Na frequência do poder: radiodifusão no Brasil

• Ano de defesa: 2011
• Autor(a) principal: Correia, Genira Chagas
• Orientador(a): Chaia, Vera Lúcia Michalany
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Ciências Sociais
• Departamento: Ciências Sociais
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Radiodifusão; Poder; Outorgas; Audiência
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Broadcasting; Political power; Grants; Audience
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/3289

Starting from the legislation as the conducting wire, this research puts in question the power influences that permeate the grants distribution of authorization/concession to Brazilian broadcasting. Because of a methodological issue, this research emphasizes four main events, whose analyses correspond to the determined chapters: signing of decree 20.407 in 1931; promulgation of Law 4.117 in 1962; Federal Constitution of 1988 and publishing of General Broadcasting Law in 1997. It was used as a principal that the political control of the grants influences the limitation of symbolical exchanges in quotidian manifestations of audience. To John B. Thompson, main theorist used in this research, individuals are continuously involved in communication with each other and in the exchange of symbolical content information . To the author, these exchanges, produced and reproduced by electronic means of dissemination are covered with ideological characteristics. The empirical research comprehends a historical survey of legislation and the reasons why it was instituted. To confirm this hypothesis, public and private collections were gone through, including on-line sources and periodicals. Many interviews were also made to compensate for the lack of information about Brazilian broadcasting. The trajectory of the thesis showed that the Estate is effectively the paradigm of political power, always apt to legislate for the ideas´ control. The majority of the concessionaries showed how to dribble the coercive acts, constituting themselves in strength similar to Estate. In order to do that, they count on primordial support of parliamentary broadcasters. To be plural and contemporary, national electronic broadcast media needs a legislation that contemplates new technologies and social cravings