A reprodução do lugar e o desafio de permanência nos lotes da reforma agrária : Assentamento Divisa - Ituiutaba-MG

• Ano de defesa: 2008
• Autor(a) principal: Cruz, Nelson Ney Dantas
• Orientador(a): Santos, Rosselvelt José
• Banca de defesa: Abdala, Mônica Chaves , Mendonça, Marcelo Rodrigues
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-graduação em Geografia
• Departamento: Ciências Humanas
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Reforma agrária (Ituiutaba - MG); Modos de vida; Lugar; Redes sociais; Comunidade; Geografia rural; Assentamentos rurais
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Agrarian reform; Life ways; Place; Nets; Community
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::GEOGRAFIA
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/16032

The work that if follows approaches the context, politician, economic and social cultural of the nesting of the Divided Agrarian Reformation. More specifically, it analyzes the ways of life, the production and reproduction of the place and the communitarian space of the living citizens of this nesting. The commercialization of ownerships of lots was one of the reasons that had guided the accomplishment of the research, therefore, in our agreement, such situation consists as a problem for the Agrarian Reformation. The concerns in understanding the reason of the sales of lots had directed the studies for the particularitities that if make gifts in the lived space. The strategy was to analyze the reality of practical the social ones of the familiar producers, by means of its speaks, in way that we could know its trajectories of life, its seated or buying conquests while of lots. Being thus, we extend our theoretical knowledge concerning the work of field in Geography, analyzing, from geographic, sociological, anthropological and historiograficas workmanships, the descriptive method and verbal history. When knowing on the daily one of the interviewed ones, we perceive that the cycles of the nature are important for the productive process in agriculture. The parties, the leisure, the individual work and the collective one constitute the daily one, being this structuralized, over all, for the work. In this direction, the collective relations for affinities if become important for reproduction and structure of the daily one. In this way, when analyzing the life ways, we understand that significant divergences that hinder the production of an only collective social space, around the productive activities exist. Some families possess to know and abilities regarding the agricultural production, therefore, in its trajectories of life, had acquired knowledge from diverse experiences lived in the agricultural space. Other families had not lived experiences in the agricultural one and possess urban origin. These have difficulties in working, producing and to get income from the uses of the lot. Of this form, the place is produced and reproduced by the conflicts, agreements and misunderstandings between living families of the nesting. The reproduction of the life, by means of the uses and appropriations of the lots, becomes a challenge, since the production of the place is conflict, permeate for frustrate conquests, negotiations and for failures in the production and the collective organizations. It is in this way that the reality nestings goes them being produced and reproduced. Some families abandon the dream to possess a land property, therefore ahead of the difficulties of generation of producing, income, relating collectively if politics and technique attainment of assistance of the Government, the community and getting financial profits for the sales of its conquest, they opt in commercializing the ownership of the lot. In this trajectory, the nets of sociability appeared by the collective relationship of the families who remain liveing in the nesting go being constructed and modified for the coming of new families. Analyzing this situation, we understand that the sales of ownerships of lots have, as cause, a set of factors that appear in the lived space and if they relate the failures in meeting gifts in the interior of the communitarian space and in the extra-communitarian social relations that the collective one establishes.