Imagens construídas: retratos de professores universitários em processo de constituição e reconstituição

• Ano de defesa: 2017
• Autor(a) principal: Franco, Kátia Cilene de Mello
• Orientador(a): Placco, Vera Maria Nigro de Souza
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação: Psicologia da Educação
• Departamento: Faculdade de Educação
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Professores universitários - Formação profissional; Professores universitários - Atitudes; Prática de ensino
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: University professors; Professor expertise; Teaching practice
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA::PSICOLOGIA DO ENSINO E DA APRENDIZAGEM
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/19967

The main objective of the present work, developed on a university located in São Paulo, is the understanding of the education process of university professors, considering the experiences of a group of professors who ministered classes for at least one school year in the discipline named Projeto Integrador. It intended, therefore, to identify if and how these professors modified their vision of teaching, based on the challenges imposed in their daily life. The research was motivated by seeking to comprehend what makes this experience an event that promotes changes in the way professors understand teaching. The theoretical-methodological model adopted for the research was essentially qualitative. In order to carry out the present study, we resorted to bibliographical and field research, opting for the use of data analysis provided by documents, questionnaires and interviews. The study was based on literature dealing with teaching (Tardif, 1991, 2000, 2004, 2005) and experimental (Larrossa, 1996, 2002, 2011, 2015) expertise. The results led to the conclusion that the task of motivating their students and providing them with more autonomy was what largely caused the professors to rethink their own way of receiving and sharing knowledge. Walking along with them in a process of discovery, creativity, constant instigation and innovation based on new experiences, knowing and making previously untested forms, also contributed to this rethinking. Finally, we realized that it was in the coexistence, joint construction and desire to motivate the other that many of the professors found themselves being modified or called to modify their actions. The integration between theory and practice, the scientific investigation led by curiosity and the search for interdisciplinary practices were mentioned several times as the greatest challenges encountered