Políticas públicas referentes à recuperação de aprendizagem implantadas na rede estadual de ensino de São Paulo: o que pensam professores dos anos finais do ensino fundamental

• Ano de defesa: 2015
• Autor(a) principal: Assis, Élio de
• Orientador(a): Ronca, Antonio Carlos Caruso
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação: Psicologia da Educação
• Departamento: Psicologia
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Direito à educação; Núcleos de significação; Políticas públicas em educação; Psicologia sócio-histórica; Recuperação de aprendizagem
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Right for education; Core meaning; Public policies; Socio-historical Psychology; Recuperation of learning
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA::PSICOLOGIA SOCIAL
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/16182

The goal of this research is to understand how middle school teachers evaluate the recuperation of learning programs implemented by the Department of Education of Sao Paulo State, as well as to know what they think about issues concerning students` right for education. In order to do so, we have searched the state law on education and found out that nine resolutions on Recuperation of learningwere implemented within a decade. Besides, we have interviewed middle school teachers to understand their view upon these issues. By studying all the data collected, analyzed by the means of core meaning methodology (AGUIAR; OZELLA, 2013), we can say that state policies for public education has misled teachers towards a selective and excluding school by stating that better performance of students on external assessments, by itself, can be read as representative of Higher Quality Education. We verify that the State of Sao Paulo does not have an education project for lower class students, but a model of basic education divided into three different levels, which promotes students` failure and exclusion inside the school. Therefore, an educational system that deepens the socio-economic and educational inequalities. The so-called learning recuperation projects are the alibi of public school administration of the state school system for justifying the inefficiency of the model. Thus, blaming students, teachers and community by not ensuring the human right to education. It is urgent to break with supposed public policies that stigmatize children and teenagers, as if social and educational differences were a natural movement in a harmonious society. We believe in policies for public school based on political education of teachers and on the perception of power relationship, which constitutes the historical reality of society and education