O fechamento das escolas do campo em Sergipe : territórios em disputa (2007-2015)
Ano de defesa: | 2018 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Pós-Graduação em Educação
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | http://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/9208 |
Resumo: | This research approached the closures of rural schools in Sergipe state from 2007 to 2015 and aimed to analyse the historical and social aspects that conducted this process. Our hypothesis is that there is an unequal dispute of development models that caused profound contradictions between the policies for rural development as a territory restricted to economic production and the Social Movements struggle for the construction of a new territory for life production in which education play a strategic role. In order to attain our objective, we sought to appropriate the historical and dialectical materialism method in order to elicit - in its own concreteness of this process - an analysis based on its totality in articulation with the singularity of the country development model with its contradictions, and the specificity encompassed in the closure of rural schools in Sergipe during period ranging. Our bibliographic study was accompanied by documentary research, statistical data from School Census (INEP) and interviews conducted by former municipal managers and leaders of peasant Social Movements in the state. Our results demonstrate evident withdrawal of the State’s role in relation to its offer with the closure of 404 rural schools, of which 296 were extinct and 108 were considered paralysed over the years in question. The closures were more evident in Sergipe’s High Sertão and Center South regions and the justification presented were: empty classrooms, lack of adequate structure at schools, pursuit for improvements in quality of education tied to the end of multigrades and a better financial management for municipal teachers’ payment. However, the peasant social movements’ analysis considers the closures as withdrawal of rights and as a way to empty the countryside. Our historical analysis enabled us to conjecture about this reality and to understand that economic policy on rural area are related to education policies and financing in it. In turn, they are guided by the overlapping of economic rationality over social demands of peasant population. Such comprehension enables us to assess that rural schools are territories in dispute and their closure is due to a policy that promotes the country as a territory restricted to economic production, opposed to the historical struggles for the construction of a counter-hegemonic peasant territory, where Rural Education is born and defended. |
id |
UFS-2_452264bc78cd3c10fe17d06ecdc5b7fd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ufs.br:riufs/9208 |
network_acronym_str |
UFS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Correia, Elis SantosBretas, Silvana Aparecida2018-10-10T19:37:45Z2018-10-10T19:37:45Z2018-02-27CORREIA, Elis Santos. O fechamento das escolas do campo em Sergipe : territórios em disputa (2007-2015). 2018. 210 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação) - Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, SE, 2018.http://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/9208This research approached the closures of rural schools in Sergipe state from 2007 to 2015 and aimed to analyse the historical and social aspects that conducted this process. Our hypothesis is that there is an unequal dispute of development models that caused profound contradictions between the policies for rural development as a territory restricted to economic production and the Social Movements struggle for the construction of a new territory for life production in which education play a strategic role. In order to attain our objective, we sought to appropriate the historical and dialectical materialism method in order to elicit - in its own concreteness of this process - an analysis based on its totality in articulation with the singularity of the country development model with its contradictions, and the specificity encompassed in the closure of rural schools in Sergipe during period ranging. Our bibliographic study was accompanied by documentary research, statistical data from School Census (INEP) and interviews conducted by former municipal managers and leaders of peasant Social Movements in the state. Our results demonstrate evident withdrawal of the State’s role in relation to its offer with the closure of 404 rural schools, of which 296 were extinct and 108 were considered paralysed over the years in question. The closures were more evident in Sergipe’s High Sertão and Center South regions and the justification presented were: empty classrooms, lack of adequate structure at schools, pursuit for improvements in quality of education tied to the end of multigrades and a better financial management for municipal teachers’ payment. However, the peasant social movements’ analysis considers the closures as withdrawal of rights and as a way to empty the countryside. Our historical analysis enabled us to conjecture about this reality and to understand that economic policy on rural area are related to education policies and financing in it. In turn, they are guided by the overlapping of economic rationality over social demands of peasant population. Such comprehension enables us to assess that rural schools are territories in dispute and their closure is due to a policy that promotes the country as a territory restricted to economic production, opposed to the historical struggles for the construction of a counter-hegemonic peasant territory, where Rural Education is born and defended.A presente pesquisa abordou o fechamento das escolas do campo no Estado de Sergipe entre os anos de 2007 a 2015 e objetivou analisar os aspectos históricos e sociais que conduzem este processo. Nossa hipótese foi a de que existe uma disputa desigual de modelos de desenvolvimento que provocam profundas contradições entre a política de promoção do campo como território apenas de produção econômica e a luta dos Movimentos Sociais pela construção de um novo território de produção da vida em que a educação tem um papel estratégico. Para alcançar nosso objetivo, procuramos nos apropriar do método do materialismo históricodialético, no intuito de trazer na própria concretude deste processo uma análise baseada na sua totalidade em articulação com a singularidade do modelo de desenvolvimento do campo com suas contradições, e a especificidade que se encerra no fechamento das escolas do campo em Sergipe no período estabelecido. Nosso estudo bibliográfico foi acompanhado de pesquisa documental, análise de dados estatísticos do Censo Escolar (INEP) e de entrevistas realizadas com ex-gestores municipais e lideranças de Movimentos Sociais camponeses do Estado. Nossos resultados demonstram a evidente retirada do papel do Estado em sua oferta com o fechamento de 404 escolas do campo, destas, 296 foram extintas e 108 se somaram ao status de paralisada ao longo dos nove anos em questão. Os fechamentos foram mais evidentes no Alto Sertão e no Centro Sul sergipano e as principais justificativas apresentadas foram: esvaziamento das turmas, falta de estrutura adequada nas escolas, a busca por melhorias na qualidade do ensino atrelada ao fim do multisseriado e a melhor gestão financeira para pagamentos dos professores municipais. A análise dos Movimentos Sociais camponeses entende os fechamentos como uma retirada de direitos e mais uma forma de esvaziar o campo. Nossa análise histórica nos permitiu estabelecer um olhar sobre esta realidade e compreender que a política econômica para o campo está em razão direta à condução das políticas e financiamento educacional para o mesmo. Estas, por sua vez, pautadas na sobreposição da racionalidade econômica às demandas sociais da população camponesa. Tal compreensão nos permite aferir que a escola do campo é um território em disputa e o seu fechamento se trata de um seguimento à política de promoção do campo como território apenas de produção econômica, oposta à histórica luta pela construção do território camponês contra-hegemônico, onde nasce e se defende a Educação do Campo.São Cristóvão, SEporCampoEducação do campoFechamento de escolas do campoCountryRural educationClosure of rural schoolsCIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAOO fechamento das escolas do campo em Sergipe : territórios em disputa (2007-2015)info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisPós-Graduação em EducaçãoUniversidade Federal de Sergipereponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSinstname:Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)instacron:UFSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTEXTELIS_SANTOS_CORREIA.pdf.txtELIS_SANTOS_CORREIA.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain439028https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/9208/3/ELIS_SANTOS_CORREIA.pdf.txt16d80298fa434a2fd05d1b075a436957MD53THUMBNAILELIS_SANTOS_CORREIA.pdf.jpgELIS_SANTOS_CORREIA.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1201https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/9208/4/ELIS_SANTOS_CORREIA.pdf.jpg26b88d6e44c1ca4e3c8d2bb603eeed5dMD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81475https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/9208/1/license.txt098cbbf65c2c15e1fb2e49c5d306a44cMD51ORIGINALELIS_SANTOS_CORREIA.pdfELIS_SANTOS_CORREIA.pdfapplication/pdf35230826https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/9208/2/ELIS_SANTOS_CORREIA.pdf97227cbef98349e7aba5115d0bf7205eMD52riufs/92082018-10-10 16:37:45.454oai:ufs.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://ri.ufs.br/oai/requestrepositorio@academico.ufs.bropendoar:2018-10-10T19:37:45Repositório Institucional da UFS - Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
O fechamento das escolas do campo em Sergipe : territórios em disputa (2007-2015) |
title |
O fechamento das escolas do campo em Sergipe : territórios em disputa (2007-2015) |
spellingShingle |
O fechamento das escolas do campo em Sergipe : territórios em disputa (2007-2015) Correia, Elis Santos Campo Educação do campo Fechamento de escolas do campo Country Rural education Closure of rural schools CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO |
title_short |
O fechamento das escolas do campo em Sergipe : territórios em disputa (2007-2015) |
title_full |
O fechamento das escolas do campo em Sergipe : territórios em disputa (2007-2015) |
title_fullStr |
O fechamento das escolas do campo em Sergipe : territórios em disputa (2007-2015) |
title_full_unstemmed |
O fechamento das escolas do campo em Sergipe : territórios em disputa (2007-2015) |
title_sort |
O fechamento das escolas do campo em Sergipe : territórios em disputa (2007-2015) |
author |
Correia, Elis Santos |
author_facet |
Correia, Elis Santos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Correia, Elis Santos |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Bretas, Silvana Aparecida |
contributor_str_mv |
Bretas, Silvana Aparecida |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Campo Educação do campo Fechamento de escolas do campo |
topic |
Campo Educação do campo Fechamento de escolas do campo Country Rural education Closure of rural schools CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Country Rural education Closure of rural schools |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO |
description |
This research approached the closures of rural schools in Sergipe state from 2007 to 2015 and aimed to analyse the historical and social aspects that conducted this process. Our hypothesis is that there is an unequal dispute of development models that caused profound contradictions between the policies for rural development as a territory restricted to economic production and the Social Movements struggle for the construction of a new territory for life production in which education play a strategic role. In order to attain our objective, we sought to appropriate the historical and dialectical materialism method in order to elicit - in its own concreteness of this process - an analysis based on its totality in articulation with the singularity of the country development model with its contradictions, and the specificity encompassed in the closure of rural schools in Sergipe during period ranging. Our bibliographic study was accompanied by documentary research, statistical data from School Census (INEP) and interviews conducted by former municipal managers and leaders of peasant Social Movements in the state. Our results demonstrate evident withdrawal of the State’s role in relation to its offer with the closure of 404 rural schools, of which 296 were extinct and 108 were considered paralysed over the years in question. The closures were more evident in Sergipe’s High Sertão and Center South regions and the justification presented were: empty classrooms, lack of adequate structure at schools, pursuit for improvements in quality of education tied to the end of multigrades and a better financial management for municipal teachers’ payment. However, the peasant social movements’ analysis considers the closures as withdrawal of rights and as a way to empty the countryside. Our historical analysis enabled us to conjecture about this reality and to understand that economic policy on rural area are related to education policies and financing in it. In turn, they are guided by the overlapping of economic rationality over social demands of peasant population. Such comprehension enables us to assess that rural schools are territories in dispute and their closure is due to a policy that promotes the country as a territory restricted to economic production, opposed to the historical struggles for the construction of a counter-hegemonic peasant territory, where Rural Education is born and defended. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-10T19:37:45Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-10T19:37:45Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018-02-27 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
CORREIA, Elis Santos. O fechamento das escolas do campo em Sergipe : territórios em disputa (2007-2015). 2018. 210 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação) - Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, SE, 2018. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/9208 |
identifier_str_mv |
CORREIA, Elis Santos. O fechamento das escolas do campo em Sergipe : territórios em disputa (2007-2015). 2018. 210 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação) - Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, SE, 2018. |
url |
http://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/9208 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Pós-Graduação em Educação |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Sergipe |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFS instname:Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) instacron:UFS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) |
instacron_str |
UFS |
institution |
UFS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/9208/3/ELIS_SANTOS_CORREIA.pdf.txt https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/9208/4/ELIS_SANTOS_CORREIA.pdf.jpg https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/9208/1/license.txt https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/9208/2/ELIS_SANTOS_CORREIA.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
16d80298fa434a2fd05d1b075a436957 26b88d6e44c1ca4e3c8d2bb603eeed5d 098cbbf65c2c15e1fb2e49c5d306a44c 97227cbef98349e7aba5115d0bf7205e |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFS - Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@academico.ufs.br |
_version_ |
1793351074524954624 |