O princípio do contraditório e da ampla defesa no processo administrativo disciplinar
Ano de defesa: | 2013 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Pós-Graduação em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/4357 |
Resumo: | The research aims to study the adversarial principle and legal defense in administrative disciplinary proceedings, examined not only in its formal aspect, but also the material. For this, we start from the vision neoconstitucionalista law, especially characterized by the transformations that the rule of law and its influence on the administrative performance, highlighting the constitutionalization of administrative law as a result of this movement. At the time that will discuss the true meaning of democracy and the approximation of the relationship between state and citizen, was launched as a result of the shift in focus to administrative act administrative process. The approach will bring extensive administrative processuality sedimented as a new paradigm in consensual, citizen participation and democratic legitimacy of state activity, with the administrative process as a true instrument of positive role of government in the implementation of fundamental rights and the effective democratization of the State of Right. In this context, the research aims to deepen the study of the adversarial principle and wide defense in administrative disciplinary proceedings as a fundamental right of the citizen, serving as a tool for democratization of the state, and is in line with the new interpretation and application of the principles and values constitutional. With the effectiveness of this principle procedural constitutional guarantees to the citizen the full defense before the Disciplinary Committees, and to be effective, the defense should be performed technical point of influencing the decision of the judge in the administrative process. Thus, the discussion of the controversy will give around the analysis of the new vision of the right neoconstitucionalista, more focused on achievement of constitutional values and the effectiveness of fundamental rights, as opposed to the judicial practice of the Supreme Court, on the grounds that motivated Binding Precedent n. 05. |
id |
UFS-2_c242bf4311416ed31124da4ffcb3e65e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ufs.br:riufs/4357 |
network_acronym_str |
UFS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Barreto, Carolina Pereirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2987779178843187Pessoa, Flávia Moreira Guimarãeshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/92920882848701532017-09-26T13:20:43Z2017-09-26T13:20:43Z2013-06-12https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/4357The research aims to study the adversarial principle and legal defense in administrative disciplinary proceedings, examined not only in its formal aspect, but also the material. For this, we start from the vision neoconstitucionalista law, especially characterized by the transformations that the rule of law and its influence on the administrative performance, highlighting the constitutionalization of administrative law as a result of this movement. At the time that will discuss the true meaning of democracy and the approximation of the relationship between state and citizen, was launched as a result of the shift in focus to administrative act administrative process. The approach will bring extensive administrative processuality sedimented as a new paradigm in consensual, citizen participation and democratic legitimacy of state activity, with the administrative process as a true instrument of positive role of government in the implementation of fundamental rights and the effective democratization of the State of Right. In this context, the research aims to deepen the study of the adversarial principle and wide defense in administrative disciplinary proceedings as a fundamental right of the citizen, serving as a tool for democratization of the state, and is in line with the new interpretation and application of the principles and values constitutional. With the effectiveness of this principle procedural constitutional guarantees to the citizen the full defense before the Disciplinary Committees, and to be effective, the defense should be performed technical point of influencing the decision of the judge in the administrative process. Thus, the discussion of the controversy will give around the analysis of the new vision of the right neoconstitucionalista, more focused on achievement of constitutional values and the effectiveness of fundamental rights, as opposed to the judicial practice of the Supreme Court, on the grounds that motivated Binding Precedent n. 05.A pesquisa se propõe a estudar o princípio do contraditório e da ampla defesa no processo administrativo disciplinar, analisado não apenas sob seu aspecto formal, mas também material. Para isso, parte-se da visão neoconstitucionalista do direito, caracterizado especialmente pelas transformações verificadas no Estado de Direito e sua influência na atuação administrativa, destacando a constitucionalização do direito administrativo como decorrência deste movimento. Ao tempo que discorrerá sobre o verdadeiro sentido de democracia e a aproximação das relações entre o Estado e o cidadão, lançando como consequência a mudança de enfoque do ato administrativo para processo administrativo. A abordagem trará a ampla processualidade administrativa como novo paradigma sedimentado na consensualidade, participação do cidadão e na legitimidade democrática da atividade estatal, apresentando o processo administrativo como verdadeiro instrumento de atuação positiva do poder público na concretização dos direitos fundamentais e da efetiva democratização do Estado de direito. Nesse contexto, a pesquisa tem como objetivo aprofundar o estudo do princípio do contraditório e da ampla defesa no processo administrativo disciplinar como direito fundamental do cidadão, servindo de instrumento de democratização do Estado, coadunando-se com a nova interpretação e aplicação dos princípios e valores constitucionais. Com a efetividade deste princípio processual constitucional, garante-se ao cidadão a ampla defesa perante as Comissões de Processo Disciplinar, e para que seja efetiva, a defesa deve ser realizada de forma técnica a ponto de influenciar a decisão do julgador no processo administrativo. Dessa forma, a discussão da controvérsia dar-se-á em torno da análise da nova visão do direito neoconstitucionalista, mais voltada para concretização dos valores constitucionais e na efetividade dos direitos fundamentais, em contraposição à prática jurisprudencial da Corte Suprema, diante das razões que motivaram a Súmula Vinculante n. 05.application/pdfporDireito administrativoProcesso administrativoDefesa (Processo administrativo)Contraditório (Direito)Administrative lawAdministrative procedureAdversary system (Law)CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOO princípio do contraditório e da ampla defesa no processo administrativo disciplinarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisPós-Graduação em Direitoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSinstname:Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)instacron:UFSORIGINALCAROLINA_PEREIRA_BARRETO.pdfapplication/pdf1124262https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/4357/1/CAROLINA_PEREIRA_BARRETO.pdf891805259bb02d7146c7b9b31216652eMD51TEXTCAROLINA_PEREIRA_BARRETO.pdf.txtCAROLINA_PEREIRA_BARRETO.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain429740https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/4357/2/CAROLINA_PEREIRA_BARRETO.pdf.txt0e9775ecc685cba00d8eff567a23bcb4MD52THUMBNAILCAROLINA_PEREIRA_BARRETO.pdf.jpgCAROLINA_PEREIRA_BARRETO.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1215https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/4357/3/CAROLINA_PEREIRA_BARRETO.pdf.jpg014819f5ace7c5792f7b13b52c0b9eaeMD53riufs/43572017-11-27 19:24:17.22oai:ufs.br:riufs/4357Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://ri.ufs.br/oai/requestrepositorio@academico.ufs.bropendoar:2017-11-27T22:24:17Repositório Institucional da UFS - Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
O princípio do contraditório e da ampla defesa no processo administrativo disciplinar |
title |
O princípio do contraditório e da ampla defesa no processo administrativo disciplinar |
spellingShingle |
O princípio do contraditório e da ampla defesa no processo administrativo disciplinar Barreto, Carolina Pereira Direito administrativo Processo administrativo Defesa (Processo administrativo) Contraditório (Direito) Administrative law Administrative procedure Adversary system (Law) CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
O princípio do contraditório e da ampla defesa no processo administrativo disciplinar |
title_full |
O princípio do contraditório e da ampla defesa no processo administrativo disciplinar |
title_fullStr |
O princípio do contraditório e da ampla defesa no processo administrativo disciplinar |
title_full_unstemmed |
O princípio do contraditório e da ampla defesa no processo administrativo disciplinar |
title_sort |
O princípio do contraditório e da ampla defesa no processo administrativo disciplinar |
author |
Barreto, Carolina Pereira |
author_facet |
Barreto, Carolina Pereira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barreto, Carolina Pereira |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2987779178843187 |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Pessoa, Flávia Moreira Guimarães |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9292088284870153 |
contributor_str_mv |
Pessoa, Flávia Moreira Guimarães |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direito administrativo Processo administrativo Defesa (Processo administrativo) Contraditório (Direito) |
topic |
Direito administrativo Processo administrativo Defesa (Processo administrativo) Contraditório (Direito) Administrative law Administrative procedure Adversary system (Law) CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Administrative law Administrative procedure Adversary system (Law) |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
description |
The research aims to study the adversarial principle and legal defense in administrative disciplinary proceedings, examined not only in its formal aspect, but also the material. For this, we start from the vision neoconstitucionalista law, especially characterized by the transformations that the rule of law and its influence on the administrative performance, highlighting the constitutionalization of administrative law as a result of this movement. At the time that will discuss the true meaning of democracy and the approximation of the relationship between state and citizen, was launched as a result of the shift in focus to administrative act administrative process. The approach will bring extensive administrative processuality sedimented as a new paradigm in consensual, citizen participation and democratic legitimacy of state activity, with the administrative process as a true instrument of positive role of government in the implementation of fundamental rights and the effective democratization of the State of Right. In this context, the research aims to deepen the study of the adversarial principle and wide defense in administrative disciplinary proceedings as a fundamental right of the citizen, serving as a tool for democratization of the state, and is in line with the new interpretation and application of the principles and values constitutional. With the effectiveness of this principle procedural constitutional guarantees to the citizen the full defense before the Disciplinary Committees, and to be effective, the defense should be performed technical point of influencing the decision of the judge in the administrative process. Thus, the discussion of the controversy will give around the analysis of the new vision of the right neoconstitucionalista, more focused on achievement of constitutional values and the effectiveness of fundamental rights, as opposed to the judicial practice of the Supreme Court, on the grounds that motivated Binding Precedent n. 05. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2013-06-12 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2017-09-26T13:20:43Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2017-09-26T13:20:43Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/4357 |
url |
https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/4357 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Pós-Graduação em Direito |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFS instname:Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) instacron:UFS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) |
instacron_str |
UFS |
institution |
UFS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/4357/1/CAROLINA_PEREIRA_BARRETO.pdf https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/4357/2/CAROLINA_PEREIRA_BARRETO.pdf.txt https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/4357/3/CAROLINA_PEREIRA_BARRETO.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
891805259bb02d7146c7b9b31216652e 0e9775ecc685cba00d8eff567a23bcb4 014819f5ace7c5792f7b13b52c0b9eae |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFS - Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@academico.ufs.br |
_version_ |
1793351073788854272 |