Percepção dos integrantes do programa produtor de água sobre os desafios do processo de implantação

• Ano de defesa: 2015
• Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro , Aristela Resende
• Orientador(a): Teixeira, Denilson
• Banca de defesa: Teixeira, Denilson, Hora, Karla Emmanuela Ribeiro, Godoi, Emiliano Lôbo de
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Goiás
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia do Meio Ambiente (EEC)
• Departamento: Escola de Engenharia Civil - EEC (RG)
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Pagamentos por serviços ambientais; Programa produtor de água do Ribeiro João Leite; Percepção ambiental
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Payment for environmental services; Brook water producer program João Leite; Environmental perception
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: ENGENHARIA SANITARIA::RECURSOS HIDRICOS; ENGENHARIA SANITARIA::SANEAMENTO AMBIENTAL
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/5163

The Payment Programs for Environmental Services (PES) have been widely researched. However, there is a need to invest in studies that discuss the influence of perception on different members of the program in relation to the success of it. Along this, the objective of the research was to present the perception of the members involved in the process of implementation of Brook Joao Leite in the Water Producer Program (RJLWPP). For that, we interviewed 10 farmers and 15 members of the Project Management Unit (PMU), in addition to the identification and analysis of the aspects of implementation and operation of the Program. Analyzing the perception of the members in relation to the program, we understand that farmers possess adequate knowledge about environmental problems. Regarding the proposed amount to be paid to the owner, 60% considered insufficient or regular, as opposed to 20% who felt the same offer as good or sufficient. On the other hand, 90% of respondents expressed interest in participating effectively in the program. The required paperwork was the main reason for disinterest in the program for 10% of the owners. As the main negative points of the Program, the PMU members pointed out: conflicts between institutions, the length of referrals and the bureaucracy of the Program implementation process. The survey also points out that the institutions have shown uncertainty about the degree of commitment and responsibilities to one another. The program is expected to face difficulties in the process of implementation and consolidation mainly due to the complexity of the legal framework and lack of institutional commitment among members. What means the need to strengthen the institutions involved (resources, technical training, autonomy) for added assurance of maintenance and operation of the Program, regardless of political changes.