributor_str_mv |
Lucareli, Paulo Roberto Garcia Politti, Fabiano Lucareli, Paulo Roberto Garcia Lanza, Fernanda de Cordoba Camargo, Paula Rezende |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
reprodutibilidade cinem??tica esc??pula tronco ??mero avaliadores experiente inexperiente |
topic |
reprodutibilidade cinem??tica esc??pula tronco ??mero avaliadores experiente inexperiente reproducibility kinematics scapula humerus trunk evaluators experienced inexperienced CIENCIAS DA SAUDE |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
reproducibility kinematics scapula humerus trunk evaluators experienced inexperienced |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE |
description |
The reproducibility of scapular kinematics has already been tested intra- and inter-sessions and intra- and inter-days, however, these evaluations were only performed by experienced evaluators and the majority of studies included only one evaluator. Thus, the comparison between evaluators with different levels of experience has not yet been explored, leaving doubts as to the accuracy of the evaluation results when performed by different evaluators. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the reproducibility inter and intra-rater, experienced and inexperienced, during flexion and abduction movements of the arm for the scapula, humerus, and trunk segments. Kinematic data were captured during flexion and abduction movements of the arm using a system of 8 cameras and a sampling frequency of 120 Hz. In total, twenty healthy volunteers were evaluated (10 men and 10 women), with an average age of 25.1 (1.1) years, who underwent 6 sessions of movement analysis. Each evaluator carried out three sessions, two sessions on the first day, with a three-hour interval between them, and the third session on the second day, twenty-four hours after the first day. For each session, 5 repetitions of each movement, unilateral abduction and flexion of the arm, were performed. Statistical analysis was performed by an independent evaluator and the Shapiro-Wilk test was used for data distribution. The reproducibility of the range of motion and angular values at angles of 30??, 60??, 90??, and 120?? was verified through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard measurement error (SEM). The values obtained for the angles 30??, 60??, 90??, and 120?? intra-day ranged from 0.67-0.98 and (0.58?? to 5.64??) for the inexperienced evaluator and from 0.67?? to 0.98?? and (0.64?? to 6.17??) for the experienced evaluator in the flexion movement. During the abduction movement the values obtained at angles of 30??, 60??, 90??, and 120?? intra-day ranged from 0.75?? to 0.96?? and (0.51?? to 4.93??) for the inexperienced evaluator and from 0.62?? to 0.97?? and (0.66?? to 6.58??) for the experienced evaluator. The model presented good to excellent intra-day reproducibility for both evaluators in the flexion and abduction movements of the arm. Inter-day values in flexion varied from 0.41?? to 0.88?? and (0.64?? to 6.17??) for the inexperienced evaluator and 0.72?? to 0.95?? and (0.67?? to 4.31??) for the experienced evaluator. In the inter-day abduction movement, values ranged from 0.33?? to 0.91?? and (0.74?? to 6.60??) for the inexperienced evaluator and 0.72?? to 0.98?? and (0.73?? to 5.01??) for the experienced evaluator. The reproducibility of the inexperienced evaluator presented from weak to excellent in the arm flexion movement and poor to excellent in abduction of the arm. The reproducibility for the experienced evaluator was good to excellent for flexion and abduction of the arm between the scapula, humerus, and trunk segments in healthy adults. The results showed that there is no difference between evaluators in the intra-day evaluations; however, on an inter-day basis the experienced evaluator obtained better reproducibility results, demonstrating that a difference in levels of experience between evaluators is of fundamental importance to obtain reproducible results on different days. However, we emphasize the importance of performing further studies, with different movements and patients, performed by two or more evaluators. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-07 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-07-23T18:20:19Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Gon??alves, Diogo Henrique Magalh??es. Reprodutibilidade da cinem??tica da esc??pula, ??mero e tronco em adultos saud??veis, comparando as avalia????es entre os avaliadores experiente e inexperiente. 2016. 89 f. Disserta????o( Programa de P??s-Gradua????o em Ci??ncias da Reabilita????o) - Universidade Nove de Julho, S??o Paulo. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/handle/tede/1900 |
identifier_str_mv |
Gon??alves, Diogo Henrique Magalh??es. Reprodutibilidade da cinem??tica da esc??pula, ??mero e tronco em adultos saud??veis, comparando as avalia????es entre os avaliadores experiente e inexperiente. 2016. 89 f. Disserta????o( Programa de P??s-Gradua????o em Ci??ncias da Reabilita????o) - Universidade Nove de Julho, S??o Paulo. |
url |
http://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/handle/tede/1900 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
8765449414823306929 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de P??s-Gradua????o em Ci??ncias da Reabilita????o |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UNINOVE |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Sa??de |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) instacron:UNINOVE |
instname_str |
Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
instacron_str |
UNINOVE |
institution |
UNINOVE |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1900/2/Diogo+Henrique+Magalh%C3%A3es+Gon%C3%A7alves.pdf http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1900/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
0d42f8a3b94345ef905deb7a85a90628 bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bibliotecatede@uninove.br||bibliotecatede@uninove.br |
_version_ |
1797250755781984256 |