Efeitos do treinamento pliométrico e de força sobre a impulsão vertical, percepção subjetiva de esforço, dor muscular de início tardio e potência muscular em jovens jogadores de futebol de campo

• Ano de defesa: 2021
• Autor(a) principal: Fonseca, Renato Tavares
• Outros Autores: [e-mail]
• Orientador(a): Vale, Rodrigo Gomes de Souza
• Banca de defesa: Santos, Luciano Alonso Valente dos , Oliveira Filho, Gilson Ramos de , Lopes, Gustavo Casimiro , Nunes, Rodolfo de Alkmim Moreira
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências do Exercício e do Esporte
• Departamento: Centro de Educação e Humanidades::Instituto de Educação Física e Desporto
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Treinamento pliométrico; Treinamento de força; Impulsão vertical; Adolescentes; Percepção subjetiva de esforço; Dor muscular; Futebol; Exercícios físicos; Esforço físico
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Plyometric training; Strength training; Vertical jump; Adolescents; Rating of perceived exertion; Muscle pain; Soccer
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::EDUCACAO FISICA
• Link de acesso: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/16886

The plyometric training (PT) and muscle strength training (ST) are applied in young field soccer players and usually have high intensity. Both can to produce an increase in performance on vertical jump (VJ), but these methods also can to produce muscle damage, especially when performed by younger athletes who are not yet adapted to these types of training. In this thesis, 3 studies were developed. The first study is a systematic review, published in the journal RETOS, that selected 10 articles, where three of these articles performed mixed interventions, with the application of PT with other methods, including ST, on the VJ and other variables. The other seven articles used PT as an isolated intervention, without being associated with any other type of training. It was found in two articles, effects (p<0.05) on bilateral and unilateral VJ, as well as, about other variables. In one of the articles, there was only an increase (p<0.05) on VJ, when the PT was associated with the ST. In the other seven articles that used PT alone, four produced effects (p<0.05) on the VJ, the other 3 articles found effects (p<0.05) on the horizontal jump (HJ) (bipedal and unipedal), as well as about other physical valences. The second study, published in the journal Human Movement, two PT methods were used, on two different groups, one that performed training directly on the ground (GPT) and the other in the aquatic environment (APT). The sets of training were performed through the deep jump (DJ), both of them, with the same volume, on the responses of VJ and the late onset muscle pain (DOMS). The results showed that the both of groups produced results (p<0.05) on VJ, however with a reduction (p<0.05) on DOMS, observed only in ATP. In third study, submitted to the journal Biology of Sport, had the formation of 2 experimental groups, that participated in different interventions, one that performed the strenght training (ST), called (STG) and the other that performed the plyometric training (PTG), in addition to one control group (CG). The aim of the study was to verify the effects of PT and ST on VJ, elevation time (ET), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), pain (DOMS), in addition to muscle absolute power’s peak (APP) and muscle relative power’s peak (RPP) in young soccer players. In this study, only in the GTF, differences were observed (p<0.05) on the VJ, through the CMJ and the jump without countermovement (SJ), as on the APP and the RPP. The PTG produced an increase (p<0.05) on VJ, only through SJ, but without significant results on APP and RPP. In intragroup comparisons on RPE and DOMS, there were increases (p<0.05) over the three groups, but in the intergroup analysis, only PTG volunteers showed an increase (p<0.05) compared to STG and CG, with higher elevation on RPE and DOMS. The increases on the RPE and the DOMS may have influenced the results (p>0.05) observed in the PTG on evaluation of the VJ, through the CMJ. There were correlations (p<0.05) both in the CMJ and in the SJ, involving the PPA and PPR with the IV and between the PPA and the PPR