Decisão multicritério aplicada à otimização da envoltória de edificações residenciais de energia zero no Rio Grande do Sul

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2021
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Selton Fernandes de Sousa lattes
Orientador(a): Santos, Joaquim Cesar Pizzutti dos lattes
Banca de defesa: Santos, Isis Portolan dos, Cunha, Eduardo Grala da
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Tecnologia
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Civil
Departamento: Engenharia Civil
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/22968
Resumo: The design and construction of Zero Energy Buildings can help reduce global energy consumption and, consequently, minimize environmental impacts. To design an energy-efficient building it is possible to use computational optimization tools, which will simulate sets of variables to find the best solutions. Faced with a variety of possible solutions, it is important to use a multi-criteria decision-making methodology to order them. The present study aims to determine the most suitable envelope configuration for obtaining residential Zero Energy Buildings in representative climate conditions of Rio Grande do Sul. Thus, the BEopt 2.8 software was used to obtain the optimal cases from the energy consumption and envelope costs point of view for Bioclimatic Zones 1, 2 and 3, in Rio Grande do Sul. Then, photovoltaic systems to balance the electrical energy consumption of each optimal case were determined. From this, the initial costs of the optimal cases were calculated, considering the cost of the envelope, the cost of the photovoltaic system and the other costs for the construction of the building. Furthermore, the adaptive model was used to assess thermal comfort indices of the optimal cases. Finally, four scenarios were considered to evaluate the optimal cases using the ELECTRE III multi-criteria decision-making process. Each scenario considered a different weight for each of the evaluation criteria (air conditioning consumption, initial cost, and thermal comfort index) to determine the best solution. The results show that in all scenarios, the best envelopes for Bioclimatic Zones 1, 2 and 3 have the main facade to the south, ceramic block walls (14 cm) and internal and external mortar (2.5 cm), 2 mm radiant barrier on the roof, percentage of transparent elements of 16% and distribution of these elements of 30% on the front and rear façades and 20% on the side façades. For the ZB1, as black exterior walls, a roof in dark colors, and windows with 3 mm single glazing are also indicated. In ZB2, the results show that pearl-colored walls, white roof, and the application of 3 mm glass characterize the best solution. On ZB3, we recommend pearl-colored walls, white roof, and 6 mm single glazed windows. In addition, it was possible to order the other optimal cases resulting from the optimization, facilitating the choice of the most adequate envelope configuration in face of possible restrictions. Thus, it was possible to verify that the results of the optimization process can be evaluated based on a set of criteria, assisting in decisions regarding the design of a residential Zero Energy Building.
id UFSM_d429b607c2365a0ddb2f9909971491e7
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/22968
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling 2021-11-24T19:35:06Z2021-11-24T19:35:06Z2021-08-09http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/22968The design and construction of Zero Energy Buildings can help reduce global energy consumption and, consequently, minimize environmental impacts. To design an energy-efficient building it is possible to use computational optimization tools, which will simulate sets of variables to find the best solutions. Faced with a variety of possible solutions, it is important to use a multi-criteria decision-making methodology to order them. The present study aims to determine the most suitable envelope configuration for obtaining residential Zero Energy Buildings in representative climate conditions of Rio Grande do Sul. Thus, the BEopt 2.8 software was used to obtain the optimal cases from the energy consumption and envelope costs point of view for Bioclimatic Zones 1, 2 and 3, in Rio Grande do Sul. Then, photovoltaic systems to balance the electrical energy consumption of each optimal case were determined. From this, the initial costs of the optimal cases were calculated, considering the cost of the envelope, the cost of the photovoltaic system and the other costs for the construction of the building. Furthermore, the adaptive model was used to assess thermal comfort indices of the optimal cases. Finally, four scenarios were considered to evaluate the optimal cases using the ELECTRE III multi-criteria decision-making process. Each scenario considered a different weight for each of the evaluation criteria (air conditioning consumption, initial cost, and thermal comfort index) to determine the best solution. The results show that in all scenarios, the best envelopes for Bioclimatic Zones 1, 2 and 3 have the main facade to the south, ceramic block walls (14 cm) and internal and external mortar (2.5 cm), 2 mm radiant barrier on the roof, percentage of transparent elements of 16% and distribution of these elements of 30% on the front and rear façades and 20% on the side façades. For the ZB1, as black exterior walls, a roof in dark colors, and windows with 3 mm single glazing are also indicated. In ZB2, the results show that pearl-colored walls, white roof, and the application of 3 mm glass characterize the best solution. On ZB3, we recommend pearl-colored walls, white roof, and 6 mm single glazed windows. In addition, it was possible to order the other optimal cases resulting from the optimization, facilitating the choice of the most adequate envelope configuration in face of possible restrictions. Thus, it was possible to verify that the results of the optimization process can be evaluated based on a set of criteria, assisting in decisions regarding the design of a residential Zero Energy Building.O projeto e construção de Edifícios de Energia Zero (Zero Energy Buildings) pode auxiliar na redução do consumo energético mundial e, consequentemente, na minimização de impactos ambientais. Para projetar uma edificação energeticamente eficiente é possível utilizar ferramentas computacionais de otimização, que irão simular conjuntos de variáveis para encontrar as melhores soluções. Diante de uma variedade de possíveis soluções, destaca-se a necessidade de utilizar uma metodologia de decisão multicritério para ordená-las. O presente estudo tem como objetivo determinar a configuração de envoltória mais adequada para a obtenção de edificações residenciais de energia zero em condições climáticas representativas do Rio Grande do Sul. Dessa forma, foi utilizado o software BEopt, versão 2.8, para a obtenção dos casos ótimos do ponto de vista do consumo energético e do custo da envoltória para as Zonas Bioclimáticas 1, 2 e 3, no Rio Grande do Sul. Então, foram determinados os sistemas fotovoltaicos necessários para compensar o consumo de energia elétrica de cada caso ótimo. A partir disso, foram determinados os custos iniciais dos casos ótimos, considerando o custo da envoltória, o custo do sistema fotovoltaico e os demais custos para a construção da edificação, obtidos por orçamentação. Além disso, foram avaliados os índices de conforto térmico adaptativo dos casos ótimos. Por fim, foram considerados quatro cenários para avaliar os casos ótimos a partir do método de decisão multicritério ELECTRE III. Cada cenário considerou um peso diferente para cada um dos critérios de avaliação (consumo de ar-condicionado, custo inicial e índice de conforto térmico), para determinar a melhor solução. Em todos os cenários, verificou-se que as melhores configurações de envoltória para as Zonas Bioclimáticas 1, 2 e 3 apresentam a fachada principal ao Sul, paredes de bloco cerâmico (14 cm) e argamassa interna e externa (2,5 cm), barreira radiante de 2 mm na cobertura, percentual de elementos transparentes de 16% e distribuição desses elementos de 30% nas fachadas frontal e posterior e 20% nas fachadas laterais. Para a ZB1, as paredes externas na cor preta e a cobertura em cores escuras, e as janelas com vidros simples de 3 mm também são indicados. Na ZB2, os resultados mostram que paredes na cor pérola, cobertura branca e a aplicação de vidros simples de 3 mm caracterizam a melhor solução. Na ZB3, recomenda-se paredes na cor pérola, cobertura branca e janelas com vidros simples de 6 mm. Além disso, foi possível ordenar os demais casos ótimos resultantes da otimização, facilitando a escolha da configuração de envoltória mais adequada diante de eventuais restrições. Assim, foi possível verificar que os resultados do processo de otimização podem ser avaliados a partir de um conjunto de critérios, auxiliando em decisões no projeto de uma edificação residencial de energia zero.porUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de TecnologiaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia CivilUFSMBrasilEngenharia CivilAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZero energy buildingsEficiência energéticaEnergia solar fotovoltaicaCusto inicialConforto térmicoEnergy efficiencyPhotovoltaicsInitial costThermal comfortCNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVILDecisão multicritério aplicada à otimização da envoltória de edificações residenciais de energia zero no Rio Grande do SulMulti-criteria decision-making process applied to net zero energy building’s envelope optimization in Rio Grande do Sulinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisSantos, Joaquim Cesar Pizzutti doshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6591314076760539Santos, Isis Portolan dosCunha, Eduardo Grala dahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9091756186887908Lima, Selton Fernandes de Sousa300100000003600600600d6d380a1-0e89-4781-9fd2-5a059fe1eeaf3cf2fdae-1a30-4353-bf31-59ac9893e0d6c73dd6a3-5021-44f3-be83-3b2d3c9e2453eab0847b-a810-4b5e-896a-c8a5282a92afreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALDIS_PPGEC_2021_LIMA_SELTON.pdfDIS_PPGEC_2021_LIMA_SELTON.pdfDissertação de Mestradoapplication/pdf1962047http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/22968/1/DIS_PPGEC_2021_LIMA_SELTON.pdf81c505de26f14da24401fff93f1175e6MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/22968/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/22968/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD53TEXTDIS_PPGEC_2021_LIMA_SELTON.pdf.txtDIS_PPGEC_2021_LIMA_SELTON.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain177202http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/22968/4/DIS_PPGEC_2021_LIMA_SELTON.pdf.txtbc810d26fa4e200bb6758c4216451bc6MD54THUMBNAILDIS_PPGEC_2021_LIMA_SELTON.pdf.jpgDIS_PPGEC_2021_LIMA_SELTON.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4269http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/22968/5/DIS_PPGEC_2021_LIMA_SELTON.pdf.jpg487ecc55feae3ca70663150d90326d14MD551/229682021-12-30 11:24:04.368oai:repositorio.ufsm.br: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 Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2021-12-30T14:24:04Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Decisão multicritério aplicada à otimização da envoltória de edificações residenciais de energia zero no Rio Grande do Sul
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Multi-criteria decision-making process applied to net zero energy building’s envelope optimization in Rio Grande do Sul
title Decisão multicritério aplicada à otimização da envoltória de edificações residenciais de energia zero no Rio Grande do Sul
spellingShingle Decisão multicritério aplicada à otimização da envoltória de edificações residenciais de energia zero no Rio Grande do Sul
Lima, Selton Fernandes de Sousa
Zero energy buildings
Eficiência energética
Energia solar fotovoltaica
Custo inicial
Conforto térmico
Energy efficiency
Photovoltaics
Initial cost
Thermal comfort
CNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL
title_short Decisão multicritério aplicada à otimização da envoltória de edificações residenciais de energia zero no Rio Grande do Sul
title_full Decisão multicritério aplicada à otimização da envoltória de edificações residenciais de energia zero no Rio Grande do Sul
title_fullStr Decisão multicritério aplicada à otimização da envoltória de edificações residenciais de energia zero no Rio Grande do Sul
title_full_unstemmed Decisão multicritério aplicada à otimização da envoltória de edificações residenciais de energia zero no Rio Grande do Sul
title_sort Decisão multicritério aplicada à otimização da envoltória de edificações residenciais de energia zero no Rio Grande do Sul
author Lima, Selton Fernandes de Sousa
author_facet Lima, Selton Fernandes de Sousa
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Santos, Joaquim Cesar Pizzutti dos
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6591314076760539
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Santos, Isis Portolan dos
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Cunha, Eduardo Grala da
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/9091756186887908
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Selton Fernandes de Sousa
contributor_str_mv Santos, Joaquim Cesar Pizzutti dos
Santos, Isis Portolan dos
Cunha, Eduardo Grala da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Zero energy buildings
Eficiência energética
Energia solar fotovoltaica
Custo inicial
Conforto térmico
topic Zero energy buildings
Eficiência energética
Energia solar fotovoltaica
Custo inicial
Conforto térmico
Energy efficiency
Photovoltaics
Initial cost
Thermal comfort
CNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Energy efficiency
Photovoltaics
Initial cost
Thermal comfort
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL
description The design and construction of Zero Energy Buildings can help reduce global energy consumption and, consequently, minimize environmental impacts. To design an energy-efficient building it is possible to use computational optimization tools, which will simulate sets of variables to find the best solutions. Faced with a variety of possible solutions, it is important to use a multi-criteria decision-making methodology to order them. The present study aims to determine the most suitable envelope configuration for obtaining residential Zero Energy Buildings in representative climate conditions of Rio Grande do Sul. Thus, the BEopt 2.8 software was used to obtain the optimal cases from the energy consumption and envelope costs point of view for Bioclimatic Zones 1, 2 and 3, in Rio Grande do Sul. Then, photovoltaic systems to balance the electrical energy consumption of each optimal case were determined. From this, the initial costs of the optimal cases were calculated, considering the cost of the envelope, the cost of the photovoltaic system and the other costs for the construction of the building. Furthermore, the adaptive model was used to assess thermal comfort indices of the optimal cases. Finally, four scenarios were considered to evaluate the optimal cases using the ELECTRE III multi-criteria decision-making process. Each scenario considered a different weight for each of the evaluation criteria (air conditioning consumption, initial cost, and thermal comfort index) to determine the best solution. The results show that in all scenarios, the best envelopes for Bioclimatic Zones 1, 2 and 3 have the main facade to the south, ceramic block walls (14 cm) and internal and external mortar (2.5 cm), 2 mm radiant barrier on the roof, percentage of transparent elements of 16% and distribution of these elements of 30% on the front and rear façades and 20% on the side façades. For the ZB1, as black exterior walls, a roof in dark colors, and windows with 3 mm single glazing are also indicated. In ZB2, the results show that pearl-colored walls, white roof, and the application of 3 mm glass characterize the best solution. On ZB3, we recommend pearl-colored walls, white roof, and 6 mm single glazed windows. In addition, it was possible to order the other optimal cases resulting from the optimization, facilitating the choice of the most adequate envelope configuration in face of possible restrictions. Thus, it was possible to verify that the results of the optimization process can be evaluated based on a set of criteria, assisting in decisions regarding the design of a residential Zero Energy Building.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-11-24T19:35:06Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2021-11-24T19:35:06Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2021-08-09
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/22968
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/22968
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 300100000003
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv d6d380a1-0e89-4781-9fd2-5a059fe1eeaf
3cf2fdae-1a30-4353-bf31-59ac9893e0d6
c73dd6a3-5021-44f3-be83-3b2d3c9e2453
eab0847b-a810-4b5e-896a-c8a5282a92af
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Tecnologia
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Civil
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSM
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Engenharia Civil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Tecnologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/22968/1/DIS_PPGEC_2021_LIMA_SELTON.pdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/22968/2/license_rdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/22968/3/license.txt
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/22968/4/DIS_PPGEC_2021_LIMA_SELTON.pdf.txt
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/22968/5/DIS_PPGEC_2021_LIMA_SELTON.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 81c505de26f14da24401fff93f1175e6
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df
bc810d26fa4e200bb6758c4216451bc6
487ecc55feae3ca70663150d90326d14
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com
_version_ 1793240073409396736