Fungos entomopatogênicos combinados com inseticidas químicos no manejo de mosca-branca em soja

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2022
Autor(a) principal: Bevilaqua, Júlia Guimarães lattes
Orientador(a): Arnemann, Jonas André lattes
Banca de defesa: Leão, José Domingos Jacques, Fiorin, Rubens Alex
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Ciências Rurais
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia
Departamento: Agronomia
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Bemisia tabaci
Glycine max
Manejo integrado de pragas
Controle biológico
Fungos entomopatogênicos
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Integrated pest management
Biological control
Entomopathogenic fungi
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/27387
Resumo: Soybean is the main agricultural crop produced and exported by Brazil, and the whitefly is one of the main pests of this crop. Its control is carried out mainly with chemical insecticides, which has resulted in an increase in the number of sprays and evolution towards resistant populations. There is a need to study alternatives for the control of this insect, and biological control with entomopathogenic fungi can be an effective mean, offering less risk to the environment. This study aimed to design and evaluate four management programs in two soybean cropping seasons, including two integrated management alternatives (a spray of chemical insecticide intercalated with a spray of biological insecticide formulated with entomopathogenic fungi), a conventional chemical management alternative and a biological control alternative. Two sequential sprays 10 days apart were performed for each program, and the results of ANOVA and Scott-Knott test (P≤0.05) revealed differences between treatments. It was found that the integrated management consisting of a sequential spray of chemical insecticide followed by a biological spray stood out as the best control option, presenting an average of 72% of control efficacy for adults and 44% for nymphs. Therefore, the integrated management of both insecticide tools can be an excellent alternative for whitefly control in soybean.
id UFSM_2d76a2866ba2095d9048d140016a90e1
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/27387
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling 2022-12-19T13:22:58Z2022-12-19T13:22:58Z2022-09-08http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/27387Soybean is the main agricultural crop produced and exported by Brazil, and the whitefly is one of the main pests of this crop. Its control is carried out mainly with chemical insecticides, which has resulted in an increase in the number of sprays and evolution towards resistant populations. There is a need to study alternatives for the control of this insect, and biological control with entomopathogenic fungi can be an effective mean, offering less risk to the environment. This study aimed to design and evaluate four management programs in two soybean cropping seasons, including two integrated management alternatives (a spray of chemical insecticide intercalated with a spray of biological insecticide formulated with entomopathogenic fungi), a conventional chemical management alternative and a biological control alternative. Two sequential sprays 10 days apart were performed for each program, and the results of ANOVA and Scott-Knott test (P≤0.05) revealed differences between treatments. It was found that the integrated management consisting of a sequential spray of chemical insecticide followed by a biological spray stood out as the best control option, presenting an average of 72% of control efficacy for adults and 44% for nymphs. Therefore, the integrated management of both insecticide tools can be an excellent alternative for whitefly control in soybean.A soja é o principal cultivo agrícola produzido e exportado pelo Brasil, e a moscabranca é uma das principais pragas dessa cultura. Seu controle é realizado principalmente com inseticidas químicos, o que tem acarretado em aumento do número de aplicações e evolução de populações resistentes. Existe a necessidade de estudar alternativas para o controle desse inseto, e o controle biológico à base de fungos entomopatogênicos pode ser um meio eficaz e de menor risco ao ambiente. Este trabalho teve como objetivo delinear e avaliar quatro programas de manejo em duas safras de soja, entre eles duas alternativas de manejo integrado (aplicações intercaladas de produto químico com produto biológico formulado com fungos entomopatogênicos), uma alternativa de manejo químico convencional e uma alternativa de controle apenas biológico. Duas aplicações sequenciais com 10 dias de intervalo foram realizadas para cada programa, e os resultados da ANOVA e teste de Scott-Knott (P≤0.05) revelaram diferenças significativas entre os tratamentos. Foi constatado que o manejo integrado composto por uma aplicação sequencial de inseticida químico seguido de biológico destacou-se como a melhor opção de controle, apresentando uma média de 72% de eficácia de controle para adultos e 44% para o controle de ninfas. Desta forma, o manejo integrado destas duas ferramentas pode ser uma excelente alternativa para o controle de mosca-branca em soja.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPqporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de Ciências RuraisPrograma de Pós-Graduação em AgronomiaUFSMBrasilAgronomiaAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBemisia tabaciGlycine maxManejo integrado de pragasControle biológicoFungos entomopatogênicosIntegrated pest managementBiological controlEntomopathogenic fungiCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIAFungos entomopatogênicos combinados com inseticidas químicos no manejo de mosca-branca em sojaIntegration of entomopathogenic fungi with chemical insecticides for the management of whiteflies in soybeaninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisArnemann, Jonas Andréhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9594849663299829Leão, José Domingos JacquesFiorin, Rubens Alexhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8852416631653941Bevilaqua, Júlia Guimarães50010000000960060060060060042f32952-37e5-4656-8893-3b7814344dcb40236506-bc74-49d2-82c0-5c6631784dbd3f085d42-79eb-47d6-b73f-c4ff4f57995de661b8c6-761b-4660-853f-fd372221f76dreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALDIS_PPGAGRONOMIA_2022_BEVILAQUA_JÚLIA.pdfDIS_PPGAGRONOMIA_2022_BEVILAQUA_JÚLIA.pdfDissertação de mestradoapplication/pdf1101623http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/27387/1/DIS_PPGAGRONOMIA_2022_BEVILAQUA_J%c3%9aLIA.pdfbf034d2607a25621bbda72fecd28d402MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/27387/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/27387/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD531/273872022-12-19 10:22:58.6oai:repositorio.ufsm.br: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 Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2022-12-19T13:22:58Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Fungos entomopatogênicos combinados com inseticidas químicos no manejo de mosca-branca em soja
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Integration of entomopathogenic fungi with chemical insecticides for the management of whiteflies in soybean
title Fungos entomopatogênicos combinados com inseticidas químicos no manejo de mosca-branca em soja
spellingShingle Fungos entomopatogênicos combinados com inseticidas químicos no manejo de mosca-branca em soja
Bevilaqua, Júlia Guimarães
Bemisia tabaci
Glycine max
Manejo integrado de pragas
Controle biológico
Fungos entomopatogênicos
Integrated pest management
Biological control
Entomopathogenic fungi
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
title_short Fungos entomopatogênicos combinados com inseticidas químicos no manejo de mosca-branca em soja
title_full Fungos entomopatogênicos combinados com inseticidas químicos no manejo de mosca-branca em soja
title_fullStr Fungos entomopatogênicos combinados com inseticidas químicos no manejo de mosca-branca em soja
title_full_unstemmed Fungos entomopatogênicos combinados com inseticidas químicos no manejo de mosca-branca em soja
title_sort Fungos entomopatogênicos combinados com inseticidas químicos no manejo de mosca-branca em soja
author Bevilaqua, Júlia Guimarães
author_facet Bevilaqua, Júlia Guimarães
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Arnemann, Jonas André
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/9594849663299829
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Leão, José Domingos Jacques
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Fiorin, Rubens Alex
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8852416631653941
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bevilaqua, Júlia Guimarães
contributor_str_mv Arnemann, Jonas André
Leão, José Domingos Jacques
Fiorin, Rubens Alex
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bemisia tabaci
Glycine max
Manejo integrado de pragas
Controle biológico
Fungos entomopatogênicos
topic Bemisia tabaci
Glycine max
Manejo integrado de pragas
Controle biológico
Fungos entomopatogênicos
Integrated pest management
Biological control
Entomopathogenic fungi
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Integrated pest management
Biological control
Entomopathogenic fungi
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
description Soybean is the main agricultural crop produced and exported by Brazil, and the whitefly is one of the main pests of this crop. Its control is carried out mainly with chemical insecticides, which has resulted in an increase in the number of sprays and evolution towards resistant populations. There is a need to study alternatives for the control of this insect, and biological control with entomopathogenic fungi can be an effective mean, offering less risk to the environment. This study aimed to design and evaluate four management programs in two soybean cropping seasons, including two integrated management alternatives (a spray of chemical insecticide intercalated with a spray of biological insecticide formulated with entomopathogenic fungi), a conventional chemical management alternative and a biological control alternative. Two sequential sprays 10 days apart were performed for each program, and the results of ANOVA and Scott-Knott test (P≤0.05) revealed differences between treatments. It was found that the integrated management consisting of a sequential spray of chemical insecticide followed by a biological spray stood out as the best control option, presenting an average of 72% of control efficacy for adults and 44% for nymphs. Therefore, the integrated management of both insecticide tools can be an excellent alternative for whitefly control in soybean.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2022-12-19T13:22:58Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2022-12-19T13:22:58Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2022-09-08
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/27387
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/27387
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 500100000009
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
600
600
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv 42f32952-37e5-4656-8893-3b7814344dcb
40236506-bc74-49d2-82c0-5c6631784dbd
3f085d42-79eb-47d6-b73f-c4ff4f57995d
e661b8c6-761b-4660-853f-fd372221f76d
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Ciências Rurais
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSM
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Agronomia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Ciências Rurais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/27387/1/DIS_PPGAGRONOMIA_2022_BEVILAQUA_J%c3%9aLIA.pdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/27387/2/license_rdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/27387/3/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv bf034d2607a25621bbda72fecd28d402
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com
_version_ 1793240157896310784

Registros relacionados