Habilidades metafonológicas e aprendizagem da linguagem escrita: um estudo com crianças da 4ª série do ensino fundamental

• Ano de defesa: 2009
• Autor(a) principal: Silva, Flávia Renata Alves da
• Orientador(a): Maluf, Maria Regina
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação: Psicologia da Educação
• Departamento: Psicologia
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Habilidades metafonológicas; Aprendizagem da linguagem escrita; Alfabetizacao; Aprendizagem; Criancas > Escrita; Compreensao na leitura; Metalinguagem
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Metalanguage; Metaphonological abilities; Writing language learning; Alphabetization
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO::FUNDAMENTOS DA EDUCACAO::PSICOLOGIA EDUCACIONAL
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/16515

The purpose of the present research was to check whether there is a relation between the learning of writing ability and the metaphonological abilities in fourth grade children ( Ensino Fundamental ). The study was conducted in a state public school located in the suburban area of São Paulo city and it consisted of two steps. In the first step, 140 fourth graders were selected. They were 74 boys and 66 girls from 9 to 12 years old; they had their writing ability evaluated through a dictation containing 60 words (TEP) and also had one exercise that evaluated their sentence reading and comprehension (TCL). The results showed that the writing ability of those 140 students is inefficient; in the writing ability evaluation (TEP), from the 8,400 words that could be written, only 31,76% were written in an orthographic level, 37,42% involved mistakes that do not disturb phonological processing, which suggests that the orthographic rules are unknown, and 30,82% words involved mistakes that disturb phonological processing, which points out that the alphabetical principle was not acquired. After analyzing those results, two groups of students were selected: G1 compounded by 20 students who had good performance and G2 compounded by 20 students who had poor performance in the previous evaluations (TEP and TCL). In the second step of the study, those two groups had their metaphonological abilities evaluated and also had an interview. During such interview, the children described how they learned reading and how they were assisted in that learning. According to the results, the students who showed developed writing ability also showed metaphonological abilities, and the students who had difficulties in their writing ability did not show developed metaphonological abilities, which supports the previous hypotheses