Uma análise pragmática/desconstrutora da obra: educação a solução está no afeto-ecos e efeitos desses dizeres no contexto educacional

• Ano de defesa: 2007
• Autor(a) principal: Stein, Lisiane Cardoso
• Orientador(a): Freitas, Alice Cunha de
• Banca de defesa: Santos, João Bôsco Cabral dos , Ferreira, Raimundo Ruberval
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-graduação em Estudos Linguísticos
• Departamento: Linguística Letras e Artes
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Afetividade; Performatividade; Identidade; Conhecimento; Educação; Pragmática
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Affectivity; Peformativity; Iidentity; Knowledge; Education
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/15318

This piece of work had, as its object of analisys, the formerly published "Educação: a solução está no afeto Chalita (2001), being our corpus consisted of some knowledge, education and identity concept-related discoursive manifestations materialised in the aforementioned work. In order to complement some parts of this analisys, we made use of one teacher's speech, so as to dicuss on which ground the 'chalitian' propousal might produce effect on the classroom practice and happenings as well as in the school context as a whole. The, previously mentioned, work choice was not, at all, made randomly. However, for being, at least in the State oof Minas Gerais, considred as a "miraculous potion", capable of solving a number of Educational issues. Based on a deconstructive reading of the refered piece, we endevour problematising some excerpts, aiming at the dicussion of some conflicts, representations and present weak points, besides the devised teacher and student related identity profiles. We opted for an qualitative, descriptive research on an interpretative basis proving the hipothesis leading our enquiry, which states that the knoledge contruction, major school foundation, is fragilised or, to say the least, relegated to a less-expressive ground because the affectivity-related discoursive manifestations have been legitimated in the educational contexts as illusions able to solve almost all learning prolems. For the development of this research's data analisys, we took, as theoretical grounds, the Pragmatics preconceptions, more specifically, the notion of performativity, as proposed by Austin (1990), associated to the Deconstruction project, proposed by Derrida (1973). We searched for, as well, reference through the French discourse-analisys principles, specially in Pêcheux (1975). The complementing theoretical grounds of this research bases itself on the post-modern cultural studies of Hall (1997) and Silva (2005), who sustain discussions concerning the identity questions. We do consider important to restate that the results presented in this research are a product of the researcher's clivaring and the metadiscoursivity process, therefore, they do not close themselves either within an unique and definite conclusion once that, for an assured deconstructivist, a text will always be a fertile ground to be, once again deconstructed. On this manner, the hermeneutic or the heuristic stages installed in this discoursivity process are unique. In relation to the results, we notice that, in the observed context, the affectivity sayings are taken as performative. This way, The subjects circumscribed to the school understand that the affective manifestations may act on an efficient manner as a solution for the most varied teaching/learningprocess related problems. We did evidence, however, the fact that the aforementioned analised work readers, in the investigated context, do not perceive that Chalita enunciates, from a subject position in which he abides political religious and ethic issues. We do judge pertinent clarify that we consider affectivity may potentialise the teaching/learning processes. Nevertheless, we cannot, in a naive manner, think that there is only one remedy for all educational illnesses and that this remedy should, at all costs, be affection.