O Quilombo de Santo Antônio de Pinheiros Altos: entre o processo de reconhecimento e a construção cultural

• Ano de defesa: 2009
• Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, ícaro Trindade
• Orientador(a): Doula, Sheila Maria
• Banca de defesa: Amodeo, Nora Beatriz Presno , Queiróz, Jonas Marçal de
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Mestrado em Extensão Rural
• Departamento: Instituições sociais e desenvolvimento; Cultura, processos sociais e conhecimento
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Processo de reconhecimento quilombola; Comunidade quilombola; História; Políticas públicas
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Quilombola recognition process; Quilombola community; History; Cultural construction
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA::EXTENSAO RURAL
• Link de acesso: http://locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/4109

This study tried to identify and describe the cultural elements that were prioritized by community of Santo Antônio of Pinheiros Altos – Piranga – M.G. for its identification, recognition and title as remaining community of “Quilombo”. Our general objective was to describe and analyze the processes of the construction of identity of Quilombola community in the community of Santo Antônio, starting from the determinations of the recognition process by public organs. Its theoretical idea was based in authors of the cultural historiography, social and economical anthropology, as well as in the juridical and normative texts of this public policy. The methodology consisted of bibliographical and document analyses, besides a field of work composed by participant observation and thematic interview. From March to November 2008 the first observations and data collection were accomplished and in August the second stage of field of work was done with the accomplishment of twenty-four thematic interviews. Thus, we believe in this dissertation, after understanding the process and the cultural elements and also the policy of “quilombola” recognition involved, might open dialogue in a national scenery, as well as on issues still little discussed, mainly under the optics of the rural extension.