Dissenso e normatividade na esfera p?blica

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2018
Autor(a) principal: Alves, ?talo da Silva lattes
Orientador(a): Weber, Thadeu lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia
Departamento: Escola de Humanidades
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/7972
Resumo: In this work, I ask what is the normative capacity of dissensus in a theory of social normativity. I investigate the fundamental elements of a deliberative theory of social normativity set forth by J?rgen Habermas and argue that, in a project of deliberative normative justification, not only consensus but also dissensus has normative capacity. I present a minimal formulation of Habermas? normative project, which encompasses the concepts of discourse, consensus and public sphere, and then proceed to distinguish three different realms in a deliberative theory of social normativity ? politics, the political, and the dispute for politicity ? approaching the nature and the role of dissensus in each one. I argue that (a) politics is a realm of the institutions of liberal democracy, where dissensus takes the form of conflict among groups and models of public spheres, having the role of keeping the public sphere multiple and inclusive; (b) the political is the realm of interaction of discourses about the imperative of human coexistence in the world, where dissensus takes the form of adversariness and has the role of maintaining the disagreement necessary for pluralism; and (c) the dispute for politicity is the pre-discursive realm where struggles for the capacity to issue political claims take place, where dissensus has the role of pointing out the unjustified partiality of the discursive genre as the only one capable of conveying social interactions with normative potential.
id P_RS_0b3b787d0e90011bdc10033c84b7d85e
oai_identifier_str oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/7972
network_acronym_str P_RS
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
repository_id_str
spelling Weber, Thadeuhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0652643529727347http://lattes.cnpq.br/0310102426281941Alves, ?talo da Silva2018-05-02T14:18:35Z2018-03-05http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/7972In this work, I ask what is the normative capacity of dissensus in a theory of social normativity. I investigate the fundamental elements of a deliberative theory of social normativity set forth by J?rgen Habermas and argue that, in a project of deliberative normative justification, not only consensus but also dissensus has normative capacity. I present a minimal formulation of Habermas? normative project, which encompasses the concepts of discourse, consensus and public sphere, and then proceed to distinguish three different realms in a deliberative theory of social normativity ? politics, the political, and the dispute for politicity ? approaching the nature and the role of dissensus in each one. I argue that (a) politics is a realm of the institutions of liberal democracy, where dissensus takes the form of conflict among groups and models of public spheres, having the role of keeping the public sphere multiple and inclusive; (b) the political is the realm of interaction of discourses about the imperative of human coexistence in the world, where dissensus takes the form of adversariness and has the role of maintaining the disagreement necessary for pluralism; and (c) the dispute for politicity is the pre-discursive realm where struggles for the capacity to issue political claims take place, where dissensus has the role of pointing out the unjustified partiality of the discursive genre as the only one capable of conveying social interactions with normative potential.Neste trabalho, questiono qual ? a capacidade normativa do dissenso em uma teoria da normatividade social. Para tanto, investigo os elementos fundamentais de uma teoria deliberativa da normatividade social estabelecidos por J?rgen Habermas e sustento que, em um projeto deliberativo de justifica??o normativa, n?o apenas o consenso, mas tamb?m o dissenso possui capacidade normativa. Apresento uma formula??o m?nima do projeto normativo de Habermas, que envolve os conceitos de discurso, consenso e esfera p?blica, e fa?o uma distin??o entre tr?s ?mbitos diferentes presentes em uma teoria deliberativa da normatividade social ? a pol?tica, o pol?tico e a disputa pela politicidade ?, abordando a natureza e o papel do dissenso em cada um deles. Defendo que (a) a pol?tica ? um ?mbito das institui??es da democracia liberal, onde o dissenso toma a forma de conflito entre grupos e modelos de esferas p?blicas e tem o papel de manter a esfera p?blica m?ltipla e inclusiva; (b) o pol?tico ? o ?mbito da intera??o de discursos sobre o imperativo da coexist?ncia humana no mundo, onde o dissenso toma a forma de adversariedade e tem o papel de manter o desacordo necess?rio ao pluralismo; e (c) a disputa pela politicidade ? o ?mbito pr?-discursivo onde t?m lugar as reivindica??es pela capacidade de emitir demandas normativas, onde o dissenso tem o papel de apontar a parcialidade injustificada do g?nero discursivo como ?nico capaz de comportar intera??es sociais com potencial normativo.Submitted by PPG Filosofia (filosofia-pg@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-02T13:54:54Z No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTA??O - ?TALO DA SILVA ALVES.pdf: 922926 bytes, checksum: 37b72dc5a9648c006567e23bf7c504be (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-02T14:16:19Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTA??O - ?TALO DA SILVA ALVES.pdf: 922926 bytes, checksum: 37b72dc5a9648c006567e23bf7c504be (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-02T14:18:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTA??O - ?TALO DA SILVA ALVES.pdf: 922926 bytes, checksum: 37b72dc5a9648c006567e23bf7c504be (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-03-05Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico - CNPqapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/171695/DIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgporPontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em FilosofiaPUCRSBrasilEscola de HumanidadesNormatividadeDissensoFilosofia Pol?ticaSociedadeHabermasCIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIADissenso e normatividade na esfera p?blicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisTrabalho n?o apresenta restri??o para publica??o-8305327606432166393500500500600-6557531471218110192-672352020940167053-2555911436985713659info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSTHUMBNAILDIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgDIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg4485http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7972/4/DIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf.jpg3b627495c8fa9d70028da4313d7475faMD54TEXTDIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf.txtDIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf.txttext/plain239041http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7972/3/DIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf.txt11b5e861b094961eb9ab3e9536567cf0MD53ORIGINALDIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdfDIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdfapplication/pdf922926http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7972/2/DIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf37b72dc5a9648c006567e23bf7c504beMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8610http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7972/1/license.txt5a9d6006225b368ef605ba16b4f6d1beMD51tede/79722018-05-02 12:00:55.983oai:tede2.pucrs.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2018-05-02T15:00:55Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Dissenso e normatividade na esfera p?blica
title Dissenso e normatividade na esfera p?blica
spellingShingle Dissenso e normatividade na esfera p?blica
Alves, ?talo da Silva
Normatividade
Dissenso
Filosofia Pol?tica
Sociedade
Habermas
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA
title_short Dissenso e normatividade na esfera p?blica
title_full Dissenso e normatividade na esfera p?blica
title_fullStr Dissenso e normatividade na esfera p?blica
title_full_unstemmed Dissenso e normatividade na esfera p?blica
title_sort Dissenso e normatividade na esfera p?blica
author Alves, ?talo da Silva
author_facet Alves, ?talo da Silva
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Weber, Thadeu
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0652643529727347
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0310102426281941
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves, ?talo da Silva
contributor_str_mv Weber, Thadeu
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Normatividade
Dissenso
Filosofia Pol?tica
Sociedade
Habermas
topic Normatividade
Dissenso
Filosofia Pol?tica
Sociedade
Habermas
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA
description In this work, I ask what is the normative capacity of dissensus in a theory of social normativity. I investigate the fundamental elements of a deliberative theory of social normativity set forth by J?rgen Habermas and argue that, in a project of deliberative normative justification, not only consensus but also dissensus has normative capacity. I present a minimal formulation of Habermas? normative project, which encompasses the concepts of discourse, consensus and public sphere, and then proceed to distinguish three different realms in a deliberative theory of social normativity ? politics, the political, and the dispute for politicity ? approaching the nature and the role of dissensus in each one. I argue that (a) politics is a realm of the institutions of liberal democracy, where dissensus takes the form of conflict among groups and models of public spheres, having the role of keeping the public sphere multiple and inclusive; (b) the political is the realm of interaction of discourses about the imperative of human coexistence in the world, where dissensus takes the form of adversariness and has the role of maintaining the disagreement necessary for pluralism; and (c) the dispute for politicity is the pre-discursive realm where struggles for the capacity to issue political claims take place, where dissensus has the role of pointing out the unjustified partiality of the discursive genre as the only one capable of conveying social interactions with normative potential.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-05-02T14:18:35Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018-03-05
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/7972
url http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/7972
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv -8305327606432166393
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 500
500
500
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv -6557531471218110192
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv -672352020940167053
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv -2555911436985713659
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv PUCRS
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Escola de Humanidades
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7972/4/DIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf.jpg
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7972/3/DIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf.txt
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7972/2/DIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7972/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 3b627495c8fa9d70028da4313d7475fa
11b5e861b094961eb9ab3e9536567cf0
37b72dc5a9648c006567e23bf7c504be
5a9d6006225b368ef605ba16b4f6d1be
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.central@pucrs.br||
_version_ 1796793232763387904