Autoria: as injunções do jogo significante
Ano de defesa: | 2015 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Linguística Aplicada e Estudos da Linguagem
|
Departamento: |
Lingüística
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/13769 |
Resumo: | This thesis retakes the issue of authorship, discussed in the text of Michel Foucault ([1969] 2002), "What is an author?" The aim is to (re)put the issue of authorship from another angle, not determined only by the imaginary vertex, where the author is situated as the origin of his act. Foucault, albeit in another position, discussing the author's notion undermines the identification/strict linkage and traditional between author and individual proposing the authorfunction for inspecting relationship between the author and the text. For that, it considered that the statement of indifference is an immanent rule of contemporary writing. A writing that, according to Foucault, is not obliged with an interiority, since it's "set of signs headed fewer by its content meaning that by nature itself of the signifier" (Foucault, [1969] 2002). Two reasons explored in this thesis delimit the meaning of "indifference" in Foucault's work: (1) the writing has freed up to connecting to a subjective expression - it only refers to itself; (2) the writing is related to the death. To observe the operation of this set of signs, when discussing authorship, parts it from the reading language while system described by Saussure ([1916] 2006), seeking to raise: (1) "as Foucault articulates the relation with the exterior of speech and language that only knows its own order (laws of internal reference of the language)" ?; (2) How relates set of signs and the nature of the signifier? and (3) "the Saussurian concept of the language, defined as" value system "is present in Foucault's discussion of the authorship?". The answers to these questions were related to the theoretical framework established by the Research Group Acquisition, disease and clinical language (LAEL-Derdic / CNPq), that Prof. Dra. Maria Francisca Lier-DeVitto and Prof. Dra. Lucia Arantes are coordinators. The importance attributed to there to its own language and the significant allowed a differentiated reading with respect to Foucault's discussions, second a target other than represented a return to Saussure (MILNER, 2002) in the 1980s. The nature of significant pointed to constitutive tensions and to a faulty connection in the articulation of a work or a text to a subject - there is non-coincidence of the subject with himself, and also non-coincidence of him with his writing. The focus on significant (and not in the meaning), where there is an emphasis on laws of internal reference of language (and not in the discursive externality), demanded differences from the discussion of the issue of authorship, indicating advances and limitations in its questioning by the philosopher |
id |
PUC_SP-1_0f210b9e46056a94881f5c8571b92d03 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/13769 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Lier-DeVitto, Maria Franciscahttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4772292U4Santos, Maria Aparecida dos2016-04-28T18:23:10Z2015-11-132015-09-29Santos, Maria Aparecida dos. Autoria: as injunções do jogo significante. 2015. 99 f. Tese (Doutorado em Lingüística) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2015.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/13769This thesis retakes the issue of authorship, discussed in the text of Michel Foucault ([1969] 2002), "What is an author?" The aim is to (re)put the issue of authorship from another angle, not determined only by the imaginary vertex, where the author is situated as the origin of his act. Foucault, albeit in another position, discussing the author's notion undermines the identification/strict linkage and traditional between author and individual proposing the authorfunction for inspecting relationship between the author and the text. For that, it considered that the statement of indifference is an immanent rule of contemporary writing. A writing that, according to Foucault, is not obliged with an interiority, since it's "set of signs headed fewer by its content meaning that by nature itself of the signifier" (Foucault, [1969] 2002). Two reasons explored in this thesis delimit the meaning of "indifference" in Foucault's work: (1) the writing has freed up to connecting to a subjective expression - it only refers to itself; (2) the writing is related to the death. To observe the operation of this set of signs, when discussing authorship, parts it from the reading language while system described by Saussure ([1916] 2006), seeking to raise: (1) "as Foucault articulates the relation with the exterior of speech and language that only knows its own order (laws of internal reference of the language)" ?; (2) How relates set of signs and the nature of the signifier? and (3) "the Saussurian concept of the language, defined as" value system "is present in Foucault's discussion of the authorship?". The answers to these questions were related to the theoretical framework established by the Research Group Acquisition, disease and clinical language (LAEL-Derdic / CNPq), that Prof. Dra. Maria Francisca Lier-DeVitto and Prof. Dra. Lucia Arantes are coordinators. The importance attributed to there to its own language and the significant allowed a differentiated reading with respect to Foucault's discussions, second a target other than represented a return to Saussure (MILNER, 2002) in the 1980s. The nature of significant pointed to constitutive tensions and to a faulty connection in the articulation of a work or a text to a subject - there is non-coincidence of the subject with himself, and also non-coincidence of him with his writing. The focus on significant (and not in the meaning), where there is an emphasis on laws of internal reference of language (and not in the discursive externality), demanded differences from the discussion of the issue of authorship, indicating advances and limitations in its questioning by the philosopherEsta tese retoma a questão da autoria, abordada no texto de Michel Foucault ([1969] 2002): O que é um autor? . O objetivo é (re) colocar a problemática da autoria por outro ângulo, não determinado unicamente pelo vértice do imaginário, em que o autor se encontra situado como origem de seu ato. Foucault, ainda que de outra posição, ao discutir a noção de autor, abala a identificação/ligação estreita e tradicional entre autor e indivíduo, ao propor a função-autor para o exame das relações entre o autor e o texto. Para tanto, considerou que na indiferença do enunciado encontra-se uma regra imanente da escrita contemporânea. Uma escrita que, segundo Foucault, não se obriga com uma interioridade, já que é jogo de signos comandado menos por seu conteúdo significado do que pela própria natureza do significante (FOUCAULT, [1969]2002). Dois motivos explorados nesta tese circunscrevem o sentido de indiferença na obra de Foucault: (1) a escrita libertou-se da ligação a uma expressão subjetiva - ela só se refere a si própria; (2) a escrita tem parentesco com a morte. Para observar o funcionamento deste jogo de signos, quando se discute autoria, parte-se da leitura da língua enquanto sistema descrito por Saussure ([1916] 2006), buscando levantar: (1) como Foucault articula a relação com a exterioridade do discurso e a língua, que só conhece sua ordem própria (as leis de referência interna da linguagem)?; (2) De que modo relaciona jogo de signos e a natureza do significante? e (3) o conceito saussuriano de a língua, definida como sistema de valores está presente na discussão foucaultiana sobre a autoria? As respostas a esses questionamentos foram relacionados ao referencial teórico estabelecido pelo Grupo de Pesquisa Aquisição, patologias e clínica de linguagem (LAELDerdic/ CNPq), de que a Profa. Dra. Maria Francisca Lier-DeVitto e a Profa. Dra. Lúcia Arantes são coordenadoras. A importância ali atribuída à ordem própria da língua e ao significante permitiu uma leitura diferenciada em relação às discussões de Foucault, segunda uma visada outra do que representou o retorno a Saussure (MILNER, 2002) nos anos de 1980. A natureza do significante apontou para tensões constitutivas e para uma relação faltosa na articulação de uma obra ou texto a um sujeito há não-coincidência do sujeito consigo mesmo, e também não-coincidência dele com sua escrita. A aposta no significante (e não no significado), em que há ênfase nas leis de referência interna da linguagem (e não na exterioridade discursiva), demandaram diferenças em relação à discussão da questão da autoria, indicando avanços e limitações em sua problematização pelo filósofoapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/30548/Maria%20Aparecida%20dos%20Santos.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Linguística Aplicada e Estudos da LinguagemPUC-SPBRLingüísticaAutoriaLínguaInjunções significantesAuthorshipLanguageSignificant injunctionsCNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA::LINGUISTICA APLICADAAutoria: as injunções do jogo significanteinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTMaria Aparecida dos Santos.pdf.txtMaria Aparecida dos Santos.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain214623https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/13769/3/Maria%20Aparecida%20dos%20Santos.pdf.txt59e7ae26c9c7c9f29400b542a3de34e9MD53ORIGINALMaria Aparecida dos Santos.pdfapplication/pdf308091https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/13769/1/Maria%20Aparecida%20dos%20Santos.pdf3660b2d9e157cc28c8e2f02c049970b6MD51THUMBNAILMaria Aparecida dos Santos.pdf.jpgMaria Aparecida dos Santos.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1943https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/13769/2/Maria%20Aparecida%20dos%20Santos.pdf.jpgcc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2MD52handle/137692022-04-27 22:40:05.358oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/13769Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-04-28T01:40:05Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Autoria: as injunções do jogo significante |
title |
Autoria: as injunções do jogo significante |
spellingShingle |
Autoria: as injunções do jogo significante Santos, Maria Aparecida dos Autoria Língua Injunções significantes Authorship Language Significant injunctions CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA::LINGUISTICA APLICADA |
title_short |
Autoria: as injunções do jogo significante |
title_full |
Autoria: as injunções do jogo significante |
title_fullStr |
Autoria: as injunções do jogo significante |
title_full_unstemmed |
Autoria: as injunções do jogo significante |
title_sort |
Autoria: as injunções do jogo significante |
author |
Santos, Maria Aparecida dos |
author_facet |
Santos, Maria Aparecida dos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Lier-DeVitto, Maria Francisca |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4772292U4 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Maria Aparecida dos |
contributor_str_mv |
Lier-DeVitto, Maria Francisca |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Autoria Língua Injunções significantes |
topic |
Autoria Língua Injunções significantes Authorship Language Significant injunctions CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA::LINGUISTICA APLICADA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Authorship Language Significant injunctions |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA::LINGUISTICA APLICADA |
description |
This thesis retakes the issue of authorship, discussed in the text of Michel Foucault ([1969] 2002), "What is an author?" The aim is to (re)put the issue of authorship from another angle, not determined only by the imaginary vertex, where the author is situated as the origin of his act. Foucault, albeit in another position, discussing the author's notion undermines the identification/strict linkage and traditional between author and individual proposing the authorfunction for inspecting relationship between the author and the text. For that, it considered that the statement of indifference is an immanent rule of contemporary writing. A writing that, according to Foucault, is not obliged with an interiority, since it's "set of signs headed fewer by its content meaning that by nature itself of the signifier" (Foucault, [1969] 2002). Two reasons explored in this thesis delimit the meaning of "indifference" in Foucault's work: (1) the writing has freed up to connecting to a subjective expression - it only refers to itself; (2) the writing is related to the death. To observe the operation of this set of signs, when discussing authorship, parts it from the reading language while system described by Saussure ([1916] 2006), seeking to raise: (1) "as Foucault articulates the relation with the exterior of speech and language that only knows its own order (laws of internal reference of the language)" ?; (2) How relates set of signs and the nature of the signifier? and (3) "the Saussurian concept of the language, defined as" value system "is present in Foucault's discussion of the authorship?". The answers to these questions were related to the theoretical framework established by the Research Group Acquisition, disease and clinical language (LAEL-Derdic / CNPq), that Prof. Dra. Maria Francisca Lier-DeVitto and Prof. Dra. Lucia Arantes are coordinators. The importance attributed to there to its own language and the significant allowed a differentiated reading with respect to Foucault's discussions, second a target other than represented a return to Saussure (MILNER, 2002) in the 1980s. The nature of significant pointed to constitutive tensions and to a faulty connection in the articulation of a work or a text to a subject - there is non-coincidence of the subject with himself, and also non-coincidence of him with his writing. The focus on significant (and not in the meaning), where there is an emphasis on laws of internal reference of language (and not in the discursive externality), demanded differences from the discussion of the issue of authorship, indicating advances and limitations in its questioning by the philosopher |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2015-11-13 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2015-09-29 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-28T18:23:10Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Maria Aparecida dos. Autoria: as injunções do jogo significante. 2015. 99 f. Tese (Doutorado em Lingüística) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2015. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/13769 |
identifier_str_mv |
Santos, Maria Aparecida dos. Autoria: as injunções do jogo significante. 2015. 99 f. Tese (Doutorado em Lingüística) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2015. |
url |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/13769 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Linguística Aplicada e Estudos da Linguagem |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUC-SP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Lingüística |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/13769/3/Maria%20Aparecida%20dos%20Santos.pdf.txt https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/13769/1/Maria%20Aparecida%20dos%20Santos.pdf https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/13769/2/Maria%20Aparecida%20dos%20Santos.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
59e7ae26c9c7c9f29400b542a3de34e9 3660b2d9e157cc28c8e2f02c049970b6 cc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br |
_version_ |
1793424110560215040 |