Fontes alternativas de proteína para vacas em lactação

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2010
Autor(a) principal: SANTOS, Viviany Lúcia Fernandes dos lattes
Orientador(a): FERREIRA, Marcelo de Andrade
Banca de defesa: GUIM, Adriana, RANGEL, Adriano Henrique do Nascimento, MELO, Airon Aparecido Silva
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia
Departamento: Departamento de Zootecnia
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/6931
Resumo: It was evaluated in this work alternative sources of protein for lactation cows, about the intake, digestibility, milk yield and composition. Eight cows multiparous ¾ (Holandez / Gir) were distributed in two 4 x 4 latin squares, simultaneous. Each experimental period lasted 21 days (14 days for adaptation and seven days to collect data and samples). Were evaluated three protein sources, cottonseed meal (CM), soybean semi integral (SBSI), mazoferm and soybean meal (SBM) as witness. When mazoferm was used was observed smaller intake of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein and total digestible nutrients compared to SBM. Milk yield was lower in animals received mazoferm compared with fed SBM. The fat content in milk no differed and yield fat was lower for the animals that received CM and mazoferm compared to SBM. With respect to the percentage of milk in protein, when it was provided SBSI was observed lower content compared to SBM. Animals fed CM presented lower total solids in milk compared with those receiving SBM. Feed efficiency was greater for animals fed diets with mazoferm e nitrogen use efficiency was lower for those receiving CM compared with SBM. Nutrient digestibility was lower for animals fed diets with mazoferm, except for digestibility of non-fibrous carbohydrate which did not differ with respect to diet with SBM. Digestibility crude protein was greater for diets with CM and SBSI compared the diet with SBM. Based on dry matter intake and animal performance, is recommended the replacement of soybean meal by cottonseed meal and soybean meal semi integral.
id URPE_06ca2aa920aab6e5141608b12f8f141f
oai_identifier_str oai:tede2:tede2/6931
network_acronym_str URPE
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
repository_id_str
spelling FERREIRA, Marcelo de AndradeGUIM, AdrianaRANGEL, Adriano Henrique do NascimentoMELO, Airon Aparecido Silvahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6012727206730629SANTOS, Viviany Lúcia Fernandes dos2017-05-18T15:33:43Z2010-07-22SANTOS, Viviany Lúcia Fernandes dos. Fontes alternativas de proteína para vacas em lactação. 2010. 39 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/6931It was evaluated in this work alternative sources of protein for lactation cows, about the intake, digestibility, milk yield and composition. Eight cows multiparous ¾ (Holandez / Gir) were distributed in two 4 x 4 latin squares, simultaneous. Each experimental period lasted 21 days (14 days for adaptation and seven days to collect data and samples). Were evaluated three protein sources, cottonseed meal (CM), soybean semi integral (SBSI), mazoferm and soybean meal (SBM) as witness. When mazoferm was used was observed smaller intake of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein and total digestible nutrients compared to SBM. Milk yield was lower in animals received mazoferm compared with fed SBM. The fat content in milk no differed and yield fat was lower for the animals that received CM and mazoferm compared to SBM. With respect to the percentage of milk in protein, when it was provided SBSI was observed lower content compared to SBM. Animals fed CM presented lower total solids in milk compared with those receiving SBM. Feed efficiency was greater for animals fed diets with mazoferm e nitrogen use efficiency was lower for those receiving CM compared with SBM. Nutrient digestibility was lower for animals fed diets with mazoferm, except for digestibility of non-fibrous carbohydrate which did not differ with respect to diet with SBM. Digestibility crude protein was greater for diets with CM and SBSI compared the diet with SBM. Based on dry matter intake and animal performance, is recommended the replacement of soybean meal by cottonseed meal and soybean meal semi integral.Objetivou-se com este trabalho avaliar fontes alternativas de proteína para vacas em lactação, quanto ao consumo, digestibilidade, produção e composição do leite. Foram utilizadas oito vacas multíparas ¾ (Holandez/Gir), distribuídas em dois quadrados latinos 4 x 4 simultâneos. Cada período experimental teve duração de 21 dias (14 dias de adaptação e 7 dias de coleta de dados e amostras). Foram avaliadas três fontes proteicas, farelo de algodão (FA), farelo de soja semi-integral (FSSI), mazoferm e o farelo de soja (FS) como testemunha. Quando o mazoferm foi utilizado, observou-se menor consumo de matéria seca, matéria orgânica, proteína bruta e nutrientes digestíveis totais em relação ao FS. A produção de leite foi menor para os animais que receberam mazoferm em relação aos que consumiram FS. O teor de gordura no leite não diferiu e a produção de gordura foi menor para os animais que receberam FA e mazoferm em relação ao FS. Com relação ao percentual de proteína no leite, quando fornecido FSSI verificou-se menor teor em comparação ao FS. Os animais alimentados com FA apresentaram menor teor de sólidos totais no leite quando comparados com os que receberam FS. A eficiência alimentar foi maior para os animais que receberam mazoferm e a eficiência de utilização do nitrogênio foi menor para os que receberam FA quando comparado com FS. A digestibilidade dos nutrientes foi menor para os animais que receberam a dieta com mazoferm, com exceção da digestibilidade dos carboidratos não-fibrosos que não diferiu com relação a dieta com FS. A digestibilidade da PB foi maior para as dietas com FA e FSSI em relação a dieta com FS. Baseado no consumo de matéria seca e desempenho dos animais, recomenda-se a substituição do farelo de soja pelo farelo de algodão e farelo de soja semi-integral.Submitted by (lucia.rodrigues@ufrpe.br) on 2017-05-18T15:33:43Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Viviany Lucia Fernandes Santos.pdf: 271837 bytes, checksum: fea613e6ba84b4d2aadce47626ad8dbc (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2017-05-18T15:33:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Viviany Lucia Fernandes Santos.pdf: 271837 bytes, checksum: fea613e6ba84b4d2aadce47626ad8dbc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-07-22Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPqapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em ZootecniaUFRPEBrasilDepartamento de ZootecniaAlimento alternativoBovino de leiteProteínaCIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIAFontes alternativas de proteína para vacas em lactaçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-3881065194686295060600600600600-76856541506829724321346858981270845602-2555911436985713659info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPEinstname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)instacron:UFRPELICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/6931/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALViviany Lucia Fernandes Santos.pdfViviany Lucia Fernandes Santos.pdfapplication/pdf271837http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/6931/2/Viviany+Lucia+Fernandes+Santos.pdffea613e6ba84b4d2aadce47626ad8dbcMD52tede2/69312018-03-12 09:47:47.998oai:tede2: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede/PUBhttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/oai/requestbdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.bropendoar:2018-03-12T12:47:47Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Fontes alternativas de proteína para vacas em lactação
title Fontes alternativas de proteína para vacas em lactação
spellingShingle Fontes alternativas de proteína para vacas em lactação
SANTOS, Viviany Lúcia Fernandes dos
Alimento alternativo
Bovino de leite
Proteína
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
title_short Fontes alternativas de proteína para vacas em lactação
title_full Fontes alternativas de proteína para vacas em lactação
title_fullStr Fontes alternativas de proteína para vacas em lactação
title_full_unstemmed Fontes alternativas de proteína para vacas em lactação
title_sort Fontes alternativas de proteína para vacas em lactação
author SANTOS, Viviany Lúcia Fernandes dos
author_facet SANTOS, Viviany Lúcia Fernandes dos
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv FERREIRA, Marcelo de Andrade
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv GUIM, Adriana
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv RANGEL, Adriano Henrique do Nascimento
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv MELO, Airon Aparecido Silva
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6012727206730629
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv SANTOS, Viviany Lúcia Fernandes dos
contributor_str_mv FERREIRA, Marcelo de Andrade
GUIM, Adriana
RANGEL, Adriano Henrique do Nascimento
MELO, Airon Aparecido Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Alimento alternativo
Bovino de leite
Proteína
topic Alimento alternativo
Bovino de leite
Proteína
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
description It was evaluated in this work alternative sources of protein for lactation cows, about the intake, digestibility, milk yield and composition. Eight cows multiparous ¾ (Holandez / Gir) were distributed in two 4 x 4 latin squares, simultaneous. Each experimental period lasted 21 days (14 days for adaptation and seven days to collect data and samples). Were evaluated three protein sources, cottonseed meal (CM), soybean semi integral (SBSI), mazoferm and soybean meal (SBM) as witness. When mazoferm was used was observed smaller intake of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein and total digestible nutrients compared to SBM. Milk yield was lower in animals received mazoferm compared with fed SBM. The fat content in milk no differed and yield fat was lower for the animals that received CM and mazoferm compared to SBM. With respect to the percentage of milk in protein, when it was provided SBSI was observed lower content compared to SBM. Animals fed CM presented lower total solids in milk compared with those receiving SBM. Feed efficiency was greater for animals fed diets with mazoferm e nitrogen use efficiency was lower for those receiving CM compared with SBM. Nutrient digestibility was lower for animals fed diets with mazoferm, except for digestibility of non-fibrous carbohydrate which did not differ with respect to diet with SBM. Digestibility crude protein was greater for diets with CM and SBSI compared the diet with SBM. Based on dry matter intake and animal performance, is recommended the replacement of soybean meal by cottonseed meal and soybean meal semi integral.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2010-07-22
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-05-18T15:33:43Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv SANTOS, Viviany Lúcia Fernandes dos. Fontes alternativas de proteína para vacas em lactação. 2010. 39 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/6931
identifier_str_mv SANTOS, Viviany Lúcia Fernandes dos. Fontes alternativas de proteína para vacas em lactação. 2010. 39 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.
url http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/6931
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv -3881065194686295060
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv -7685654150682972432
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 1346858981270845602
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv -2555911436985713659
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFRPE
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Departamento de Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
instacron:UFRPE
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
instacron_str UFRPE
institution UFRPE
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/6931/1/license.txt
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/6931/2/Viviany+Lucia+Fernandes+Santos.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
fea613e6ba84b4d2aadce47626ad8dbc
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.br
_version_ 1794501113520586752