Programa Ciência sem Fronteiras: uma avaliação da política pública de internacionalização do ensino superior sob a perspectiva do paradigma multidimensional

• Ano de defesa: 2016
• Autor(a) principal: Cruz, Viviane Xavier de Araujo
• Orientador(a): Souza, Eliane Moreira Sá de
• Banca de defesa: Souza, Eliane Moreira Sá de , Carvalho, Claudia Regina Rosal , Cruz, Alethéia Ferreira da, Mello, Simone Portela Teixeira de
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Goiás
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: PROFIAP - Programa de Pós-graduação em Administração Pública Andifes (FCT)
• Departamento: Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia - FCT (RG)
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Políticas públicas; Avaliação; Internacionalização; Programas governamentais; Programas educacionais; Ciência sem fronteiras
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Public policies; Evaluation; Internationalization; Government programs; Educational programs; Science without borders
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: ADMINISTRACAO PUBLICA
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/6543

This work aimed to develop an educational assessment model applied to program Science Without Borders program, based on the multidimensional paradigm model. Therefore, it has been done a multidimensional diagnosis of the program, which was one of the government of Dilma Rousseff 's flagship and had an approximately three-billion-real investment in its first phase, based on the analysis of the meeting minutes of the Superior Council and Technical Scientific Council of Higher Education of CAPES, the DataSenado research that evaluated the perception of the scholarship holder and a survey applied to the institutional coordinators in higher education institutions. Then, indicators of efficacy, efficiency, effectiveness and relevance have been established, based on the literature and CAPES’ documents of area, to a program evaluation, in order to support the planning and formulation of government intervention, the monitoring of the second phase implementation , its revisions and adjustments, as well as decisions on the maintenance or interruption of actions in order to improve the efficiency of public spending, the quality of management and the control over the effectiveness of state action. When applying the proposed model, it was found that the program is not very efficacious and efficient, although it is quite relevant. As for effectiveness, it could not be measured due to lack of data.