Quem ensina, aprende a vencer os desafios da profissão: o papel do coletivo

• Ano de defesa: 2016
• Autor(a) principal: Gomes, Kátia Diolina
• Orientador(a): Barbara, Leila
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Linguística Aplicada e Estudos da Linguagem
• Departamento: Faculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e Artes
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Professores > Formação profissional; Prática de ensino; Trabalho coletivo
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Teacher's work; Collective work
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA::LINGUISTICA APLICADA
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/19452

The objective of this thesis is to identify how teachers from a state school in the São Paulo metropolitan area overcome the daily challenges of the profession. More specifically, it aims to discuss the role of collective in this whole process, through the analysis transferred by educators. This paper comprehends the collective as a resource for the development of the métier (job), being decisive for the legitimacy of individual styles and transformations of rules as well as mutual help among the different situations which challenge the teacher (CLOT, 2010). This thesis is related to analyze the representations of work activity as configured in texts produced by the researcher and eight teachers of elementary school II and high school of the State of São Paulo public schools for five debate meetings (oral) in group. At the meetings, participants discussed the challenges and possible solutions of the activity, producing texts (transcripts) that allowed a better understanding of the representations about the role of the collective. For that, we use a theoretical-philosophical and methodological approach for studying the relationship between language and educational work, such as: the Systemic Functional Linguistics (HALLIDAY 1994; HALLIDAY & MATTHIESSEN, 1999, 2004, 2014) and Sociodiscursive Interactionism (BRONCKART, 2006, 2008, LAF, 2004; DOLZ & SCHNEUWLY, 2004) as well as the references of sciences of team work ERGAPE (AMIGUES, 2004; FAITA, 2004, 2005; SAUJAT, 2004) and the Activity Clinic (CLOT, 2000, 2002, 2006; KOSTULSKI, 2005; ROGER, 2008). The interpretations of the collective paper also focused on the vitality of the collective characteristics (CAROLY, 2010; 2013) of the French constructivist ergonomics. The results point to a restricted collective role, where the challenges are often bypassed individually. While most strategies is individual, some vitality of the collective characteristics was identified from collective strategies developed to overcome the daily challenges in an unfolding process of the power to act for each teacher and the group. Analysis of such vitality characteristics also contributed to reveal aspects that devitalize the collective, such as the turnover of teachers due to contracts and licenses; the differentiated status between teachers; the incompatibility of purposes and common interests; professional loneliness; the imposition of standards; lack of confidence; the lack of linkages; full of work to do; how the groups are formed and distributed in schools; the lack of technical and psychological instruments; the difficulty of time and space for dialogue; and the heterogeneity of the profession. Among the contributions of this thesis, we highlight the discussion around the activity of the features that can both undermine the collective as empower it in favor of professional development