Família é a gente com quem se conta : o Programa Família Acolhedora ampliando a rede de pertencimento

• Ano de defesa: 2012
• Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Carolina Sette
• Orientador(a): Uziel, Anna Paula
• Banca de defesa: Vianna, Adriana de Resende Barreto , Ayres, Lygia Santa Maria
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Social
• Departamento: Centro de Educação e Humanidades::Instituto de Psicologia
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Família; Acolhimento familiar; Família acolhedora; Políticas públicas; Política familiar; Assistência a menores; Crianças Formação
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Family; Foster care; Foster family; Public policies
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA::PSICOLOGIA SOCIAL
• Link de acesso: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/15325

The present dissertation had the goal of charting the field of intervention of Rio de Janeiro s Programa Família Acolhedora (PFA), in order to comprehend the tools of management of minorities operated by public policies in this case, the PFA. In order to do this, groups were conducted with families of origin, foster families and foster children and adolescents, and interviews with two families of origin and several meetings and discussions with technical staff. From the theoretical framework of the french Institutional Analysis and the cartographic method, the defense of family life advocated in speeches that support foster family programs was put under review, showing discursive-practices that naturalize models of family and care, operating certain childhood management that ultimately aims neutralizing a portion of the population considered as being potentially dangerous through the insertion or maintenance in households. The analysis of tensions placed on the negotiations held in the Program s quotidian explains the tension of the protection that tutorizes, which is inherent to the intervention. The emergence of dynamics, such as management of the solidarity and rhetoric of gratitude, allowed the analysis of a field of enunciative relationships and negotiation of positions that produce the subjects in relation and work the possibilities of negotiation. Through the discussion of the work with groups and the dismantling of two cases, we discuss experiences of families of origin and foster families in the Program. We could see how families and technical staff appropriate the Program to themselves, despite the impositive character as a government disciplinary practice, creating vanishing lines and maintaining some degree of autonomy, not affirming themselves as rebellious or pitiful.