Autoavaliação a partir da ótica dos gestores de uma instituição de ensino superior

• Ano de defesa: 2014
• Autor(a) principal: Andrade, Nelson Lambert de
• Orientador(a): Abramowicz, Mere
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação: Currículo
• Departamento: Educação
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Autoavaliação; Educação superior; Gestão; Tomada de decisão
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Decision-making; Higher education; Managing; Self-evaluation
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO::CURRICULO
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/9812

The evaluation process of higher education in Brazil, proposed by the national system of higher education evaluation (SINAES / MEC), establishes that the quality of education in higher education institutions (IES) is verified via self-evaluation and external evaluation. This research aims to study the process of institutional self-evaluation, focusing on the decision-making process by the managers, and within the field of evaluation of higher education quality. Object to analyze the role of self-evaluation and their impact on process of decision making, from the results of self-evaluation. As the self-evaluation is carried out by the committee itself Assessment (CPA), the question of this research relied on to investigate whether the managers of an institution of higher learning, located in the south of Minas Gerais, using the results of self-evaluation, the systematic reports (CPA), for making management decisions. methodology was used as an empirical study, which was conducted by interview / questionnaire with six managers in office at IES researched, and a documentary analysis of reports from the CPA, years 2012 and 2013, and official documents SINAES. The research pointed out that the field of evaluation of higher education is fertile territory for discussion of managing the quality of higher education that is regulated by the ten dimensions of SINAES. Highlights the experiences carried out by IES researched because of political evaluation created by Brazil from the 1990s demonstrated further that despite the conservative, technocratic and political connotations of institutional self-evaluation basis, in the face of your recommended formative character by SINAES also has the positive aspect, since it can lead to a continuous improvement of academic management and evaluation processes, if their results are used to stimulate discussion and reflection. Which may contribute to the process of decision making by managers in the management of IES