Fontes de proteína para vacas em lactação

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2005
Autor(a) principal: Pina, Douglas dos Santos
Orientador(a): Valadares Filho, Sebastião de Campos lattes
Banca de defesa: Valadares, Rilene Ferreira Diniz lattes, Campos, José Maurício de Souza lattes, Detmann, Edenio lattes, Leão, Maria Ignez lattes
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Mestrado em Zootecnia
Departamento: Genética e Melhoramento de Animais Domésticos; Nutrição e Alimentação Animal; Pastagens e Forragicul
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/5678
Resumo: Twelve Holstein and cross-bred dairy cows were used in this trial and were distributed in a three latin square design (4x4), according to days in milk, aiming at evaluate the effect of two periods of fecal collection was also evaluated (two or six days) in 26 hours intervals. The effect of two markers (insoluble neutral detergent fiber (NDFi) or insoluble acid detergent fiber indigestible (ADFi)) and of the diets with differents protein sources on intake, nutrients digestibility, milk production and composition, on efficiency of microbial protein synthesis, calculated by urinary excretion of purine derivatives, plasma (PUN) and milk (MUN) urea nitrogen concentration, ruminal ammonia concentration and pH. The A corn silage based diet (60% of the total dry matter) was used and the concentrate was formulated with different proteins sources (SM soybean meal, CM38 cottonseed meal with 38% of crude protein, CM28 - cottonseed meal with 28% of crude protein and SMU soybean meal plus 5% of urea/ammonium sulfate in the concentrate dry matter). The four experimental periods lasted 18 days each, being the last seven days used to sample collections. Milk samples from each animal were collected twice (morning and afternoon) at the 15th day of each experimental period, and later were combined in order to obtain a composed sample. Urine (spot) and blood collections were accomplished at the 18th day of each experimental period, at approximately four hours after the morning feeding of the animals. The urinary volume (V) was estimated using 24,4mg/kg live weight of creatinine as a daily mean. The means comparisons were always made in relation to the control diet (SM). Dry matter (DMI) and organic matter intakes (OMI) didn't differ among diets (P>0,05), whereas crude protein (CP) intake was larger to the CM38 diet. Rumen degradable (RDP) and undegradable protein intakes (RUP) were larger and smaller, respectively, to the CM28 and SMU diets. The intake of ether extract were larger to the CM28 and SMU diet and smaller to the CM28 diet, whereas non-fiber carbohydrates (NFC) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) intakes were smaller and larger, respectively, to the CM38 and CM28 diets. Total digestible nutrients (TDN) intake was smaller (P <0,05) in both diets, when compared to the control diet (SM). The fecal dry matter excretion (FDME) was overestimated and the digestibility coefficients of DM, OM, CP, NDF and NFC were underestimated by ADFi, but .fecal collection days had no effect on the estimates. The DM, OM and NDF digestibility coefficients (DC) were smaller (P <0,05) in the CM38, CM28 and FSU diets compared to the control diet. CP and EE digestibility were smaller and larger (P <0,05), respectively, in the CM38, CM28 diets, while NFC digestibility was smaller (P <0,05) in the SMU diet. Milk yield (MY), corrected or not for 3,5% of fat, milk fat concentration and production were not influenced (P <0,05) by the different protein sources, albeit DM and nitrogen efficiency of use for milk production, milk protein concentration and production were lower (P <0,05) in the diets formulated with cottonseed meal to the diet formulated with SM. Differences among diets for urinary volume (V), total excretion of purine derivatives (PT), microbial CP synthesis and efficiency of synthesis, expressed in g of CP/kg of intake TDN, were also not detected. PUN and MUN concentrations did not differed (P>0,05) among the diets. It was concluded that two days of fecal collection were enough to estimate FDME and to obtain the nutrients digestibilities and the contents of TDN of the diets and that NDFi was the most precise marker than AFDi. Also it was concluded that dairy cows producing, on average, 25 kg/day, can be fed with diets containing 5% of urea in the dry matter of the concentrate or cottonseed meal with 38% CP, in situations where the roughage is composed by 60% (total dry matter basis) of corn silage.
id UFV_ea15bc2fd6c9772b098ff511a2f8344c
oai_identifier_str oai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/5678
network_acronym_str UFV
network_name_str LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
repository_id_str
spelling Pina, Douglas dos Santoshttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4778249J8Valadares Filho, Sebastião de Camposhttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4787028J6Valadares, Rilene Ferreira Dinizhttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4787025E4Campos, José Maurício de Souzahttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4798551U0Detmann, Edeniohttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4760013T1Leão, Maria Ignezhttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4783340T92015-03-26T13:55:02Z2006-05-202015-03-26T13:55:02Z2005-02-21PINA, Douglas dos Santos. Protein sources by cows in the lactation. 2005. 72 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Genética e Melhoramento de Animais Domésticos; Nutrição e Alimentação Animal; Pastagens e Forragicul) - Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, 2005.http://locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/5678Twelve Holstein and cross-bred dairy cows were used in this trial and were distributed in a three latin square design (4x4), according to days in milk, aiming at evaluate the effect of two periods of fecal collection was also evaluated (two or six days) in 26 hours intervals. The effect of two markers (insoluble neutral detergent fiber (NDFi) or insoluble acid detergent fiber indigestible (ADFi)) and of the diets with differents protein sources on intake, nutrients digestibility, milk production and composition, on efficiency of microbial protein synthesis, calculated by urinary excretion of purine derivatives, plasma (PUN) and milk (MUN) urea nitrogen concentration, ruminal ammonia concentration and pH. The A corn silage based diet (60% of the total dry matter) was used and the concentrate was formulated with different proteins sources (SM soybean meal, CM38 cottonseed meal with 38% of crude protein, CM28 - cottonseed meal with 28% of crude protein and SMU soybean meal plus 5% of urea/ammonium sulfate in the concentrate dry matter). The four experimental periods lasted 18 days each, being the last seven days used to sample collections. Milk samples from each animal were collected twice (morning and afternoon) at the 15th day of each experimental period, and later were combined in order to obtain a composed sample. Urine (spot) and blood collections were accomplished at the 18th day of each experimental period, at approximately four hours after the morning feeding of the animals. The urinary volume (V) was estimated using 24,4mg/kg live weight of creatinine as a daily mean. The means comparisons were always made in relation to the control diet (SM). Dry matter (DMI) and organic matter intakes (OMI) didn't differ among diets (P>0,05), whereas crude protein (CP) intake was larger to the CM38 diet. Rumen degradable (RDP) and undegradable protein intakes (RUP) were larger and smaller, respectively, to the CM28 and SMU diets. The intake of ether extract were larger to the CM28 and SMU diet and smaller to the CM28 diet, whereas non-fiber carbohydrates (NFC) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) intakes were smaller and larger, respectively, to the CM38 and CM28 diets. Total digestible nutrients (TDN) intake was smaller (P <0,05) in both diets, when compared to the control diet (SM). The fecal dry matter excretion (FDME) was overestimated and the digestibility coefficients of DM, OM, CP, NDF and NFC were underestimated by ADFi, but .fecal collection days had no effect on the estimates. The DM, OM and NDF digestibility coefficients (DC) were smaller (P <0,05) in the CM38, CM28 and FSU diets compared to the control diet. CP and EE digestibility were smaller and larger (P <0,05), respectively, in the CM38, CM28 diets, while NFC digestibility was smaller (P <0,05) in the SMU diet. Milk yield (MY), corrected or not for 3,5% of fat, milk fat concentration and production were not influenced (P <0,05) by the different protein sources, albeit DM and nitrogen efficiency of use for milk production, milk protein concentration and production were lower (P <0,05) in the diets formulated with cottonseed meal to the diet formulated with SM. Differences among diets for urinary volume (V), total excretion of purine derivatives (PT), microbial CP synthesis and efficiency of synthesis, expressed in g of CP/kg of intake TDN, were also not detected. PUN and MUN concentrations did not differed (P>0,05) among the diets. It was concluded that two days of fecal collection were enough to estimate FDME and to obtain the nutrients digestibilities and the contents of TDN of the diets and that NDFi was the most precise marker than AFDi. Also it was concluded that dairy cows producing, on average, 25 kg/day, can be fed with diets containing 5% of urea in the dry matter of the concentrate or cottonseed meal with 38% CP, in situations where the roughage is composed by 60% (total dry matter basis) of corn silage.Foram utilizadas 12 vacas da raça Holandesa entre puras e mestiças, distribuídas em três quadrados latinos 4 x 4, organizados de acordo com os dias em lactação, com o objetivo de avaliar o efeito de dois períodos de coleta de fezes (dois ou seis dias) em intervalos de 26 horas, de dois indicadores (fibra indigestível em detergente neutro (FDNi) ou ácido (FDAi)) e de dietas com diferentes fontes protéicas sobre os consumos e as digestibilidades dos nutrientes, a produção e composição do leite, a eficiência de síntese de proteína microbiana, calculada a partir da excreção urinária de derivados de purina, a concentração de nitrogênio uréico no plasma e no leite, o balanço de compostos nitrogenados e a concentração de nitrogênio amoniacal e o pH ruminal. As dietas foram constituídas de 60% de silagem de milho na base da MS total, mais os concentrados, os quais foram constituídos de diferentes fontes protéicas (FS - farelo de soja; FA38 farelo de algodão 38%PB; FA28 - farelo de algodão 28%PB e FSU farelo de soja mais 5% de uréia/sulfato de amônio na MS do concentrado). Os quatro períodos experimentais tiveram duração de18 dias cada, sendo os últimos sete dias destinados às coletas de amostras. No 15º dia do período experimental; foi coletada uma amostra de leite por animal em cada uma das ordenhas, para posteriormente originar uma amostra composta. No 18º dia do período experimental foram coletadas, 4 horas após o fornecimento do alimento uma amostra spot de urina e uma amostra de sangue em cada um dos animais. O volume urinário médio diário foi obtido, admitindo-se a excreção total de creatinina de 24,4 mg/kg de PV. As comparações estatísticas foram sempre feitas em relação à dieta controle (FS). Os consumos de matéria seca (MS) e de matéria orgânica (MO) não diferiram entre as dietas (P>0,05). Os consumos de proteína bruta (PB) foram maiores para a dieta contendo FA38, enquanto os de proteína degradada no rúmen (PDR) e de proteína não degradada no rúmen (PNDR) foram maiores e menores, respectivamente, com as dietas FA28 e FSU. Os consumos de extrato etéreo (EE) foram maiores com as dietas FA38 e FSU e menores para a dieta FA28, enquanto os de carboidratos não fibrosos (CNF) foram menores com as dietas FA38 e FA28. Os consumos de fibra em detergente neutro (FDN) foram maiores com as dietas FA38 e FA28 e os consumos de nutrientes digestíveis totais (NDT) foram menores (P<0,05) com ambas as dietas em relação à dieta controle (FS). A excreção de matéria seca fecal foi superestimada e os coeficientes de digestibilidade da MS, MO, PB, FDN e CNF foram subestimados pela FDAi, mas não houve efeito dos dias de coletas de fezes. Em relação à dieta controle, os CD da MS, MO e FDN foram menores (P<0,05) com as dietas FA38, FA28 e FSU , os CD da PB e do EE foram menores e maiores (P<0,05),respectivamente, com as dietas FA38 e FA28, e o CD do CNF foi menor (P<0,05) com a dieta com FSU. A produção de leite (PL) corrigida (PLG) ou não para 3,5% de gordura, o teor e a produção de gordura do leite não foram influenciados (P>0,05), mas a eficiência de utilização da MS e do nitrogênio dietético para a produção de leite, o teor e a produção de proteína do leite foram inferiores (P<0,05), com as dietas FA28 e FA38 em relação à dieta controle. Não foram observadas diferenças (P>0,05) nas frações e na excreção total de derivados de purinas (PT), na síntese de proteína bruta (PB) microbiana (PBMIC) e na eficiência de síntese de PB microbiana expressa em g de PB/kg de NDT consumido. As concentrações de nitrogênio uréico no plasma (NUP) e no leite (NUL) também não diferiram (P>0,05) entre as dietas. Conclui-se que dois dias de coleta de fezes foram suficientes para estimar a digestibilidade dos nutrientes e os teores de NDT e que a FDNi foi mais precisa que a FDAi para estimar a produção de matéria seca fecal. Conclui-se também que o farelo de soja pode ser substituído pelo farelo de algodão 38% ou pela mistura de farelo de soja contendo 5% de uréia/sulfato de amônio na MS do concentrado, para vacas com produção média diária de 25 kg de leite, alimentadas com 60% de silagem de milho na base da MS total das dietas.Universidade Federal de Viçosaapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de ViçosaMestrado em ZootecniaUFVBRGenética e Melhoramento de Animais Domésticos; Nutrição e Alimentação Animal; Pastagens e ForragiculUréiaFarelo de sojaFarelo de algodãoLeiteNutrição animalRuminantesDairy cattleUreaSoybean mealCotton mealMilkAnimal nutritionCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA::NUTRICAO E ALIMENTACAO ANIMAL::AVALIACAO DE ALIMENTOS PARA ANIMAISFontes de proteína para vacas em lactaçãoProtein sources by cows in the lactationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFVinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVORIGINALtexto completo.pdfapplication/pdf216579https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/5678/1/texto%20completo.pdf115c59ab1c7c1fa5e69f1fe41a4f20a7MD51TEXTtexto completo.pdf.txttexto completo.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain161179https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/5678/2/texto%20completo.pdf.txt27eb7153c48ca408184ab10bb84f5df5MD52THUMBNAILtexto completo.pdf.jpgtexto completo.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg3623https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/5678/3/texto%20completo.pdf.jpg67f97fff7bdde3ac63a64f568b03d2c7MD53123456789/56782016-04-10 23:13:41.218oai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/5678Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.locus.ufv.br/oai/requestfabiojreis@ufv.bropendoar:21452016-04-11T02:13:41LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Fontes de proteína para vacas em lactação
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Protein sources by cows in the lactation
title Fontes de proteína para vacas em lactação
spellingShingle Fontes de proteína para vacas em lactação
Pina, Douglas dos Santos
Uréia
Farelo de soja
Farelo de algodão
Leite
Nutrição animal
Ruminantes
Dairy cattle
Urea
Soybean meal
Cotton meal
Milk
Animal nutrition
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA::NUTRICAO E ALIMENTACAO ANIMAL::AVALIACAO DE ALIMENTOS PARA ANIMAIS
title_short Fontes de proteína para vacas em lactação
title_full Fontes de proteína para vacas em lactação
title_fullStr Fontes de proteína para vacas em lactação
title_full_unstemmed Fontes de proteína para vacas em lactação
title_sort Fontes de proteína para vacas em lactação
author Pina, Douglas dos Santos
author_facet Pina, Douglas dos Santos
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorLattes.por.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4778249J8
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pina, Douglas dos Santos
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Valadares Filho, Sebastião de Campos
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4787028J6
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Valadares, Rilene Ferreira Diniz
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4787025E4
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Campos, José Maurício de Souza
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4798551U0
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Detmann, Edenio
dc.contributor.referee3Lattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4760013T1
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv Leão, Maria Ignez
dc.contributor.referee4Lattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4783340T9
contributor_str_mv Valadares Filho, Sebastião de Campos
Valadares, Rilene Ferreira Diniz
Campos, José Maurício de Souza
Detmann, Edenio
Leão, Maria Ignez
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Uréia
Farelo de soja
Farelo de algodão
Leite
Nutrição animal
Ruminantes
topic Uréia
Farelo de soja
Farelo de algodão
Leite
Nutrição animal
Ruminantes
Dairy cattle
Urea
Soybean meal
Cotton meal
Milk
Animal nutrition
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA::NUTRICAO E ALIMENTACAO ANIMAL::AVALIACAO DE ALIMENTOS PARA ANIMAIS
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Dairy cattle
Urea
Soybean meal
Cotton meal
Milk
Animal nutrition
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA::NUTRICAO E ALIMENTACAO ANIMAL::AVALIACAO DE ALIMENTOS PARA ANIMAIS
description Twelve Holstein and cross-bred dairy cows were used in this trial and were distributed in a three latin square design (4x4), according to days in milk, aiming at evaluate the effect of two periods of fecal collection was also evaluated (two or six days) in 26 hours intervals. The effect of two markers (insoluble neutral detergent fiber (NDFi) or insoluble acid detergent fiber indigestible (ADFi)) and of the diets with differents protein sources on intake, nutrients digestibility, milk production and composition, on efficiency of microbial protein synthesis, calculated by urinary excretion of purine derivatives, plasma (PUN) and milk (MUN) urea nitrogen concentration, ruminal ammonia concentration and pH. The A corn silage based diet (60% of the total dry matter) was used and the concentrate was formulated with different proteins sources (SM soybean meal, CM38 cottonseed meal with 38% of crude protein, CM28 - cottonseed meal with 28% of crude protein and SMU soybean meal plus 5% of urea/ammonium sulfate in the concentrate dry matter). The four experimental periods lasted 18 days each, being the last seven days used to sample collections. Milk samples from each animal were collected twice (morning and afternoon) at the 15th day of each experimental period, and later were combined in order to obtain a composed sample. Urine (spot) and blood collections were accomplished at the 18th day of each experimental period, at approximately four hours after the morning feeding of the animals. The urinary volume (V) was estimated using 24,4mg/kg live weight of creatinine as a daily mean. The means comparisons were always made in relation to the control diet (SM). Dry matter (DMI) and organic matter intakes (OMI) didn't differ among diets (P>0,05), whereas crude protein (CP) intake was larger to the CM38 diet. Rumen degradable (RDP) and undegradable protein intakes (RUP) were larger and smaller, respectively, to the CM28 and SMU diets. The intake of ether extract were larger to the CM28 and SMU diet and smaller to the CM28 diet, whereas non-fiber carbohydrates (NFC) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) intakes were smaller and larger, respectively, to the CM38 and CM28 diets. Total digestible nutrients (TDN) intake was smaller (P <0,05) in both diets, when compared to the control diet (SM). The fecal dry matter excretion (FDME) was overestimated and the digestibility coefficients of DM, OM, CP, NDF and NFC were underestimated by ADFi, but .fecal collection days had no effect on the estimates. The DM, OM and NDF digestibility coefficients (DC) were smaller (P <0,05) in the CM38, CM28 and FSU diets compared to the control diet. CP and EE digestibility were smaller and larger (P <0,05), respectively, in the CM38, CM28 diets, while NFC digestibility was smaller (P <0,05) in the SMU diet. Milk yield (MY), corrected or not for 3,5% of fat, milk fat concentration and production were not influenced (P <0,05) by the different protein sources, albeit DM and nitrogen efficiency of use for milk production, milk protein concentration and production were lower (P <0,05) in the diets formulated with cottonseed meal to the diet formulated with SM. Differences among diets for urinary volume (V), total excretion of purine derivatives (PT), microbial CP synthesis and efficiency of synthesis, expressed in g of CP/kg of intake TDN, were also not detected. PUN and MUN concentrations did not differed (P>0,05) among the diets. It was concluded that two days of fecal collection were enough to estimate FDME and to obtain the nutrients digestibilities and the contents of TDN of the diets and that NDFi was the most precise marker than AFDi. Also it was concluded that dairy cows producing, on average, 25 kg/day, can be fed with diets containing 5% of urea in the dry matter of the concentrate or cottonseed meal with 38% CP, in situations where the roughage is composed by 60% (total dry matter basis) of corn silage.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2005-02-21
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2006-05-20
2015-03-26T13:55:02Z
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2015-03-26T13:55:02Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv PINA, Douglas dos Santos. Protein sources by cows in the lactation. 2005. 72 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Genética e Melhoramento de Animais Domésticos; Nutrição e Alimentação Animal; Pastagens e Forragicul) - Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, 2005.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/5678
identifier_str_mv PINA, Douglas dos Santos. Protein sources by cows in the lactation. 2005. 72 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Genética e Melhoramento de Animais Domésticos; Nutrição e Alimentação Animal; Pastagens e Forragicul) - Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, 2005.
url http://locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/5678
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Mestrado em Zootecnia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFV
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Genética e Melhoramento de Animais Domésticos; Nutrição e Alimentação Animal; Pastagens e Forragicul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron:UFV
instname_str Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron_str UFV
institution UFV
reponame_str LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
collection LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/5678/1/texto%20completo.pdf
https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/5678/2/texto%20completo.pdf.txt
https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/5678/3/texto%20completo.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 115c59ab1c7c1fa5e69f1fe41a4f20a7
27eb7153c48ca408184ab10bb84f5df5
67f97fff7bdde3ac63a64f568b03d2c7
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv fabiojreis@ufv.br
_version_ 1794528750720778240