Design de joia e pesquisa acadêmica: limites e sobreposições

• Ano de defesa: 2013
• Autor(a) principal: Favaro, Henny Aguiar Bizarro Rosa
• Orientador(a): Lima, Ana Gabriela Godinho
• Banca de defesa: Santos, Cecilia Helena Godoy Rodrigues dos , Martins, Nara Sílvia Marcondes , Taralli, Cibele Haddad , Korolkovas, Miriam Mirna
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Arquitetura e Urbanismo
• Departamento: Arquitetura e Urbanismo
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: design; joia; pesquisa acadêmica; prática projetual; produção criativa
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: design; jewel; academic research; projective practice; creative production
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DESENHO INDUSTRIAL::DESENHO DE PRODUTO
• Link de acesso: http://dspace.mackenzie.br/handle/10899/25819

This reflection takes place in the contest of the FAU-Mackenzie and takes as substrate the author s experience in Design course as a supervisor in the (TCC) Final Graduation Project in the area of jewelry. Part of reflection on how the graduate works are analysed, seeking to explain and develop its conceptual and practical tools. Takes as its theoretical basis, the study of history, arts, crafts and design, in order to contribute to the definition of a field, specifically regarding the building of knowledge in the area of design practice and jewelry design research. The context is presented in a brief review of the literature on inadequacies in the use of terms design, craft and art, with focus in the area of jewelry design, which mobilize the categories or confuse and complicate the discourses based on the conventional definitions and distinct studies of visual and material practice. At first we assume that academic research in areas of design practice, similarly to what happens, for example, with the arts, it is usually described, explained, discussed and read through the vocabulary stemming from the theory of traditional science, focusing on aspects as method and content. However, we are often not satisfied with a terminology that does not capture the events we experience as being essential and fascinating in design. In the proposed study, some aspects of this dissatisfaction are discussed and as well as a reflection on the issue is performed of process to the design procedures of jewelry in the academic realm. The research infers, from the proceedings in a selection of TCC, which can lead to the solution of problems via design tools, not be so closely linked to the academic literature. As a resource for this research, we used concepts from articles such as Eight criteria of academic research in areas of practice projetual , from authors such as Michel Biggs and Daniela Büchler, as well as works by Ana Gabriela Godinho Lima and Steven Scrivener, in a discussion of academic research techniques regarding the design methods in the academic research based on jewelry design.