Propriedades físicas de uma topossequência argissolo-gleissolo

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2011
Autor(a) principal: Braga, Fabiano de Vargas Arigony lattes
Orientador(a): Reichert, José Miguel lattes
Banca de defesa: Suzuki, Luis Eduardo Akiyoshi Sanches lattes, Sequinatto, Letícia lattes
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Agrícola
Departamento: Engenharia Agrícola
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/7540
Resumo: The soils of the Central Depression in Rio Grande do Sul consist mainly of mudstones, siltstones and sandstones. The region has dimensions ranging from 40 to 100 m at lower elevations (lowland) predominate Gley soils (shallow, poor drainage). In the plateau predominate Ultisols (deep to very deep and vary in color, as drainage level). The aim of this study was to evaluate the compressive behavior (carrying capacity and susceptibility to compaction) of the soil and influence of loads 25, 50, 100 and 200 kPa in the physical properties and water (CRA and air permeability). The sampling of soil for study was made in a private property located in Santa Maria. Trenches were dug to collect in two profiles located in the floodplain (Haplic Gley soil), two slopes (lower and upper) and one at the top, both Ultisol. In metal rings were collected soil samples with preserved structure for the uniaxial compression test on all horizons of the five different profiles, loads of 25, 50, 100 and 200 kPa in uniaxial press, then were only collected samples of soil surface horizons of the profiles for testing air permeability and water retention curve.. In both times the samples were equilibrated at a voltage of 10 kPa. Were carried out: sieve analysis, organic carbon, density, porosity, macro porosity, compressibility test, air permeability and water retention curve (WRC). The pre-consolidation pressure (σp) had a significant positive correlation with clay and negatively with sand, having no significant correlation with organic carbon (OC), degree of saturation (DS), voids (IV) and density (BD), the IC has had a significant negative correlation only with the Ds. Among the profiles, Gley Soils presented higher carrying capacity than the Argisols. Surface horizons had lower deformation compression curves compared to the subsurface, due to having larger soil density and smaller IV. The deeper horizons (BA, Bt1, Bt2 and Cg) showed higher σp than the surface horizons (A, Ap, A1, A2, B), by having greater amount of clay. The higher the load applied on the samples, higher soil density and porosity. The higher permeability was greater in profiles A, A1 and Ap under loads of 25 and 50 kPa, it produced no adverse effects on the structure. The application of higher loads in the sample changed the soil structure, retaining more water due to the increase of macro porosity. The Gley soils had a higher carrying capacity and are less susceptible to compaction than Argisols. Among Gley soil, profile 2 is less susceptible to compaction than a profile from the Ultisols and susceptibility to compaction of the profile 5 is lower than in profiles 3 and 4. The deeper horizons had higher pre-consolidation pressure (σp) and carrying capacity of the soil surface, because the greatest amount of clay. Loads of 25 and 50 kPa are lower than the values of pressure pre consolidation of horizons and the samples submitted showed no negative effects on the structure and had higher values of permeability. The application of loads 100 and 200 kPa, in the profiles 1.2 (floodplain), 4 (upper slope) and 5 (top) reduced the values of permeability, resulting from the change of the sample. The compacting process of the sample reduced macro porosity and increased total porosity by promoting greater water storage in the highest voltages applied.
id UFSM-20_287e66f4d300af1782cf0392c5ac0cc2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/7540
network_acronym_str UFSM-20
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling 2015-03-132015-03-132011-03-31Braga, Fabiano de Vargas Arigony. Physical properties of a toposequence gley-podzolic. 2011. 66 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Agrícola) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2011.http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/7540The soils of the Central Depression in Rio Grande do Sul consist mainly of mudstones, siltstones and sandstones. The region has dimensions ranging from 40 to 100 m at lower elevations (lowland) predominate Gley soils (shallow, poor drainage). In the plateau predominate Ultisols (deep to very deep and vary in color, as drainage level). The aim of this study was to evaluate the compressive behavior (carrying capacity and susceptibility to compaction) of the soil and influence of loads 25, 50, 100 and 200 kPa in the physical properties and water (CRA and air permeability). The sampling of soil for study was made in a private property located in Santa Maria. Trenches were dug to collect in two profiles located in the floodplain (Haplic Gley soil), two slopes (lower and upper) and one at the top, both Ultisol. In metal rings were collected soil samples with preserved structure for the uniaxial compression test on all horizons of the five different profiles, loads of 25, 50, 100 and 200 kPa in uniaxial press, then were only collected samples of soil surface horizons of the profiles for testing air permeability and water retention curve.. In both times the samples were equilibrated at a voltage of 10 kPa. Were carried out: sieve analysis, organic carbon, density, porosity, macro porosity, compressibility test, air permeability and water retention curve (WRC). The pre-consolidation pressure (σp) had a significant positive correlation with clay and negatively with sand, having no significant correlation with organic carbon (OC), degree of saturation (DS), voids (IV) and density (BD), the IC has had a significant negative correlation only with the Ds. Among the profiles, Gley Soils presented higher carrying capacity than the Argisols. Surface horizons had lower deformation compression curves compared to the subsurface, due to having larger soil density and smaller IV. The deeper horizons (BA, Bt1, Bt2 and Cg) showed higher σp than the surface horizons (A, Ap, A1, A2, B), by having greater amount of clay. The higher the load applied on the samples, higher soil density and porosity. The higher permeability was greater in profiles A, A1 and Ap under loads of 25 and 50 kPa, it produced no adverse effects on the structure. The application of higher loads in the sample changed the soil structure, retaining more water due to the increase of macro porosity. The Gley soils had a higher carrying capacity and are less susceptible to compaction than Argisols. Among Gley soil, profile 2 is less susceptible to compaction than a profile from the Ultisols and susceptibility to compaction of the profile 5 is lower than in profiles 3 and 4. The deeper horizons had higher pre-consolidation pressure (σp) and carrying capacity of the soil surface, because the greatest amount of clay. Loads of 25 and 50 kPa are lower than the values of pressure pre consolidation of horizons and the samples submitted showed no negative effects on the structure and had higher values of permeability. The application of loads 100 and 200 kPa, in the profiles 1.2 (floodplain), 4 (upper slope) and 5 (top) reduced the values of permeability, resulting from the change of the sample. The compacting process of the sample reduced macro porosity and increased total porosity by promoting greater water storage in the highest voltages applied.Os solos da Depressão Central Gaúcha são constituidos porareia, silte e argila. A região tem cotas entre 40 à 100 m, nas mais baixas (várzea) predominam os Gleissolos e nas coxilhas predominam os Argissolos. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o comportamento compressivo (capacidade de suporte e susceptibilidade a compactação) do solo, e a influência de cargas 25, 50, 100 e 200kPa nas propriedades físicas e hídricas (curva de retenção de água (CRA) e permeabilidade ao ar (Ka)). As coletas de solo foram feitas em uma propriedade particular em Santa Maria, RS. Foram abertas trincheiras em dois perfis localizados na várzea (Gleissolos Háplicos), dois na encosta (inferior e superior) e um no topo, ambos Argissolo Vermelho. Foram coletadas amostras de solo com estrutura preservada em anéis metálicos para o teste de compressão uniaxial em todos os horizontes dos cinco diferentes perfis, após foram coletados somente amostras dos horizontes superficiais para os testes de Ka e CRA, após aplicadas as cargas de 25, 50, 100 e 200 kPa na prensa uniaxial. Nos dois momentos as amostras foram equilibradas à tensão de 10 kPa. Foram realizadas análise granulométrica, carbono orgânico, densidade, porosidade total, macroporosidade, microporosidade, teste de compressibilidade, Ka e CRA. A pressão de pré-consolidação (σp) teve correlação significativa positiva com a argila e negativa com a areia, não tendo correlação significativa com carbono orgânico (CO), grau de saturação (GS), índice de vazios (IV) e densidade do solo (Ds), o IC teve correlação significativa negativa somente com a Ds. Os Gleissolos apresentaram maior capacidade de suporte do que os Argissolos. Os horizontes superficiais tiveram menor deformação em relação aos subsuperficiais, devido a ter maior Ds e menor IV. Os horizontes mais profundos(BA, Bt1, Bt2 e Cg) apresentaram maior σp que os horizontes superficiais(A, Ap, A1, A2, AB), por terem maior quantidade de argila. Quanto maior a carga aplicada nas amostras, maior a densidade Ds e menos PT, a maior permeabilidade foi nos perfis A, A1 e Ap sob as cargas de 25 e 50 kPa, pois não produziram efeitos negativos na estrutura. A aplicação de maiores cargas na amostra mudou a estrutura do solo, retendo mais água em função do aumento de mircoporos. Os Gleissolos apresentaram maior capacidade de suporte e são menos suscetíveis à compactação do que os Argissolos. Os Gleissolos apresentaram maior capacidade de suporte e são menos suscetíveis à compactação do que os Argissolos. Dentre os Gleissolos, o perfil 2 apresentou menor susceptibilidade a compactação do que o perfil 1 e dentre os Argissolos, a susceptibilidade à compactação do perfil 5 é menor que nos perfis 3 e 4. Os horizontes mais profundos (BA, Bt1, Bt2 e Cg) apresentaram maior (σp) e capacidade de suporte que os horizontes superficiais (A, Ap, A1, A2 e AB) pois tem maior quantidade de argila. Após aplicação das cargas de 100 e 200 kPa, os perfis 1,2, 4 e 5 apresentaram menores valores de Ka, resultado da mudança de estrutura da amostra, diminuindo a macroporosidade e aumentando a microporosidade. A compactação da amostra reduziu a macroporosidade e a porosidade total promovendo um maior armazenamento de água nas maiores tensões aplicadas.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia AgrícolaUFSMBREngenharia AgrícolaTopossequênciaCompressibilidade do soloPropriedades físico-hídricasTop sequenceCompressibility of soilPhysical and hydraulic propertiesCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ENGENHARIA AGRICOLAPropriedades físicas de uma topossequência argissolo-gleissoloPhysical properties of a toposequence gley-podzolicinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisReichert, José Miguelhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0910765178697312Suzuki, Luis Eduardo Akiyoshi Sancheshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8976157511758125Sequinatto, Letíciahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6907053055563965http://lattes.cnpq.br/9623722041477952Braga, Fabiano de Vargas Arigony500300000008400500500500300a85444db-3c89-4606-bf03-0e1915842baad434fada-0ca2-4aaa-a2e8-2cfee40fdda348d97066-4b0c-4dac-8227-b6de093a92f1d83bcfdf-248b-454a-8ae9-61393d204e27info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALBRAGA, FABIANO DE VARGAS ARIGONY.pdfapplication/pdf1802621http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/7540/1/BRAGA%2c%20FABIANO%20DE%20VARGAS%20ARIGONY.pdff926c1e44929741db16d92f4808b1f47MD51TEXTBRAGA, FABIANO DE VARGAS ARIGONY.pdf.txtBRAGA, FABIANO DE VARGAS ARIGONY.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain131695http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/7540/2/BRAGA%2c%20FABIANO%20DE%20VARGAS%20ARIGONY.pdf.txt8369199d0a6062fdd89b22d045b3bd20MD52THUMBNAILBRAGA, FABIANO DE VARGAS ARIGONY.pdf.jpgBRAGA, FABIANO DE VARGAS ARIGONY.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4950http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/7540/3/BRAGA%2c%20FABIANO%20DE%20VARGAS%20ARIGONY.pdf.jpgaaadbc1dcd3e9cb8f03a7b23a4a63f13MD531/75402022-06-01 11:53:16.733oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/7540Repositório Institucionalhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestopendoar:39132022-06-01T14:53:16Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Propriedades físicas de uma topossequência argissolo-gleissolo
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Physical properties of a toposequence gley-podzolic
title Propriedades físicas de uma topossequência argissolo-gleissolo
spellingShingle Propriedades físicas de uma topossequência argissolo-gleissolo
Braga, Fabiano de Vargas Arigony
Topossequência
Compressibilidade do solo
Propriedades físico-hídricas
Top sequence
Compressibility of soil
Physical and hydraulic properties
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA
title_short Propriedades físicas de uma topossequência argissolo-gleissolo
title_full Propriedades físicas de uma topossequência argissolo-gleissolo
title_fullStr Propriedades físicas de uma topossequência argissolo-gleissolo
title_full_unstemmed Propriedades físicas de uma topossequência argissolo-gleissolo
title_sort Propriedades físicas de uma topossequência argissolo-gleissolo
author Braga, Fabiano de Vargas Arigony
author_facet Braga, Fabiano de Vargas Arigony
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Reichert, José Miguel
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0910765178697312
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Suzuki, Luis Eduardo Akiyoshi Sanches
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8976157511758125
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Sequinatto, Letícia
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6907053055563965
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/9623722041477952
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Braga, Fabiano de Vargas Arigony
contributor_str_mv Reichert, José Miguel
Suzuki, Luis Eduardo Akiyoshi Sanches
Sequinatto, Letícia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Topossequência
Compressibilidade do solo
Propriedades físico-hídricas
topic Topossequência
Compressibilidade do solo
Propriedades físico-hídricas
Top sequence
Compressibility of soil
Physical and hydraulic properties
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Top sequence
Compressibility of soil
Physical and hydraulic properties
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA
description The soils of the Central Depression in Rio Grande do Sul consist mainly of mudstones, siltstones and sandstones. The region has dimensions ranging from 40 to 100 m at lower elevations (lowland) predominate Gley soils (shallow, poor drainage). In the plateau predominate Ultisols (deep to very deep and vary in color, as drainage level). The aim of this study was to evaluate the compressive behavior (carrying capacity and susceptibility to compaction) of the soil and influence of loads 25, 50, 100 and 200 kPa in the physical properties and water (CRA and air permeability). The sampling of soil for study was made in a private property located in Santa Maria. Trenches were dug to collect in two profiles located in the floodplain (Haplic Gley soil), two slopes (lower and upper) and one at the top, both Ultisol. In metal rings were collected soil samples with preserved structure for the uniaxial compression test on all horizons of the five different profiles, loads of 25, 50, 100 and 200 kPa in uniaxial press, then were only collected samples of soil surface horizons of the profiles for testing air permeability and water retention curve.. In both times the samples were equilibrated at a voltage of 10 kPa. Were carried out: sieve analysis, organic carbon, density, porosity, macro porosity, compressibility test, air permeability and water retention curve (WRC). The pre-consolidation pressure (σp) had a significant positive correlation with clay and negatively with sand, having no significant correlation with organic carbon (OC), degree of saturation (DS), voids (IV) and density (BD), the IC has had a significant negative correlation only with the Ds. Among the profiles, Gley Soils presented higher carrying capacity than the Argisols. Surface horizons had lower deformation compression curves compared to the subsurface, due to having larger soil density and smaller IV. The deeper horizons (BA, Bt1, Bt2 and Cg) showed higher σp than the surface horizons (A, Ap, A1, A2, B), by having greater amount of clay. The higher the load applied on the samples, higher soil density and porosity. The higher permeability was greater in profiles A, A1 and Ap under loads of 25 and 50 kPa, it produced no adverse effects on the structure. The application of higher loads in the sample changed the soil structure, retaining more water due to the increase of macro porosity. The Gley soils had a higher carrying capacity and are less susceptible to compaction than Argisols. Among Gley soil, profile 2 is less susceptible to compaction than a profile from the Ultisols and susceptibility to compaction of the profile 5 is lower than in profiles 3 and 4. The deeper horizons had higher pre-consolidation pressure (σp) and carrying capacity of the soil surface, because the greatest amount of clay. Loads of 25 and 50 kPa are lower than the values of pressure pre consolidation of horizons and the samples submitted showed no negative effects on the structure and had higher values of permeability. The application of loads 100 and 200 kPa, in the profiles 1.2 (floodplain), 4 (upper slope) and 5 (top) reduced the values of permeability, resulting from the change of the sample. The compacting process of the sample reduced macro porosity and increased total porosity by promoting greater water storage in the highest voltages applied.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2011-03-31
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2015-03-13
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2015-03-13
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Braga, Fabiano de Vargas Arigony. Physical properties of a toposequence gley-podzolic. 2011. 66 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Agrícola) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2011.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/7540
identifier_str_mv Braga, Fabiano de Vargas Arigony. Physical properties of a toposequence gley-podzolic. 2011. 66 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Agrícola) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2011.
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/7540
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 500300000008
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 400
500
500
500
300
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv a85444db-3c89-4606-bf03-0e1915842baa
d434fada-0ca2-4aaa-a2e8-2cfee40fdda3
48d97066-4b0c-4dac-8227-b6de093a92f1
d83bcfdf-248b-454a-8ae9-61393d204e27
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Agrícola
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSM
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/7540/1/BRAGA%2c%20FABIANO%20DE%20VARGAS%20ARIGONY.pdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/7540/2/BRAGA%2c%20FABIANO%20DE%20VARGAS%20ARIGONY.pdf.txt
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/7540/3/BRAGA%2c%20FABIANO%20DE%20VARGAS%20ARIGONY.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv f926c1e44929741db16d92f4808b1f47
8369199d0a6062fdd89b22d045b3bd20
aaadbc1dcd3e9cb8f03a7b23a4a63f13
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1794524464604512256