An?lise ambiental e econ?mica comparativa de m?todos de amostragem do solo utilizadas em agricultura de precis?o
Ano de defesa: | 2017 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Engenharia Agr?cola e Ambiental
|
Departamento: |
Instituto de Tecnologia
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/1944 |
Resumo: | Precision agriculture has been an alternative to reduce costs in agriculture and environmental gain, and can also facilitate the localized and rational application of inputs, with positive economic, environmental and social results. Soil sampling techniques studies from the use of new sensors available in the market becomes fundamental importance. The objective of this work was to compare fertilizer recommendation maps based on three different soil sampling methods to evaluate the economic and environmental component. The experiment was carried out in three distinct areas in the cities of Guarapuava and Cantagalo, both in the state of Paran?, under no-tillage system, with crops rotation of soy, oat, corn, wheat and barley. The used sampling methods were: by altitude management zones, sample meshes and electrical conductivity oriented sampling (CEa). The soil samples for the method of altitude management zones were performed after the zones definition. Mesh sampling was performed at the density of one sample per ha. The guided sampling was carried out after the definition of management zones by electrical conductivity of the soil, through the use of soil approach sensor. From the results of the laboratory analysis, recommendation maps were made for limestone, phosphorus, potassium and nitrogen application to allow comparison between methods, volumes, environmental factors and costs. With the accomplishment of this study it was possible to evaluate the spatial variability of the soil attributes, comparing the fertilizer volumes recommended, estimating the global economic cost of using the technology by sensor, as well as all the used inputs, equipment and implements. From the environmental point of view, it was possible to quantitatively and spatially evaluate the behavior of the applications of each fertilizer by sampling method. Taking the Meshes Samples method as reference, it was presented as a better alternative compared to the other methods, however, the use of soil sensors have been presented as viable technologies that need further improvement in order to provide productivity, costs reduction and consequent economic and environmental gain. |
id |
UFRRJ-1_37157f12afed750db7369a9b8b27eceb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:jspui/1944 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRRJ-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Ferraz, Gabriel Ara?jo e Silva074.181.446-36Reynaldo, ?tore Francisco845.455.261-87Ferraz, Gabriel Ara?jo e SilvaBarros, Murilo Machado deSilva, Fl?vio Castro da008.297.707-00http://lattes.cnpq.br/5955994311305502Gon?alves, Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro2017-08-03T18:16:36Z2017-02-17GON?ALVES, Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro. An?lise Ambiental e Econ?mica Comparativa de M?todos de Amostragem do Solo Utilizadas em Agricultura de Precis?o. 2017. 93 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Ci?ncias, Engenharia Agr?cola e Ambiental). Instituto de Tecnologia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica, RJ, 2017.https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/1944Precision agriculture has been an alternative to reduce costs in agriculture and environmental gain, and can also facilitate the localized and rational application of inputs, with positive economic, environmental and social results. Soil sampling techniques studies from the use of new sensors available in the market becomes fundamental importance. The objective of this work was to compare fertilizer recommendation maps based on three different soil sampling methods to evaluate the economic and environmental component. The experiment was carried out in three distinct areas in the cities of Guarapuava and Cantagalo, both in the state of Paran?, under no-tillage system, with crops rotation of soy, oat, corn, wheat and barley. The used sampling methods were: by altitude management zones, sample meshes and electrical conductivity oriented sampling (CEa). The soil samples for the method of altitude management zones were performed after the zones definition. Mesh sampling was performed at the density of one sample per ha. The guided sampling was carried out after the definition of management zones by electrical conductivity of the soil, through the use of soil approach sensor. From the results of the laboratory analysis, recommendation maps were made for limestone, phosphorus, potassium and nitrogen application to allow comparison between methods, volumes, environmental factors and costs. With the accomplishment of this study it was possible to evaluate the spatial variability of the soil attributes, comparing the fertilizer volumes recommended, estimating the global economic cost of using the technology by sensor, as well as all the used inputs, equipment and implements. From the environmental point of view, it was possible to quantitatively and spatially evaluate the behavior of the applications of each fertilizer by sampling method. Taking the Meshes Samples method as reference, it was presented as a better alternative compared to the other methods, however, the use of soil sensors have been presented as viable technologies that need further improvement in order to provide productivity, costs reduction and consequent economic and environmental gain.A agricultura de precis?o tem sido uma alternativa para redu??o de custos na agricultura e ganho ambiental, podendo ainda facilitar a aplica??o localizada e racional dos insumos, com resultados econ?micos, ambientais e sociais positivos. O estudo das t?cnicas amostrais de solo a partir do uso de novos sensores dispon?veis no mercado torna-se de fundamental import?ncia. Objetivou-se no presente trabalho, comparar mapas de recomenda??o de fertilizantes baseados em tr?s diferentes m?todos de amostragem do solo para avalia??o do componente econ?mico e ambiental. O experimento foi realizado em tr?s ?reas distintas nos munic?pios de Guarapuava e Cantagalo, ambos no estado do Paran?, sob sistema de plantio direto, com rota??o das culturas de soja, aveia, milho, trigo e cevada. Os m?todos amostrais utilizados foram: por zonas de manejo por altitude, malhas amostrais e amostragem orientada por condutividade el?trica (CEa). As amostras de solo para o m?todo zonas de manejo por altitude foram realizadas ap?s a defini??o das zonas. A amostragem em malha foi realizada na densidade de uma amostra por ha. A amostragem orientada foi realizada ap?s a defini??o das zonas de manejo por condutividade el?trica do solo, por meio do uso de sensor de aproxima??o do solo. A partir dos resultados das an?lises laboratoriais, foram confeccionados mapas de recomenda??o para aplica??o de Calc?rio, F?sforo, Pot?ssio e Nitrog?nio de forma a permitir a compara??o entre os m?todos, volumes, fatores ambientais e custos. Com a realiza??o deste estudo foi poss?vel avaliar a variabilidade espacial dos atributos do solo, comparando os volumes dos fertilizantes recomendados, estimar o custo econ?mico global da utiliza??o da tecnologia via sensor, bem como de todos os insumos, equipamentos e implementos utilizados. Sob o ponto de vista ambiental, foi poss?vel avaliar de maneira quantitativa e espacial o comportamento das aplica??es cada fertilizante por m?todo amostral. Tomando-se o m?todo de Malhas Amostrais como refer?ncia, o mesmo se apresentou como a alternativa mais vi?vel comparado com os demais m?todos, por?m, o uso dos sensores do solo tem se apresentado como tecnologias vi?veis que carecem de maior aperfei?oamento no sentido de propiciar produtividade, redu??o de custos e consequente ganho econ?mico e ambiental.Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2017-08-03T18:16:36Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2017 - Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro Gon?alves.pdf: 2652122 bytes, checksum: a01db58ccd026d3e5dc25d586d1ee8ac (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-03T18:16:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2017 - Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro Gon?alves.pdf: 2652122 bytes, checksum: a01db58ccd026d3e5dc25d586d1ee8ac (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-02-17application/pdfhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/7351/2017%20-%20Jose%20Roberto%20Moreira%20Ribeiro%20Gon%c3%a7alves.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/20614/2017%20-%20Jose%20Roberto%20Moreira%20Ribeiro%20Gon%c3%a7alves.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/26979/2017%20-%20Jose%20Roberto%20Moreira%20Ribeiro%20Gon%c3%a7alves.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/33350/2017%20-%20Jose%20Roberto%20Moreira%20Ribeiro%20Gon%c3%a7alves.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/39780/2017%20-%20Jose%20Roberto%20Moreira%20Ribeiro%20Gon%c3%a7alves.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/46158/2017%20-%20Jose%20Roberto%20Moreira%20Ribeiro%20Gon%c3%a7alves.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/52534/2017%20-%20Jose%20Roberto%20Moreira%20Ribeiro%20Gon%c3%a7alves.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/58992/2017%20-%20Jose%20Roberto%20Moreira%20Ribeiro%20Gon%c3%a7alves.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de JaneiroPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em Engenharia Agr?cola e AmbientalUFRRJBrasilInstituto de TecnologiaSoil samplingEnvironmental impactTechnology diffusionPrecision agriculture.Amostragem de soloImpacto AmbientalDifus?o de tecnologiaAgricultura de Precis?oEngenharia Agr?colaAn?lise ambiental e econ?mica comparativa de m?todos de amostragem do solo utilizadas em agricultura de precis?oComparative environmental and economic analysis of soil sampling methods used in precision agricultureinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJinstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)instacron:UFRRJTHUMBNAIL2017 - Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro Gon?alves.pdf.jpg2017 - Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro Gon?alves.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg1943http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1944/18/2017+-+Jose+Roberto+Moreira+Ribeiro+Gon%C3%A7alves.pdf.jpgcc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2MD518TEXT2017 - Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro Gon?alves.pdf.txt2017 - Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro Gon?alves.pdf.txttext/plain194127http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1944/17/2017+-+Jose+Roberto+Moreira+Ribeiro+Gon%C3%A7alves.pdf.txt4333ee7d601cd71c75496bd45ef82ef3MD517ORIGINAL2017 - Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro Gon?alves.pdf2017 - Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro Gon?alves.pdfapplication/pdf2645362http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1944/2/2017+-+Jose+Roberto+Moreira+Ribeiro+Gon%C3%A7alves.pdfd1303ca2e41abb9eba931da431ba1a1eMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82089http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1944/1/license.txt7b5ba3d2445355f386edab96125d42b7MD51jspui/19442022-02-08 01:51:22.479oai:localhost: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://tede.ufrrj.br/PUBhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/oai/requestbibliot@ufrrj.br||bibliot@ufrrj.bropendoar:2022-02-08T03:51:22Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
An?lise ambiental e econ?mica comparativa de m?todos de amostragem do solo utilizadas em agricultura de precis?o |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Comparative environmental and economic analysis of soil sampling methods used in precision agriculture |
title |
An?lise ambiental e econ?mica comparativa de m?todos de amostragem do solo utilizadas em agricultura de precis?o |
spellingShingle |
An?lise ambiental e econ?mica comparativa de m?todos de amostragem do solo utilizadas em agricultura de precis?o Gon?alves, Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro Soil sampling Environmental impact Technology diffusion Precision agriculture. Amostragem de solo Impacto Ambiental Difus?o de tecnologia Agricultura de Precis?o Engenharia Agr?cola |
title_short |
An?lise ambiental e econ?mica comparativa de m?todos de amostragem do solo utilizadas em agricultura de precis?o |
title_full |
An?lise ambiental e econ?mica comparativa de m?todos de amostragem do solo utilizadas em agricultura de precis?o |
title_fullStr |
An?lise ambiental e econ?mica comparativa de m?todos de amostragem do solo utilizadas em agricultura de precis?o |
title_full_unstemmed |
An?lise ambiental e econ?mica comparativa de m?todos de amostragem do solo utilizadas em agricultura de precis?o |
title_sort |
An?lise ambiental e econ?mica comparativa de m?todos de amostragem do solo utilizadas em agricultura de precis?o |
author |
Gon?alves, Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro |
author_facet |
Gon?alves, Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Ferraz, Gabriel Ara?jo e Silva |
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv |
074.181.446-36 |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
Reynaldo, ?tore Francisco |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1ID.fl_str_mv |
845.455.261-87 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Ferraz, Gabriel Ara?jo e Silva |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Barros, Murilo Machado de |
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Fl?vio Castro da |
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv |
008.297.707-00 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/5955994311305502 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gon?alves, Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro |
contributor_str_mv |
Ferraz, Gabriel Ara?jo e Silva Reynaldo, ?tore Francisco Ferraz, Gabriel Ara?jo e Silva Barros, Murilo Machado de Silva, Fl?vio Castro da |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Soil sampling Environmental impact Technology diffusion Precision agriculture. |
topic |
Soil sampling Environmental impact Technology diffusion Precision agriculture. Amostragem de solo Impacto Ambiental Difus?o de tecnologia Agricultura de Precis?o Engenharia Agr?cola |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Amostragem de solo Impacto Ambiental Difus?o de tecnologia Agricultura de Precis?o |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia Agr?cola |
description |
Precision agriculture has been an alternative to reduce costs in agriculture and environmental gain, and can also facilitate the localized and rational application of inputs, with positive economic, environmental and social results. Soil sampling techniques studies from the use of new sensors available in the market becomes fundamental importance. The objective of this work was to compare fertilizer recommendation maps based on three different soil sampling methods to evaluate the economic and environmental component. The experiment was carried out in three distinct areas in the cities of Guarapuava and Cantagalo, both in the state of Paran?, under no-tillage system, with crops rotation of soy, oat, corn, wheat and barley. The used sampling methods were: by altitude management zones, sample meshes and electrical conductivity oriented sampling (CEa). The soil samples for the method of altitude management zones were performed after the zones definition. Mesh sampling was performed at the density of one sample per ha. The guided sampling was carried out after the definition of management zones by electrical conductivity of the soil, through the use of soil approach sensor. From the results of the laboratory analysis, recommendation maps were made for limestone, phosphorus, potassium and nitrogen application to allow comparison between methods, volumes, environmental factors and costs. With the accomplishment of this study it was possible to evaluate the spatial variability of the soil attributes, comparing the fertilizer volumes recommended, estimating the global economic cost of using the technology by sensor, as well as all the used inputs, equipment and implements. From the environmental point of view, it was possible to quantitatively and spatially evaluate the behavior of the applications of each fertilizer by sampling method. Taking the Meshes Samples method as reference, it was presented as a better alternative compared to the other methods, however, the use of soil sensors have been presented as viable technologies that need further improvement in order to provide productivity, costs reduction and consequent economic and environmental gain. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-03T18:16:36Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017-02-17 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
GON?ALVES, Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro. An?lise Ambiental e Econ?mica Comparativa de M?todos de Amostragem do Solo Utilizadas em Agricultura de Precis?o. 2017. 93 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Ci?ncias, Engenharia Agr?cola e Ambiental). Instituto de Tecnologia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica, RJ, 2017. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/1944 |
identifier_str_mv |
GON?ALVES, Jose Roberto Moreira Ribeiro. An?lise Ambiental e Econ?mica Comparativa de M?todos de Amostragem do Solo Utilizadas em Agricultura de Precis?o. 2017. 93 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Ci?ncias, Engenharia Agr?cola e Ambiental). Instituto de Tecnologia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica, RJ, 2017. |
url |
https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/1944 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Engenharia Agr?cola e Ambiental |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFRRJ |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Tecnologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ) instacron:UFRRJ |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ) |
instacron_str |
UFRRJ |
institution |
UFRRJ |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1944/18/2017+-+Jose+Roberto+Moreira+Ribeiro+Gon%C3%A7alves.pdf.jpg http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1944/17/2017+-+Jose+Roberto+Moreira+Ribeiro+Gon%C3%A7alves.pdf.txt http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1944/2/2017+-+Jose+Roberto+Moreira+Ribeiro+Gon%C3%A7alves.pdf http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1944/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
cc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2 4333ee7d601cd71c75496bd45ef82ef3 d1303ca2e41abb9eba931da431ba1a1e 7b5ba3d2445355f386edab96125d42b7 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bibliot@ufrrj.br||bibliot@ufrrj.br |
_version_ |
1797220278375284736 |