Manejo de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) em milho com plantas Bt, inseticidas químicos e Baculovirus

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2021
Autor(a) principal: Giacomelli, Tiago lattes
Orientador(a): Guedes, Jerson Carus lattes
Banca de defesa: Perini, Clérison Régis, Magano, Deivid Araújo
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Ciências Rurais
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia
Departamento: Agronomia
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23385
Resumo: The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is considered the main insect pest of corn (Zea mays) in Brazil. The control of this pest is carried out mainly with the use of Bt Plants (Bacillus thuringiensis) and chemical insecticides and, more recently, the use of biological insecticides has grown as a new alternative to be added to Integrated Pest Management. In order to evaluate the efficacy of Bt proteins expressed by some corn hybrids available on the market, as well as the interaction with the use of chemical and biological insecticides based on Baculovirus spodoptera for the control of this species, field experiments were carried out, with infestation natural of S. frugiperda, during two sowing seasons in the 2019/20 crop. Five Bt corn hybrids and one non-Bt corn hybrid were evaluated, in addition to 6 chemical insecticides and 2 biological insecticides. The evaluations were carried out at an interval of five days, attributing damage scores, according to the Davis Scale (1992), in addition to counting the number of plants attacked. For decision-making on insecticide applications, a control level was assigned whenever 10% of the evaluated plants had a damage score ≥ 3. In the first crop of the 2019/2020 season, DKB 290 (Cry1A.105/ Cry2Ab2/ Cry3Bb1) and Morgan 20A78 (Cry1F/ Cry1A.105/ Cry2Ab2) required four insecticidal applications, while Pioneer 32R22YHR (Cry1F/ Cry1Ab) and Pioneer 30F53R (non-Bt) required five insecticidal applications to mitigate S. frugiperda damage. In the second crop, DKB 290 and Morgan 20A78 required three to six insecticide applications, while Pioneer 32R22YHR and Pioneer 30F53R (non-Bt) required five to seven insecticide applications. On the other hand, in both cultures, Pioneer 30F53VYHR (Cry1Ab/ Cry1F/ Vip3Aa20) and Brevant 2401 (Cry1F/ Cry1A.105/ Cry2Ab2/ Vip3Aa20) did not require insecticidal applications, showing the efficiency of Vip toxins. Regarding the combination of chemical + biological insecticides, in the first crop, starting applications with Baculovirus spodoptera was more efficient, and in the Pioneer 30F53R corn hybrid the Baculovirus spodoptera + Exalt combination performed better, and in the corn hybrid Pioneer 32R22YHR the best combination was Baculovirus spodoptera + Exalt and Avatar. In the second crop, starting applications with chemical insecticides showed lower damage rates, because in both corn hybrids, the best combination was to start treatments using Exalt + Baculovirus spodoptera. Among the chemical insecticides used in this work, the ones that performed better were Exalt and Premio.
id UFSM-20_07c7186f8f9da4ef99eb5d9881e0949f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/23385
network_acronym_str UFSM-20
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling 2021-12-20T19:15:07Z2021-12-20T19:15:07Z2021-09-10http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23385The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is considered the main insect pest of corn (Zea mays) in Brazil. The control of this pest is carried out mainly with the use of Bt Plants (Bacillus thuringiensis) and chemical insecticides and, more recently, the use of biological insecticides has grown as a new alternative to be added to Integrated Pest Management. In order to evaluate the efficacy of Bt proteins expressed by some corn hybrids available on the market, as well as the interaction with the use of chemical and biological insecticides based on Baculovirus spodoptera for the control of this species, field experiments were carried out, with infestation natural of S. frugiperda, during two sowing seasons in the 2019/20 crop. Five Bt corn hybrids and one non-Bt corn hybrid were evaluated, in addition to 6 chemical insecticides and 2 biological insecticides. The evaluations were carried out at an interval of five days, attributing damage scores, according to the Davis Scale (1992), in addition to counting the number of plants attacked. For decision-making on insecticide applications, a control level was assigned whenever 10% of the evaluated plants had a damage score ≥ 3. In the first crop of the 2019/2020 season, DKB 290 (Cry1A.105/ Cry2Ab2/ Cry3Bb1) and Morgan 20A78 (Cry1F/ Cry1A.105/ Cry2Ab2) required four insecticidal applications, while Pioneer 32R22YHR (Cry1F/ Cry1Ab) and Pioneer 30F53R (non-Bt) required five insecticidal applications to mitigate S. frugiperda damage. In the second crop, DKB 290 and Morgan 20A78 required three to six insecticide applications, while Pioneer 32R22YHR and Pioneer 30F53R (non-Bt) required five to seven insecticide applications. On the other hand, in both cultures, Pioneer 30F53VYHR (Cry1Ab/ Cry1F/ Vip3Aa20) and Brevant 2401 (Cry1F/ Cry1A.105/ Cry2Ab2/ Vip3Aa20) did not require insecticidal applications, showing the efficiency of Vip toxins. Regarding the combination of chemical + biological insecticides, in the first crop, starting applications with Baculovirus spodoptera was more efficient, and in the Pioneer 30F53R corn hybrid the Baculovirus spodoptera + Exalt combination performed better, and in the corn hybrid Pioneer 32R22YHR the best combination was Baculovirus spodoptera + Exalt and Avatar. In the second crop, starting applications with chemical insecticides showed lower damage rates, because in both corn hybrids, the best combination was to start treatments using Exalt + Baculovirus spodoptera. Among the chemical insecticides used in this work, the ones that performed better were Exalt and Premio.A lagarta-do-cartucho, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) é considerada o principal inseto-praga da cultura do milho (Zea mays) no Brasil. O controle dessa praga é realizado principalmente com o uso de Plantas Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) e inseticidas químicos e, mais recentemente, tem crescido o uso de inseticidas biológicos como uma nova alternativa a ser somada ao Manejo Integrado de Pragas. Tendo como objetivo avaliar a eficácia das proteínas Bt expressas por alguns híbridos de milho disponíveis no mercado, assim como a interação com o uso de inseticidas químicos e biológicos a base de Baculovirus spodoptera para o controle dessa espécie, foram realizados experimentos em campo, com infestação natural de S. frugiperda, durante duas épocas de semeadura na safra de 2019/20. Foram avaliados 5 híbridos de milho Bt e um híbrido de milho não-Bt, além de 6 inseticidas químicos e 2 inseticidas biológicos. As avaliações foram realizadas em intervalo de cinco dias, atribuindo-se notas de dano, de acordo com a Escala de Davis (1992), além de contabilizar o número de plantas atacadas. Para a tomada de decisão das aplicações inseticidas, foi atribuído um nível de controle sempre que 10% das plantas avaliadas apresentassem nota de dano ≥ 3. No primeiro cultivo da safra 2019/2020, DKB 290 (Cry1A.105/ Cry2Ab2/ Cry3Bb1) e Morgan 20A78 (Cry1F/ Cry1A.105/ Cry2Ab2) necessitaram de quatro aplicações inseticidas, enquanto Pioneer 32R22YHR (Cry1F/ Cry1Ab) e Pioneer 30F53R (não-Bt) necessitaram de cinco aplicações inseticidas para mitigar os danos de S. frugiperda. No segundo cultivo, DKB 290 e Morgan 20A78 necessitaram de três a seis aplicações inseticidas, enquanto Pioneer 32R22YHR e Pioneer 30F53R (não-Bt) necessitaram de cinco a sete aplicações inseticidas. Por outro lado, em ambos os cultivos, Pioneer 30F53VYHR (Cry1Ab/ Cry1F/ Vip3Aa20) e Brevant 2401 (Cry1F/ Cry1A.105/ Cry2Ab2/ Vip3Aa20) não necessitaram de aplicações inseticidas, evidenciando a eficiência das toxinas Vip. A respeito da combinação de inseticida químicos + biológicos, no primeiro cultivo, iniciar as aplicações com Baculovirus spodoptera foi mais eficiente, sendo que no híbrido de milho Pioneer 30F53R a combinação Baculovirus spodoptera + Exalt foi a que desempenhou melhor resultado e, no híbrido de milho Pioneer 32R22YHR a melhor combinação foi Baculovirus spodoptera + Exalt e Avatar. Já no segundo cultivo, iniciar as aplicações com inseticidas químicos apresentou menor índices de danos, pois em ambos os híbridos de milho, a melhor combinação foi iniciar os tratamentos utilizando Exalt + Baculovirus spodoptera. Dentre os inseticidas químicos utilizados neste trabalho, os que desempenharam melhor resultado foram Exalt e Premio.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de Ciências RuraisPrograma de Pós-Graduação em AgronomiaUFSMBrasilAgronomiaAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBacillus thuringiensisControle biológicoControle químicoToxinas VipBiological controlChemical controlVip ToxinsCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIAManejo de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) em milho com plantas Bt, inseticidas químicos e BaculovirusManagement of Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith, 1797) in maize with Bt plants, chemical insecticides and Baculovirusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisGuedes, Jerson Carushttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0846418627719511Arnemann, Jonas Andréhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9594849663299829Perini, Clérison RégisMagano, Deivid Araújohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4836653867090513Giacomelli, Tiago5001000000096006006006006006002bd0e300-d7a8-4db4-9de9-04b7a0f47542cdefb893-0b88-45ce-a071-1e805b9b522cd0fff2aa-3628-4a14-a0f7-0adfe9cecd590dce0432-1086-4222-895c-818bcead3c070ceda81a-ea7c-4962-aace-a20ccfda3832reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALDIS_PPGAGRONOMIA_2021_GIACOMELLI_TIAGO.pdfDIS_PPGAGRONOMIA_2021_GIACOMELLI_TIAGO.pdfDissertação de Mestradoapplication/pdf922161http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/23385/1/DIS_PPGAGRONOMIA_2021_GIACOMELLI_TIAGO.pdf901554657c299c327b0fe1aa5d486be9MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/23385/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/23385/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD53TEXTDIS_PPGAGRONOMIA_2021_GIACOMELLI_TIAGO.pdf.txtDIS_PPGAGRONOMIA_2021_GIACOMELLI_TIAGO.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain126704http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/23385/4/DIS_PPGAGRONOMIA_2021_GIACOMELLI_TIAGO.pdf.txtbbde2b924b751c0d946cafeaaf0117dcMD54THUMBNAILDIS_PPGAGRONOMIA_2021_GIACOMELLI_TIAGO.pdf.jpgDIS_PPGAGRONOMIA_2021_GIACOMELLI_TIAGO.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4305http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/23385/5/DIS_PPGAGRONOMIA_2021_GIACOMELLI_TIAGO.pdf.jpg0b8b3c3c3016cb9b7547a820c3e41c7dMD551/233852022-08-18 11:17:21.52oai:repositorio.ufsm.br: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ório Institucionalhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestopendoar:39132022-08-18T14:17:21Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Manejo de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) em milho com plantas Bt, inseticidas químicos e Baculovirus
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Management of Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith, 1797) in maize with Bt plants, chemical insecticides and Baculovirus
title Manejo de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) em milho com plantas Bt, inseticidas químicos e Baculovirus
spellingShingle Manejo de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) em milho com plantas Bt, inseticidas químicos e Baculovirus
Giacomelli, Tiago
Bacillus thuringiensis
Controle biológico
Controle químico
Toxinas Vip
Biological control
Chemical control
Vip Toxins
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
title_short Manejo de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) em milho com plantas Bt, inseticidas químicos e Baculovirus
title_full Manejo de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) em milho com plantas Bt, inseticidas químicos e Baculovirus
title_fullStr Manejo de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) em milho com plantas Bt, inseticidas químicos e Baculovirus
title_full_unstemmed Manejo de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) em milho com plantas Bt, inseticidas químicos e Baculovirus
title_sort Manejo de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) em milho com plantas Bt, inseticidas químicos e Baculovirus
author Giacomelli, Tiago
author_facet Giacomelli, Tiago
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Guedes, Jerson Carus
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0846418627719511
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv Arnemann, Jonas André
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/9594849663299829
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Perini, Clérison Régis
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Magano, Deivid Araújo
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4836653867090513
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Giacomelli, Tiago
contributor_str_mv Guedes, Jerson Carus
Arnemann, Jonas André
Perini, Clérison Régis
Magano, Deivid Araújo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bacillus thuringiensis
Controle biológico
Controle químico
Toxinas Vip
topic Bacillus thuringiensis
Controle biológico
Controle químico
Toxinas Vip
Biological control
Chemical control
Vip Toxins
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Biological control
Chemical control
Vip Toxins
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
description The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is considered the main insect pest of corn (Zea mays) in Brazil. The control of this pest is carried out mainly with the use of Bt Plants (Bacillus thuringiensis) and chemical insecticides and, more recently, the use of biological insecticides has grown as a new alternative to be added to Integrated Pest Management. In order to evaluate the efficacy of Bt proteins expressed by some corn hybrids available on the market, as well as the interaction with the use of chemical and biological insecticides based on Baculovirus spodoptera for the control of this species, field experiments were carried out, with infestation natural of S. frugiperda, during two sowing seasons in the 2019/20 crop. Five Bt corn hybrids and one non-Bt corn hybrid were evaluated, in addition to 6 chemical insecticides and 2 biological insecticides. The evaluations were carried out at an interval of five days, attributing damage scores, according to the Davis Scale (1992), in addition to counting the number of plants attacked. For decision-making on insecticide applications, a control level was assigned whenever 10% of the evaluated plants had a damage score ≥ 3. In the first crop of the 2019/2020 season, DKB 290 (Cry1A.105/ Cry2Ab2/ Cry3Bb1) and Morgan 20A78 (Cry1F/ Cry1A.105/ Cry2Ab2) required four insecticidal applications, while Pioneer 32R22YHR (Cry1F/ Cry1Ab) and Pioneer 30F53R (non-Bt) required five insecticidal applications to mitigate S. frugiperda damage. In the second crop, DKB 290 and Morgan 20A78 required three to six insecticide applications, while Pioneer 32R22YHR and Pioneer 30F53R (non-Bt) required five to seven insecticide applications. On the other hand, in both cultures, Pioneer 30F53VYHR (Cry1Ab/ Cry1F/ Vip3Aa20) and Brevant 2401 (Cry1F/ Cry1A.105/ Cry2Ab2/ Vip3Aa20) did not require insecticidal applications, showing the efficiency of Vip toxins. Regarding the combination of chemical + biological insecticides, in the first crop, starting applications with Baculovirus spodoptera was more efficient, and in the Pioneer 30F53R corn hybrid the Baculovirus spodoptera + Exalt combination performed better, and in the corn hybrid Pioneer 32R22YHR the best combination was Baculovirus spodoptera + Exalt and Avatar. In the second crop, starting applications with chemical insecticides showed lower damage rates, because in both corn hybrids, the best combination was to start treatments using Exalt + Baculovirus spodoptera. Among the chemical insecticides used in this work, the ones that performed better were Exalt and Premio.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-12-20T19:15:07Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2021-12-20T19:15:07Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2021-09-10
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23385
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23385
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 500100000009
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
600
600
600
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv 2bd0e300-d7a8-4db4-9de9-04b7a0f47542
cdefb893-0b88-45ce-a071-1e805b9b522c
d0fff2aa-3628-4a14-a0f7-0adfe9cecd59
0dce0432-1086-4222-895c-818bcead3c07
0ceda81a-ea7c-4962-aace-a20ccfda3832
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Ciências Rurais
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSM
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Agronomia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Ciências Rurais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/23385/1/DIS_PPGAGRONOMIA_2021_GIACOMELLI_TIAGO.pdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/23385/2/license_rdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/23385/3/license.txt
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/23385/4/DIS_PPGAGRONOMIA_2021_GIACOMELLI_TIAGO.pdf.txt
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/23385/5/DIS_PPGAGRONOMIA_2021_GIACOMELLI_TIAGO.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 901554657c299c327b0fe1aa5d486be9
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df
bbde2b924b751c0d946cafeaaf0117dc
0b8b3c3c3016cb9b7547a820c3e41c7d
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1794524403501891584