Previsibilidade do Direito no Sistema Processual Civil Brasileiro: enfoque na técnica de julgamento dos recursos extraordinários e especiais repetitivos

• Ano de defesa: 2014
• Autor(a) principal: Gaspar, Lílian Regina Ioti Henrique
• Orientador(a): Lopes, João Batista
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Previsibilidade do Direito; Precedentes judiciais; Tribunais superiores; Recursos extraordinários e especiais repetitivos
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Predictability of Law; Judicial precedent; Common Law; Civil Law; Superior Courts; Repetitive extraordinary and special appeals
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6461

Both the Common Law legal systems and the Civil Law jurisdictions, aims to guard legal certainty and equality, given that these principles are essential to ensuring a fair and equitable society. This paper will demonstrate the importance of predictability for the establishment of a state founded on these principles. In this sense, become relevant the Supreme Courts, to the extent that they are responsible for giving unit to the law, that can be achieved through the establishment of precedents, to be followed by hierarchically lower courts. Thus, the idea that the judiciary is the body that acts, alone, in the resolution of individual disputes is obsolete and no longer consistent with the notion of system that must prevail in any legal system. It is based on the positions adopted by the judiciary that citizens should guide their conduct. Therefore, for the judicial system to be effective and can provide legal certainty and equality for citizens, there must be mechanisms to confer binding to judicial precedents. Given this, will then be focused the technique of repetitive extraordinary and special appeals trial, introduced in our legal system by the Acts 11.418 passed in 2006 and 11.472 passed in 2008, through the articles 543-B and 543-C of the Civil Procedure Code, as a way to demonstrate their ability to provide predictability to the law, by giving unity to its interpretation, enabling identical cases receive the same solution of the judiciary. Within this perspective this work, which, in a critical way, try to force a larger reflection on the institutes involved will be developed