Neoconstitucionalismo e as possibilidades e os limites do ativismo judicial no Brasil contemporâneo

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2010
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes, Ricardo Vieira de Carvalho lattes
Orientador(a): Borges, Alexandre Walmott lattes
Banca de defesa: Nunes, Jorge Amaury Maia lattes, Melo, Luiz Carlos Figueira de lattes, Soares Neto, Cícero José Alves lattes
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito
Departamento: Ciências Sociais Aplicadas
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/13175
Resumo: This work completes a study cycle whose object was judicial activism. It began in 2009, with the entry of its author in Masters Degree Program in Public Law supported by Prof. Jaci de Assis Law School, of Federal University of Uberlandia. Its apex is the presentation of this study. From the methodological point of view, the research consisted on the analysis of the theoretical literature, based on the deductive method. The two main arguments against a more active behavior of the judiciary are the violation of the principle (to some people, it is a dogma) of the separation of powers and democracy. In order to investigate the first one of them, the research considered the origins of power and its most frequently institutionalized expressions. The study came to the conclusion that power itself cannot be possessed, but exercised, so that it has an intrinsic mobility. Given this premise, the comprehension of that principle was analyzed regarding its evolution since classical theories until contemporary doctrine. The results of the study pointed to its conceptual mobility and fluidity over the centuries, and especially to the fact that the essential core of its expression depends on the settings of power at the moment experienced. Then, the division of powers has been studied considering Brazilian historical and constitutional reality. The partial conclusion extracted from this point was that neither in normality, nor in situations of exception, there was a linear distribution of state power between the established powers in Brazil. The preponderance of the Executive power stood out as well as the growing strength of judiciary, both in its independence and in its political strength. It is important to mention that judiciary is contemporaneously understood, in fact, as a branch of the state. After that, this study stated the conceptual definition of judicialization, judicialization of politics and judicial activism, as well as the presentation of what some theorists have identified as a constitutional crisis. At this point, the analysis of new constitutionalism as a theoretical, ideological and methodological framework for a new paradigm of law emerges as an inevitable element in order to study the proposed object. The post-legal positivism is presented as a philosophical paradigm of the new constitutionalism. Its study is preceded by the presentation of legal positivism in order to demonstrate the major changes of its perspective and some of its excesses. The Constitutional State, the implementation of the Constitution and human dignity as the central value of the system are mentioned. After the general demonstration of the new paradigm, the study investigates the position of Brazilian Judiciary in this perspective, firstly in an overview, then in relation to their legitimacy. Foreign experiences in India, South Africa, United States, Germany, Italy and Spain bring an important contribution to the study of judicial activism in Brazil. Then, in relation to the second main argument against judicial activism (a possible violation of democracy), the research culminates in the legitimate investigation of the possibilities of judicial activism and the presentation of some limits on this activity.
id UFU_ae675886cdda4059c23007c121643656
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufu.br:123456789/13175
network_acronym_str UFU
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFU
repository_id_str
spelling 2016-06-22T18:34:13Z2011-03-022016-06-22T18:34:13Z2010-09-02FERNANDES, Ricardo Vieira de Carvalho. Neoconstitucionalismo e as possibilidades e os limites do ativismo judicial no Brasil contemporâneo. 2010. 313 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Sociais Aplicadas) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, 2010.https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/13175This work completes a study cycle whose object was judicial activism. It began in 2009, with the entry of its author in Masters Degree Program in Public Law supported by Prof. Jaci de Assis Law School, of Federal University of Uberlandia. Its apex is the presentation of this study. From the methodological point of view, the research consisted on the analysis of the theoretical literature, based on the deductive method. The two main arguments against a more active behavior of the judiciary are the violation of the principle (to some people, it is a dogma) of the separation of powers and democracy. In order to investigate the first one of them, the research considered the origins of power and its most frequently institutionalized expressions. The study came to the conclusion that power itself cannot be possessed, but exercised, so that it has an intrinsic mobility. Given this premise, the comprehension of that principle was analyzed regarding its evolution since classical theories until contemporary doctrine. The results of the study pointed to its conceptual mobility and fluidity over the centuries, and especially to the fact that the essential core of its expression depends on the settings of power at the moment experienced. Then, the division of powers has been studied considering Brazilian historical and constitutional reality. The partial conclusion extracted from this point was that neither in normality, nor in situations of exception, there was a linear distribution of state power between the established powers in Brazil. The preponderance of the Executive power stood out as well as the growing strength of judiciary, both in its independence and in its political strength. It is important to mention that judiciary is contemporaneously understood, in fact, as a branch of the state. After that, this study stated the conceptual definition of judicialization, judicialization of politics and judicial activism, as well as the presentation of what some theorists have identified as a constitutional crisis. At this point, the analysis of new constitutionalism as a theoretical, ideological and methodological framework for a new paradigm of law emerges as an inevitable element in order to study the proposed object. The post-legal positivism is presented as a philosophical paradigm of the new constitutionalism. Its study is preceded by the presentation of legal positivism in order to demonstrate the major changes of its perspective and some of its excesses. The Constitutional State, the implementation of the Constitution and human dignity as the central value of the system are mentioned. After the general demonstration of the new paradigm, the study investigates the position of Brazilian Judiciary in this perspective, firstly in an overview, then in relation to their legitimacy. Foreign experiences in India, South Africa, United States, Germany, Italy and Spain bring an important contribution to the study of judicial activism in Brazil. Then, in relation to the second main argument against judicial activism (a possible violation of democracy), the research culminates in the legitimate investigation of the possibilities of judicial activism and the presentation of some limits on this activity.A presente dissertação conclui um ciclo de estudos cujo objeto girou em torno do ativismo judicial. Teve início em 2009 com o ingresso do autor no Programa de Mestrado em Direito Público da Faculdade de Direito Prof. Jacy de Assis da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia e tem como ápice a defesa desta dissertação. Sob o aspecto metodológico, utilizou-se a pesquisa bibliográfica ou teórica, com apoio do método dedutivo. Os dois principais argumentos contrários a uma postura mais ativa do Poder Judiciário são a afronta ao princípio da separação de poderes (para alguns um dogma) e à democracia. Com o objetivo de investigar o primeiro deles, buscaram-se as origens do poder e suas emanações mais frequentes na acepção institucionalizada do Estado. Verificou-se que o poder não se detém, mas se exerce, por isso tem uma mobilidade intrínseca. Diante dessa premissa, houve o confronto do princípio da separação de poderes no viés das principais teorias clássicas com este mesmo princípio segundo a doutrina contemporânea. O resultado demonstrou sua mobilidade e fluidez conceitual ao longo dos séculos e, sobretudo, que o núcleo essencial de sua expressão depende das configurações de poder no momento social e estatal vivenciados. Então, a divisão de poderes foi estudada na realidade histórico-constitucional brasileira. A conclusão parcial que se extraiu deste ponto foi de que, no Brasil, seja em momentos de normalidade, seja em situações de exceção, não houve uma distribuição do poder estatal linearmente entre os Poderes constituídos. A preponderância do Executivo se destacou, bem como o crescente fortalecimento da independência e da força política do Judiciário. Este, contemporaneamente, é entendido, de fato, como um Poder do Estado. Partese então à delimitação conceitual da judicialização, da judicialização da política e do ativismo judicial, bem como à apresentação do que alguns teóricos identificaram como crise constitucional. A partir desse ponto, a análise do neoconstitucionalismo, como referencial teórico, ideológico e metodológico de um novo paradigma de direito, mostra-se essencial ao estudo do objeto proposto. O pós-positivismo jurídico é apresentado como marco filosófico do novo constitucionalismo. Seu estudo é precedido da apresentação do positivismo jurídico com o fim de demonstrar as principais mudanças de perspectivas e alguns de seus excessos. O Estado Constitucional Democrático, a concretização da Constituição e a dignidade da pessoa humana como valor central do ordenamento são transpassados. Após a demonstração geral do novo paradigma, o estudo investiga a posição do Poder Judiciário brasileiro nessa perspectiva, primeiro em um apanhado geral, depois em relação a sua legitimidade. As experiências estrangeiras da Índia, África do Sul, Estados Unidos, Alemanha, Itália e Espanha trazem uma importante contribuição para o estudo do ativismo judicial no Brasil. Depois, adentrando na perspectiva do segundo principal argumento contrário ao ativismo judicial sua eventual afronta à democracia , a pesquisa culmina na investigação das possibilidades legítimas de ativismo judicial e na apresentação de alguns limites sobre a atuação ativista.Mestre em Direito Públicoapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de UberlândiaPrograma de Pós-graduação em DireitoUFUBRCiências Sociais AplicadasDireito constitucionalDemocraciaSeparação de poderesPoder judiciárioCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICONeoconstitucionalismo e as possibilidades e os limites do ativismo judicial no Brasil contemporâneoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisBorges, Alexandre Walmotthttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4797069Z8Nunes, Jorge Amaury Maiahttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4766055U0Melo, Luiz Carlos Figueira dehttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4757915Y9Soares Neto, Cícero José Alveshttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4780796A3http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4463631J9Fernandes, Ricardo Vieira de Carvalhoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFUinstname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUTHUMBNAILDiss Ricardo.pdf.jpgDiss Ricardo.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1454https://repositorio.ufu.br/bitstream/123456789/13175/3/Diss%20Ricardo.pdf.jpgc50f0ea8ba779a9dc44f1ca6724e365fMD53ORIGINALDiss Ricardo.pdfapplication/pdf2105292https://repositorio.ufu.br/bitstream/123456789/13175/1/Diss%20Ricardo.pdfa5ed8084b6ae737a867ba0db7ca67ef0MD51TEXTDiss Ricardo.pdf.txtDiss Ricardo.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain875362https://repositorio.ufu.br/bitstream/123456789/13175/2/Diss%20Ricardo.pdf.txtbea78a833306b2b29195c114bc5b8981MD52123456789/131752017-06-21 08:26:47.541oai:repositorio.ufu.br:123456789/13175Repositório InstitucionalONGhttp://repositorio.ufu.br/oai/requestdiinf@dirbi.ufu.bropendoar:2017-06-21T11:26:47Repositório Institucional da UFU - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Neoconstitucionalismo e as possibilidades e os limites do ativismo judicial no Brasil contemporâneo
title Neoconstitucionalismo e as possibilidades e os limites do ativismo judicial no Brasil contemporâneo
spellingShingle Neoconstitucionalismo e as possibilidades e os limites do ativismo judicial no Brasil contemporâneo
Fernandes, Ricardo Vieira de Carvalho
Direito constitucional
Democracia
Separação de poderes
Poder judiciário
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO
title_short Neoconstitucionalismo e as possibilidades e os limites do ativismo judicial no Brasil contemporâneo
title_full Neoconstitucionalismo e as possibilidades e os limites do ativismo judicial no Brasil contemporâneo
title_fullStr Neoconstitucionalismo e as possibilidades e os limites do ativismo judicial no Brasil contemporâneo
title_full_unstemmed Neoconstitucionalismo e as possibilidades e os limites do ativismo judicial no Brasil contemporâneo
title_sort Neoconstitucionalismo e as possibilidades e os limites do ativismo judicial no Brasil contemporâneo
author Fernandes, Ricardo Vieira de Carvalho
author_facet Fernandes, Ricardo Vieira de Carvalho
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Borges, Alexandre Walmott
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4797069Z8
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Nunes, Jorge Amaury Maia
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4766055U0
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Melo, Luiz Carlos Figueira de
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4757915Y9
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Soares Neto, Cícero José Alves
dc.contributor.referee3Lattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4780796A3
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4463631J9
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes, Ricardo Vieira de Carvalho
contributor_str_mv Borges, Alexandre Walmott
Nunes, Jorge Amaury Maia
Melo, Luiz Carlos Figueira de
Soares Neto, Cícero José Alves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Direito constitucional
Democracia
Separação de poderes
Poder judiciário
topic Direito constitucional
Democracia
Separação de poderes
Poder judiciário
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO
description This work completes a study cycle whose object was judicial activism. It began in 2009, with the entry of its author in Masters Degree Program in Public Law supported by Prof. Jaci de Assis Law School, of Federal University of Uberlandia. Its apex is the presentation of this study. From the methodological point of view, the research consisted on the analysis of the theoretical literature, based on the deductive method. The two main arguments against a more active behavior of the judiciary are the violation of the principle (to some people, it is a dogma) of the separation of powers and democracy. In order to investigate the first one of them, the research considered the origins of power and its most frequently institutionalized expressions. The study came to the conclusion that power itself cannot be possessed, but exercised, so that it has an intrinsic mobility. Given this premise, the comprehension of that principle was analyzed regarding its evolution since classical theories until contemporary doctrine. The results of the study pointed to its conceptual mobility and fluidity over the centuries, and especially to the fact that the essential core of its expression depends on the settings of power at the moment experienced. Then, the division of powers has been studied considering Brazilian historical and constitutional reality. The partial conclusion extracted from this point was that neither in normality, nor in situations of exception, there was a linear distribution of state power between the established powers in Brazil. The preponderance of the Executive power stood out as well as the growing strength of judiciary, both in its independence and in its political strength. It is important to mention that judiciary is contemporaneously understood, in fact, as a branch of the state. After that, this study stated the conceptual definition of judicialization, judicialization of politics and judicial activism, as well as the presentation of what some theorists have identified as a constitutional crisis. At this point, the analysis of new constitutionalism as a theoretical, ideological and methodological framework for a new paradigm of law emerges as an inevitable element in order to study the proposed object. The post-legal positivism is presented as a philosophical paradigm of the new constitutionalism. Its study is preceded by the presentation of legal positivism in order to demonstrate the major changes of its perspective and some of its excesses. The Constitutional State, the implementation of the Constitution and human dignity as the central value of the system are mentioned. After the general demonstration of the new paradigm, the study investigates the position of Brazilian Judiciary in this perspective, firstly in an overview, then in relation to their legitimacy. Foreign experiences in India, South Africa, United States, Germany, Italy and Spain bring an important contribution to the study of judicial activism in Brazil. Then, in relation to the second main argument against judicial activism (a possible violation of democracy), the research culminates in the legitimate investigation of the possibilities of judicial activism and the presentation of some limits on this activity.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2010-09-02
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2011-03-02
2016-06-22T18:34:13Z
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-06-22T18:34:13Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv FERNANDES, Ricardo Vieira de Carvalho. Neoconstitucionalismo e as possibilidades e os limites do ativismo judicial no Brasil contemporâneo. 2010. 313 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Sociais Aplicadas) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, 2010.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/13175
identifier_str_mv FERNANDES, Ricardo Vieira de Carvalho. Neoconstitucionalismo e as possibilidades e os limites do ativismo judicial no Brasil contemporâneo. 2010. 313 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Sociais Aplicadas) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, 2010.
url https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/13175
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFU
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Ciências Sociais Aplicadas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFU
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFU
collection Repositório Institucional da UFU
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufu.br/bitstream/123456789/13175/3/Diss%20Ricardo.pdf.jpg
https://repositorio.ufu.br/bitstream/123456789/13175/1/Diss%20Ricardo.pdf
https://repositorio.ufu.br/bitstream/123456789/13175/2/Diss%20Ricardo.pdf.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv c50f0ea8ba779a9dc44f1ca6724e365f
a5ed8084b6ae737a867ba0db7ca67ef0
bea78a833306b2b29195c114bc5b8981
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFU - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv diinf@dirbi.ufu.br
_version_ 1792331474257575936