A concilia??o judicial trabalhista : possibilidade de otimiza??o a partir da aplica??o de t?cnicas e ferramentas inerentes aos mecanismos negocial e mediativo de solu??o de conflitos : volume 1, 2 e 3
Ano de defesa: | 2021 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Escola de Direito
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/9659 |
Resumo: | Labor judicial conciliation, despite its inquestionable relevancy to labor procedure, is a scarcely addressed theme by specialized literature, that does not usually deal with issues such as the structure and set of tools that should be used by magistrate judges to seek agreements. Adhering to the concentration ?rea of ?Theoiry of Jurisdiction and Process? and to the line of research ?Jurisdiction, Efectiveness and Procedural Instrumantality?, the study aims to determine whether ? and to what extent ? it?s possible to apply negotiation and mediation techniques of conflict resolution to judicial conciliation attempts, in order to fill this hiatus. Adopting a hypothetical-deductive approach method, typological, functionalist, historical-comparative and monographic procedure methods, as well as a systematic interpretation method, the study revolves around a central issue related to the possibility of adapting the procedures inherent to interest-based negotiation and traditional mediation in order to provide a minimal and flexible structure to judicial conciliation is approached. Therefore, among others, the possibility of usage by the magistrate of the annexed duties of the cooperative model of procedural organization to seek for agreements is maintained; it is established that access to justice needs to be reframed so that appropriate methods of conflict resolution are considered as instruments of jurisdictional provision in a broad sense; through field research, self-composing mechanisms offered by the labor Multidoor Courthouse system are mapped and quantifyed, confirming the relevant role played by judicial conciliation in this context; and the stages and communicational techniques inherent to negotiation and mediation mechanisms appliable to judicial conciliations are analyzed. Based on the empirical-theoretical path taken, it?s concluded that the methodological exchange between self-composing conflict resolution mechanisms is not only possible, but effectively recommendable, as it allows: from a juridical stance, a standardization and perfectibilization of the judicial conciliation procedure and the reduction of the negative externalities linked to self-composition attempts made by judges; and form a social point of view, the education and incentive for disputants to autonomously solve conflicts and to combat, in the long run, the conflict and litigation cultures. |
id |
P_RS_f7cac715f50ad49eb906788814631b35 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/9659 |
network_acronym_str |
P_RS |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Fincato, Denise Pireshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2978023445556532Osna, Gustavohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6404084238253036http://lattes.cnpq.br/2621633748554965Campos, Am?lia Rosa de2021-05-24T18:06:20Z2021-03-30http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/9659Labor judicial conciliation, despite its inquestionable relevancy to labor procedure, is a scarcely addressed theme by specialized literature, that does not usually deal with issues such as the structure and set of tools that should be used by magistrate judges to seek agreements. Adhering to the concentration ?rea of ?Theoiry of Jurisdiction and Process? and to the line of research ?Jurisdiction, Efectiveness and Procedural Instrumantality?, the study aims to determine whether ? and to what extent ? it?s possible to apply negotiation and mediation techniques of conflict resolution to judicial conciliation attempts, in order to fill this hiatus. Adopting a hypothetical-deductive approach method, typological, functionalist, historical-comparative and monographic procedure methods, as well as a systematic interpretation method, the study revolves around a central issue related to the possibility of adapting the procedures inherent to interest-based negotiation and traditional mediation in order to provide a minimal and flexible structure to judicial conciliation is approached. Therefore, among others, the possibility of usage by the magistrate of the annexed duties of the cooperative model of procedural organization to seek for agreements is maintained; it is established that access to justice needs to be reframed so that appropriate methods of conflict resolution are considered as instruments of jurisdictional provision in a broad sense; through field research, self-composing mechanisms offered by the labor Multidoor Courthouse system are mapped and quantifyed, confirming the relevant role played by judicial conciliation in this context; and the stages and communicational techniques inherent to negotiation and mediation mechanisms appliable to judicial conciliations are analyzed. Based on the empirical-theoretical path taken, it?s concluded that the methodological exchange between self-composing conflict resolution mechanisms is not only possible, but effectively recommendable, as it allows: from a juridical stance, a standardization and perfectibilization of the judicial conciliation procedure and the reduction of the negative externalities linked to self-composition attempts made by judges; and form a social point of view, the education and incentive for disputants to autonomously solve conflicts and to combat, in the long run, the conflict and litigation cultures.A concilia??o judicial, apesar de sua inquestion?vel relev?ncia para a processual?stica juslaboral, ? tema parcamente explorado pela literatura especializada, que n?o costuma endere?ar quest?es referentes ? estrutura??o e t?cnicas que devem ser utilizadas pelo magistrado para buscar a composi??o das partes. Com ader?ncia ? ?rea de concentra??o ?Teoria da Jurisdi??o e Processo? e ? linha de pesquisa ?Jurisdi??o, Efetividade e Instrumentalidade do Processo?, o estudo objetiva determinar se ? e em que medida ? ? poss?vel aplicar etapas e ferramentas mediativas e negociais de resolu??o conflitual ?s tentativas de concilia??o judicial trabalhista, a fim de colmatar essa lacuna. Empregando-se m?todo de abordagem hipot?tico-dedutivo, m?todos de procedimento tipol?gico, funcionalista, hist?rico-comparativo e monogr?fico, e m?todo de interpreta??o sistem?tico, busca-se enfrentar problem?tica central relacionada ? possibilidade de se adaptar os procedimentos inerentes ? negocia??o baseada em interesses e ? media??o tradicional para conferir uma estrutura??o m?nima e flex?vel ? conciliativo judicial trabalhista. Para tanto, dentre outros, sustenta-se a possibilidade de que o magistrado se valha dos deveres anexos ao modelo cooperativo de processo para buscar autocompor as partes; estabelece-se que o acesso ? justi?a necessita ser ressignificado para que os m?todos adequados de resolu??o de conflitos figurem como instrumentos de presta??o jurisdicional lato senso; mapeia-se e quantifica-se, por meio de pesquisa de campo, os mecanismos autocompositivos disponibilizados pela Justi?a Multiportas do Trabalho e confirma-se o relevante papel ocupado pela concilia??o judicial neste contexto; e, ao final, analisam-se os est?gios e t?cnicas comunicacionais inerentes aos mecanismos negocial e mediativo pass?veis de serem aplicados ?s concilia??es judiciais. Conclui-se que o intercambiamento metodol?gico entre mecanismos autocompositivos de resolu??o de conflito n?o apenas ? poss?vel, mas efetivamente recomend?vel, contribuindo: sob prisma jur?dico para a padroniza??o e perfectibiliza??o da concilia??o judicial como forma de acesso ? justi?a e para o amainamento das externalidades negativas atreladas ? condu??o da tentativa autocompositiva pelo julgador; e sob prisma social, para educar e incentivar os disputantes a autonomamente resolverem conflitos e combater, a longo prazo, a cultura do conflito e da senten?a.Submitted by PPG Direito (ppgdir@pucrs.br) on 2021-05-18T21:56:35Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Am?lia_Rosa_de_Campos.pdf: 6262539 bytes, checksum: 1099dbe6a895665d036d83ccb967215a (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2021-05-24T17:59:16Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Am?lia_Rosa_de_Campos.pdf: 6262539 bytes, checksum: 1099dbe6a895665d036d83ccb967215a (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-24T18:06:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Am?lia_Rosa_de_Campos.pdf: 6262539 bytes, checksum: 1099dbe6a895665d036d83ccb967215a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-03-30application/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/180917/DIS_AMALIA_ROSA_DE_CAMPOS_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpgporPontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em DireitoPUCRSBrasilEscola de DireitoConcilia??o Judicial TrabalhistaM?todos Adequados de Solu??o de ConflitosAutocomposi??oProcedimentoT?cnicas ComunicacionaisLabor Judicial ConciliationAppropriate Dispute Resolution MethodsProcedureCommunication TechniquesSelf-compositionCIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOA concilia??o judicial trabalhista : possibilidade de otimiza??o a partir da aplica??o de t?cnicas e ferramentas inerentes aos mecanismos negocial e mediativo de solu??o de conflitos : volume 1, 2 e 3info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisTrabalho ser? publicado como artigo ou livro60 meses24/05/2026-81189034825801997565005005004512033976268881925-7277407233034425144info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSTHUMBNAILDIS_AMALIA_ROSA_DE_CAMPOS_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpgDIS_AMALIA_ROSA_DE_CAMPOS_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg4110http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9659/4/DIS_AMALIA_ROSA_DE_CAMPOS_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpg6ce7b83874d9044766361efa65545c51MD54TEXTDIS_AMALIA_ROSA_DE_CAMPOS_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txtDIS_AMALIA_ROSA_DE_CAMPOS_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txttext/plain2996http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9659/3/DIS_AMALIA_ROSA_DE_CAMPOS_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txt72866413767316aa3056b9333ed732f6MD53ORIGINALDIS_AMALIA_ROSA_DE_CAMPOS_CONFIDENCIAL.pdfDIS_AMALIA_ROSA_DE_CAMPOS_CONFIDENCIAL.pdfapplication/pdf634251http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9659/2/DIS_AMALIA_ROSA_DE_CAMPOS_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf602b67cf2bba638cda24dfe118896815MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8590http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9659/1/license.txt220e11f2d3ba5354f917c7035aadef24MD51tede/96592021-05-24 20:00:22.078oai:tede2.pucrs.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2021-05-24T23:00:22Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
A concilia??o judicial trabalhista : possibilidade de otimiza??o a partir da aplica??o de t?cnicas e ferramentas inerentes aos mecanismos negocial e mediativo de solu??o de conflitos : volume 1, 2 e 3 |
title |
A concilia??o judicial trabalhista : possibilidade de otimiza??o a partir da aplica??o de t?cnicas e ferramentas inerentes aos mecanismos negocial e mediativo de solu??o de conflitos : volume 1, 2 e 3 |
spellingShingle |
A concilia??o judicial trabalhista : possibilidade de otimiza??o a partir da aplica??o de t?cnicas e ferramentas inerentes aos mecanismos negocial e mediativo de solu??o de conflitos : volume 1, 2 e 3 Campos, Am?lia Rosa de Concilia??o Judicial Trabalhista M?todos Adequados de Solu??o de Conflitos Autocomposi??o Procedimento T?cnicas Comunicacionais Labor Judicial Conciliation Appropriate Dispute Resolution Methods Procedure Communication Techniques Self-composition CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
A concilia??o judicial trabalhista : possibilidade de otimiza??o a partir da aplica??o de t?cnicas e ferramentas inerentes aos mecanismos negocial e mediativo de solu??o de conflitos : volume 1, 2 e 3 |
title_full |
A concilia??o judicial trabalhista : possibilidade de otimiza??o a partir da aplica??o de t?cnicas e ferramentas inerentes aos mecanismos negocial e mediativo de solu??o de conflitos : volume 1, 2 e 3 |
title_fullStr |
A concilia??o judicial trabalhista : possibilidade de otimiza??o a partir da aplica??o de t?cnicas e ferramentas inerentes aos mecanismos negocial e mediativo de solu??o de conflitos : volume 1, 2 e 3 |
title_full_unstemmed |
A concilia??o judicial trabalhista : possibilidade de otimiza??o a partir da aplica??o de t?cnicas e ferramentas inerentes aos mecanismos negocial e mediativo de solu??o de conflitos : volume 1, 2 e 3 |
title_sort |
A concilia??o judicial trabalhista : possibilidade de otimiza??o a partir da aplica??o de t?cnicas e ferramentas inerentes aos mecanismos negocial e mediativo de solu??o de conflitos : volume 1, 2 e 3 |
author |
Campos, Am?lia Rosa de |
author_facet |
Campos, Am?lia Rosa de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Fincato, Denise Pires |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2978023445556532 |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
Osna, Gustavo |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6404084238253036 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2621633748554965 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Campos, Am?lia Rosa de |
contributor_str_mv |
Fincato, Denise Pires Osna, Gustavo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Concilia??o Judicial Trabalhista M?todos Adequados de Solu??o de Conflitos Autocomposi??o Procedimento T?cnicas Comunicacionais |
topic |
Concilia??o Judicial Trabalhista M?todos Adequados de Solu??o de Conflitos Autocomposi??o Procedimento T?cnicas Comunicacionais Labor Judicial Conciliation Appropriate Dispute Resolution Methods Procedure Communication Techniques Self-composition CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Labor Judicial Conciliation Appropriate Dispute Resolution Methods Procedure Communication Techniques Self-composition |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
description |
Labor judicial conciliation, despite its inquestionable relevancy to labor procedure, is a scarcely addressed theme by specialized literature, that does not usually deal with issues such as the structure and set of tools that should be used by magistrate judges to seek agreements. Adhering to the concentration ?rea of ?Theoiry of Jurisdiction and Process? and to the line of research ?Jurisdiction, Efectiveness and Procedural Instrumantality?, the study aims to determine whether ? and to what extent ? it?s possible to apply negotiation and mediation techniques of conflict resolution to judicial conciliation attempts, in order to fill this hiatus. Adopting a hypothetical-deductive approach method, typological, functionalist, historical-comparative and monographic procedure methods, as well as a systematic interpretation method, the study revolves around a central issue related to the possibility of adapting the procedures inherent to interest-based negotiation and traditional mediation in order to provide a minimal and flexible structure to judicial conciliation is approached. Therefore, among others, the possibility of usage by the magistrate of the annexed duties of the cooperative model of procedural organization to seek for agreements is maintained; it is established that access to justice needs to be reframed so that appropriate methods of conflict resolution are considered as instruments of jurisdictional provision in a broad sense; through field research, self-composing mechanisms offered by the labor Multidoor Courthouse system are mapped and quantifyed, confirming the relevant role played by judicial conciliation in this context; and the stages and communicational techniques inherent to negotiation and mediation mechanisms appliable to judicial conciliations are analyzed. Based on the empirical-theoretical path taken, it?s concluded that the methodological exchange between self-composing conflict resolution mechanisms is not only possible, but effectively recommendable, as it allows: from a juridical stance, a standardization and perfectibilization of the judicial conciliation procedure and the reduction of the negative externalities linked to self-composition attempts made by judges; and form a social point of view, the education and incentive for disputants to autonomously solve conflicts and to combat, in the long run, the conflict and litigation cultures. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-24T18:06:20Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-30 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/9659 |
url |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/9659 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-8118903482580199756 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
500 500 500 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
4512033976268881925 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-7277407233034425144 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Direito |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUCRS |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9659/4/DIS_AMALIA_ROSA_DE_CAMPOS_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpg http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9659/3/DIS_AMALIA_ROSA_DE_CAMPOS_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txt http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9659/2/DIS_AMALIA_ROSA_DE_CAMPOS_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9659/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
6ce7b83874d9044766361efa65545c51 72866413767316aa3056b9333ed732f6 602b67cf2bba638cda24dfe118896815 220e11f2d3ba5354f917c7035aadef24 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.central@pucrs.br|| |
_version_ |
1796793248990101504 |