Estabelecimento de escrita sob controle de ditado como base para a recombinação na leitura e na escrita

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2013
Autor(a) principal: Reis, Thaíze de Souza
Orientador(a): Souza, Deisy das Graças de lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia - PPGPsi
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/5983
Resumo: Several studies are interested in the acquisition of reading and spelling as well as in the role the acquisition of one ability plays in the acquisition of the other. However, many of these studies focus on reading rather than on spelling. This study aimed to teach spelling skills and verify whether it would affect the reading repertoire. To teach spelling, a constructed response matching to sample task was employed. In this task, a sample (that could be a printed word, a picture, a picture and its correspondent printed word or a dictated word) was presented as well as a pool of randomly chosen letters. Children had to select in the correct order the letters to spell the word correspondent to the sample. Thirty Portuguese words were taught. Five studies were conducted. In Study 1, each word was taught till criterion and once it was achieved the word was no longer presented during training. Two students took part but only one achieved the criterion for the totality of the words. Although the criterion was achieved rapidly for most words, the performance decreased on the posttest probes. Study 2 employed a mixed training: groups of three words were taught together so that in each trial one of the words worked as a sample. Study 3 employed the mixed training and a cumulative baseline: words previously taught were interspersed with words to be taught. Study 4 introduced a new variable, besides the mixed training and the cumulative baseline: a compound sample. In this study, words should be constructed under the control of a sample compounded by a picture and its correspondent printed word. After training, all participants of the Studies 2, 3 and 4 showed high spelling performances and excepting one participant, all of them had great improvements in reading. Reading scores were more variable than spelling scores. Performances with new words (compounded by the syllables of the taught words) were variable and some participants did not show recombinative repertoire. Also, some participants showed performances with some words before they were actually trained. Because of that, Study 5 employed a group design to evaluate the effect of the teaching procedure. The Experimental Group took the teaching procedure lessons (the same version employed in Study 4) while the Control Group was exposed only to the assessment sessions. The Experimental Group performances in spelling, reading and other relations evaluated were significantly higher than the Control Group performances. These results showed that the procedure have been effective in teaching spelling and also in promoting the emerge of reading.
id SCAR_c06e93b3039359f2020a8441e55ecd0a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/5983
network_acronym_str SCAR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
repository_id_str
spelling Reis, Thaíze de SouzaSouza, Deisy das Graças dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4404800720856419http://lattes.cnpq.br/34970499703964402016-06-02T20:30:08Z2013-09-062016-06-02T20:30:08Z2013-04-10https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/5983Several studies are interested in the acquisition of reading and spelling as well as in the role the acquisition of one ability plays in the acquisition of the other. However, many of these studies focus on reading rather than on spelling. This study aimed to teach spelling skills and verify whether it would affect the reading repertoire. To teach spelling, a constructed response matching to sample task was employed. In this task, a sample (that could be a printed word, a picture, a picture and its correspondent printed word or a dictated word) was presented as well as a pool of randomly chosen letters. Children had to select in the correct order the letters to spell the word correspondent to the sample. Thirty Portuguese words were taught. Five studies were conducted. In Study 1, each word was taught till criterion and once it was achieved the word was no longer presented during training. Two students took part but only one achieved the criterion for the totality of the words. Although the criterion was achieved rapidly for most words, the performance decreased on the posttest probes. Study 2 employed a mixed training: groups of three words were taught together so that in each trial one of the words worked as a sample. Study 3 employed the mixed training and a cumulative baseline: words previously taught were interspersed with words to be taught. Study 4 introduced a new variable, besides the mixed training and the cumulative baseline: a compound sample. In this study, words should be constructed under the control of a sample compounded by a picture and its correspondent printed word. After training, all participants of the Studies 2, 3 and 4 showed high spelling performances and excepting one participant, all of them had great improvements in reading. Reading scores were more variable than spelling scores. Performances with new words (compounded by the syllables of the taught words) were variable and some participants did not show recombinative repertoire. Also, some participants showed performances with some words before they were actually trained. Because of that, Study 5 employed a group design to evaluate the effect of the teaching procedure. The Experimental Group took the teaching procedure lessons (the same version employed in Study 4) while the Control Group was exposed only to the assessment sessions. The Experimental Group performances in spelling, reading and other relations evaluated were significantly higher than the Control Group performances. These results showed that the procedure have been effective in teaching spelling and also in promoting the emerge of reading.Vários estudos têm investigado a aquisição de leitura e escrita, bem como a relação entre os repertórios. Em muitos deles, as relações ensinadas privilegiam o desenvolvimento da leitura e os efeitos observados no repertório de escrita são secundários. O presente estudo teve por objetivo ensinar escrita sob controle de ditado e verificar os possíveis efeitos sobre a leitura. Para isso foi empregada uma tarefa computadorizada de construção de palavras. Nesse tipo de tarefa, um estímulo modelo (que pode ser uma palavra impressa, uma figura, uma figura e a palavra impressa correspondente ou uma palavra ditada) é apresentado juntamente com um conjunto de letras (estímulos de escolha). A tarefa do participante consiste em selecionar, entre os estímulos de escolha disponíveis, na sequência correta, as letras que permitem construir uma palavra correspondente ao modelo. Foram conduzidos cinco estudos. Em cada estudo foi ensinada a construção de 30 palavras, constituídas por sílabas simples do tipo consoante vogal. No Estudo 1 foi empregado um procedimento que previa o ensino separado de cada uma das palavras. Além disso, uma vez aprendidas, as palavras não eram revisadas. Um, entre dois participantes atingiu rapidamente o critério para cada palavra, mas a avaliação final detectou falta de manutenção do repertório. No Estudo 2, as palavras foram ensinadas de maneira intercalada e no Estudo 3, além do ensino intercalado, as palavras já aprendidas passaram a ser reapresentadas juntamente com as palavras novas nos passos subsequentes, constituindo uma linha de base cumulativa. O Estudo 4 manteve as manipulações introduzidas nos Estudos 2 e 3 e acrescentou uma nova variável: o ensino da construção da resposta sob controle de estímulo composto (figura e palavra impressa correspondente). Após a exposição ao procedimento, todos os participantes dos Estudos 2, 3 e 4 apresentaram ganhos em ditado e com exceção de um, os demais também apresentaram ganhos em leitura. Os desempenhos em leitura foram mais variáveis do que os desempenhos em ditado. Os desempenhos com palavras novas (compostas pela recombinação de sílabas das palavras ensinadas) também variaram entre os participantes e alguns deles não demonstraram repertórios recombinativos. Alguns participantes apresentaram desempenho com as palavras do conjunto não ensinado. Em virtude disso, o Estudo 5 investigou o efeito do procedimento por meio de um delineamento de grupo. O Grupo Experimental foi exposto ao procedimento do Estudo 4 (por ter sido o que gerou um responder mais estável) e o Grupo Controle foi exposto apenas às avaliações previstas pelo procedimento. O GE apresentou desempenho significativamente superior ao do GC em ditado, leitura e na maioria das outras relações testadas, o que demonstra a efetividade do procedimento de ensino no estabelecimento de escrita sob controle de ditado e também na emergência de leitura.Universidade Federal de Minas Geraisapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de São CarlosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia - PPGPsiUFSCarBREscritaLeituraEmparelhamento com modeloRecombinaçãoSoletraçãoEmparelhamento de acordo com o modelo por construção da respostaEquivalência de estímulosSpellingReadingConstructed response matching to sampleRecombinationStimuls equivalenceCIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIAEstabelecimento de escrita sob controle de ditado como base para a recombinação na leitura e na escritainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINAL5361.pdfapplication/pdf1037300https://{{ getenv "DSPACE_HOST" "repositorio.ufscar.br" }}/bitstream/ufscar/5983/1/5361.pdff6d3f569ec96dcb450a7aee8bd65999bMD51TEXT5361.pdf.txt5361.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain0https://{{ getenv "DSPACE_HOST" "repositorio.ufscar.br" }}/bitstream/ufscar/5983/2/5361.pdf.txtd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD52THUMBNAIL5361.pdf.jpg5361.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg8276https://{{ getenv "DSPACE_HOST" "repositorio.ufscar.br" }}/bitstream/ufscar/5983/3/5361.pdf.jpg2a762cf071cd14e8b63ccc581846da0aMD53ufscar/59832019-09-11 04:19:33.272oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/5983Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestopendoar:43222023-05-25T12:50:41.159617Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Estabelecimento de escrita sob controle de ditado como base para a recombinação na leitura e na escrita
title Estabelecimento de escrita sob controle de ditado como base para a recombinação na leitura e na escrita
spellingShingle Estabelecimento de escrita sob controle de ditado como base para a recombinação na leitura e na escrita
Reis, Thaíze de Souza
Escrita
Leitura
Emparelhamento com modelo
Recombinação
Soletração
Emparelhamento de acordo com o modelo por construção da resposta
Equivalência de estímulos
Spelling
Reading
Constructed response matching to sample
Recombination
Stimuls equivalence
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA
title_short Estabelecimento de escrita sob controle de ditado como base para a recombinação na leitura e na escrita
title_full Estabelecimento de escrita sob controle de ditado como base para a recombinação na leitura e na escrita
title_fullStr Estabelecimento de escrita sob controle de ditado como base para a recombinação na leitura e na escrita
title_full_unstemmed Estabelecimento de escrita sob controle de ditado como base para a recombinação na leitura e na escrita
title_sort Estabelecimento de escrita sob controle de ditado como base para a recombinação na leitura e na escrita
author Reis, Thaíze de Souza
author_facet Reis, Thaíze de Souza
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3497049970396440
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Reis, Thaíze de Souza
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Souza, Deisy das Graças de
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4404800720856419
contributor_str_mv Souza, Deisy das Graças de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Escrita
Leitura
Emparelhamento com modelo
Recombinação
Soletração
Emparelhamento de acordo com o modelo por construção da resposta
Equivalência de estímulos
topic Escrita
Leitura
Emparelhamento com modelo
Recombinação
Soletração
Emparelhamento de acordo com o modelo por construção da resposta
Equivalência de estímulos
Spelling
Reading
Constructed response matching to sample
Recombination
Stimuls equivalence
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Spelling
Reading
Constructed response matching to sample
Recombination
Stimuls equivalence
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA
description Several studies are interested in the acquisition of reading and spelling as well as in the role the acquisition of one ability plays in the acquisition of the other. However, many of these studies focus on reading rather than on spelling. This study aimed to teach spelling skills and verify whether it would affect the reading repertoire. To teach spelling, a constructed response matching to sample task was employed. In this task, a sample (that could be a printed word, a picture, a picture and its correspondent printed word or a dictated word) was presented as well as a pool of randomly chosen letters. Children had to select in the correct order the letters to spell the word correspondent to the sample. Thirty Portuguese words were taught. Five studies were conducted. In Study 1, each word was taught till criterion and once it was achieved the word was no longer presented during training. Two students took part but only one achieved the criterion for the totality of the words. Although the criterion was achieved rapidly for most words, the performance decreased on the posttest probes. Study 2 employed a mixed training: groups of three words were taught together so that in each trial one of the words worked as a sample. Study 3 employed the mixed training and a cumulative baseline: words previously taught were interspersed with words to be taught. Study 4 introduced a new variable, besides the mixed training and the cumulative baseline: a compound sample. In this study, words should be constructed under the control of a sample compounded by a picture and its correspondent printed word. After training, all participants of the Studies 2, 3 and 4 showed high spelling performances and excepting one participant, all of them had great improvements in reading. Reading scores were more variable than spelling scores. Performances with new words (compounded by the syllables of the taught words) were variable and some participants did not show recombinative repertoire. Also, some participants showed performances with some words before they were actually trained. Because of that, Study 5 employed a group design to evaluate the effect of the teaching procedure. The Experimental Group took the teaching procedure lessons (the same version employed in Study 4) while the Control Group was exposed only to the assessment sessions. The Experimental Group performances in spelling, reading and other relations evaluated were significantly higher than the Control Group performances. These results showed that the procedure have been effective in teaching spelling and also in promoting the emerge of reading.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2013-09-06
2016-06-02T20:30:08Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2013-04-10
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-06-02T20:30:08Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/5983
url https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/5983
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia - PPGPsi
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSCar
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:UFSCAR
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str UFSCAR
institution UFSCAR
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
collection Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://{{ getenv "DSPACE_HOST" "repositorio.ufscar.br" }}/bitstream/ufscar/5983/1/5361.pdf
https://{{ getenv "DSPACE_HOST" "repositorio.ufscar.br" }}/bitstream/ufscar/5983/2/5361.pdf.txt
https://{{ getenv "DSPACE_HOST" "repositorio.ufscar.br" }}/bitstream/ufscar/5983/3/5361.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv f6d3f569ec96dcb450a7aee8bd65999b
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
2a762cf071cd14e8b63ccc581846da0a
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1767351095148937216