O REGIME DE PRIVAÇÃO DE LIBERDADE SOB ENFOQUE DA SOCIOEDUCAÇÃO: EXPERIÊNCIA DO CENTRO DE SOCIOEDUCAÇÃO REGIONAL DE PONTA GROSSA

• Ano de defesa: 2010
• Autor(a) principal: Guralh, Soeli Andrea
• Orientador(a): Moreira, Dircéia
• Banca de defesa: Costa, Lucia Cortes da , Silva, Lenir Aparecida Mainardes da
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE PONTA GROSSA
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciências Sociais Aplicadas
• Departamento: Sociedade, Direito e Cidadania
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: adolescente autor de ato infracional; privação de liberdade; socioeducação; prática profissional
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: adolescent author of an infraction; deprivation; social education; professional practice
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS
• Link de acesso: http://tede2.uepg.br/jspui/handle/prefix/300

The present study is about the challenges and contradictions inherent for the development of the social educative professional practice, by a multiprofessional team, into the everyday reality of the freedom liberty deprivation regime – the internment – of Social Education Center of Ponta Grossa – CENSE PG. The main objective is to approach the limit and the possibilities of development of a professional practice of education for the social connivance, which promotes the autonomy and strengthen the interpersonal relation of the subjects and the demands that are faced by the professionals in this process. The methodological procedures used had been: bibliographic research; documental source study; and observation. For the data gathering, it had been used a qualitative research procedure; the focal group. The interviews with the selected professionals had been analyzed, using as a resource, the categorical content analysis. The first chapter relates the category freedom, in its legal dimension, as social educative internment, the institution's daily attendance, and the socializing and punitive dimensions of detention procedure with an emphasis on institutional social control. The second chapter approaches the social educative care, while public policy in its construction process. The third chapter refers to the operationalization of the concepts and guidelines of the social educational in the institution. The main finding in the survey is that the absence of a design and an own of the social education to causing a split in the formative processes of these professionals, who become trained for different lines of action prevents professionals to have clarity of their attributions and limits of intervention.