Desenvolvimento desigual : ensino e pesquisa nas universidades brasileiras

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2015
Autor(a) principal: Guedes, Cláudia
Orientador(a): Oliveira, Wilson José Ferreira de lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Sergipe
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Pós-Graduação em Sociologia
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/6250
Resumo: The goal of the following text is to give some contribution to the discussion about a separation between main activities of university teaching and research its development and consequences. Looking specially at Brazilian public universities, first intention is to rescue the arguments by others authors, specially Edmundo Campos Coelho and Simon Schwartzman, facing the positions against and for this division. Before it, however, it is shown a historical presentation on the bases that sustain this unity, from the origins of universities in European continent to American reform. Then, it is presented the context where it was developed in Brazil, where the unity is expected since university reform of 1968. This research looks for verifying the hypothesis of separation, until now argued, mainly, in historical terms. This verification is held by statistic data of evaluations and comparisons referring to teaching and research, which means also, undergraduate and graduate courses. Beyond the observation of several university rankings, it is taken into account the Índice Geral de Cursos (IGC), promoted by Ministery of Education and two evaluations in which consists that indicator: the Exame Nacional de Desempenho de Estudantes (ENADE) and triennial evaluations of the Coordenação de Pessoal de Nìvel Superior (Capes). In addition to the precedent observations, these data confirm the maintenance of the condition of secession. From statistics that show general problems of teaching, as low development of basic abilities among graduated in higher educational system, it is argued that the main consequence of division is in undergraduate formation, once it increases research status, decreasing the one of teaching. It is presented also some policies which aim to reintegrate teaching and research, and the discussion about alternative pedagogic methodologies that see scientific method as the best way to make the student develop independency in apprenticeship process.
id UFS-2_08efe4e3429594d05a58ddc54c1cfb5b
oai_identifier_str oai:ufs.br:riufs/6250
network_acronym_str UFS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFS
repository_id_str
spelling Guedes, Cláudiahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9472797070089177Oliveira, Wilson José Ferreira de2017-09-27T14:06:02Z2017-09-27T14:06:02Z2015-03-31GUEDES, Cláudia. Desenvolvimento desigual : ensino e pesquisa nas universidades brasileiras. 2015. 217 f. Tese (Doutorado em Sociologia) - Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, 2015.https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/6250The goal of the following text is to give some contribution to the discussion about a separation between main activities of university teaching and research its development and consequences. Looking specially at Brazilian public universities, first intention is to rescue the arguments by others authors, specially Edmundo Campos Coelho and Simon Schwartzman, facing the positions against and for this division. Before it, however, it is shown a historical presentation on the bases that sustain this unity, from the origins of universities in European continent to American reform. Then, it is presented the context where it was developed in Brazil, where the unity is expected since university reform of 1968. This research looks for verifying the hypothesis of separation, until now argued, mainly, in historical terms. This verification is held by statistic data of evaluations and comparisons referring to teaching and research, which means also, undergraduate and graduate courses. Beyond the observation of several university rankings, it is taken into account the Índice Geral de Cursos (IGC), promoted by Ministery of Education and two evaluations in which consists that indicator: the Exame Nacional de Desempenho de Estudantes (ENADE) and triennial evaluations of the Coordenação de Pessoal de Nìvel Superior (Capes). In addition to the precedent observations, these data confirm the maintenance of the condition of secession. From statistics that show general problems of teaching, as low development of basic abilities among graduated in higher educational system, it is argued that the main consequence of division is in undergraduate formation, once it increases research status, decreasing the one of teaching. It is presented also some policies which aim to reintegrate teaching and research, and the discussion about alternative pedagogic methodologies that see scientific method as the best way to make the student develop independency in apprenticeship process.O trabalho a seguir tem o objetivo de contribuir para o debate sobre a separação entre as principais atividades da instituição universitária o ensino e a pesquisa seu desenvolvimento e suas consequências. Com foco especial nas universidades públicas brasileiras, resgata-se a discussão realizada por outros autores sobre o tema, especialmente Edmundo Campos Coelho e Simon Schwartzman, confrontando as argumentações contrárias e favoráveis à separação. Antes, porém, procurou-se fazer uma apresentação histórica das bases que sustentam a unidade, desde as origens das universidades no continente europeu até a reforma americana. Em seguida, fez-se uma contextualização sobre seu desenvolvimento no Brasil, onde a unidade é prevista desde a reforma universitária de 1968. Esta pesquisa procura verificar a hipótese da cisão, discutida até então, principalmente, em termos históricos. Esta verificação apoiou-se em dados estatísticos de avaliações e comparações referentes a ensino e pesquisa, ou seja, graduação e pós-graduação. Além da observação de diversos rankings universitários, leva-se em conta o Índice Geral de Cursos (IGC), promovido pelo Ministério da Educação e as duas avaliações que são a base para o índice: o Exame Nacional de Desempenho de Estudantes (ENADE) e as avaliações trienais da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes). Somados às observações precedentes, estes dados confirmam a manutenção da condição de separação. A partir de estatísticas que demonstram problemas gerais do ensino, como o baixo desenvolvimento de habilidades básicas entre diplomados no ensino superior, argumenta-se que a principal consequência da separação está na formação da graduação, uma vez que esta cisão aumenta o status da pesquisa, diminuindo o do ensino. Além de buscar enumerar as políticas que visam reaproximar ensino e pesquisa, apresenta-se também a discussão sobre metodologias pedagógicas alternativas que veem no método científico a melhor maneira para o estudante desenvolver sua independência no processo de aprendizagem.application/pdfporUniversidade Federal de SergipePós-Graduação em SociologiaUFSBREnsinoPesquisaUniversidadeEnsino superiorTeachingResearchUniversityHigher educationCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIADesenvolvimento desigual : ensino e pesquisa nas universidades brasileirasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSinstname:Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)instacron:UFSORIGINALCLAUDIA_GUEDES.pdfapplication/pdf10007234https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/6250/1/CLAUDIA_GUEDES.pdf0987bb709b8d7631ed9f17a08d99ac54MD51TEXTCLAUDIA_GUEDES.pdf.txtCLAUDIA_GUEDES.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain493014https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/6250/2/CLAUDIA_GUEDES.pdf.txtf863628e88054448b7a0a3854c0cefb3MD52THUMBNAILCLAUDIA_GUEDES.pdf.jpgCLAUDIA_GUEDES.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1209https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/6250/3/CLAUDIA_GUEDES.pdf.jpgcb906d277594052862cc0f75fccbf1f3MD53riufs/62502018-01-16 20:08:16.365oai:ufs.br:riufs/6250Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://ri.ufs.br/oai/requestrepositorio@academico.ufs.bropendoar:2018-01-16T23:08:16Repositório Institucional da UFS - Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Desenvolvimento desigual : ensino e pesquisa nas universidades brasileiras
title Desenvolvimento desigual : ensino e pesquisa nas universidades brasileiras
spellingShingle Desenvolvimento desigual : ensino e pesquisa nas universidades brasileiras
Guedes, Cláudia
Ensino
Pesquisa
Universidade
Ensino superior
Teaching
Research
University
Higher education
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA
title_short Desenvolvimento desigual : ensino e pesquisa nas universidades brasileiras
title_full Desenvolvimento desigual : ensino e pesquisa nas universidades brasileiras
title_fullStr Desenvolvimento desigual : ensino e pesquisa nas universidades brasileiras
title_full_unstemmed Desenvolvimento desigual : ensino e pesquisa nas universidades brasileiras
title_sort Desenvolvimento desigual : ensino e pesquisa nas universidades brasileiras
author Guedes, Cláudia
author_facet Guedes, Cláudia
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guedes, Cláudia
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/9472797070089177
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Wilson José Ferreira de
contributor_str_mv Oliveira, Wilson José Ferreira de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ensino
Pesquisa
Universidade
Ensino superior
topic Ensino
Pesquisa
Universidade
Ensino superior
Teaching
Research
University
Higher education
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Teaching
Research
University
Higher education
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA
description The goal of the following text is to give some contribution to the discussion about a separation between main activities of university teaching and research its development and consequences. Looking specially at Brazilian public universities, first intention is to rescue the arguments by others authors, specially Edmundo Campos Coelho and Simon Schwartzman, facing the positions against and for this division. Before it, however, it is shown a historical presentation on the bases that sustain this unity, from the origins of universities in European continent to American reform. Then, it is presented the context where it was developed in Brazil, where the unity is expected since university reform of 1968. This research looks for verifying the hypothesis of separation, until now argued, mainly, in historical terms. This verification is held by statistic data of evaluations and comparisons referring to teaching and research, which means also, undergraduate and graduate courses. Beyond the observation of several university rankings, it is taken into account the Índice Geral de Cursos (IGC), promoted by Ministery of Education and two evaluations in which consists that indicator: the Exame Nacional de Desempenho de Estudantes (ENADE) and triennial evaluations of the Coordenação de Pessoal de Nìvel Superior (Capes). In addition to the precedent observations, these data confirm the maintenance of the condition of secession. From statistics that show general problems of teaching, as low development of basic abilities among graduated in higher educational system, it is argued that the main consequence of division is in undergraduate formation, once it increases research status, decreasing the one of teaching. It is presented also some policies which aim to reintegrate teaching and research, and the discussion about alternative pedagogic methodologies that see scientific method as the best way to make the student develop independency in apprenticeship process.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2015-03-31
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-09-27T14:06:02Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2017-09-27T14:06:02Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv GUEDES, Cláudia. Desenvolvimento desigual : ensino e pesquisa nas universidades brasileiras. 2015. 217 f. Tese (Doutorado em Sociologia) - Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, 2015.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/6250
identifier_str_mv GUEDES, Cláudia. Desenvolvimento desigual : ensino e pesquisa nas universidades brasileiras. 2015. 217 f. Tese (Doutorado em Sociologia) - Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, 2015.
url https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/6250
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Sergipe
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Pós-Graduação em Sociologia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFS
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Sergipe
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFS
instname:Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)
instacron:UFS
instname_str Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)
instacron_str UFS
institution UFS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/6250/1/CLAUDIA_GUEDES.pdf
https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/6250/2/CLAUDIA_GUEDES.pdf.txt
https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/6250/3/CLAUDIA_GUEDES.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 0987bb709b8d7631ed9f17a08d99ac54
f863628e88054448b7a0a3854c0cefb3
cb906d277594052862cc0f75fccbf1f3
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFS - Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@academico.ufs.br
_version_ 1793351131343093760