Comunicação não Verbal em Situação de Comissão Parlamentar Mista de Inquerito: percepções de Jornalistas e Fonoaudiólogos

• Ano de defesa: 2006
• Autor(a) principal: Martins, Érika Soares de Almeida
• Orientador(a): Andrada e Silva, Marta Assumpção de
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Fonoaudiologia
• Departamento: Fonoaudiologia
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Comunicação não-verbal; Jornalistas; Fonoaudiólogos; Comunicacao nao-verbal; Fonoaudiologos
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Nonverbal communication; Journalists; Speech and hearing therapists
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FONOAUDIOLOGIA
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/12064

Objective: compare the perceptions of journalists and speech and hearing therapists when analyzing nonverbal communication of subjects declaring in a Congressional Committee of Investigation. Method: it was given a nonverbal communication questionnaire to a sample of 30 journalists and 30 speech and hearing therapists, which 10 of the journalists work on television, 10 of them work at radio station, 10 of them work at writing press, 10 of the speech and hearing therapists work on television, 10 of them work with language and 10 of them work with hearing. It was made statistics and discourse analyzes of a dialogic map of communicative approach. Results: speech and hearing therapists who work on TV analyzed generically with almost no specificity when concerning nonverbal elements as well as the journalists who work on TV. Speech and hearing therapists who work with hearing participated attentively of the research and exceeded when analyzing facial expression. Speech and hearing therapists who work with language let themselves be influenced by the context and content. Journalists who work at radio station paid more attention to the body movements when compared to other journalists, this group exceeded among the other groups. Journalists who work with writing press, as well as the speech and hearing therapists and journalists who work on TV also had a generical view, however, they let themselves be less influenced by the context and content. Final considerations: the analyses show that journalists were more efficient filling out the questionnaire when concerning the objective of this research compared to speech and hearing therapists. They also show that it is impossible to separate nonverbal communication of the speech, questioning the fact that many authors, when considering communication, assure that nonverbal communication is responsible for over 50% of the message. The nonverbal communication was mentioned very little considering that the priority was to analyze it.