A proteção da dignidade da pessoa humana como causa justificadora para uma intervenção internacional institucional
Ano de defesa: | 2018 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Ciências Sociais
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Sociais
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21485 |
Resumo: | During the last two decades, the matter of States’ internal conflicts has been becoming important as well as their adverse consequences, which come from the survival conditions of their populations, bringing the discussion of a theme which, for a long time, has been deserving the attention of International Relations and International Law scholars and which consists of the pursuit of a system composed of principles and rules meant to promote, in the broadest way possible, the protection and defence of dignity and rights of the human person. Associated to this matter and to its corollary, there is place for one of the most burning and controversial themes of politics and international relations, which is the admissibility of interventions practiced by States and International Organizations in States in which situations of flagrant contempt of the minimal conditions of human dignity can be verified. The discussion around an intervention undertaken on the conditions already mentioned before is inserted in a broader debate involving two significant issues about international relations, which are State’s sovereignty and legitimacy of humanitarian interventions. The classical concept of sovereignty states that it means absolute power of the State over people and things within its territory and, in this sense, an intervention in a particular State, even if aimed towards humanitarian ends, would represent an affront to its sovereignty. During the last two decades, however, by the proliferation of internal conflicts in several States, discussion has arisen on whether the State, in the name of its sovereignty, had the right to inflict suffering and, in many cases, even to kill its population. In 2001, the United Nations (UN), upon the study of a specialized commission, released the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine. According to this doctrine, the State is responsible for giving protection and assistance to its population and if, somehow, it does not comply with its obligation or is incapable of doing so, the international community will supply this State’s deficiency, intervening in order to reorganize it, restoring peace and stability to its population. According to the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine, State’s sovereignty, formerly seen as a State’s “right”, becomes its “responsibility” to protect its population. As it is seen, the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine has a double objective: 1) it grants the first responsibility to protect its population to the respective State; 2) it enables, additionally, the UN’s intervention in this State, as an institution representing the international community. The alluded doctrine comes to support a mechanism from the UN’s Letter, which forbids the intervention practiced in a State, unilaterally, by another State or by groups of States, without a warrant from that entity. Therefore, it is through the sense of dignity as a human person’s essence, as his or her intrinsic value, that it is developed, in the present work, the idea that every aggression to this fundamental value, coming from the own State, coming from radical groups established in it, is framed as an international illegal act. In this sense, the UN, with all its flaws and imperfections, is still the representative body of international community. Thus, the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine can be considered a significant step towards the search for means and instruments, which legitimize and justify humanitarian interventions |
id |
PUC_SP-1_8649945e11f82414ce4b9a4f85409c75 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/21485 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Nunes, Edisonhttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4332167Z3Grisi Neto, Afonso2018-10-10T10:09:16Z2018-09-10Grisi Neto, Afonso. A proteção da dignidade da pessoa humana como causa justificadora para uma intervenção internacional institucional. 2018. 162 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Sociais) – Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Ciências Sociais, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2018.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21485During the last two decades, the matter of States’ internal conflicts has been becoming important as well as their adverse consequences, which come from the survival conditions of their populations, bringing the discussion of a theme which, for a long time, has been deserving the attention of International Relations and International Law scholars and which consists of the pursuit of a system composed of principles and rules meant to promote, in the broadest way possible, the protection and defence of dignity and rights of the human person. Associated to this matter and to its corollary, there is place for one of the most burning and controversial themes of politics and international relations, which is the admissibility of interventions practiced by States and International Organizations in States in which situations of flagrant contempt of the minimal conditions of human dignity can be verified. The discussion around an intervention undertaken on the conditions already mentioned before is inserted in a broader debate involving two significant issues about international relations, which are State’s sovereignty and legitimacy of humanitarian interventions. The classical concept of sovereignty states that it means absolute power of the State over people and things within its territory and, in this sense, an intervention in a particular State, even if aimed towards humanitarian ends, would represent an affront to its sovereignty. During the last two decades, however, by the proliferation of internal conflicts in several States, discussion has arisen on whether the State, in the name of its sovereignty, had the right to inflict suffering and, in many cases, even to kill its population. In 2001, the United Nations (UN), upon the study of a specialized commission, released the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine. According to this doctrine, the State is responsible for giving protection and assistance to its population and if, somehow, it does not comply with its obligation or is incapable of doing so, the international community will supply this State’s deficiency, intervening in order to reorganize it, restoring peace and stability to its population. According to the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine, State’s sovereignty, formerly seen as a State’s “right”, becomes its “responsibility” to protect its population. As it is seen, the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine has a double objective: 1) it grants the first responsibility to protect its population to the respective State; 2) it enables, additionally, the UN’s intervention in this State, as an institution representing the international community. The alluded doctrine comes to support a mechanism from the UN’s Letter, which forbids the intervention practiced in a State, unilaterally, by another State or by groups of States, without a warrant from that entity. Therefore, it is through the sense of dignity as a human person’s essence, as his or her intrinsic value, that it is developed, in the present work, the idea that every aggression to this fundamental value, coming from the own State, coming from radical groups established in it, is framed as an international illegal act. In this sense, the UN, with all its flaws and imperfections, is still the representative body of international community. Thus, the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine can be considered a significant step towards the search for means and instruments, which legitimize and justify humanitarian interventionsNas duas últimas décadas, vem ganhando vulto a questão dos conflitos internos dos Estados e das nefastas consequências deles advindas quanto às condições de sobrevivência de suas populações, trazendo à discussão um tema que de há muito vem merecendo a atenção de estudiosos das Relações Internacionais e do Direito Internacional e que consiste na busca de um sistema de princípios e normas destinado a promover, da forma mais ampla possível, a proteção e a defesa da dignidade e dos diretos da pessoa humana. Associada a essa questão e como seu corolário, tem lugar um dos temas mais candentes e polêmicos da política e das relações internacionais, que é o da admissibilidade de intervenções levadas a efeito por Estados e por Organizações Internacionais em Estados nos quais se verifique situações de flagrante vilipêndio das condições mínimas de dignidade humana. A discussão em torno de uma intervenção empreendida nas condições antes referidas insere-se em um debate mais amplo envolvendo duas questões de relevo nas relações internacionais, quais sejam, a soberania do Estado e a legitimidade das intervenções humanitárias. O conceito clássico de soberania diz que esta significa o poder absoluto do Estado sobre as pessoas e coisas dentro de seu território e, nesse sentido, uma intervenção em determinado Estado, ainda que levada a efeito com fins humanitários, representaria uma afronta a sua soberania. Nas duas últimas décadas, no entanto, com a proliferação dos conflitos internos em diversos Estados, passou-se a discutir se o Estado, em nome de sua soberania, tinha o direito de infligir sofrimento e, em muitos casos, até de matar sua população. Em 2001, a Organização das Nações Unidas (ONU), após o estudo de uma comissão especializada, lança a doutrina da “Responsabilidade de Proteger”. Segundo essa doutrina, compete ao Estado dar proteção e assistência a sua população e se, de algum modo, aquele não cumprir com esta obrigação ou não tiver condições de fazê-lo, a comunidade internacional suprirá essa deficiência do Estado, intervindo neste para o fim de reorganizá-lo, devolvendo a paz e a estabilidade a sua população. De acordo com a doutrina da “Responsabilidade de Proteger”, a soberania do Estado, antes entendida como um “direito” do Estado, passa a ser uma “responsabilidade” deste de proteger sua população. Como se vê, a doutrina da “Responsabilidade de Proteger” visa a um duplo objetivo: 1) confere a responsabilidade primeira de proteger sua população ao respectivo Estado; 2) permite, subsidiariamente, a intervenção por parte da ONU nesse Estado, como instituição representativa da comunidade internacional. A aludida doutrina vem corroborar dispositivo da Carta da ONU, que veda a intervenção levada a efeito em um Estado, unilateralmente, por outro Estado ou por grupos de Estados, sem mandato daquela entidade. Portanto, é na acepção de dignidade como essência da pessoa humana, como seu valor intrínseco, que se desenvolve, no presente trabalho, a ideia de que toda agressão a esse valor fundamental, seja por parte do próprio Estado, seja por parte de grupos radicais nele estabelecidos, configura um ilícito internacional. Nesse sentido, a ONU, com todos os seus defeitos e imperfeições, ainda continua a ser o órgão representativo da comunidade internacional. Desse modo, a doutrina da “Responsabilidade de Proteger” pode ser considerada um passo significativo na busca de meios e instrumentos que legitimem e justifiquem as intervenções humanitáriasapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/46870/Afonso%20Grisi%20Neto.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Ciências SociaisPUC-SPBrasilFaculdade de Ciências SociaisDireitos humanosDignidade da pessoa humanaIntervenção humanitáriaHuman rightsHuman person’s dignityHumanitarian interventionCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADASA proteção da dignidade da pessoa humana como causa justificadora para uma intervenção internacional institucionalThe protection of the human person’s dignity as a justifying cause for an institutional international interventioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTAfonso Grisi Neto.pdf.txtAfonso Grisi Neto.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain464941https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21485/4/Afonso%20Grisi%20Neto.pdf.txtb96ea86768fef766e289454c130c60f0MD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21485/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALAfonso Grisi Neto.pdfAfonso Grisi Neto.pdfapplication/pdf1029283https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21485/2/Afonso%20Grisi%20Neto.pdf76d2cd12bd98dbcca2078f9ceea836f5MD52THUMBNAILAfonso Grisi Neto.pdf.jpgAfonso Grisi Neto.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1943https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21485/3/Afonso%20Grisi%20Neto.pdf.jpgcc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2MD53handle/214852022-04-28 15:53:44.985oai:repositorio.pucsp.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-04-28T18:53:44Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
A proteção da dignidade da pessoa humana como causa justificadora para uma intervenção internacional institucional |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
The protection of the human person’s dignity as a justifying cause for an institutional international intervention |
title |
A proteção da dignidade da pessoa humana como causa justificadora para uma intervenção internacional institucional |
spellingShingle |
A proteção da dignidade da pessoa humana como causa justificadora para uma intervenção internacional institucional Grisi Neto, Afonso Direitos humanos Dignidade da pessoa humana Intervenção humanitária Human rights Human person’s dignity Humanitarian intervention CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS |
title_short |
A proteção da dignidade da pessoa humana como causa justificadora para uma intervenção internacional institucional |
title_full |
A proteção da dignidade da pessoa humana como causa justificadora para uma intervenção internacional institucional |
title_fullStr |
A proteção da dignidade da pessoa humana como causa justificadora para uma intervenção internacional institucional |
title_full_unstemmed |
A proteção da dignidade da pessoa humana como causa justificadora para uma intervenção internacional institucional |
title_sort |
A proteção da dignidade da pessoa humana como causa justificadora para uma intervenção internacional institucional |
author |
Grisi Neto, Afonso |
author_facet |
Grisi Neto, Afonso |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Nunes, Edison |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4332167Z3 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Grisi Neto, Afonso |
contributor_str_mv |
Nunes, Edison |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direitos humanos Dignidade da pessoa humana Intervenção humanitária |
topic |
Direitos humanos Dignidade da pessoa humana Intervenção humanitária Human rights Human person’s dignity Humanitarian intervention CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Human rights Human person’s dignity Humanitarian intervention |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS |
description |
During the last two decades, the matter of States’ internal conflicts has been becoming important as well as their adverse consequences, which come from the survival conditions of their populations, bringing the discussion of a theme which, for a long time, has been deserving the attention of International Relations and International Law scholars and which consists of the pursuit of a system composed of principles and rules meant to promote, in the broadest way possible, the protection and defence of dignity and rights of the human person. Associated to this matter and to its corollary, there is place for one of the most burning and controversial themes of politics and international relations, which is the admissibility of interventions practiced by States and International Organizations in States in which situations of flagrant contempt of the minimal conditions of human dignity can be verified. The discussion around an intervention undertaken on the conditions already mentioned before is inserted in a broader debate involving two significant issues about international relations, which are State’s sovereignty and legitimacy of humanitarian interventions. The classical concept of sovereignty states that it means absolute power of the State over people and things within its territory and, in this sense, an intervention in a particular State, even if aimed towards humanitarian ends, would represent an affront to its sovereignty. During the last two decades, however, by the proliferation of internal conflicts in several States, discussion has arisen on whether the State, in the name of its sovereignty, had the right to inflict suffering and, in many cases, even to kill its population. In 2001, the United Nations (UN), upon the study of a specialized commission, released the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine. According to this doctrine, the State is responsible for giving protection and assistance to its population and if, somehow, it does not comply with its obligation or is incapable of doing so, the international community will supply this State’s deficiency, intervening in order to reorganize it, restoring peace and stability to its population. According to the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine, State’s sovereignty, formerly seen as a State’s “right”, becomes its “responsibility” to protect its population. As it is seen, the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine has a double objective: 1) it grants the first responsibility to protect its population to the respective State; 2) it enables, additionally, the UN’s intervention in this State, as an institution representing the international community. The alluded doctrine comes to support a mechanism from the UN’s Letter, which forbids the intervention practiced in a State, unilaterally, by another State or by groups of States, without a warrant from that entity. Therefore, it is through the sense of dignity as a human person’s essence, as his or her intrinsic value, that it is developed, in the present work, the idea that every aggression to this fundamental value, coming from the own State, coming from radical groups established in it, is framed as an international illegal act. In this sense, the UN, with all its flaws and imperfections, is still the representative body of international community. Thus, the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine can be considered a significant step towards the search for means and instruments, which legitimize and justify humanitarian interventions |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-10T10:09:16Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-10 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Grisi Neto, Afonso. A proteção da dignidade da pessoa humana como causa justificadora para uma intervenção internacional institucional. 2018. 162 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Sociais) – Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Ciências Sociais, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2018. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21485 |
identifier_str_mv |
Grisi Neto, Afonso. A proteção da dignidade da pessoa humana como causa justificadora para uma intervenção internacional institucional. 2018. 162 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Sociais) – Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Ciências Sociais, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2018. |
url |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21485 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Ciências Sociais |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUC-SP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Ciências Sociais |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21485/4/Afonso%20Grisi%20Neto.pdf.txt https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21485/1/license.txt https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21485/2/Afonso%20Grisi%20Neto.pdf https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21485/3/Afonso%20Grisi%20Neto.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
b96ea86768fef766e289454c130c60f0 bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 76d2cd12bd98dbcca2078f9ceea836f5 cc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br |
_version_ |
1793423983863922688 |