Formação inicial de professores de filosofia: um estudo sobre sua situação e perspectivas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2004
Autor(a) principal: Gonçalves, Rita de Cassia Sant´ Anna de Athayde lattes
Orientador(a): Tomazetti, Elisete Medianeira lattes
Banca de defesa: Moraes, Amaury C., Cunha, Jorge L . da, Bellochio, Claúdia
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Educação
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação
Departamento: Educação
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/27267
Resumo: This work presents a study about the initial educational approach adopted by the Philosophy teacher, by introducing an analysis of the educational model used before the Curriculum Regulations and the Philosophy Courses Regulations, with the purpose of comparing the educational model of the Philosophy teachers and the current perspectives of changes in this initial education. It is also discussed an old problem of Philosophy which is the assumption that there is a difference between the philosophic activity and the teaching of Philosophy, or in other words, that there is a distinction between the philosophy teacher and the philosopher. The study also analyses the initial education of the Philosophy teachers by making interviews with the supervising teachers, to investigate the comprehension that they have about the initial education of the future teachers and to find out what is the profile for the licentiateships in Philosophy, after the Resolutions 1/2002 and 2/2002 were adopted. With this data, it is our intention to evaluate the challenges and perspectives of the Philosophy teacher today. Although, generally speaking, this theme is still being discussed and this discussion is not completed, we understand that a problem for the teaching of Philosophy in the secondary schools is in the form that the initial education is conducted, which is more directed towards the research than to the teaching methodology. There are no consistent discussions about a methodological approach to Philosophy by the majority of the supervising teachers or by the secondary schools teachers. The greater importance given to the research together with a lower status of the teaching has produced the lack of fundamental teaching pre-requisites, and this is specially true for Philosophy. This situation tends to be modified, because the Curriculum Regulations and the Resolutions, which have determined an increase of the class hours, have forced the supervising teachers to reflect about learning and teaching. Although they still express some restrictions, they are discussing the widening of the teachers pedagogical education. The creation of new propositions for the licentiateships in Philosophy is a matter that cannot wait much longer, because it is a request from the supervisors, worried not only with the development of the critical sense of the student. This is something that all subjects must do. What we really want is to increase the capacity of problematizing the reality and lead the student to the activity.
id UFSM_fcaf924eb97cd53983792f015dac8ee4
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/27267
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling 2022-12-06T19:50:23Z2022-12-06T19:50:23Z2004-12-17http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/27267This work presents a study about the initial educational approach adopted by the Philosophy teacher, by introducing an analysis of the educational model used before the Curriculum Regulations and the Philosophy Courses Regulations, with the purpose of comparing the educational model of the Philosophy teachers and the current perspectives of changes in this initial education. It is also discussed an old problem of Philosophy which is the assumption that there is a difference between the philosophic activity and the teaching of Philosophy, or in other words, that there is a distinction between the philosophy teacher and the philosopher. The study also analyses the initial education of the Philosophy teachers by making interviews with the supervising teachers, to investigate the comprehension that they have about the initial education of the future teachers and to find out what is the profile for the licentiateships in Philosophy, after the Resolutions 1/2002 and 2/2002 were adopted. With this data, it is our intention to evaluate the challenges and perspectives of the Philosophy teacher today. Although, generally speaking, this theme is still being discussed and this discussion is not completed, we understand that a problem for the teaching of Philosophy in the secondary schools is in the form that the initial education is conducted, which is more directed towards the research than to the teaching methodology. There are no consistent discussions about a methodological approach to Philosophy by the majority of the supervising teachers or by the secondary schools teachers. The greater importance given to the research together with a lower status of the teaching has produced the lack of fundamental teaching pre-requisites, and this is specially true for Philosophy. This situation tends to be modified, because the Curriculum Regulations and the Resolutions, which have determined an increase of the class hours, have forced the supervising teachers to reflect about learning and teaching. Although they still express some restrictions, they are discussing the widening of the teachers pedagogical education. The creation of new propositions for the licentiateships in Philosophy is a matter that cannot wait much longer, because it is a request from the supervisors, worried not only with the development of the critical sense of the student. This is something that all subjects must do. What we really want is to increase the capacity of problematizing the reality and lead the student to the activity.Este trabalho apresenta um estudo sobre a formação inicial do professore de Filosofia, introduzindo uma análise de modelo de formação anterior às Diretrizes Curriculares e as Diretrizes dos Cursos de Filosofia, com o intuito de se fazer um contraponto entre o modelo de formação de professores de Filosofia e as perspectivas atuais de mudança nesta formação inicial. Discute-se também um problema antigo da Filosofia sobre o preconceito que diferencia a atividade filosófica e ensino de Filosofia, ou seja, a distinção entre o professor de filosofia e o filósofo. O estudo faz, ainda, uma análise da formação inicial do professor de Filosofia a partir de entrevistas aplicadas aos professores formadores, para analisar a compreensão que estes têm da formação inicial dos futuros professores e qual o perfil para as licenciaturas em Filosofia, a partir da reforma curricular que está sendo desenvolvida a após a promulgação das Resoluções 1/2002 e 2/2002. Partindo destes dados, pretende-se abrir uma apreciação acerca dos desafios e perspectivas do professor de Filosofia hoje. Embora, de modo geral, este tema esteja sendo ainda discutido e em construção, entende-se que um dos problemas para a atuação docente em Filosofia no nível médio, esteja no modo como é conduzida a formação inicial, voltada muito mais para pesquisa do que para o ensino. Não há discussões consistentes sobre uma didática da Filosofia pela maioria dos professores formadores, assim como dos professores da escola média. A valorização da pesquisa em detrimento do ensino produz a falta de pré-requisitos fundamentais á docência e, especialmente para docência em Filosofia. Essa situação tende a se modificar, pois as Diretrizes Curriculares e as Resoluções, que determinam aumento carga horária, em certo sentido, forçaram os professores formadores a refletirem sobre a questão do ensino que, a despeito de colocarem muitas restrições, estão discutindo a ampliação da formação pedagógica dos professores. A criação de novas propostas para as licenciaturas em Filosofia é uma questão que não pode esperar mais, pois é uma exigência dos próprios formadores, preocupados não só com o desenvolvimento do senso crítico do aluno, pois isso todas as disciplinas devem fazer, mas, acima de tudo, com a capacidade de problematizar a realidade e levar o aluno à atividade de filosofar.porUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de EducaçãoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em EducaçãoUFSMBrasilEducaçãoAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEducaçãoEnsinoFilosofiaFormação de professoresCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAOFormação inicial de professores de filosofia: um estudo sobre sua situação e perspectivasInitial education of philosophy teachers: a study about their situation and perspectivesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisTomazetti, Elisete Medianeirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3942924352722374Moraes, Amaury C.Cunha, Jorge L . daBellochio, Claúdiahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1222676044476889Gonçalves, Rita de Cassia Sant´ Anna de Athayde700800000006600600600600600600fb013dc0-4954-467f-ba4a-c04757300e98b3c41542-a058-49f6-b80a-ceb5458e0d9b8df401ba-23e8-4537-9b05-268803db2126b11b7da6-f9bb-4fc8-900e-ba156c415da41060a8c2-44ac-4075-8118-67c71291f9a1reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALDIS_PPGEDUCAÇÃO_2004_GONÇALVES_RITA.pdfDIS_PPGEDUCAÇÃO_2004_GONÇALVES_RITA.pdfDissertação de mestradoapplication/pdf1516132http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/27267/1/DIS_PPGEDUCA%c3%87%c3%83O_2004_GON%c3%87ALVES_RITA.pdf3f5d36f1781295a0c61cb0599c19d418MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/27267/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/27267/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD531/272672022-12-06 16:50:23.863oai:repositorio.ufsm.br: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 Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2022-12-06T19:50:23Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Formação inicial de professores de filosofia: um estudo sobre sua situação e perspectivas
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Initial education of philosophy teachers: a study about their situation and perspectives
title Formação inicial de professores de filosofia: um estudo sobre sua situação e perspectivas
spellingShingle Formação inicial de professores de filosofia: um estudo sobre sua situação e perspectivas
Gonçalves, Rita de Cassia Sant´ Anna de Athayde
Educação
Ensino
Filosofia
Formação de professores
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
title_short Formação inicial de professores de filosofia: um estudo sobre sua situação e perspectivas
title_full Formação inicial de professores de filosofia: um estudo sobre sua situação e perspectivas
title_fullStr Formação inicial de professores de filosofia: um estudo sobre sua situação e perspectivas
title_full_unstemmed Formação inicial de professores de filosofia: um estudo sobre sua situação e perspectivas
title_sort Formação inicial de professores de filosofia: um estudo sobre sua situação e perspectivas
author Gonçalves, Rita de Cassia Sant´ Anna de Athayde
author_facet Gonçalves, Rita de Cassia Sant´ Anna de Athayde
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Tomazetti, Elisete Medianeira
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3942924352722374
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Moraes, Amaury C.
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Cunha, Jorge L . da
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Bellochio, Claúdia
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1222676044476889
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gonçalves, Rita de Cassia Sant´ Anna de Athayde
contributor_str_mv Tomazetti, Elisete Medianeira
Moraes, Amaury C.
Cunha, Jorge L . da
Bellochio, Claúdia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Educação
Ensino
Filosofia
Formação de professores
topic Educação
Ensino
Filosofia
Formação de professores
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
description This work presents a study about the initial educational approach adopted by the Philosophy teacher, by introducing an analysis of the educational model used before the Curriculum Regulations and the Philosophy Courses Regulations, with the purpose of comparing the educational model of the Philosophy teachers and the current perspectives of changes in this initial education. It is also discussed an old problem of Philosophy which is the assumption that there is a difference between the philosophic activity and the teaching of Philosophy, or in other words, that there is a distinction between the philosophy teacher and the philosopher. The study also analyses the initial education of the Philosophy teachers by making interviews with the supervising teachers, to investigate the comprehension that they have about the initial education of the future teachers and to find out what is the profile for the licentiateships in Philosophy, after the Resolutions 1/2002 and 2/2002 were adopted. With this data, it is our intention to evaluate the challenges and perspectives of the Philosophy teacher today. Although, generally speaking, this theme is still being discussed and this discussion is not completed, we understand that a problem for the teaching of Philosophy in the secondary schools is in the form that the initial education is conducted, which is more directed towards the research than to the teaching methodology. There are no consistent discussions about a methodological approach to Philosophy by the majority of the supervising teachers or by the secondary schools teachers. The greater importance given to the research together with a lower status of the teaching has produced the lack of fundamental teaching pre-requisites, and this is specially true for Philosophy. This situation tends to be modified, because the Curriculum Regulations and the Resolutions, which have determined an increase of the class hours, have forced the supervising teachers to reflect about learning and teaching. Although they still express some restrictions, they are discussing the widening of the teachers pedagogical education. The creation of new propositions for the licentiateships in Philosophy is a matter that cannot wait much longer, because it is a request from the supervisors, worried not only with the development of the critical sense of the student. This is something that all subjects must do. What we really want is to increase the capacity of problematizing the reality and lead the student to the activity.
publishDate 2004
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2004-12-17
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2022-12-06T19:50:23Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2022-12-06T19:50:23Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/27267
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/27267
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 700800000006
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
600
600
600
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv fb013dc0-4954-467f-ba4a-c04757300e98
b3c41542-a058-49f6-b80a-ceb5458e0d9b
8df401ba-23e8-4537-9b05-268803db2126
b11b7da6-f9bb-4fc8-900e-ba156c415da4
1060a8c2-44ac-4075-8118-67c71291f9a1
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Educação
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSM
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Educação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Educação
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/27267/1/DIS_PPGEDUCA%c3%87%c3%83O_2004_GON%c3%87ALVES_RITA.pdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/27267/2/license_rdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/27267/3/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 3f5d36f1781295a0c61cb0599c19d418
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com
_version_ 1793240166305890304