An?lise ambiental e econ?mica comparativa de m?todos de amostragem do solo utilizadas em agricultura de precis?o

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2017
Autor(a) principal: Gon?alves, Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro lattes
Orientador(a): Ferraz, Gabriel Ara?jo e Silva
Banca de defesa: Ferraz, Gabriel Ara?jo e Silva, Barros, Murilo Machado de, Silva, Fl?vio Castro da
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Engenharia Agr?cola e Ambiental
Departamento: Instituto de Tecnologia
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/1944
Resumo: Precision agriculture has been an alternative to reduce costs in agriculture and environmental gain, and can also facilitate the localized and rational application of inputs, with positive economic, environmental and social results. Soil sampling techniques studies from the use of new sensors available in the market becomes fundamental importance. The objective of this work was to compare fertilizer recommendation maps based on three different soil sampling methods to evaluate the economic and environmental component. The experiment was carried out in three distinct areas in the cities of Guarapuava and Cantagalo, both in the state of Paran?, under no-tillage system, with crops rotation of soy, oat, corn, wheat and barley. The used sampling methods were: by altitude management zones, sample meshes and electrical conductivity oriented sampling (CEa). The soil samples for the method of altitude management zones were performed after the zones definition. Mesh sampling was performed at the density of one sample per ha. The guided sampling was carried out after the definition of management zones by electrical conductivity of the soil, through the use of soil approach sensor. From the results of the laboratory analysis, recommendation maps were made for limestone, phosphorus, potassium and nitrogen application to allow comparison between methods, volumes, environmental factors and costs. With the accomplishment of this study it was possible to evaluate the spatial variability of the soil attributes, comparing the fertilizer volumes recommended, estimating the global economic cost of using the technology by sensor, as well as all the used inputs, equipment and implements. From the environmental point of view, it was possible to quantitatively and spatially evaluate the behavior of the applications of each fertilizer by sampling method. Taking the Meshes Samples method as reference, it was presented as a better alternative compared to the other methods, however, the use of soil sensors have been presented as viable technologies that need further improvement in order to provide productivity, costs reduction and consequent economic and environmental gain.
id UFRRJ-1_37157f12afed750db7369a9b8b27eceb
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:jspui/1944
network_acronym_str UFRRJ-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
repository_id_str
spelling Ferraz, Gabriel Ara?jo e Silva074.181.446-36Reynaldo, ?tore Francisco845.455.261-87Ferraz, Gabriel Ara?jo e SilvaBarros, Murilo Machado deSilva, Fl?vio Castro da008.297.707-00http://lattes.cnpq.br/5955994311305502Gon?alves, Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro2017-08-03T18:16:36Z2017-02-17GON?ALVES, Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro. An?lise Ambiental e Econ?mica Comparativa de M?todos de Amostragem do Solo Utilizadas em Agricultura de Precis?o. 2017. 93 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Ci?ncias, Engenharia Agr?cola e Ambiental). Instituto de Tecnologia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica, RJ, 2017.https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/1944Precision agriculture has been an alternative to reduce costs in agriculture and environmental gain, and can also facilitate the localized and rational application of inputs, with positive economic, environmental and social results. Soil sampling techniques studies from the use of new sensors available in the market becomes fundamental importance. The objective of this work was to compare fertilizer recommendation maps based on three different soil sampling methods to evaluate the economic and environmental component. The experiment was carried out in three distinct areas in the cities of Guarapuava and Cantagalo, both in the state of Paran?, under no-tillage system, with crops rotation of soy, oat, corn, wheat and barley. The used sampling methods were: by altitude management zones, sample meshes and electrical conductivity oriented sampling (CEa). The soil samples for the method of altitude management zones were performed after the zones definition. Mesh sampling was performed at the density of one sample per ha. The guided sampling was carried out after the definition of management zones by electrical conductivity of the soil, through the use of soil approach sensor. From the results of the laboratory analysis, recommendation maps were made for limestone, phosphorus, potassium and nitrogen application to allow comparison between methods, volumes, environmental factors and costs. With the accomplishment of this study it was possible to evaluate the spatial variability of the soil attributes, comparing the fertilizer volumes recommended, estimating the global economic cost of using the technology by sensor, as well as all the used inputs, equipment and implements. From the environmental point of view, it was possible to quantitatively and spatially evaluate the behavior of the applications of each fertilizer by sampling method. Taking the Meshes Samples method as reference, it was presented as a better alternative compared to the other methods, however, the use of soil sensors have been presented as viable technologies that need further improvement in order to provide productivity, costs reduction and consequent economic and environmental gain.A agricultura de precis?o tem sido uma alternativa para redu??o de custos na agricultura e ganho ambiental, podendo ainda facilitar a aplica??o localizada e racional dos insumos, com resultados econ?micos, ambientais e sociais positivos. O estudo das t?cnicas amostrais de solo a partir do uso de novos sensores dispon?veis no mercado torna-se de fundamental import?ncia. Objetivou-se no presente trabalho, comparar mapas de recomenda??o de fertilizantes baseados em tr?s diferentes m?todos de amostragem do solo para avalia??o do componente econ?mico e ambiental. O experimento foi realizado em tr?s ?reas distintas nos munic?pios de Guarapuava e Cantagalo, ambos no estado do Paran?, sob sistema de plantio direto, com rota??o das culturas de soja, aveia, milho, trigo e cevada. Os m?todos amostrais utilizados foram: por zonas de manejo por altitude, malhas amostrais e amostragem orientada por condutividade el?trica (CEa). As amostras de solo para o m?todo zonas de manejo por altitude foram realizadas ap?s a defini??o das zonas. A amostragem em malha foi realizada na densidade de uma amostra por ha. A amostragem orientada foi realizada ap?s a defini??o das zonas de manejo por condutividade el?trica do solo, por meio do uso de sensor de aproxima??o do solo. A partir dos resultados das an?lises laboratoriais, foram confeccionados mapas de recomenda??o para aplica??o de Calc?rio, F?sforo, Pot?ssio e Nitrog?nio de forma a permitir a compara??o entre os m?todos, volumes, fatores ambientais e custos. Com a realiza??o deste estudo foi poss?vel avaliar a variabilidade espacial dos atributos do solo, comparando os volumes dos fertilizantes recomendados, estimar o custo econ?mico global da utiliza??o da tecnologia via sensor, bem como de todos os insumos, equipamentos e implementos utilizados. Sob o ponto de vista ambiental, foi poss?vel avaliar de maneira quantitativa e espacial o comportamento das aplica??es cada fertilizante por m?todo amostral. Tomando-se o m?todo de Malhas Amostrais como refer?ncia, o mesmo se apresentou como a alternativa mais vi?vel comparado com os demais m?todos, por?m, o uso dos sensores do solo tem se apresentado como tecnologias vi?veis que carecem de maior aperfei?oamento no sentido de propiciar produtividade, redu??o de custos e consequente ganho econ?mico e ambiental.Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2017-08-03T18:16:36Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2017 - Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro Gon?alves.pdf: 2652122 bytes, checksum: a01db58ccd026d3e5dc25d586d1ee8ac (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-03T18:16:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2017 - Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro Gon?alves.pdf: 2652122 bytes, checksum: a01db58ccd026d3e5dc25d586d1ee8ac (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-02-17application/pdfhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/7351/2017%20-%20Jose%20Roberto%20Moreira%20Ribeiro%20Gon%c3%a7alves.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/20614/2017%20-%20Jose%20Roberto%20Moreira%20Ribeiro%20Gon%c3%a7alves.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/26979/2017%20-%20Jose%20Roberto%20Moreira%20Ribeiro%20Gon%c3%a7alves.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/33350/2017%20-%20Jose%20Roberto%20Moreira%20Ribeiro%20Gon%c3%a7alves.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/39780/2017%20-%20Jose%20Roberto%20Moreira%20Ribeiro%20Gon%c3%a7alves.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/46158/2017%20-%20Jose%20Roberto%20Moreira%20Ribeiro%20Gon%c3%a7alves.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/52534/2017%20-%20Jose%20Roberto%20Moreira%20Ribeiro%20Gon%c3%a7alves.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/58992/2017%20-%20Jose%20Roberto%20Moreira%20Ribeiro%20Gon%c3%a7alves.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de JaneiroPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em Engenharia Agr?cola e AmbientalUFRRJBrasilInstituto de TecnologiaSoil samplingEnvironmental impactTechnology diffusionPrecision agriculture.Amostragem de soloImpacto AmbientalDifus?o de tecnologiaAgricultura de Precis?oEngenharia Agr?colaAn?lise ambiental e econ?mica comparativa de m?todos de amostragem do solo utilizadas em agricultura de precis?oComparative environmental and economic analysis of soil sampling methods used in precision agricultureinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJinstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)instacron:UFRRJTHUMBNAIL2017 - Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro Gon?alves.pdf.jpg2017 - Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro Gon?alves.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg1943http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1944/18/2017+-+Jose+Roberto+Moreira+Ribeiro+Gon%C3%A7alves.pdf.jpgcc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2MD518TEXT2017 - Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro Gon?alves.pdf.txt2017 - Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro Gon?alves.pdf.txttext/plain194127http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1944/17/2017+-+Jose+Roberto+Moreira+Ribeiro+Gon%C3%A7alves.pdf.txt4333ee7d601cd71c75496bd45ef82ef3MD517ORIGINAL2017 - Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro Gon?alves.pdf2017 - Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro Gon?alves.pdfapplication/pdf2645362http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1944/2/2017+-+Jose+Roberto+Moreira+Ribeiro+Gon%C3%A7alves.pdfd1303ca2e41abb9eba931da431ba1a1eMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82089http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1944/1/license.txt7b5ba3d2445355f386edab96125d42b7MD51jspui/19442022-02-08 01:51:22.479oai:localhost: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://tede.ufrrj.br/PUBhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/oai/requestbibliot@ufrrj.br||bibliot@ufrrj.bropendoar:2022-02-08T03:51:22Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv An?lise ambiental e econ?mica comparativa de m?todos de amostragem do solo utilizadas em agricultura de precis?o
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Comparative environmental and economic analysis of soil sampling methods used in precision agriculture
title An?lise ambiental e econ?mica comparativa de m?todos de amostragem do solo utilizadas em agricultura de precis?o
spellingShingle An?lise ambiental e econ?mica comparativa de m?todos de amostragem do solo utilizadas em agricultura de precis?o
Gon?alves, Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro
Soil sampling
Environmental impact
Technology diffusion
Precision agriculture.
Amostragem de solo
Impacto Ambiental
Difus?o de tecnologia
Agricultura de Precis?o
Engenharia Agr?cola
title_short An?lise ambiental e econ?mica comparativa de m?todos de amostragem do solo utilizadas em agricultura de precis?o
title_full An?lise ambiental e econ?mica comparativa de m?todos de amostragem do solo utilizadas em agricultura de precis?o
title_fullStr An?lise ambiental e econ?mica comparativa de m?todos de amostragem do solo utilizadas em agricultura de precis?o
title_full_unstemmed An?lise ambiental e econ?mica comparativa de m?todos de amostragem do solo utilizadas em agricultura de precis?o
title_sort An?lise ambiental e econ?mica comparativa de m?todos de amostragem do solo utilizadas em agricultura de precis?o
author Gon?alves, Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro
author_facet Gon?alves, Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Ferraz, Gabriel Ara?jo e Silva
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv 074.181.446-36
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv Reynaldo, ?tore Francisco
dc.contributor.advisor-co1ID.fl_str_mv 845.455.261-87
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Ferraz, Gabriel Ara?jo e Silva
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Barros, Murilo Machado de
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Silva, Fl?vio Castro da
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv 008.297.707-00
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/5955994311305502
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gon?alves, Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro
contributor_str_mv Ferraz, Gabriel Ara?jo e Silva
Reynaldo, ?tore Francisco
Ferraz, Gabriel Ara?jo e Silva
Barros, Murilo Machado de
Silva, Fl?vio Castro da
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Soil sampling
Environmental impact
Technology diffusion
Precision agriculture.
topic Soil sampling
Environmental impact
Technology diffusion
Precision agriculture.
Amostragem de solo
Impacto Ambiental
Difus?o de tecnologia
Agricultura de Precis?o
Engenharia Agr?cola
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Amostragem de solo
Impacto Ambiental
Difus?o de tecnologia
Agricultura de Precis?o
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agr?cola
description Precision agriculture has been an alternative to reduce costs in agriculture and environmental gain, and can also facilitate the localized and rational application of inputs, with positive economic, environmental and social results. Soil sampling techniques studies from the use of new sensors available in the market becomes fundamental importance. The objective of this work was to compare fertilizer recommendation maps based on three different soil sampling methods to evaluate the economic and environmental component. The experiment was carried out in three distinct areas in the cities of Guarapuava and Cantagalo, both in the state of Paran?, under no-tillage system, with crops rotation of soy, oat, corn, wheat and barley. The used sampling methods were: by altitude management zones, sample meshes and electrical conductivity oriented sampling (CEa). The soil samples for the method of altitude management zones were performed after the zones definition. Mesh sampling was performed at the density of one sample per ha. The guided sampling was carried out after the definition of management zones by electrical conductivity of the soil, through the use of soil approach sensor. From the results of the laboratory analysis, recommendation maps were made for limestone, phosphorus, potassium and nitrogen application to allow comparison between methods, volumes, environmental factors and costs. With the accomplishment of this study it was possible to evaluate the spatial variability of the soil attributes, comparing the fertilizer volumes recommended, estimating the global economic cost of using the technology by sensor, as well as all the used inputs, equipment and implements. From the environmental point of view, it was possible to quantitatively and spatially evaluate the behavior of the applications of each fertilizer by sampling method. Taking the Meshes Samples method as reference, it was presented as a better alternative compared to the other methods, however, the use of soil sensors have been presented as viable technologies that need further improvement in order to provide productivity, costs reduction and consequent economic and environmental gain.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-08-03T18:16:36Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017-02-17
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv GON?ALVES, Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro. An?lise Ambiental e Econ?mica Comparativa de M?todos de Amostragem do Solo Utilizadas em Agricultura de Precis?o. 2017. 93 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Ci?ncias, Engenharia Agr?cola e Ambiental). Instituto de Tecnologia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica, RJ, 2017.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/1944
identifier_str_mv GON?ALVES, Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro. An?lise Ambiental e Econ?mica Comparativa de M?todos de Amostragem do Solo Utilizadas em Agricultura de Precis?o. 2017. 93 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Ci?ncias, Engenharia Agr?cola e Ambiental). Instituto de Tecnologia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica, RJ, 2017.
url https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/1944
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Engenharia Agr?cola e Ambiental
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFRRJ
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Instituto de Tecnologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron:UFRRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron_str UFRRJ
institution UFRRJ
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1944/18/2017+-+Jose+Roberto+Moreira+Ribeiro+Gon%C3%A7alves.pdf.jpg
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1944/17/2017+-+Jose+Roberto+Moreira+Ribeiro+Gon%C3%A7alves.pdf.txt
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1944/2/2017+-+Jose+Roberto+Moreira+Ribeiro+Gon%C3%A7alves.pdf
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1944/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv cc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2
4333ee7d601cd71c75496bd45ef82ef3
d1303ca2e41abb9eba931da431ba1a1e
7b5ba3d2445355f386edab96125d42b7
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibliot@ufrrj.br||bibliot@ufrrj.br
_version_ 1797220278375284736