O papel da argumentação na zona de colaboração e criticidade
Ano de defesa: | 2010 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Linguística Aplicada e Estudos da Linguagem
|
Departamento: |
Lingüística
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/14151 |
Resumo: | This study aims to understand and critically analyze not only the dialogues carried out between teachers and their pedagogical coordinator in pedagogical meetings at an accredited nursery school of the Municipality of São Paulo, but also the dialogues between the researcher-educator and the pedagogical coordinator in talks and reflective sessions, which had the discussion of the role of argumentation in critical teacher education as their main objective. For that purpose, it identifies the arguments that provide the production of a zone of collaboration and criticism as an attempt to help education professionals who are engaged in critical teacher education. The theoretical support for this research has two cores: argumentation (ARISTOTLE, 350 a.C./2005, PERELMAN and OLBRECHTSTYTECA, 1970/2005; BRETON, 2003; MOSCA, 1997/2004, 2005, 2007; OSAKABE, 1999) and critical teacher education (MAGALHÃES, 2009; LIBERALI, 1994, 2008; SCHÖN, 1992; FREIRE, 1970), both supported by the Social-Historical-Cultural Activity Theory, as discussed by Vygotsky (1924/2004, 1930/2007, 1934/2001), Leontiev (1958/1998, 1977, 1978a, 1978b), Engeström (1987, 1999) and Engeström et. al. (1999). This research is inserted in the paradigm of critical collaboration (PCcol), which makes use of action-driven investigation methods in the search for alternatives to the pattern of traditional research, as a way to offer to all participants researcher and groups connected to the research the means to efficiently answer problems of specific contexts, as well as the guidelines for a transforming action (MAGALHÃES, 2003/2007). The discussion of the results was based on selected extracts of interactions between the pedagogical coordinator and the teachers, and the pedagogical coordinator and the researcher, adding up to four activities. This discussion was grounded on the developed categories of analysis, based on Perelman and Olbrechts- Tyteca (1970/2005), Mosca (1997/2004, 2005, 2007) and Liberali (2007, 2008), and on the categories of interpretation, based on Vygotsky (1924/2004, 1930/2007, 1934/2001), Bakhtin (1934-5/1975/2002) and Magalhães (2009). The results show that the connections developed between the subjects of the research made their learning and development possible. Besides, the use of argumentation in educational moments, such as pedagogical meetings, talks and reflective sessions, enabled the production of the zone of collaboration and criticism, leading the participants to question, discuss and transform their actions |
id |
PUC_SP-1_8d141380095c6785a0d3ae4fca9e941e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/14151 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Liberali, Fernanda Coelhohttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4206822Z6Rodrigues, Valquiria dos Santos2016-04-28T18:24:18Z2010-07-282010-05-20Rodrigues, Valquiria dos Santos. The role of argumentation in the zone of collaboration and criticism. 2010. 217 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Lingüística) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2010.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/14151This study aims to understand and critically analyze not only the dialogues carried out between teachers and their pedagogical coordinator in pedagogical meetings at an accredited nursery school of the Municipality of São Paulo, but also the dialogues between the researcher-educator and the pedagogical coordinator in talks and reflective sessions, which had the discussion of the role of argumentation in critical teacher education as their main objective. For that purpose, it identifies the arguments that provide the production of a zone of collaboration and criticism as an attempt to help education professionals who are engaged in critical teacher education. The theoretical support for this research has two cores: argumentation (ARISTOTLE, 350 a.C./2005, PERELMAN and OLBRECHTSTYTECA, 1970/2005; BRETON, 2003; MOSCA, 1997/2004, 2005, 2007; OSAKABE, 1999) and critical teacher education (MAGALHÃES, 2009; LIBERALI, 1994, 2008; SCHÖN, 1992; FREIRE, 1970), both supported by the Social-Historical-Cultural Activity Theory, as discussed by Vygotsky (1924/2004, 1930/2007, 1934/2001), Leontiev (1958/1998, 1977, 1978a, 1978b), Engeström (1987, 1999) and Engeström et. al. (1999). This research is inserted in the paradigm of critical collaboration (PCcol), which makes use of action-driven investigation methods in the search for alternatives to the pattern of traditional research, as a way to offer to all participants researcher and groups connected to the research the means to efficiently answer problems of specific contexts, as well as the guidelines for a transforming action (MAGALHÃES, 2003/2007). The discussion of the results was based on selected extracts of interactions between the pedagogical coordinator and the teachers, and the pedagogical coordinator and the researcher, adding up to four activities. This discussion was grounded on the developed categories of analysis, based on Perelman and Olbrechts- Tyteca (1970/2005), Mosca (1997/2004, 2005, 2007) and Liberali (2007, 2008), and on the categories of interpretation, based on Vygotsky (1924/2004, 1930/2007, 1934/2001), Bakhtin (1934-5/1975/2002) and Magalhães (2009). The results show that the connections developed between the subjects of the research made their learning and development possible. Besides, the use of argumentation in educational moments, such as pedagogical meetings, talks and reflective sessions, enabled the production of the zone of collaboration and criticism, leading the participants to question, discuss and transform their actionsEste estudo propõe compreender e analisar criticamente tanto os diálogos entre uma coordenadora pedagógica e as professoras de uma creche conveniada com a Prefeitura de São Paulo (SP) durante reuniões pedagógicas quanto os diálogos da pesquisadoraformadora com a coordenadora pedagógica durante conversa e sessão reflexiva, objetivando discutir o papel da argumentação na formação crítica de professores. Para tanto, identifica os argumentos que propiciam a produção de uma zona de colaboração e criticidade como uma tentativa de auxiliar os profissionais da educação engajados na formação crítica de professores. A base teórica desta pesquisa tem dois eixos centrais - argumentação (ARISTÓTELES, 350 a.C./2005, PERELMAN e OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, 1970/2005; BRETON, 2003; MOSCA, 1997/2004, 2005, 2007; OSAKABE, 1999) e formação crítica de professores (MAGALHÃES, 2009; LIBERALI, 1994, 2008; SCHÖN, 1992; FREIRE, 1970) - ambos sustentados pela Teoria da Atividade Sócio-Histórico-Cultural como discutida por Vygotsky (1924/2004, 1930/2007, 1934/2001), Leontiev (1958/1998, 1977, 1978a, 1978b), Engeström (1987, 1999) e Engeström et. al. (1999). Esta pesquisa está inserida no paradigma crítico de colaboração (PCcol) que utiliza métodos de investigação orientados pela ação, que buscam alternativas ao padrão de pesquisa convencional com o objetivo de oferecer a todos os participantes - pesquisador e grupos envolvidos - meios de responder eficazmente a problemas dos contextos particulares, bem como diretrizes de uma ação que seja transformadora (MAGALHÃES, 2003/2007). A discussão dos resultados foi realizada com base em excertos selecionados de interações entre a coordenadora pedagógica e as professoras e a coordenadora pedagógica e pesquisadora totalizando quatro atividades. Essa discussão está pautada em categorias de análise desenvolvidas com base em Perelman e Olbrechts-Tyteca (1970/2005), Mosca (1997/2004, 2005, 2007) e Liberali (2007, 2008) e categorias de interpretação definidas com base em Vygotsky (1924/2004, 1930/2007, 1934/2001), Bakhtin (1934-5/1975/2002) e Magalhães (2009). Os resultados revelam que as relações desenvolvidas entre os sujeitos da pesquisa possibilitaram aprendizagem e desenvolvimento de todos. Além disso, o uso da argumentação em momentos de formação (reuniões pedagógicas, conversa e sessão reflexivas) possibilitou a produção da zona de colaboração e criticidade, levando os participantes a questionarem, discutirem e transformarem suas açõesCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/29468/Valquiria%20dos%20Santos%20Rodrigues.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Linguística Aplicada e Estudos da LinguagemPUC-SPBRLingüísticaFormação crítica de educadoresCriticidadeArgumentacaoCriticaProfessores -- Formacao profissionalArgumentationCritical teacher educationCriticismCNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA::LINGUISTICA APLICADAO papel da argumentação na zona de colaboração e criticidadeThe role of argumentation in the zone of collaboration and criticisminfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTValquiria dos Santos Rodrigues.pdf.txtValquiria dos Santos Rodrigues.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain539509https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/14151/3/Valquiria%20dos%20Santos%20Rodrigues.pdf.txtd2f0aee590190dd58be4ad55bd426be3MD53ORIGINALValquiria dos Santos Rodrigues.pdfapplication/pdf23968853https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/14151/1/Valquiria%20dos%20Santos%20Rodrigues.pdf2b2b60cfcb8494f996ba664a78454a53MD51THUMBNAILValquiria dos Santos Rodrigues.pdf.jpgValquiria dos Santos Rodrigues.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2963https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/14151/2/Valquiria%20dos%20Santos%20Rodrigues.pdf.jpg3be49fcf62cda960c074fc6c31228a0fMD52handle/141512022-04-28 08:59:01.198oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/14151Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-04-28T11:59:01Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
O papel da argumentação na zona de colaboração e criticidade |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
The role of argumentation in the zone of collaboration and criticism |
title |
O papel da argumentação na zona de colaboração e criticidade |
spellingShingle |
O papel da argumentação na zona de colaboração e criticidade Rodrigues, Valquiria dos Santos Formação crítica de educadores Criticidade Argumentacao Critica Professores -- Formacao profissional Argumentation Critical teacher education Criticism CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA::LINGUISTICA APLICADA |
title_short |
O papel da argumentação na zona de colaboração e criticidade |
title_full |
O papel da argumentação na zona de colaboração e criticidade |
title_fullStr |
O papel da argumentação na zona de colaboração e criticidade |
title_full_unstemmed |
O papel da argumentação na zona de colaboração e criticidade |
title_sort |
O papel da argumentação na zona de colaboração e criticidade |
author |
Rodrigues, Valquiria dos Santos |
author_facet |
Rodrigues, Valquiria dos Santos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Liberali, Fernanda Coelho |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4206822Z6 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Valquiria dos Santos |
contributor_str_mv |
Liberali, Fernanda Coelho |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Formação crítica de educadores Criticidade Argumentacao Critica Professores -- Formacao profissional |
topic |
Formação crítica de educadores Criticidade Argumentacao Critica Professores -- Formacao profissional Argumentation Critical teacher education Criticism CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA::LINGUISTICA APLICADA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Argumentation Critical teacher education Criticism |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA::LINGUISTICA APLICADA |
description |
This study aims to understand and critically analyze not only the dialogues carried out between teachers and their pedagogical coordinator in pedagogical meetings at an accredited nursery school of the Municipality of São Paulo, but also the dialogues between the researcher-educator and the pedagogical coordinator in talks and reflective sessions, which had the discussion of the role of argumentation in critical teacher education as their main objective. For that purpose, it identifies the arguments that provide the production of a zone of collaboration and criticism as an attempt to help education professionals who are engaged in critical teacher education. The theoretical support for this research has two cores: argumentation (ARISTOTLE, 350 a.C./2005, PERELMAN and OLBRECHTSTYTECA, 1970/2005; BRETON, 2003; MOSCA, 1997/2004, 2005, 2007; OSAKABE, 1999) and critical teacher education (MAGALHÃES, 2009; LIBERALI, 1994, 2008; SCHÖN, 1992; FREIRE, 1970), both supported by the Social-Historical-Cultural Activity Theory, as discussed by Vygotsky (1924/2004, 1930/2007, 1934/2001), Leontiev (1958/1998, 1977, 1978a, 1978b), Engeström (1987, 1999) and Engeström et. al. (1999). This research is inserted in the paradigm of critical collaboration (PCcol), which makes use of action-driven investigation methods in the search for alternatives to the pattern of traditional research, as a way to offer to all participants researcher and groups connected to the research the means to efficiently answer problems of specific contexts, as well as the guidelines for a transforming action (MAGALHÃES, 2003/2007). The discussion of the results was based on selected extracts of interactions between the pedagogical coordinator and the teachers, and the pedagogical coordinator and the researcher, adding up to four activities. This discussion was grounded on the developed categories of analysis, based on Perelman and Olbrechts- Tyteca (1970/2005), Mosca (1997/2004, 2005, 2007) and Liberali (2007, 2008), and on the categories of interpretation, based on Vygotsky (1924/2004, 1930/2007, 1934/2001), Bakhtin (1934-5/1975/2002) and Magalhães (2009). The results show that the connections developed between the subjects of the research made their learning and development possible. Besides, the use of argumentation in educational moments, such as pedagogical meetings, talks and reflective sessions, enabled the production of the zone of collaboration and criticism, leading the participants to question, discuss and transform their actions |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2010-07-28 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2010-05-20 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-28T18:24:18Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Valquiria dos Santos. The role of argumentation in the zone of collaboration and criticism. 2010. 217 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Lingüística) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2010. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/14151 |
identifier_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Valquiria dos Santos. The role of argumentation in the zone of collaboration and criticism. 2010. 217 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Lingüística) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2010. |
url |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/14151 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Linguística Aplicada e Estudos da Linguagem |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUC-SP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Lingüística |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/14151/3/Valquiria%20dos%20Santos%20Rodrigues.pdf.txt https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/14151/1/Valquiria%20dos%20Santos%20Rodrigues.pdf https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/14151/2/Valquiria%20dos%20Santos%20Rodrigues.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
d2f0aee590190dd58be4ad55bd426be3 2b2b60cfcb8494f996ba664a78454a53 3be49fcf62cda960c074fc6c31228a0f |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br |
_version_ |
1793424061887414272 |