A concessão ex offício da tutela antecipada no contexto da efetividade processual

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2008
Autor(a) principal: Figuerôa, Bruno Angelim lattes
Orientador(a): Santos, Gustavo Ferreira lattes
Banca de defesa: Teixeira, Sergio Torres lattes, Galindo, Bruno César Machado Torres lattes
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Católica de Pernambuco
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Mestrado em Direito
Departamento: Direito
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/416
Resumo: This scientific paper examined the possibility of the magistrate to grant, in a discretionary way, the anticipatory technique disciplined in Article 273 of the Brazilian Civil Procedural Code, because of the effectiveness of the procedural context. To accomplish that, the jurisdictional guardianship was analyzed under the fundamental rights perspective, focusing on time and process, the phases of the evolution of the procedural theory, the need for a constitutional interpretation of the laws and the implications of the fundamental principals in the process. It was also necessary to understand, through the instrumental point of view, the judge s power-duty to safeguard and the incidence of the fungibility principal around urgent matters, defending the unified nature of the reassuring and satisfying techniques. And, therefore, the disconnection of the ordinarization and cognition ending, plus assessing this theme under compared law analyzes, especially in the countries that influenced the Brazilian law system. It was highlighted, in this subject, that formalism for the sake of formalism could not be accepted, as well as the procedural technicism as an obstacle to a sound analysis of each concrete situation and the very assurance of the best possible efficiency of the material guardianship obtained via procedural tool. The re-designing of the anticipated guardianship of the parental right could not be ignored, momentarily when one seeks to demonstrate the efforts that, for a long time, have been used to favor a faster and fairer judicial service. Some constraints, written by the ones who pay reverence to legality and a rigid concept of the procedural institutes, have been analyzed, those points are easily surpassed by the need for effectiveness of the legal guardianship. At the end, the research checked the incidence of the proportionality, reasonability and inter-subjective cooperation principals as main factors to the granting of the anticipatory urgency institute, without the necessary lawful formality (express petition by the one interested). Summing everything up, we search, hence, to legitimate the judge the one who interprets and is a creative operator of the legal system to interact with the others procedural subjects, thinking of the goods and interests on the line in each case, as to autonomously act in the process aiming the protection of material rights and the very utility of the final ruling. Only from this conception, the anticipatory guardianship institute will fulfill its true purpose which is to avoid improper time dilations in a process and assure justice in a timely manner
id UCAP_2d001788121e713e6588085f0a407ab2
oai_identifier_str oai:tede2.unicap.br:tede/416
network_acronym_str UCAP
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP
repository_id_str
spelling Santos, Gustavo FerreiraCPF:70258309415http://lattes.cnpq.br/0225515825120934Teixeira, Sergio TorresCPF:39994570404http://lattes.cnpq.br/5251373969908944Galindo, Bruno César Machado TorresCPF:00000000452http://lattes.cnpq.br/8696645008219824CPF:86770870444http://lattes.cnpq.br/9424702305796969Figuerôa, Bruno Angelim2017-06-01T18:17:58Z2010-03-222008-09-24FIGUERÔA, Bruno Angelim. The ex officio grant of injunctive relief in the context of procedural effectiveness. 2008. 121 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco, Recife, 2008.http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/416This scientific paper examined the possibility of the magistrate to grant, in a discretionary way, the anticipatory technique disciplined in Article 273 of the Brazilian Civil Procedural Code, because of the effectiveness of the procedural context. To accomplish that, the jurisdictional guardianship was analyzed under the fundamental rights perspective, focusing on time and process, the phases of the evolution of the procedural theory, the need for a constitutional interpretation of the laws and the implications of the fundamental principals in the process. It was also necessary to understand, through the instrumental point of view, the judge s power-duty to safeguard and the incidence of the fungibility principal around urgent matters, defending the unified nature of the reassuring and satisfying techniques. And, therefore, the disconnection of the ordinarization and cognition ending, plus assessing this theme under compared law analyzes, especially in the countries that influenced the Brazilian law system. It was highlighted, in this subject, that formalism for the sake of formalism could not be accepted, as well as the procedural technicism as an obstacle to a sound analysis of each concrete situation and the very assurance of the best possible efficiency of the material guardianship obtained via procedural tool. The re-designing of the anticipated guardianship of the parental right could not be ignored, momentarily when one seeks to demonstrate the efforts that, for a long time, have been used to favor a faster and fairer judicial service. Some constraints, written by the ones who pay reverence to legality and a rigid concept of the procedural institutes, have been analyzed, those points are easily surpassed by the need for effectiveness of the legal guardianship. At the end, the research checked the incidence of the proportionality, reasonability and inter-subjective cooperation principals as main factors to the granting of the anticipatory urgency institute, without the necessary lawful formality (express petition by the one interested). Summing everything up, we search, hence, to legitimate the judge the one who interprets and is a creative operator of the legal system to interact with the others procedural subjects, thinking of the goods and interests on the line in each case, as to autonomously act in the process aiming the protection of material rights and the very utility of the final ruling. Only from this conception, the anticipatory guardianship institute will fulfill its true purpose which is to avoid improper time dilations in a process and assure justice in a timely mannerEsta produção científica examinou a possibilidade do magistrado conceder de ofício a técnica antecipatória disciplinada no art. 273 do Código de Processo Civil, em razão do contexto da efetividade processual. Para tanto, analisou-se a tutela jurisdicional na perspectiva dos direitos fundamentais, enfocando-se a relação tempo e processo, as fases de evolução da teoria processual, a necessidade de interpretação constitucional do ordenamento jurídico e as implicações dos princípios fundamentais no processo. Procurou-se ainda compreender, através do ponto de vista instrumental, o poder-dever do juiz de acautelar e a incidência do princípio da fungibilidade no contorno das medidas de urgências, em defesa da natureza unificada das técnicas assecuratórias e satisfativas. E, por conseguinte, o rompimento do paradigma da ordinarização e da exauriência da cognição, além de visitar o tema em foco no direito comparado, especialmente nos países influenciadores do regime brasileiro. Destacouse, nesse conjunto, a inadmissibilidade do formalismo pelo formalismo, do tecnicismo processual como óbice à análise criteriosa de cada situação em concreto e à própria garantia da maior eficácia possível à tutela material obtida via instrumento-processo. A reestruturação da tutela antecipada no direito pátrio não poderia ter sido ignorada, mormente quando se busca demonstrar os esforços que, há muito, têm sido envidados em favor de uma prestação jurisdicional mais célere e justa. Foram também analisados alguns entraves formulados pelos que reverenciam a legalidade e a concepção rígida dos institutos processuais, aspectos perfeitamente superáveis em função da exigência da efetividade da tutela jurisdicional. Ao final, dirigiu-se a pesquisa para a averiguação da incidência dos princípios da proporcionalidade, razoabilidade e cooperação intersubjetiva como fatores decisivos ao deferimento da medida de urgência antecipatória, sem o cumprimento da formalidade exigida por lei (pedido expresso do sujeito interessado). Em suma, busca-se, pois, legitimar o juiz intérprete e operador criativo do direito a interagir com os demais sujeitos processuais, ponderando os valores e bens em jogo no caso concreto, de modo a atuar autonomamente no processo com vistas à proteção do direito material e da própria utilidade do provimento judicial definitivo. Somente a partir dessa concepção, o instituto da antecipação da tutela cumprirá o seu verdadeiro papel de evitar as dilações indevidas no processo e garantir a materialização do acesso à ordem jurídica justaMade available in DSpace on 2017-06-01T18:17:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 dissertacao_bruno_angelim.pdf: 463546 bytes, checksum: b83bbe01a2f5f3734eab192ab22e7f24 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-09-24application/pdfporUniversidade Católica de PernambucoMestrado em DireitoUNICAPBRDireitotutela antecipadaprocesso civildissertaçõesinjunctive reliefcivil proceduredissertationsCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOA concessão ex offício da tutela antecipada no contexto da efetividade processualThe ex officio grant of injunctive relief in the context of procedural effectivenessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAPinstname:Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)instacron:UNICAPORIGINALdissertacao_bruno_angelim.pdfapplication/pdf463546http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/416/1/dissertacao_bruno_angelim.pdfb83bbe01a2f5f3734eab192ab22e7f24MD51tede/4162018-09-24 15:29:18.65oai:tede2.unicap.br:tede/416Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.unicap.br:8080/http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/oai/requestbiblioteca@unicap.br||biblioteca@unicap.bropendoar:46462018-09-24T18:29:18Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv A concessão ex offício da tutela antecipada no contexto da efetividade processual
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv The ex officio grant of injunctive relief in the context of procedural effectiveness
title A concessão ex offício da tutela antecipada no contexto da efetividade processual
spellingShingle A concessão ex offício da tutela antecipada no contexto da efetividade processual
Figuerôa, Bruno Angelim
tutela antecipada
processo civil
dissertações
injunctive relief
civil procedure
dissertations
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
title_short A concessão ex offício da tutela antecipada no contexto da efetividade processual
title_full A concessão ex offício da tutela antecipada no contexto da efetividade processual
title_fullStr A concessão ex offício da tutela antecipada no contexto da efetividade processual
title_full_unstemmed A concessão ex offício da tutela antecipada no contexto da efetividade processual
title_sort A concessão ex offício da tutela antecipada no contexto da efetividade processual
author Figuerôa, Bruno Angelim
author_facet Figuerôa, Bruno Angelim
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Santos, Gustavo Ferreira
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv CPF:70258309415
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0225515825120934
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Teixeira, Sergio Torres
dc.contributor.referee1ID.fl_str_mv CPF:39994570404
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/5251373969908944
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Galindo, Bruno César Machado Torres
dc.contributor.referee2ID.fl_str_mv CPF:00000000452
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8696645008219824
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv CPF:86770870444
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/9424702305796969
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Figuerôa, Bruno Angelim
contributor_str_mv Santos, Gustavo Ferreira
Teixeira, Sergio Torres
Galindo, Bruno César Machado Torres
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv tutela antecipada
processo civil
dissertações
topic tutela antecipada
processo civil
dissertações
injunctive relief
civil procedure
dissertations
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv injunctive relief
civil procedure
dissertations
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
description This scientific paper examined the possibility of the magistrate to grant, in a discretionary way, the anticipatory technique disciplined in Article 273 of the Brazilian Civil Procedural Code, because of the effectiveness of the procedural context. To accomplish that, the jurisdictional guardianship was analyzed under the fundamental rights perspective, focusing on time and process, the phases of the evolution of the procedural theory, the need for a constitutional interpretation of the laws and the implications of the fundamental principals in the process. It was also necessary to understand, through the instrumental point of view, the judge s power-duty to safeguard and the incidence of the fungibility principal around urgent matters, defending the unified nature of the reassuring and satisfying techniques. And, therefore, the disconnection of the ordinarization and cognition ending, plus assessing this theme under compared law analyzes, especially in the countries that influenced the Brazilian law system. It was highlighted, in this subject, that formalism for the sake of formalism could not be accepted, as well as the procedural technicism as an obstacle to a sound analysis of each concrete situation and the very assurance of the best possible efficiency of the material guardianship obtained via procedural tool. The re-designing of the anticipated guardianship of the parental right could not be ignored, momentarily when one seeks to demonstrate the efforts that, for a long time, have been used to favor a faster and fairer judicial service. Some constraints, written by the ones who pay reverence to legality and a rigid concept of the procedural institutes, have been analyzed, those points are easily surpassed by the need for effectiveness of the legal guardianship. At the end, the research checked the incidence of the proportionality, reasonability and inter-subjective cooperation principals as main factors to the granting of the anticipatory urgency institute, without the necessary lawful formality (express petition by the one interested). Summing everything up, we search, hence, to legitimate the judge the one who interprets and is a creative operator of the legal system to interact with the others procedural subjects, thinking of the goods and interests on the line in each case, as to autonomously act in the process aiming the protection of material rights and the very utility of the final ruling. Only from this conception, the anticipatory guardianship institute will fulfill its true purpose which is to avoid improper time dilations in a process and assure justice in a timely manner
publishDate 2008
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2008-09-24
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2010-03-22
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-06-01T18:17:58Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv FIGUERÔA, Bruno Angelim. The ex officio grant of injunctive relief in the context of procedural effectiveness. 2008. 121 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco, Recife, 2008.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/416
identifier_str_mv FIGUERÔA, Bruno Angelim. The ex officio grant of injunctive relief in the context of procedural effectiveness. 2008. 121 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco, Recife, 2008.
url http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/416
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Pernambuco
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Mestrado em Direito
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UNICAP
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Pernambuco
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP
instname:Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)
instacron:UNICAP
instname_str Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)
instacron_str UNICAP
institution UNICAP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/416/1/dissertacao_bruno_angelim.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv b83bbe01a2f5f3734eab192ab22e7f24
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca@unicap.br||biblioteca@unicap.br
_version_ 1797223314234540032