Hegel e as bases do comunitarismo
Ano de defesa: | 2021 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia
|
Departamento: |
Escola de Humanidades
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/9560 |
Resumo: | The text we developed aims to identify the more indicated way to refresh the hegelian social theory. This goal uses the development of the concept of liberalism according to Hegel and a comprehension of the individual freedom into hegelian ethics. The work develops in a first step the concept of liberalismo according to Hegel, mainly because we have no acceptable sort of thing. Outlining this concept we were able to demonstrate that Hegel can not be considered a liberal thinker and this idea responds to the problems which resulted from a unilateral view on hegelian work. The text faces therefore the problem of the lack of a genuine research on the real hegelian view on liberalism and moreover the consequences of these omissions. We will make clear that individual freedom has no conditions to state itself as the reason for common rules which we could enforce to everybody. From a logical point of view, where is the concept of freedom, or even in a practical development of the free will, the social theory institutes stated by Hegel have more conditions to help our plural democracy and pluralism in order to provide stability and freedom capabilities. Moreover, we aregoing to state that the hegelian institutes are the basis of contemporary communitarianism and remain able to subsidize our democracies elements of stability and development offreedom. That shows the communitarianism answers, since hegelian basis, to our political challenges. Liberalism is overcome by a social theory, an important theoretical basis of communitarianism, and individual freedom gets more concretude in the ethics?s freedom in which we have institucional mediations. Along this text we demonstrate that reading our political system through a social theory, and according to the communitarianism that receives influences, way is useful to deal with the justice problems, even though we keep the democratic elements and pluralism. The text begins from a concept of liberalism to evidentiate the problems of that notion (liberalism) according to Hegel himself. That states the logical and consequente overcoming of liberalism by social theory, which is a more factual answer to Hegel and to our problems. |
id |
P_RS_4a233a957a3fb9340a38f86bcad31e63 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/9560 |
network_acronym_str |
P_RS |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Weber, Thadeuhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0652643529727347http://lattes.cnpq.br/3658426950857037Engelmann, Jo?o Gilberto2021-04-27T13:20:41Z2021-03-25http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/9560The text we developed aims to identify the more indicated way to refresh the hegelian social theory. This goal uses the development of the concept of liberalism according to Hegel and a comprehension of the individual freedom into hegelian ethics. The work develops in a first step the concept of liberalismo according to Hegel, mainly because we have no acceptable sort of thing. Outlining this concept we were able to demonstrate that Hegel can not be considered a liberal thinker and this idea responds to the problems which resulted from a unilateral view on hegelian work. The text faces therefore the problem of the lack of a genuine research on the real hegelian view on liberalism and moreover the consequences of these omissions. We will make clear that individual freedom has no conditions to state itself as the reason for common rules which we could enforce to everybody. From a logical point of view, where is the concept of freedom, or even in a practical development of the free will, the social theory institutes stated by Hegel have more conditions to help our plural democracy and pluralism in order to provide stability and freedom capabilities. Moreover, we aregoing to state that the hegelian institutes are the basis of contemporary communitarianism and remain able to subsidize our democracies elements of stability and development offreedom. That shows the communitarianism answers, since hegelian basis, to our political challenges. Liberalism is overcome by a social theory, an important theoretical basis of communitarianism, and individual freedom gets more concretude in the ethics?s freedom in which we have institucional mediations. Along this text we demonstrate that reading our political system through a social theory, and according to the communitarianism that receives influences, way is useful to deal with the justice problems, even though we keep the democratic elements and pluralism. The text begins from a concept of liberalism to evidentiate the problems of that notion (liberalism) according to Hegel himself. That states the logical and consequente overcoming of liberalism by social theory, which is a more factual answer to Hegel and to our problems.O texto que desenvolvemos visa identificar a via mais indicada para atualizar a teoria social hegeliana. Tal busca recorre ao desenvolvimento do conceito de liberalismo em Hegel e da compreens?o do status da liberdade individual na Eticidade. O trabalho desenvolve, inicialmente, o conceito de liberalismo em Hegel, face ? aus?ncia de uma delimita??o aceit?vel desta no??o. O delineamento deste conceito fez surgir a demonstra??o de que Hegel n?o pode ser considerado liberal apenas porque trabalha conceitos liberais, o que faz frente a problemas gerados por uma interpreta??o unilateral da obra hegeliana. O trabalho enfrenta, portanto, o problema da aus?ncia de efetiva busca por aquilo que Hegel escreveu sobre o liberalismo e pelas consequ?ncias de tal omiss?o. O trabalho ir? explicitar que a liberdade individual, para Hegel, n?o possui condi??es de se firmar como raz?o de ser da normatividade impon?vel a todos. Tanto do ponto de vista l?gico, em que se radica o conceito de liberdade, quanto do ponto de vista dos desdobramentos pr?ticos da vontade livre, os institutos hist?rico-culturais desenvolvidos por Hegel encontram-se na base do comunitarismo contempor?neo e permanecem aptos a subsidiar ? nossa democracia plural elementos de estabilidade e desenvolvimento da liberdade o que, portanto, p?e em evid?ncia respostas comunitaristas, de matriz hegeliana, a estes desafios. O liberalismo ? superado pela teoria social hegeliana, importante lastro te?rico do comunitarismo, e a liberdade individual ganha concretude na liberdade da eticidade, em que se alia a media??es institucionais. Ao longo de todo o texto, h? a demonstra??o de que a leitura de nosso sistema pol?tico pelo vi?s da teoria social hegeliana, e pelo comunitarismo que ela alimenta, revela uma via producente de lidar com os problemas mais candentes de nossas teorias da justi?a, inclusive se mantivermos os elementos democr?ticos e o pluralismo. Por outro lado, revela a base hegeliana do comunitarismo e os desafios que este assume e, inclusive, como diverge desta origem em Hegel. O texto parte de um conceito de liberalismo em Hegel para evidenciar as defici?ncias desta no??o trazidas pelo pr?prio Hegel, sedimentando, por fim, a l?gica e consequente supera??o do liberalismo na consolida??o da teoria social, fundamental base do comunitarismo, que ? uma resposta mais concreta aos problemas contextuais de Hegel e, tamb?m, aos nossos.Submitted by PPG Filosofia (filosofia-pg@pucrs.br) on 2021-03-29T19:08:39Z No. of bitstreams: 1 JO?O_GILBERTO_ENGELMANN_Tes .pdf: 959117 bytes, checksum: b918af65983b685a56954ebbf1d30b75 (MD5)Rejected by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br), reason: Devolvido devido ao sum?rio estar sem pagina??o, e na capa institucional (1? p?gina) consta o ano de 2021, nas demais 2020. on 2021-04-13T16:16:13Z (GMT)Submitted by PPG Filosofia (filosofia-pg@pucrs.br) on 2021-04-13T17:23:13Z No. of bitstreams: 1 JO?O_GILBERTO_ENGELMANN_Tes .pdf: 916001 bytes, checksum: b3adb37d6aa6cba67f43359681485ea6 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2021-04-27T13:07:57Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 JO?O_GILBERTO_ENGELMANN_Tes .pdf: 916001 bytes, checksum: b3adb37d6aa6cba67f43359681485ea6 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2021-04-27T13:20:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 JO?O_GILBERTO_ENGELMANN_Tes .pdf: 916001 bytes, checksum: b3adb37d6aa6cba67f43359681485ea6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-03-25Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/180427/TES_JOAO_GILBERTO_ENGELMANN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpgporPontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em FilosofiaPUCRSBrasilEscola de HumanidadesComunitarismoHegelLiberalismoLiberdade IndividualSupera??oHegelLiberalismIndividual FreedomOvercomingCIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAHegel e as bases do comunitarismoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisTrabalho ser? publicado como artigo ou livro60 meses27/04/2026-1441514414422910841500500500600-6557531471218110192-6723520209401670533590462550136975366info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSTHUMBNAILTES_JOAO_GILBERTO_ENGELMANN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpgTES_JOAO_GILBERTO_ENGELMANN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg4100http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9560/6/TES_JOAO_GILBERTO_ENGELMANN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpgd60850a9ad057b11c73f58d0d863c903MD56TEXTTES_JOAO_GILBERTO_ENGELMANN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txtTES_JOAO_GILBERTO_ENGELMANN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txttext/plain1338http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9560/5/TES_JOAO_GILBERTO_ENGELMANN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txtd628d630323727ba299498d00e87f2c9MD55ORIGINALTES_JOAO_GILBERTO_ENGELMANN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdfTES_JOAO_GILBERTO_ENGELMANN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdfapplication/pdf432418http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9560/4/TES_JOAO_GILBERTO_ENGELMANN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf77afce8d9017ab8621cd1db859352ef4MD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8590http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9560/3/license.txt220e11f2d3ba5354f917c7035aadef24MD53tede/95602021-04-27 12:00:16.171oai:tede2.pucrs.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2021-04-27T15:00:16Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Hegel e as bases do comunitarismo |
title |
Hegel e as bases do comunitarismo |
spellingShingle |
Hegel e as bases do comunitarismo Engelmann, Jo?o Gilberto Comunitarismo Hegel Liberalismo Liberdade Individual Supera??o Hegel Liberalism Individual Freedom Overcoming CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
Hegel e as bases do comunitarismo |
title_full |
Hegel e as bases do comunitarismo |
title_fullStr |
Hegel e as bases do comunitarismo |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hegel e as bases do comunitarismo |
title_sort |
Hegel e as bases do comunitarismo |
author |
Engelmann, Jo?o Gilberto |
author_facet |
Engelmann, Jo?o Gilberto |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Weber, Thadeu |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0652643529727347 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3658426950857037 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Engelmann, Jo?o Gilberto |
contributor_str_mv |
Weber, Thadeu |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Comunitarismo Hegel Liberalismo Liberdade Individual Supera??o |
topic |
Comunitarismo Hegel Liberalismo Liberdade Individual Supera??o Hegel Liberalism Individual Freedom Overcoming CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Hegel Liberalism Individual Freedom Overcoming |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
The text we developed aims to identify the more indicated way to refresh the hegelian social theory. This goal uses the development of the concept of liberalism according to Hegel and a comprehension of the individual freedom into hegelian ethics. The work develops in a first step the concept of liberalismo according to Hegel, mainly because we have no acceptable sort of thing. Outlining this concept we were able to demonstrate that Hegel can not be considered a liberal thinker and this idea responds to the problems which resulted from a unilateral view on hegelian work. The text faces therefore the problem of the lack of a genuine research on the real hegelian view on liberalism and moreover the consequences of these omissions. We will make clear that individual freedom has no conditions to state itself as the reason for common rules which we could enforce to everybody. From a logical point of view, where is the concept of freedom, or even in a practical development of the free will, the social theory institutes stated by Hegel have more conditions to help our plural democracy and pluralism in order to provide stability and freedom capabilities. Moreover, we aregoing to state that the hegelian institutes are the basis of contemporary communitarianism and remain able to subsidize our democracies elements of stability and development offreedom. That shows the communitarianism answers, since hegelian basis, to our political challenges. Liberalism is overcome by a social theory, an important theoretical basis of communitarianism, and individual freedom gets more concretude in the ethics?s freedom in which we have institucional mediations. Along this text we demonstrate that reading our political system through a social theory, and according to the communitarianism that receives influences, way is useful to deal with the justice problems, even though we keep the democratic elements and pluralism. The text begins from a concept of liberalism to evidentiate the problems of that notion (liberalism) according to Hegel himself. That states the logical and consequente overcoming of liberalism by social theory, which is a more factual answer to Hegel and to our problems. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-27T13:20:41Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-25 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/9560 |
url |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/9560 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-1441514414422910841 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
500 500 500 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-6557531471218110192 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-672352020940167053 |
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv |
3590462550136975366 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUCRS |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Humanidades |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9560/6/TES_JOAO_GILBERTO_ENGELMANN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpg http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9560/5/TES_JOAO_GILBERTO_ENGELMANN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txt http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9560/4/TES_JOAO_GILBERTO_ENGELMANN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9560/3/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
d60850a9ad057b11c73f58d0d863c903 d628d630323727ba299498d00e87f2c9 77afce8d9017ab8621cd1db859352ef4 220e11f2d3ba5354f917c7035aadef24 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.central@pucrs.br|| |
_version_ |
1796793247760121856 |